Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Value of a Data and Digital Object Management Plan (D(DO)MP) in Fostering Sharing Practices in a Multidisciplinary Multinational Project Cover

The Value of a Data and Digital Object Management Plan (D(DO)MP) in Fostering Sharing Practices in a Multidisciplinary Multinational Project

Data Science Journal
Volume 22 (2023): Issue 1
By: Alison Specht,  Margaret O’Brien,  Rorie Edmunds,  Pedro Corrêa,  Romain David,  Laurence Mabile,  Jeaneth Machicao,  Yasuhiro Murayama and  Shelley Stall  
Open Access
|Oct 2023

References

  1. 1Allison, L, et al. 2015. A place to stand: e-infrastructures and data management for global change research. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.34370
    Back to article
  2. 2Belmont Forum. 2017. Belmont Forum. Available at https://www.belmontforum.org/ [Last accessed 03 August 2023].
    Back to article
  3. 3Belmont Forum e-I and DM CRA. 2018. e-Infrastructures & data management toolkit. Available at https://bfe-inf.github.io/toolkit/index.html [Last accessed 03 August 2023].
    Back to article
  4. 4Bishop, B, et al. 2020. Data curation profiling to assess data management training needs and practices to inform a toolkit. Data Science Journal, 19: 4. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-004
    Back to article
  5. 5Bishop, BW, et al. 2019. Belmont Forum data management plan scorecard. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3530933
    Back to article
  6. 6Burnette, M, Williams, S and Imker, H. 2016. From plan to action: successful data management plan implementation in a multidisciplinary project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5: e1101. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
    Back to article
  7. 7Crowston, K, et al. 2015. Perceived discontinuities and continuities in transdisciplinary scientific working groups. Science of The Total Environment, 534: 159–172. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
    Back to article
  8. 8DataCite. 2020. Data cite commons. Available at https://commons.datacite.org/ [Last accessed 10 August 2023].
    Back to article
  9. 9Devaraju, A, et al. 2021. From conceptualization to implementation: FAIR assessment of research data objects. Data Science Journal, 20: 4. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-004
    Back to article
  10. 10Edmunds, R, et al. 2022. Repository guidelines. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6542494
    Back to article
  11. 11ESF. 2011. ESF Member organisation forum on research integrity. Available at http://www.esf.org/coordinating-research/mo-fora/research-integrity.html [Last accessed 03 August 2023].
    Back to article
  12. 12Gries, C, et al. 2023. The environmental data Initiative: Connecting the past to the future through data reuse. Ecology and Evolution, 13: e9592. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9592
    Back to article
  13. 13Lin, D, et al. 2020. The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7: 1–5. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
    Back to article
  14. 14Miksa, T, Simms, S, Mietchen, D and Jones, S. 2019. Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLOS Computational Biology, 15: e1006750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
    Back to article
  15. 15Michener, WK. 2015. Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 11: e1004525. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
    Back to article
  16. 16Michener, WK, et al. A 2012. Participatory design of DataONE—Enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences. Ecological Informatics, 11: 5–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.08.007
    Back to article
  17. 17PARSEC. 2019. Building new tools for data sharing and re-use through a transnational investigation of the socioeconomic impacts of protected areas. PARSEC. Available at http://parsecproject.org [Last accessed 03 August 2023].
    Back to article
  18. 18Schmidt, B, Gemeinholzer, B and Treloar, A. 2016. Open data in global environmental research: The Belmont Forum’s open data survey. PLOS ONE, 11: e0146695. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146695
    Back to article
  19. 19Science Europe. 2022. Research data management. Science Europe. Available at https://scieur.org/rdm [Last accessed 03 August 2023].
    Back to article
  20. 20Smale, NA, et al. 2020. A Review of the History, Advocacy and Efficacy of Data Management Plans. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15: 30. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.525
    Back to article
  21. 21Specht, A, et al. 2015. Data management challenges in analysis and synthesis in the ecosystem sciences. Science of The Total Environment, 534: 144–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.092
    Back to article
  22. 22Specht, A and Crowston, K. 2022. Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes. PLoS ONE, 17: e0278043. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278043
    Back to article
  23. 23Specht, A and Stall, S. 2022. PARSEC entry data management survey. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/Zenodo.7425596
    Back to article
  24. 24Stall, S, et al. 2020. PARSEC data and digital output management plan and workbook Version 1. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3891427
    Back to article
  25. 25Stall, S, et al. 2021a. PARSEC data and digital output management plan and workbook Version 2. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4910115
    Back to article
  26. 26Stall, S, et al. 2021b. PARSEC DDOMP workbook checklist Version 1. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4909852
    Back to article
  27. 27Stall, S, et al. 2023a. PARSEC data and digital output management plan and workbook Version 3. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8231464
    Back to article
  28. 28Stall, S, et al. 2023b. PARSEC DDOMP workbook checklist Version 3. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8239982
    Back to article
  29. 29UNESCO. 2021. UNESCO recommendation on open science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, France. UNESDOC. Available at: https://bit.ly/3rTYZxw [last accessed on 8 August 2023].
    Back to article
  30. 30Verburg, M and Grootveld, M. 2022. FAIR-Aware. Additional guidance to the science Europe DMP assessment rubric. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6088215
    Back to article
  31. 31Wilkinson, MD, et al. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-038 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 15, 2022
Accepted on: Aug 22, 2023
Published on: Oct 6, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Digital object management,
DMP,
collaboration,
transnational,
inter/multidisciplinary,
Open Science

© 2023 Alison Specht, Margaret O’Brien, Rorie Edmunds, Pedro Corrêa, Romain David, Laurence Mabile, Jeaneth Machicao, Yasuhiro Murayama, Shelley Stall, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2023): Issue 1Next article