Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data Management Plans: Implications for Automated Analyses Cover

Data Management Plans: Implications for Automated Analyses

Data Science Journal
Volume 22 (2023): Issue 1
By: Ngoc-Minh Pham,  Heather Moulaison-Sandy,  Bradley Wade Bishop and  Hannah Gunderman  
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. 1Aggarwal, CC. 2015. Data mining: the textbook (Vol. 1). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14142-8_1
    Back to article
  2. 2Anandarajan, M, Hill, C and Nolan, T. 2019. Text preprocessing. In: Practical Text Analytics. Springer. pp. 45–59. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95663-3_4
    Back to article
  3. 3Belmont Forum. 2018. Data and digital outputs management plan (DDOMP). Available at http://www.bfe-inf.org/resource/data-and-digital-outputs-management-plan-ddomp.
    Back to article
  4. 4Berman, EA. 2017. An exploratory sequential mixed methods approach to understanding researchers’ data management practices at UVM: Integrated findings to develop research data services. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 6(1): e1104. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2017.1104
    Back to article
  5. 5Bially Mattern, J and Moulaison Sandy, H. 2018. Use, ethics, and governance of data repositories: A power-sensitive sociotechnical perspective [Paper presentation]. The 14th Annual Social Informatics Research Symposium: Sociotechnical Perspective on Ethics and Governance of Emerging Information Technologies, 81st Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T), Vancouver, Canada.
    Back to article
  6. 6Bishoff, C and Johnston, L. 2015. Approaches to data sharing: An analysis of NSF data management plans from a large research university. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(2): eP1231. DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.1231
    Back to article
  7. 7Bishop, BW and Hank, C. 2020. Digital curation. In Kobayashi, A (ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography (2nd ed.). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10531-1
    Back to article
  8. 8Bishop, BW, Ungvari, J, Davis, RI, Lee, T, Goudeseune, L, Virapongse, A and Samors, RJ. 2019. Belmont forum data management plan scorecard (Version v.20190819_final). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3530933
    Back to article
  9. 9Bishop, W, Ungvári, J, Gunderman, HC and Moulaison-Sandy, H. 2020. Data management plan scorecard. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1): e325. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.325
    Back to article
  10. 10Cardoso, J, Proença, D and Borbinha, J. 2020. Machine-actionable data management plans: A knowledge retrieval approach to automate the assessment of funders’ requirements. In: European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer. pp. 118–125. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_15
    Back to article
  11. 11Diekema, AR, Wesolek, A and Walters, CD. 2014. The NSF/NIH effect: surveying the effect of data management requirements on faculty, sponsored programs, and institutional repositories. The Journal of academic librarianship, 40(3–4): 322–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.010
    Back to article
  12. 12Dietrich, D, Adamus, T, Miner, A and Steinhart, G. 2012. De-mystifying the data management requirements of research funders. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 70(1). DOI: 10.29173/istl1556
    Back to article
  13. 13Gajbe, SB, Tiwari, A and Singh, RK. 2021. Evaluation and analysis of data management plan tools: a parametric approach. Information Processing & Management, 58(3): 102480. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102480
    Back to article
  14. 14Gewin, V. 2016. Data sharing: An open mind on open data. Nature, 529(7584): 117–119. DOI: 10.1038/nj7584-117a
    Back to article
  15. 15Kim, Y and Adler, M. 2015. Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4): 408–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.007
    Back to article
  16. 16Lenzerini, M, Milano, D and Poggi, A. 2004. Ontology representation & reasoning. Proceedings of InterOp.
    Back to article
  17. 17Long, JA. 2017. jtools: Analysis and presentation of social scientific data (R package version 0.9.3) [Computer software]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=jtools.
    Back to article
  18. 18Luhn, HP. 1958. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of research and development, 2(2): 159–165. DOI: 10.1147/rd.22.0159
    Back to article
  19. 19Mannheimer, S. 2018. Toward a better data management plan: The impact of DMPs on grant funded research practices. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 7(3): e115. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2018.1155
    Back to article
  20. 20Miksa, T, Simms, S, Mietchen, D and Jones, S. 2019. Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(3): e1006750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
    Back to article
  21. 21Mischo, W, Schlembach, M and O’donnell, M. 2014. An analysis of data management plans in University of Illinois National Science Foundation grant proposals. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 3(1): 31–43. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2014.1060
    Back to article
  22. 22R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.
    Back to article
  23. 23Rolando, L, Carlson, J, Hswe, P, Parham, SW, Westra, B and Whitmire, AL. 2015. Data management plans as a research tool. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(5): 43–45. DOI: 10.1002/bult.2015.1720410510
    Back to article
  24. 24Sallans, A and Donnelly, M. 2012. DMP online and DMPTool: Different strategies towards a shared goal. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(2): 123–129. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.235
    Back to article
  25. 25Samuel, SM, Grochowski, PF, Lalwani, LN and Carlson, J. 2015. Analyzing data management plans: Where librarians can make a difference. Paper presented at the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. Available at https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/56/papers/12072/view.
    Back to article
  26. 26Silge, J and Robinson, D. 2016. tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R [Computer software]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. DOI: 10.21105/joss.00037
    Back to article
  27. 27Simms, S, Jones, S, Mietchen, D and Miksa, T. 2017. Machine-actionable data management plans (maDMPs). Research Ideas and Outcomes, 3: e13086. DOI: 10.3897/rio.3.e13086
    Back to article
  28. 28Van Loon, JE, Akers, KG, Hudson, C and Sarkozy, A. 2017. Quality evaluation of data management plans at a research university. IFLA Journal, 43(1): 98–104. DOI: 10.1177/0340035216682041
    Back to article
  29. 29VERBI Software. 2022. MAXQDA Analytics Pro [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Available at maxqda.com.
    Back to article
  30. 30Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis [Computer software]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.
    Back to article
  31. 31Wickham, H. 2018. scales: Scale functions for visualization (R package version 1.0.0) [Computer software]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=scales.
    Back to article
  32. 32Wickham, H and Bryan, J. 2018. readxl: Read excel files (R package version 1.1.0) [Computer software]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl.
    Back to article
  33. 33Wickham, H, François, R, Henry, L and Müller, K. 2021. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation (package version 1.0.4) [Computer software]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4842-6876-6_1
    Back to article
  34. 34Wiley Open Science Researcher Survey 2016. 2017. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4748332
    Back to article
  35. 35Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, Santos, LBDS, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, C, Finkers, R and Mons, B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-002 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 6, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 15, 2022
Published on: Jan 25, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Data management plans (DMPs),
Automated approaches,
Text-mining,
DMP evaluation

© 2023 Ngoc-Minh Pham, Heather Moulaison-Sandy, Bradley Wade Bishop, Hannah Gunderman, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2023): Issue 1Next article