References
- 1Bishop, BW and Hank, C. 2020.
Curation, Digital . In: Kobayashi, A (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2e. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10531-1 - 2Bishop, BW, et al. 2022. Data Services Librarians’ Responsibilities and Perspectives on Research Data Management. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 11(1):
e1226 . DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2022.1226 - 3Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2022. Data Management Plan for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from
https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/BJS%20Data%20Management%20Plan%20Model%20Template%20August%202022.pdf . - 4Cardoso, J, et al. 2022. DCSO: towards an ontology for machine-actionable data management plans. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 13(1): 21. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-022-00274-4
- 5Dietrich, D, Adamus, T, Miner, A and Steinhart, G. 2012. De-mystifying the data management requirements of research funders. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 70(1). DOI: 10.5062/F44M92G2
- 6Hui, Y. 2012. What is a digital object? Metaphilosophy, 43(4): 380–395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
- 7Le Béchec, M, Bouchard, A, Charrier, P, Denecker, C, Gallezot, G, et al. 2022. Pratiques et usages des outils numériques dans les communautés scientifiques en France. [Rapport de recherche] Comité pour la science ouverte, 112: ⟨
hal-03545512 ⟩. - 8Michener, WK, Brunt, JW, Helly, JJ, Kirchner, TB and Stafford, SG. 1997. Nongeospatial metadata for the ecological sciences. Ecological Applications, 7(1): 330–342. DOI: 10.2307/2269427
- 9Miksa, T, Walk, P and Neish, P. 2019. RDA DMP Common Standard for Machine-actionable Data Management Plans. DOI: 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622618
- 10Miksa, T, et al. 2021 Application Profile for Machine-Actionable Data Management Plans. Data Science Journal, 20(1): 32. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-032
- 11Million, AJ. 2023.
Successes, pain points, and lessons learned when curating data at scale: The NACJD experience . In: IASSIST 2023, Philadelphia, PA on 30 May–3 June 2023. - 12National Institute of Justice. 2022. Data Archiving. Retrieved from
https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/data-archiving#data-archiving-plan . - 13Office of Justice Programs. 2021. FY 2022 Budget Request Overview. Retrieved from
https://www.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh241/files/media/document/dojojpfy2022budget.pdf . - 14Park, HJ and Kim, JH. 2021. A Study on the Considerations for Data Management Plan Services in University Libraries. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 32(3): 187–215.
- 15Park, Y and Kim, J. 2021. A study on research data creation and management by researchers in mechanical engineering. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(4): 137–162.
- 16Pham, MN, et al. 2023. Data Management Plans: Implications for automated analyses. Data Science Journal. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2023-002
- 17PLOS. n.d. Data availability.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability . - 18Smale, N, Unsworth, K, Denyer, G and Barr, D. 2018. The history, advocacy and efficacy of data management plans. bioRxiv (pre-print). DOI: 10.1101/443499
- 19The Royal Society. 2017. Data sharing and mining.
https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ . - 20Tullis, J and Kar, B. 2021. Where Is the Provenance? Ethical Replicability and Reproducibility in GIScience and Its Critical Applications. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(5): 1318–1328. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1806029
- 21Wilkinson, MD, et al. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(160018). DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18