References
- 1Adler, R. 2015. Navigating continual disruption: A report of the 2014 Aspen Institute roundtable on institutional innovation. Available at
http://www.johnseelybrown.com/navigatingdistruption.pdf [Last accessed 21 December 2021]. - 2Akers, KG, Sferdean, FC, Nicholls, NH and Green, JA. 2014. Building support for research data management: Biographies of eight research universities. International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(2): 171–191. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v9i2.327
- 3Calton, JM and Payne, SL. 2003. Coping with paradox: Multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems. Business & Society, 42(1): 7–42. DOI: 10.1177/0007650302250505
- 4Childs, S and McLeod, J. 2013. Tackling the Wicked Problem of ERM: Using the Cynefin Framework as a Lens. Records Management Journal, 23(3): 191–227. DOI: 10.1108/RMJ-07-2013-0016
- 5Cox, AM, Kennan, MA, Lyon, L and Pinfield, S. 2017. Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9): 2182–2200. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23781
- 6Cox, AM, Pinfield, S and Smith, J. 2016. Moving a brick building: UK libraries coping with research data management as a ‘wicked’ problem. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(1): 3–17. DOI: 10.1177/0961000614533717
- 7Curdt, C. 2019. Supporting the interdisciplinary, long-term research project ‘Patterns in Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere-Systems’ by Data Management Services. Data Science Journal, 18(5): 1–9. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-005
- 8Dierkes, J and Wuttke, U. 2016. The Göttingen eResearch Alliance: A case study of developing and establishing institutional support for research data management. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(8): 133. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi5080133
- 9Dierkes, J and Curdt, C. 2018. Von der Idee zum Konzept—Forschungsdatenmanagement an der Universität zu Köln. O-bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal/Herausgegeben vom VDB, 5(2): 28–46. DOI: 10.5282/o-bib/2018H2S28-46
- 10Dierkes, J and Helling, P. 2020.
Forschungsdatenmanagement als gemeinsame Herausforderung am Beispiel C3RDM und DCH an der Universität zu Köln . Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, Nr. 1 (April). German: 77–85. DOI: 10.17192/bfdm.2020.1.8164 - 11Fitt, A, Rouse, R and Taylor, S. 2015. RDM: An approach from a modern university with a growing research portfolio. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(1): 154–162. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.353
- 12Hagel, J
III , Brown, JS and Davison, L. 2012. The power of pull: How small moves, smartly made, can set big things in motion. New York: Basic Books. - 13Hagel, J
III , Durchslag, S and Brown, JS. 2002. Orchestrating loosely coupled business processes: The secret to successful collaboration. Working Paper. Available athttp://www.johnseelybrown.com/paper_orchestratingcollaboration.pdf [Last accessed 21 December 2021]. - 14HRK. 2014. Empfehlung der 16. Mitgliederversammlung der HRK am 13. Mai 2014 in Frankfurt am Main. Management von Forschungsdaten–eine zentrale strategische Herausforderung für Hochschulleitungen. Available at
https://www.hrk.de/uploads/tx_szconvention/HRK_Empfehlung_Forschungsdaten_13052014_01.pdf [Last accessed 21 December 2021]. - 15HRK. 2015. Wie Hochschulleitungen die Entwicklung des Forschungsdatenmanagements steuern können. Orientierungspfade, Handlungsoptionen, Szenarien. Empfehlung der 19. Mitgliederversammlung der HRK am 10. November 2015 in Kiel. Available at
http://www.hrk.de/uploads/tx_szconvention/Empfehlung_Forschungsdatenmanagement__final_Stand_11.11.2015.pdf [Last accessed 21 December 2021]. - 16Mathiesen, J, Jamtveit, B and Sneppen, K. 2010. Organizational structure and communication networks in a university environment. Physical Review E, 82(1): 016104. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.016104
- 17Plomp, E, Dintzner, N, Teperek, M and Dunning, A. 2019. Cultural obstacles to research data management and sharing at TU Delft. Insights, 32(1): 29. DOI: 10.1629/uksg.484
- 18Savage, JL and Cadwallader, L. 2019. Establishing, developing, and sustaining a community of data champions. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 23. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-023
- 19Stamnas, E, Lammert, A, Winkelmann, V and Lang, U. 2016. The HD(CP)2 data archive for atmospheric measurement data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(7): 124. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi5070124
- 20Symanski, U. 2012.
Uni, wie tickst Du? Eine exemplarische Erhebung von organisationskulturellen Merkmalen an Universitäten im Zeitalter der Hochschulreform . Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University. Available athttp://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/197558 [Last accessed 21 December 2021]. - 21Verbaan, E and Cox, AM. 2014. Occupational Sub-Cultures, Jurisdictional Struggle and Third Space: Theorising Professional Service Responses to Research Data Management. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3): 211–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.008