Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of Personal Values for Data-Driven Human Resource Management Cover

Assessment of Personal Values for Data-Driven Human Resource Management

Data Science Journal
Volume 22 (2023): Issue 1
By: Takuma Kimura  
Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. 1Abramson, L, Daniel, E and Knafo-Noam, A. 2018. The role of personal values in children’s costly sharing and non-costly giving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 165: 117–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.007
    Back to article
  2. 2Agüera y Arcas, B. 2018. Do algorithms reveal sexual orientation or just expose our stereotypes? 12 January 2018. Available at https://medium.com/@blaisea/do-algorithms-reveal-sexual-orientation-or-just-expose-our-stereotypes-d998fafdf477 [Last accessed 2 May 2023].
    Back to article
  3. 3Adyapady, RR and Annappa, B. 2023. A comprehensive review of facial expression recognition techniques. Multimedia Systems, 29(1): 73–103. DOI: 10.1007/s00530-022-00984-w
    Back to article
  4. 4Allik, J, Realo, A, Mõttus, R, Borkenau, P, Kuppens, P and Hřebíčková, M. 2010. How people see others is different from how people see themselves: A replicable pattern across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99: 870–882. DOI: 10.1037/a0020963
    Back to article
  5. 5Altuntas, E, Gloor, PA and Budner, P. 2022. Measuring ethical values with AI for better teamwork. Future Internet, 14(5): 133. DOI: 10.3390/fi14050133
    Back to article
  6. 6Aquilar, S, Bacchini, D and Affuso, G. 2018. Three-year cross-lagged relationships among adolescents’ antisocial behavior, personal values, and judgment of wrongness. Social Development, 27(2): 381–400. DOI: 10.1111/sode.12279
    Back to article
  7. 7Arieli, S, Sagiv, L and Roccas, S. 2020. Values at work: The impact of personal values in organisations. Applied Psychology, 69(2): 230–275. DOI: 10.1111/apps.12181
    Back to article
  8. 8Bar-Anan, Y and Nosek, BA. 2014. A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3): 668–688. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0410-6
    Back to article
  9. 9Bardi, A, Calogero, RM and Mullen, B. 2008. A new archival approach to the study of values and value-behavior relations: validation of the value lexicon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3): 483–497. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.483
    Back to article
  10. 10Baro, E. 2022. Personal values priorities and support for populism in Europe—An analysis of personal motivations underpinning support for populist parties in Europe. Political Psychology, 43(6): 1191–1215. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12812
    Back to article
  11. 11Bentler, PM, Jackson, DN and Messick, S. 1971. Identification of content and style: a two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 76(3): 186–204. DOI: 10.1037/h0031474
    Back to article
  12. 12Berkelaar, BL. 2014. Cybervetting, online information, and personnel selection: New transparency expectations and the emergence of a digital social contract. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(4): 479–506. DOI: 10.1177/0893318914541966
    Back to article
  13. 13Bhatia, S, Olivola, CY, Bhatia, N and Ameen, A. 2022. Predicting leadership perception with large-scale natural language data. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(5): 101535. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101535
    Back to article
  14. 14Bobbio, A and Manganelli, AM. 2011. Measuring social desirability responding. A short version of Paulhus’ BIDR 6. Testing, Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18: 117–135. DOI: 10.4473/TPM.18.2.4
    Back to article
  15. 15Cho, W, Choi, S and Choi, H. 2023. Human resources analytics for public personnel management: Concepts, cases, and caveats. Administrative Sciences, 13(2): 41. DOI: 10.3390/admsci13020041
    Back to article
  16. 16Choi, Y and Choi, JW. 2021. The prediction of workplace turnover using machine learning technique. International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), 8(4): 1–10. DOI: 10.4018/IJBAN.2021100101
    Back to article
  17. 17Christen, M, Narvaez, D, Tanner, C and Ott, T. 2016. Using thesauruses as a heuristics for mapping values. Cognitive Systems Research, 40: 59–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.02.003
    Back to article
  18. 18Collins, R. 2020. Clinician cognitive overload and its implications for nurse leaders. Nurse Leader, 18(1): 44–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.mnl.2019.11.007
    Back to article
  19. 19Crowne, DP and Marlowe, D. 1960. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4): 349–354. DOI: 10.1037/h0047358
    Back to article
  20. 20Danioni, F and Barni, D. 2021. Value priorities, impression management and self-deceptive enhancement: Once again, much substance and a little bit of style. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(2): 146–159. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1778619
    Back to article
  21. 21Danioni, F, Coen, S, Rosnati, R and Barni, D. 2020. The relationship between direct and indirect measures of values: Is social desirability a significant moderator? European Review of Applied Psychology, 70(3): 100524. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2020.100524
    Back to article
  22. 22Dennison, J, Davidov, E and Seddig, D. 2020. Explaining voting in the UK’s 2016 EU referendum: values, attitudes to immigration. European identity and political trust. Social Science Research, 92: 102476. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102476
    Back to article
  23. 23Dentale, F, Vecchione, M, Gebauer, JE and Barbaranelli, C. 2018. Measuring automatic value orientations: The achievement-benevolence implicit association test. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1): 210–229. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12229
    Back to article
  24. 24Devlin, J, Chang, MW, Lee, K and Toutanova, K. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
    Back to article
  25. 25Dobwalls, H, Aavik, T, Konstabel, K, Schwartz, SH and Realo, A. 2014. A comparison of self-other agreement in personal values versus the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 50: 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.01.004
    Back to article
  26. 26Fan, L, Li, L, Ma, Z, Lee, S, Yu, H and Hemphill, L. 2023. A bibliometric review of large language models research from 2017 to 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02020. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.02020
    Back to article
  27. 27Fayoumi, A and Loucopoulos, P. 2023. Bridging the strategy execution gap of designing intelligent talent acquisition systems using enterprise modelling and simulation. Enterprise Information Systems, 17(6): 781–816. DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2021.2005149
    Back to article
  28. 28Feldman, G, Chao, MM, Farh, JL and Bardi, A. 2015. The motivation and inhibition of breaking the rules: Personal values structures predict unethicality. Journal of Research in Personality, 59: 69–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.003
    Back to article
  29. 29Finn, A and Louviere, JJ. 1992. Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: The case of food safety. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 11: 19–25. DOI: 10.1177/074391569201100202
    Back to article
  30. 30Firth, JR. 1957. A synopsis of linguistics theory 1930–1955. In Studies in linguistic analysis (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Philological Society.
    Back to article
  31. 31Fisher, RJ and Katz, JE. 2000. Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2): 105–120. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<;105::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-9
    Back to article
  32. 32Fyffe, S, Lee, P and Kaplan, S. 2023. “Transforming” Personality Scale Development: Illustrating the Potential of State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing. Organizational Research Methods, 10944281231155771. DOI: 10.1177/10944281231155771
    Back to article
  33. 33Galant, M, Zawada, W and Maciejewska, M. 2020. Analysis of pilot’s cognitive overload changes during the flight. Advances in Military Technology, 15(2): 329–342. DOI: 10.3849/aimt.01408
    Back to article
  34. 34Garg, S, Sinha, S, Kar, AK and Mani, M. 2022. A review of machine learning applications in human resource management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(5): 1590–1610. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2020-0427
    Back to article
  35. 35Gawronski, B, Morrison, M, Phills, CE and Galdi, S. 2017. Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3): 300–312. DOI: 10.1177/0146167216684131
    Back to article
  36. 36Gloor, PA, Fronzetti Colladon, A, Altuntas, E, Cetinkaya, C, Kaiser, M F, Ripperger, L and Schaefer, T. 2021. Your face mirrors your deepest beliefs—predicting personality and morals through facial emotion recognition. Future Internet, 14(1): 5. DOI: 10.3390/fi14010005
    Back to article
  37. 37Hassanein, M, Rady, S, Hussein, W and Gharib, TF. 2021. Predicting the dark triad for social network users using their personality characteristics. International Journal for Computers & Their Applications, 28(4): 204–211. DOI: 10.1109/ICICIS52592.2021.9694160
    Back to article
  38. 38Hegde, NP, Vikkurty, S, Kandukuri, G, Musunuru, S and Hegde, GP. 2022. Employee sentiment analysis towards remote work during COVID-19 using Twitter data. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 75–84. DOI: 10.22266/ijies2022.0228.08
    Back to article
  39. 39Hickman, L, Tay, L and Woo, SE. 2019. Validity evidence for off-the-shelf language-based personality assessment using video interviews: Convergent and discriminant relationships with self and observer ratings. Personnel Assessment, 5(3): 12–20. DOI: 10.25035/pad.2019.03.003
    Back to article
  40. 40Hoffman, BJ and Woehr, DJ. 2006. A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3): 389–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
    Back to article
  41. 41Hofstede, G. 2011. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede Model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1). DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
    Back to article
  42. 42Holland, P, Dowling, P and Brewster, C. 2022. HRM and the smart and dark side of technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(1): 62–78. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7941.12319
    Back to article
  43. 43Karkhanis, GV, Chandnani, SU and Chakraborti, S. 2023. Analysis of employee perception of employer brand: a comparative study across business cycles using structural topic modelling. Journal of Business Analytics, 6(2): 95–111. DOI: 10.1080/2573234X.2022.2104663
    Back to article
  44. 44Joulin, A, Grave, E, Bojanowski, P and Mikolov, T. 2016. Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.01759. DOI: 10.18653/v1/E17-2068
    Back to article
  45. 45Kiesel, J, Alshomary, M, Handke, N, Cai, X, Wachsmuth, H and Stein, B. 2022. Identifying the human values behind arguments. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 4459–4471. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.306
    Back to article
  46. 46Krippendorff, K. 2004. Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and quantity, 38: 787–800. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-004-8107-7
    Back to article
  47. 47Larson, RB. 2019. Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research, 61(5): 534–547. DOI: 10.1177/1470785318805305
    Back to article
  48. 48Lee, JA, Soutar, G and Louviere, J. 2008. The best–worst scaling approach: An alternative to Schwartz’s values survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(4): 335–347. DOI: 10.1080/00223890802107925
    Back to article
  49. 49Lee, P, Fyffe, S, Son, M, Jia, Z and Yao, Z. 2023. A paradigm shift from “human writing” to “machine generation” in personality test development: An application of state-of-the-art natural language processing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(1): 163–190. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-022-09864-6
    Back to article
  50. 50Lewis, M, Liu, Y, Goyal, N, Ghazvininejad, M, Mohamed, A, Levy, O, Stoyanov, V and Zettlemoyer, L. 2019. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.13461
    Back to article
  51. 51Lindeman, M and Verkasalo, M. 2005. Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2): 170–178. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09
    Back to article
  52. 52Liu, Y, Ott, M, Goyal, N, Du, J, Joshi, M, Chen, D, Levy, O, Lewis, M, Zettlemoyer, L and Stoyanov, V. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.11692
    Back to article
  53. 53McCrae, RR and Costa, PT. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1): 81–90. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
    Back to article
  54. 54Margherita, A. 2021. Human resources analytics: A systematization of research topics and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 32: 100795. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100795
    Back to article
  55. 55Marler, JH and Boudreau, JW. 2017. An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1): 3–26. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699
    Back to article
  56. 56Milfont, TL, Milojev, P and Sibley, CG. 2016. Values stability and change in adulthood: A 3-year longitudinal study of rank-order stability and mean-level differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5): 572–588. DOI: 10.1177/0146167216639245
    Back to article
  57. 57Mishra, R, Rodriguez, R and Portillo, V. 2020. An ai based talent acquisition and benchmarking for job. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09088. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2009.09088
    Back to article
  58. 58Mubako, G, Bagchi, K, Udo, G and Marinovic, M. 2021. Personal values and ethical behavior in accounting students. Journal of business ethics, 174(1): 161–176. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04606-1
    Back to article
  59. 59Najjar, A, Amro, B and Macedo, M. 2021. An intelligent decision support system for recruitment: resumes screening and applicants ranking. Informatica, 45(4): 617–623. DOI: 10.31449/inf.v45i4.3356
    Back to article
  60. 60Oreg, S and Berson, Y. 2011. Leadership and employees’ reactions to change: The role of leaders’ personal attributes and transformational leadership style. Personnel Psychology, 64(3): 627–659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01221.x
    Back to article
  61. 61Ott, T, Kern, A, Steeb, WH and Stoop, R. 2005. Sequential clustering: tracking down the most natural clusters. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2005(11): P11014. DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/11/P11014
    Back to article
  62. 62Palshikar, GK, Srivastava, R, Pawar, S, Hingmire, S, Jain, A, Chourasia, S, and Shah, M. 2019. Analytics-led talent acquisition for improving efficiency and effectiveness. Advances in analytics and applications, 141–160. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1208-3_13
    Back to article
  63. 63Parks-Leduc, L, Feldman, G and Bardi, A. 2015. Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1): 3–29. DOI: 10.1177/1088868314538548
    Back to article
  64. 64Paulhus, DL. 1984. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3): 598–609. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
    Back to article
  65. 65Pentland, AS. 2008. Honest signals: How they shape our world. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8022.001.0001
    Back to article
  66. 66Polzer, JT. 2022. The rise of people analytics and the future of organizational research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 42: 100181. DOI: 10.1016/j.riob.2023.100181
    Back to article
  67. 67Ponizovskiy, V, Ardag, M, Grigoryan, L, Boyd, R, Dobewall, H and Holtz, P. 2020. Development and validation of the personal values dictionary: A theory–driven tool for investigating references to basic human values in text. European Journal of Personality, 34(5): 885–902. DOI: 10.1002/per.2294
    Back to article
  68. 68Ponizovskiy, V, Grigoryan, L, Kühnen, U and Boehnke, K. 2019. Social construction of the value–behavior relation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 934. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00934
    Back to article
  69. 69Pulfrey, C and Butera, F. 2013. Why neoliberal values of self-enhancement lead to cheating in higher education: A motivational account. Psychological Science, 24(11): 2153–2162. DOI: 10.1177/095679761348722
    Back to article
  70. 70Qiu, L, Zhao, Y, Li, J, Lu, P, Peng, B, Gao, J, and Zhu, SC. 2022. Valuenet: A new dataset for human value driven dialogue system. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(10): 11183–11191. DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21368
    Back to article
  71. 71Roccas, S, Sagiv, L, Schwartz, SH and Knafo, A. 2002. The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6): 789–801. DOI: 10.1177/0146167202289008
    Back to article
  72. 72Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Back to article
  73. 73Sagiv, L and Roccas, S. 2021. How do values affect behavior? Let me count the ways. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4): 295–316. DOI: 10.1177/10888683211015975
    Back to article
  74. 74Sagiv, L, Roccas, S, Cieciuch, J and Schwartz, SH. 2017. Personal values in human life. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(9): 630–639. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100
    Back to article
  75. 75Sagiv, L and Schwartz, SH. 2022. Personal values across cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73: 517–546. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100
    Back to article
  76. 76Sandy, CJ, Gosling, SD, Schwartz, SH and Koelkebeck, T. 2017. The development and validation of brief and ultra-brief measures of values. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5): 545–555. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1231115
    Back to article
  77. 77Sanh, V, Debut, L, Chaumond, J and Wolf, T. 2019. DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.01108
    Back to article
  78. 78Schimmack, U. 2021. The Implicit Association Test: A method in search of a construct. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2): 396–414. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619863798
    Back to article
  79. 79Schwartz, SH. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press. pp. 1–65. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
    Back to article
  80. 80Schwartz, SH. 2003. A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. In: Questionnaire Development Package of the European Social Survey 2003, 259–319.
    Back to article
  81. 81Schwartz, SH, Cieciuch, J, Vecchione, M, Davidov, E, Fischer, R, Beierlein, C, Ramos, A, Verkasalo, M, Lönnqvist, JE, Demirutku, K, Dirilen-Gumus, O and Konty, M. 2012. Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4): 663–688. DOI: 10.1037/a0029393
    Back to article
  82. 82Schwartz, SH, Melech, G, Lehmann, A, Burgess, S, Harris, M and Owens, V. 2001. Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32(5): 519–542. DOI: 10.1177/0022022101032005001
    Back to article
  83. 83Schwartz, SH, Verkasalo, M, Antonovsky, A and Sagiv, L. 1997. Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1): 3–18. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01115.x
    Back to article
  84. 84Teubner, T, Flath, CM, Weinhardt, C, van der Aalst, W and Hinz, O. 2023. Welcome to the era of chatgpt et al. the prospects of large language models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-023-00795-x
    Back to article
  85. 85Triana, MDC, Kim, K, Byun, SY, Delgado, DM and Arthur, W, Jr. 2021. The relationship between team deep-level diversity and team performance: A meta-analysis of the main effect, moderators, and mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management Studies, 58(8): 2137–2179. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12670
    Back to article
  86. 86Van Knippenberg, D, Van Ginkel, WP and Homan, AC. 2013. Diversity mindsets and the performance of diverse teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2): 183–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.003
    Back to article
  87. 87Vanderstukken, A, Van den Broeck, A and Proost, K. 2016. For love or for money: Intrinsic and extrinsic value congruence in recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(1): 34–41. DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12127
    Back to article
  88. 88Verquer, ML, Beehr, TA and Wagner, SH. 2003. A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3): 473–489. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2
    Back to article
  89. 89Vidgof, M, Bachhofner, S and Mendling, J. 2023. Large language models for business process management: Opportunities and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04309. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.04309
    Back to article
  90. 90Wang, J, Cheng, GHL, Chen, T and Leung, K. 2019. Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6): 693–708. DOI: 10.1002/job.2362
    Back to article
  91. 91Wang, Y and Kosinski, M. 2018. Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2): 246–257. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000098
    Back to article
  92. 92Wang, X and Zhi, J. 2021. A machine learning-based analytical framework for employee turnover prediction. Journal of Management Analytics, 8(3): 351–370. DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2021.1961318
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-022 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 6, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 19, 2023
Published on: Jul 11, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Personal values,
HR analytics,
Machine learning,
Natural language processing,
Large language model

© 2023 Takuma Kimura, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2023): Issue 1Next article