References
- Abu-Jbara, A, Ezra, J and Radev, D. 2013. Purpose and polarity of citation: Towards NLP-based bibliometrics. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, Georgia,
June 2013 , 596–606.Association for Computational Linguistics . Available at:https://aclanthology.org/N13-1067 . - Altman, M, Borgman, C, Crosas, M and Matone, M. 2015.
An introduction to the joint principles for data citation . Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science/ASIS, 41(3): 43–45. Wiley Online Library. DOI: 10.1002/bult.2015.1720410313 - Ball, A and Duke, M. 2015. How to cite datasets and link to publications. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-5340-1
- Banaeefar, H, Burchart, S, Moss, E, et al. 2022. Best practice may not be enough: Variation in data citation using DOIs. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Social Science Information Service and Technology,
June 9, 2022 . DOI: 10.7302/4809 - Bauer, MW. 2000.
Classical content analysis: A review . In: Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook. Sage, 131–151. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209731 - Belter, CW. 2014. Measuring the value of research data: a citation analysis of oceanographic data sets. PloS one, 9(3):
e92590 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092590 - Blake, C. 2010. Beyond genes, proteins, and abstracts: Identifying scientific claims from full-text biomedical articles. Journal of biomedical informatics, 43(2): 173–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.11.001
- Boland, K, Ritze, D, Eckert, K, et al. 2012. Identifying references to datasets in publications. In: Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, 2012: 150–161. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_17
- Buneman, P, Dosso, D, Lissandrini, M, et al. 2022.
Data citation and the citation graph . Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4): 1399–1422. MIT Press – Journals. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00166 - Case, DO and Higgins, GM. 2000.
How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication . Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Wiley Online Library. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<;635::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-H - Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
- Chernin, E. 1988.
The ‘Harvard system’: a mystery dispelled . BMJ: British Medical Journal, 297(6655). BMJ Publishing Group: 1062. Available at:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1834803/ (accessed 15 February 2023). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.297.6655.1062 - Cohan, A, Ammar, W, van Zuylen, M, et al. 2019. Structural scaffolds for citation intent classification in scientific publications. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019.
Association for Computational Linguistics . DOI: 10.18653/v1/N19-1361 - Coombs, CH. 1964.
A theory of data . Oxford, England: Wiley A theory of data. Available at:https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1965-00053-000.pdf . - Cousijn, H, Feeney, P, Lowenberg, D, et al. 2019.
Bringing citations and usage metrics together to make data count . Data science journal, 18. Ubiquity Press, Ltd. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-009 - Cragin, MH, Palmer, CL, Carlson, JR, et al. 2010.
Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926): 4023–4038. The Royal Society Publishing. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0165 - Cronin, B. 1981.
The need for a theory of citing . The Journal of documentation; devoted to the recording, organization and dissemination of specialized knowledge, 37(1): 16–24. Emerald. DOI: 10.1108/eb026703 - Cronin, B. 1984. The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. Taylor Graham.
- Ding, Y, Zhang, G, Chambers, T, et al. 2014.
Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis . Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(9): 1820–1833. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23256 - Edge, D. 1979. Quantitative measures of communication in science: a critical review. History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching, 17(36 Pt 2): 102–134. DOI: 10.1177/007327537901700202
- Egghe, L. 2010. The Hirsch index and related impact measures. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 44(1): 65–114. DOI: 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440109
- Fear, KM. 2013. Measuring and anticipating the impact of data reuse. Available at:
https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/102481 . - Fenner, M, Crosas, M, Grethe, JS, et al. 2019. A data citation roadmap for scholarly data repositories. Scientific data, 6(1): 28. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0031-8
- Frumkin, H, Das, MB, Negev, M, et al. 2020. Protecting health in dry cities: considerations for policy makers. BMJ, 371: m2936. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2936
- Furner, J. 2016.
‘Data’: The data . In: Kelly, M and Bielby, J, Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 287–306. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_17 - Garfield, E. 1964.
‘Science Citation Index’—A New Dimension in Indexing . Science, 144(3619): 649–654. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). DOI: 10.1126/science.144.3619.649 - Garfield, E. 1979. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4): 359–375. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. DOI: 10.1007/BF02019306
- Garvey, WD and Griffith, BC. 1972. Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for Psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8(3): 123–136. DOI: 10.1016/0020-0271(72)90041-1
- Gilbert, GN and Woolgar, S. 1974. Essay review: The quantitative study of science: An examination of the literature. Science studies, 4(3): 279–294. SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.1177/030631277400400305
- Gregory, K, Groth, P, Scharnhorst, A, et al. 2020. Lost or found? Discovering data needed for research. Harvard Data Science Review. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.e38165eb
- Haines, M, Fishback, P and Rhode, PW. 2015.
United States Agriculture Data, 1840–2010 . Dataset ICPSR35206-v2, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Ann Arbor, MI. - Hernández-Alvarez, M and Gomez, JM. 2016. Survey about citation context analysis: Tasks, techniques, and resources. Natural Language Engineering, 22(3): 327–349. DOI: 10.1017/S1351324915000388
- Hey, T, Tansley, S and Tolle, K. 2009. The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Research.
- Holsti, OR. 1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Hook, DW, Porter, SJ and Herzog, C. 2018. Dimensions: Building context for search and evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2018.00023
- Jiao, C and Darch, PT. 2020.
The role of the data paper in scholarly communication . Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1). Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.316 - Jurgens, D, Kumar, S, Hoover, R, et al. 2018.
Measuring the evolution of a scientific field through citation frames . Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6. MIT Press: 391–406. DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00028 - Kozlowski, D, Larivière, V, Sugimoto, CR, et al. 2022. Intersectional inequalities in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(2). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2113067119
- Kwon, D. 2022. The rise of citational justice: how scholars are making references fairer. Nature, 603(7902): 568–571. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-00793-1
- Lewis, GJ and Bates, TC. 2017. The temporal stability of in-group favoritism Is mostly attributable to genetic factors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8): 897–903. DOI: 10.1177/1948550617699250
- Leydesdorff, L. 1998.
Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1): 5–25. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. DOI: 10.1007/BF02458391 - Li, K and Jiao, C. 2022. The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(6): 834–846. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24585
- Liu, M. 1993.
Progress in documentation the complexities of citation practice: a review of citation studies . Journal of Documentation, 49(4): 370–408. MCB UP Ltd. DOI: 10.1108/eb026920 - Lyu, D, Ruan, X, Xie, J, et al. (2021) The classification of citing motivations: a meta-synthesis. Scientometrics, 126(4): 3243–3264. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03908-z
- Mayernik, MS, Hart, DL, Maull, KE, et al. 2017.
Assessing and tracing the outcomes and impact of research infrastructures . Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(6): 1341–1359. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23721 - Mayo, C, Vision, TJ and Hull, EA. 2016. The location of the citation: changing practices in how publications cite original data in the Dryad Digital Repository, 11(1): 150–155. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.400
- McIntyre, F and Simkovic, M. 2018. Are law degrees as valuable to minorities? International Review of Law and Economics, 53: 23–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2017.09.004
- Merton, RK. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810): 56–63. Available at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5634379 . DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56 - Meyers, K. 2019. In the shadow of the mushroom cloud: Nuclear testing, radioactive fallout, and damage to U.S. agriculture, 1945 to 1970. The journal of economic history, 79(1): 244–274. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S002205071800075X
- Mooney, H and Newton, MP. 2012. The anatomy of a data citation: Discovery, reuse, and credit. Journal of librarianship and information science. DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.1035
- Moss, E and Lyle, J. 2018. Opaque data citation: Actual citation practice and its implication for tracking data use. Available at:
https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/142393 . - Nakov, PI, Schwartz, AS, Hearst, M, et al. 2004.
Citances: Citation sentences for semantic analysis of bioscience text . In: Proceedings of the SIGIR, 2004: 81–88. Citeseer. DOI: 10.1525/rep.2004.88.1.81 - Park, H, You, S and Wolfram, D. 2018.
Informal data citation for data sharing and reuse is more common than formal data citation in biomedical fields . Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(11): 1346–1354. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24049 - Pasquetto, IV, Borgman, CL and Wofford, MF. 2019.
Uses and reuses of scientific data: The data creators’ advantage . 1.2 1(2). MIT Press – Journals. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.fc14bf2d - Renear, AH, Sacchi, S and Wickett, KM. 2010. Definitions of dataset in the scientific and technical literature. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1): 1–4. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504701240
- Settels, J. 2021.
Compound disadvantage between economic declines at the city and neighborhood levels for older Americans’ depressive symptoms . City & community, 20(3): 260–288. SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.1177/1535684120980992 - Shotton, D. 2010. CiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology. Journal of biomedical semantics, 1(Suppl 1): S6. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-1-S1-S6
- Silvello, G. 2018.
Theory and practice of data citation . Journal of the Association for Information Science. Wiley Online Library. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23917 - Small, HG. 1978. Cited documents as concept symbols. Social studies of science, 8(3): 327–340. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.1177/030631277800800305
- Smith, B. 2014. Document acts. Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents, 19–31. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6934-2_2
- Sollaci, LB and Pereira, MG. 2004. The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 92(3): 364–367. Available at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15243643 . - Spiegel-Rosing, I. 1977.
Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis . Social studies of science, 7(1): 97–113. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.1177/030631277700700111 - Styck, KM, Beaujean, AA and Watkins, MW. 2019. Profile reliability of cognitive ability subscores in a referred sample. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 7(1): 119–128. DOI: 10.1037/arc0000064
- Teplitskiy, M, Duede, E, Menietti, M, et al. 2022. How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited. Research policy, 51(4): 104484. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104484
- Teufel, S, Siddharthan, A and Tidhar, D. 2006. Automatic classification of citation function. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sydney, Australia,
July 2006 , 103–110.Association for Computational Linguistics . Available at:https://aclanthology.org/W06-1613 . DOI: 10.3115/1610075.1610091 - White, MD and Wang, P. 1997.
A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns . The Library quarterly, The University of Chicago Press. 67(2): 122–154. DOI: 10.1086/629929 - Wickett, KM, Sacchi, S, Dubin, D, et al. 2012.
Identifying content and levels of representation in scientific data . Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1): 1–10. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901199 - Wynholds, L 2011.
Linking to scientific data: Identity problems of unruly and poorly bounded digital objects . International journal of digital curation, 6(1): 214–225. Edinburgh University Library. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.183 - Zhao, M, Yan, E and Li, K. 2018. Data set mentions and citations: A content analysis of full-text publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1): 32–46. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23919