References
- Bishop, B, Gunderman, H, Davis, R, et al. 2020. Data curation profiling to assess data management training needs and practices to inform a toolkit. Data Science Journal, 19(1): 4. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-004
- Blomberg, N, Sarntivijai, S and Mayrhofer, MTh. 2020. EOSC-Life data management plan. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4010442
- Burnette, MH, Williams, SC and Imker, HJ. 2016. From plan to action: successful data management plan implementation in a multidisciplinary project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1): 6. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
- Canham, S, Felder, G, Ohmann, C and Panagiotopoulou, M. 2022. Identification of COVID-19 clinical studies intending to share individual participant data for secondary use: Protocol for a pilot study. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7064624
- Carroll, SR, Garba, I, Figueroa-Rodríguez, OL, et al. 2020. The CARE principles for indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19: 43. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
- David, R, Mabile, L, Specht, A, et al., RDA – SHAring Reward and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group R.D.A. 2020. FAIRness literacy: The Achilles’ heel of applying FAIR principles. Data Science Journal, 19(1): 32. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-032
- David, R, Ohmann, C, Boiten, JW, et al. 2022. An iterative and interdisciplinary categorisation process towards FAIRer digital resources for sensitive life-sciences’ data. Sci Rep, 12: 20989. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25278-z
- Davidson, J, Grootveld, M, Verburg, M, et al. 2022. FAIR-enabling Data Policy Checklist. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6225775
- Eguinoa, I, Suchánek, M, Knaisl, V, et al. 2022. BioHackEU22 Report: Enhancing research data management in Galaxy and Data Stewardship Wizard by utilising RO-Crates. BiorXiv (in prep). DOI: 10.37044/osf.io/24jst
- Frey, J and Hellmann, S. 2021. FAIR linked data – towards a linked data backbone for users and machines. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 431–435 (
Association for Computing Machinery, 2021 ). DOI: 10.1145/3442442.3451364 - García Álvarez, E, Mayrhofer, M and Holub, P. 2021. BY-COVID – D8.2 – Data Management Plan. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6884816
- Giraldo, O, Alves, R, Bampalikis, D, et al. 2022. A FAIRification roadmap for ELIXIR software management plans. 1st International Conference on FAIR Digital Objects (FDO 2022). Research Ideas and Outcomes, 8:
e94608 . DOI: 10.3897/rio.8.e94608 - Goble, C, Soiland-Reyes, S, Bacall, F, et al. 2021. Implementing FAIR digital objects in the EOSC-Life workflow collaboratory. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4605654
- Goble, C, Bacall, F, Soiland-Reyes, S, et al. 2022. WorkflowHub – a FAIR registry for workflows. F1000Research, 11. DOI: 10.7490/f1000research.1118984.1
- Haque, AKMB, Arifuzzaman, BM, Siddik, SAN, et al. 2022. Semantic web in healthcare: A systematic literature review of application, research gap, and future research avenues. Int J Clin Pract. 2022: 6807484. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6807484
- Hermjakob, H, Kleemola, M, Moilanen, K, et al. 2022. BY-COVID – D3.1 – Metadata standards. Documentation on metadata standards for inclusion of resources in data portal. Zenodo. DOI:
https://www.doi.org:10.5281/zenodo.6885016 - Holub, P, Kohlmayer, F, Prasser, F, et al. 2018. Enhancing reuse of data and biological material in medical research: From FAIR to FAIR-Health. Biopreserv Biobank, 16: 97–105. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2017.0110
- Hrynaszkiewicz, I, Simons, N, Hussain, A, et al. 2020. Developing a research data policy framework for all journals and publishers. Data Science Journal, 19: 5. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-005
- Hutson, M. 2022. Taking the pain out of data sharing. Nature, 610: 220–221. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-03133-5
- Jacobs, JA and Humphrey, C. 2004. Preserving research data. Commun. ACM, 47(9): 27–29. DOI: 10.1145/1015864.1015881
- Kesisoglou, I, Cosgrove, S, Derycke, P, et al. 2022. Glossary of commonly used terms in the field of health data research – developed by the EU project HealthyCloud. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6787119
- Lin, D, Crabtree, J, Dillo, I, et al. 2020. The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Sci Data, 7: 144. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
- Michener, WK. 2015. Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Comput Biol, 11:
e1004525 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525 - Miksa, T, Jaoua M and Arfaoui, G. 2020. Research object crates and machine-actionable data management plans. First Workshop on Data and Research Objects Management for Linked Open Science(DaMaLOS) at The 19th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2020). DOI: 10.4126/frl01-006423291
- Miksa, T, Walk, P and Neish, P. 2020. RDA DMP common standard for machine-actionable data management plans. RDA recommendation. DOI: 10.15497/rda00039
- Mons, B. 2020. Invest 5% of research funds in ensuring data are reusable. Nature, 578: 491–491. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-00505-7
- Ohmann, C, Banzi, R, Canham, S, et al. 2017. Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations. BMJ Open, 7:
e018647 . DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018647 - Pergl, R, Hooft, R, Suchánek, M, et al. 2019. Data Stewardship Wizard: A tool bringing together researchers, data stewards, and data experts around data management planning. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 59. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-059
- Papadopoulou, E, Bardi, A and Kakaletris, G. 2020.
Data management plans and linked open data: Exploiting machine actionable data management plans through open science graphs . First Workshop on Data and Research Objects Management for Linked Open Science (DaMaLOS) at The 19th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2020). DOI:https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6423283 - Richard, A, Stepanyan, D and Ewbank, J. 2022. Pandemic preparedness – Europe launches research consortium. Nature, 603(7900): 228. PMID: 35260850. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-00669-4
- Rocca-Serra, P, Gu, W, Ioannidis, V, et al. 2023. The FAIR Cookbook – The essential resource for and by FAIR doers. Sci Data, 10: 292. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02166-3
- Sansone, S-A, McQuilton, P, Rocca-Serra, P, et al. 2019. FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. Nat Biotechnol, 37: 358–367. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
- Smale, N, Unsworth, K, Denyer, G, et al. 2020. A review of the history, advocacy and efficacy of data management plans. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1): 1–29. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.525
- Stall, S, Specht, A, Corrêa, PLP, et al. 2020. PARSEC data and digital output management plan and workbook. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3891426
- Soiland-Reyes, S, Sefton, P, Crosas, M, et al. 2022a. Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate. Data Science, 5(2). DOI: 10.3233/ds-210053
- Soiland-Reyes, S, Sefton, P, Jael Castro, L, et al. 2022b. Creating lightweight FAIR digital objects with RO-Crate. 1st International Conference on FAIR Digital Objects (FDO 2022). Research Ideas and Outcomes 8:
e93937 . DOI: 10.3897/rio.8.e93937 - Vines, TH, Albert, AYK, Andrew, RL, et al. 2014. The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Current Biology, 24: 94–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014
- Waagmeester, A, Stupp, G, Burgstaller-Muehlbacher, S, et al. 2020. Wikidata as a knowledge graph for the life sciences. eLife, Mar 17; 9:
e52614 . DOI: 10.7554/eLife.52614 - Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IjJ, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Wittner, R, Holub, P, Müller, H, et al. 2021.
ISO 23494: Biotechnology – Provenance Information Model for Biological Specimen And Data’ In: Glavic, B., Braganholo, V., Koop, D. (eds) Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes. IPAW IPAW 2020 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12839. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 222–225. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80960-7_16 - Wittner, R, Mascia, C, Gallo, M, et al. 2022. Lightweight distributed provenance model for complex real-world environments. Sci Data, 9: 503. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01537-6
