Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Research Data Management Challenges in Citizen Science Projects and Recommendations for Library Support Services. A Scoping Review and Case Study Cover

Research Data Management Challenges in Citizen Science Projects and Recommendations for Library Support Services. A Scoping Review and Case Study

Data Science Journal
Volume 20 (2021): Issue 1
By: Jitka Stilund Hansen,  Signe Gadegaard,  Karsten Kryger Hansen,  Asger Væring Larsen,  Søren Møller,  Gertrud Stougård Thomsen and  Katrine Flindt Holmstrand  
Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. 1Adriaens, T, Sutton-Croft, M, Owen, K, Brosens, D, Van Valkenburg, J, Kilbey, D, Groom, Q, Ehmig, C, Thürkow, F, Van Hende, P and Schneider, K. 2015. Trying to engage the crowd in recording invasive alien species in Europe: experiences from two smartphone applications in northwest Europe. Management of Biological Invasions, 6(2): 215–225. DOI: 10.3391/mbi.2015.6.2.12
    Back to article
  2. 2Anhalt-Depies, C, Stenglein, JL, Zuckerberg, B, Townsend, PA and Rissman, AR. 2019. Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science. Biological Conservation, 238: 108195. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108195
    Back to article
  3. 3August, T, Harvey, M, Lightfoot, P, Kilbey, D, Papadopoulos, T and Jepson, P. 2015. Emerging technologies for biological recording. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115(3): 731–749. DOI: 10.1111/bij.12534
    Back to article
  4. 4Bastin, L, Schade, S and Schill, C. 2017. Data and Metadata Management for Better VGI Reusability. In: Foody, G, Fritz, S, Mooney, P, Olteanu-Raimond, A-M, Fonte, CC and Antoniou, V (eds.), Mapping and the Citizen Sensor, 249–272. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: 10.5334/bbf.k
    Back to article
  5. 5Bielefeld University Library. n.d. What is BASE? https://de.base-search.net/about/en/index.php. Available at https://de.base-search.net/about/en/index.php [Last accessed 14 September 2020].
    Back to article
  6. 6Bonn, A, Richter, A, Vohland, K, Pettibone, L, Brandt, M, Feldmann, R, Goebel, C, Grefe, C, Hecker, S, Hennen, L, Hofer, H, Kiefer, S, Klotz, S, Kluttig, T, Krause, J, Küsel, K, Liedtke, C, Mahla, A, Neumeier, V, Premke-Kraus, M, Rillig, MC, Röller, O, Schäffer, L, Schmalzbauer, B, Schneidewind, U, Schumann, A, Settele, J, Tochtermann, K, Tockner, K, Vogel, J, Volkmann, W, von Unger, H, Walter, D, Weisskopf, M, Wirth, C, Witt, TDW and Ziegler, D. 2016. Green Paper Citizen Science Strategy 2020 for Germany. Available at https://www.buergerschaffenwissen.de/sites/default/files/assets/dokumente/gewiss_cs_strategy_englisch.pdf.
    Back to article
  7. 7Borda, A, Gray, K and Fu, Y. 2020. Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects. JAMIA Open, 3(1): 113–125. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz052
    Back to article
  8. 8Bowser, A, Cooper, C, De Sherbinin, A, Wiggins, A, Brenton, P, Chuang, T-R, Faustman, E, Haklay, M (Muki) and Meloche, M. 2020. Still in Need of Norms: The State of the Data in Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 18. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.303
    Back to article
  9. 9Bowser, A, Shilton, K, Preece, J and Warrick, E. 2017. Accounting for Privacy in Citizen Science. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 2124–2136. New York, NY, USA: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2998181.2998305
    Back to article
  10. 10Bowser, A, Wiggins, A, Shanley, L, Preece, J and Henderson, S. 2014. Sharing data while protecting privacy in citizen science. Interactions, 21(1): 70–73. DOI: 10.1145/2540032
    Back to article
  11. 11Bürger schaffen Wissen. n.d. Available at https://www.buergerschaffenwissen.de/ [Last accessed 28 June 2020].
    Back to article
  12. 12Chimbari, MJ. 2017. Lessons from implementation of ecohealth projects in Southern Africa: A principal investigator’s perspective. Acta Tropica, 175: 9–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.09.028
    Back to article
  13. 13Clements, AL, Griswold, WG, Abhijit, RS, Johnston, JE, Herting, MM, Thorson, J, Collier-Oxandale, A and Hannigan, M. 2017. Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary). Sensors, 17(11): 2478. DOI: 10.3390/s17112478
    Back to article
  14. 14Corrall, S, Kennan, MA and Afzal, W. 2013. Bibliometrics and Research Data Management Services: Emerging Trends in Library Support for Research. Library Trends, 61(3): 636–674. DOI: 10.1353/lib.2013.0005
    Back to article
  15. 15COST Action CA 15212. 2019. Workshop Report WG5: On citizen-science ontology, standards and data. Available at https://cs-eu.net/news/workshop-report-wg5-citizen-science-ontology-standards-and-data [Last accessed 5 June 2020].
    Back to article
  16. 16Cox, AM and Corrall, S. 2013. Evolving academic library specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1002/asi.22847
    Back to article
  17. 17Crall, AW, Newman, GJ, Jarnevich, CS, Stohlgren, TJ, Waller, DM and Graham, J. 2010. Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biological Invasions, 12(10): 3419–3428. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9740-9
    Back to article
  18. 18CS WG OSPP. 2018. Recommendations of the OSPP on Citizen Science. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/citizen_science_recomendations.pdf.
    Back to article
  19. 19CSNA. n.d. Österreich forscht. Available at https://www.citizen-science.at [Last accessed 1 September 2020].
    Back to article
  20. 20Danish Parliament. 2011. Lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter. Denmark: retsinformation.dk. Available at https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2011/593.
    Back to article
  21. 21De Pourcq, K and Ceccaroni, L. 2018. On the importance of data standards in citizen science | COST Action CA15212. Citizen Science Cost Actio. Available at https://cs-eu.net/blog/importance-data-standards-citizen-science [Last accessed 12 May 2020].
    Back to article
  22. 22Deutz, DB, Buss, MCH, Hansen, JS, Hansen, KK, Kjelmann, KG, Larsen, AV, Vlachos, E and Holmstrand, KF. 2020. How to FAIR: a website to guide researchers on making research data more FAIR. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3712065
    Back to article
  23. 23Disney, J, Bailey, D, Farrell, A and Taylor, A. 2017. Next Generation Citizen Science Using Anecdata.org. Maine Policy Review, 26(2): 70–79. Available at https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr/vol26/iss2/15.
    Back to article
  24. 24ECSA. 2015. Ten principles of citizen science. London. Available at https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/sites/default/files/ecsa_ten_principles_of_citizen_science.pdf [Last accessed 14 July 2019].
    Back to article
  25. 25European Commission. 2021. Horizon Europe Programme Guide, version 1.1. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/programme-guide_horizon_en.pdf [Last accessed 12 August 2021].
    Back to article
  26. 26Forest Service. 2018. Design Your Project & Data Management Plan. In: Tamez, M, Merriman, D and Zimmerman, N (eds.), Forest Service Citizen Science Project Planning Guide. FS-1.0. Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/working-with-us/citizen-science/ch-4-design-your-project-data-management-plan.
    Back to article
  27. 27Ganzevoort, W, van den Born, RJG, Halffman, W and Turnhout, S. 2017. Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12): 2821–2837. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1391-z
    Back to article
  28. 28GO FAIR. n.d. F2: Data are described with rich metadata. Available at https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/f2-data-described-rich-metadata/ [Last accessed 14 September 2020].
    Back to article
  29. 29Greshake Tzovaras, B, Angrist, M, Arvai, K, Dulaney, M, Estrada-Galiñanes, V, Gunderson, B, Head, T, Lewis, D, Nov, O, Shaer, O, Tzovara, A, Bobe, J and Price Ball, M. 2019. Open Humans: A platform for participant-centered research and personal data exploration. GigaScience, 8(6). DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz076
    Back to article
  30. 30Groom, Q, Weatherdon, L and Geijzendorffer, IR. 2017. Is citizen science an open science in the case of biodiversity observations? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2): 612–617. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12767
    Back to article
  31. 31Guerrini, CJ, Majumder, MA, Lewellyn, MJ and McGuire, AL. 2018. Citizen science, public policy. Science, 361(6398): 134–136. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar8379
    Back to article
  32. 32Hanke, G, Walvoort, D, Van Loon, W, Addamo, A, Brosich, A, Del Mar Chaves Montero, M, Molina Jack, M, Vinci, M and Giorgetti, AG. 2020. EU Marine Beach Litter Baselines. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/16903
    Back to article
  33. 33Hansen, JS, Gadegaard, S and Holmstrand, KF. 2021. 9 things to make citizen science data FAIR. A research librarian’s guide. Technical University of Denmark. DOI: 10.11583/DTU.12998663
    Back to article
  34. 34Heigl, F, Dörler, D, Bartar, P, Brodschneider, R, Cieslinski, M, Ernst, M, Fritz, S, Krisai-Greilhuber, I, Hager, G, Hatlauf, J, Hecker, S, Hübner, T, Kieslinger, B, Kraker, P, Krennert, T, Oberraufner, G, Paul, KT, Tiefenthaler, B, Vignoli, M, Walter, T, Würflinger, R, Zacharias, M and Ziegler, D. 2018. Quality criteria catalogue for citizen science projects on Österreich forscht. Zenodo. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2b5qw
    Back to article
  35. 35Higgins, CI, Williams, J, Leibovici, DG, Simonis, I, Davis, MJ, Muldoon, C, van Genuchten, P, O’Hare, G and Wiemann, S. 2016. Citizen OBservatory WEB (COBWEB): A Generic Infrastructure Platform to Facilitate the Collection of Citizen Science Data for Environmental Monitoring. International journal of spatial data infrastructures research, 11: 20–48. DOI: 10.2902/1725-0463.2018.13.art8
    Back to article
  36. 36Holmstrand, KF, den Boer, SP, Vlachos, E, Martínez-Lavanchy, PM and Hansen, KK. 2019. Research Data Management (eLearning course). DOI: 10.11581/dtu:00000047
    Back to article
  37. 37Holmstrand, KF, Larsen, AV, Gadegaard, S, Hansen, JS, Hansen, KK and Thomsen, GS. 2020. FAIR data in a Citizen Science project “Fangstjournalen.” DOI: 10.11581/DTU:00000092
    Back to article
  38. 38Hunter, J and Hsu, C-H. 2015. Formal Acknowledgement of Citizen Scientists’ Contributions via Dynamic Data Citations. In: Allen, RB, Hunter, J and Zeng, ML (eds.), Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. ICADL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9469. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_7
    Back to article
  39. 39ICMJE. n.d. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. icmje.org. Available at http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html [Last accessed 12 June 2020].
    Back to article
  40. 40Karasmanis, S and Murphy, F. 2014. Emerging roles and collaborations in research support for academic health librarians. In: Australian Library and Information Association National 2014 Conference. Melbourne, Australia, 18 Sept 2014. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2350.7208
    Back to article
  41. 41Kennan, MA, Williamson, K and Johanson, G. 2012. Wild Data: Collaborative E-Research and University Libraries. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 43(1): 56–79. DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2012.10722254
    Back to article
  42. 42Kissling, WD, Ahumada, JA, Bowser, A, Fernandez, M, Fernández, N, García, EA, Guralnick, RP, Isaac, NJB, Kelling, S, Los, W, McRae, L, Mihoub, J-B, Obst, M, Santamaria, M, Skidmore, AK, Williams, KJ, Agosti, D, Amariles, D, Arvanitidis, C, Bastin, L, De Leo, F, Egloff, W, Elith, J, Hobern, D, Martin, D, Pereira, HM, Pesole, G, Peterseil, J, Saarenmaa, H, Schigel, D, Schmeller, DS, Segata, N, Turak, E, Uhlir, PF, Wee, B and Hardisty, AR. 2018. Building essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale. Biological Reviews, 93(1): 600–625. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12359
    Back to article
  43. 43Kosmala, M, Wiggins, A, Swanson, A and Simmons, B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10): 551–560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
    Back to article
  44. 44Miller-Rushing, A, Primack, R and Bonney, R. 2012. The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. DOI: 10.1890/110278
    Back to article
  45. 45Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J and Altman, DG. 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7): e1000097. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
    Back to article
  46. 46NVK. 2017. Vejledning om forsikring. nvk.dk. Available at nvk.dk/emner/forsikring-og-erstatning/vejledning-om-forsikring [Last accessed 1 September 2020].
    Back to article
  47. 47Oberle, KM, Page, SA, Stanley, FK and Goodarzi, AA. 2019. A reflection on research ethics and citizen science. Research Ethics, 15(3–4): 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/1747016119868900
    Back to article
  48. 48OSPP. 2017. Open Science Policy Platform Recommendations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2777/958647
    Back to article
  49. 49Owen, RP and Parker, AJ. 2018. Citzen science in environmental protection agencies. In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 284–300. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339
    Back to article
  50. 50Parthenos. How to Manage Data and Metadata in Citizen Science – Parthenos training. Available at https://training.parthenos-project.eu/sample-page/citizen-science-in-the-digital-arts-and-humanities/how-to-manage-data-and-metadata-in-citizen-science/ [Last accessed 20 May 2020].
    Back to article
  51. 51Patrick-Lake, B and Goldsack, JC. 2019 Mind the Gap: The Ethics Void Created by the Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8): 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1639389
    Back to article
  52. 52Pettibone, L, Vohland, K, Bonn, A, Richter, A, Bauhus, W, Behrisch, B, Borcherding, R, Brandt, M, Bry, F, Dörler, D, Elbertse, I, Glöckler, F, Göbel, C, Hecker, S, Heigl, F, Herdick, M, Kiefer, S, Kluttig, T, Kühn, E, Kühn, K, Oldorff, S, Oswald, K, Röller, O, Schefels, C, Schierenberg, A, Scholz, W, Schumann, A, Sieber, A, Smolarski, R, Tochtermann, K, Wende, W and Ziegle, D. 2016. Citizen science for all – A guide for citizen science practitioners. Available at https://www.rri-tools.eu/-/citizen-science-for-all-a-guide-for-citizen-science-practitione-1#
    Back to article
  53. 53Pulsifer, PL, Huntington, HP and Pecl, GT. 2014. Introduction: local and traditional knowledge and data management in the Arctic. Polar Geography, 37(1): 1–4. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2014.894591
    Back to article
  54. 54Rauber, A, Asmi, A, van Uytvanck, D and Proell, S. 2015. Data Citation of Evolving Data: Recommendations of the Working Group on Data Citation (WGDC). Zenodo. DOI: 10.15497/RDA00016
    Back to article
  55. 55RDA-CODATA Legal Interoperability Interest Group. 2016. Legal Interoperability of Research Data: Principles and Implementation Guidelines. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.162241
    Back to article
  56. 56Resnik, DB, Elliott, KC and Miller, AK. 2015. A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science. Environmental Science & Policy, 54: 475–481. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.008
    Back to article
  57. 57Riesch, H and Potter, C. 2014. Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1): 107–120. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513497324
    Back to article
  58. 58Rothstein, MA, Wilbanks, JT and Brothers, KB. 2015. Citizen Science on Your Smartphone: An ELSI Research Agenda. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 43(4): 897–903. DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12327
    Back to article
  59. 59Runnel, V and Wijers, A. 2019. Improving the detection of collection-based citizen science projects. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3364519
    Back to article
  60. 60Schade, S and Tsinaraki, C. 2016. Survey report: data management in Citizen Science projects. JRC Technical Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2788/539115
    Back to article
  61. 61Schade, S, Tsinaraki, C and Roglia, E. 2017 Scientific data from and for the citizen. First Monday, 22(8). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v22i8.7842
    Back to article
  62. 62Sheppard, SA, Wiggins, A and Terveen, L. 2014. Capturing quality: retaining provenance for curated volunteer monitoring data. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing – CSCW ’14, 1234–1245. New York, USA: ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/2531602.2531689
    Back to article
  63. 63Simonis, I. 2018. Standardized Information Models to Optimize Exchange, Reusability and Comparability of Citizen Science Data. A Specialization Approach. International journal of spatial data infrastructures research, 13: 38–47. DOI: 10.2902/1725-0463.2018.13.art5
    Back to article
  64. 64Skov, C. 2021 Database from citizen science project “Fangstjournalen”. [Data set]. Technical University of Denmark. DOI: 10.11583/DTU.13795928
    Back to article
  65. 65Sturm, U, Schade, S, Ceccaroni, L, Gold, M, Kyba, C, Claramunt, B, Haklay, M, Kasperowski, D, Albert, A, Piera, J, Brier, J, Kullenberg, C and Luna, S. 2018. Defining principles for mobile apps and platforms development in citizen science. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 4: e23394. DOI: 10.3897/rio.4.e23394
    Back to article
  66. 66Syberg, K. 2020. Data for Mass Experiment [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3886973
    Back to article
  67. 67Tauginienė, L. 2019. Ethical concerns in citizen science projects and public engagement related research projects. Ethical Perspectives, 26(1): 119–134. DOI: 10.2143/EP.26.1.3286291
    Back to article
  68. 68Tweddle, JC, Robinson, LD, Pocock, MJ, Roy, HE and UK Environmental Observation Framework. 2012. Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK. London: Natural History Museum. Available at http://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/citizenscienceguide.pdf.
    Back to article
  69. 69UKEOF’s Advisory Group. 2013. The principles of planning, collecting and using citizen science data. Advice Note 2. Available at http://www.ukeof.org.uk/documents/DataAdviceNote2.pdf.
    Back to article
  70. 70US CSA Data and Metadata WG. 2019. PPSR Core Data & Metadata Standards Repository. GitHub. Available at https://github.com/CitSciAssoc/DMWG-PPSR-Core [Last accessed 4 August 2020].
    Back to article
  71. 71US EPA. 2019. Handbook for Citizen Science Quality Assurance and Documention -Version 1. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-03/documents/508_csqapphandbook_3_5_19_mmedits.pdf.
    Back to article
  72. 72US GSA. Manage Your Data. Available at https://www.citizenscience.gov/toolkit/howto/step4/ [Last accessed 12 May 2020].
    Back to article
  73. 73Venturelli, PA, Hyder, K and Skov, C. 2017. Angler apps as a source of recreational fisheries data: opportunities, challenges and proposed standards. Fish and Fisheries, 18(3): 578–595. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12189
    Back to article
  74. 74Wahlberg, M. 2020. Harbour porpoises sightings 2019 [Dataset]. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3661479
    Back to article
  75. 75Wang, Y, Kaplan, N, Newman, G and Scarpino, R. 2015. CitSci.org: A New Model for Managing, Documenting, and Sharing Citizen Science Data. PLOS Biology, 13(10): e1002280. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002280
    Back to article
  76. 76Ward-Fear, G, Pauly, GB, Vendetti, JE and Shine, R. 2020. Authorship Protocols Must Change to Credit Citizen Scientists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(3): 187–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.007
    Back to article
  77. 77Wiggins, A, Bonney, R, Graham, E, Henderson, S, Kelling, S, Littauer, R, Lebuhn, G, Lotts, G, Michener, W, Newman, G, Russel, E, Stevenson, R and Weltzin, J. 2013. Data Management Guide for Public Participation in Scientific Research. DataOne. Available at http://safmc.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Wigginsetal2013_DataManagementGuidePPSR.pdf.
    Back to article
  78. 78Wiggins, A and Wilbanks, J. 2019. The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8): 3–14. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859
    Back to article
  79. 79Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, Ij J, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, CT, Finkers, R, Gonzalez-Beltran, A, Gray, AJG, Groth, P, Goble, C, Grethe, JS, Heringa, J, ’t Hoen, PA, Hooft, R, Kuhn, T, Kok, R, Kok, J, Lusher, SJ, Martone, ME, Mons, A, Packer, AL, Persson, B, Rocca-Serra, P, Roos, M, van Schaik, R, Sansone, S-A, Schultes, E, Sengstag, T, Slater, T, Strawn, G, Swertz, MA, Thompson, M, van der Lei, J, van Mulligen, E, Velterop, J, Waagmeester, A, Wittenburg, P, Wolstencroft, K, Zhao, J and Mons, B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1): 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  80. 80Williams, J, Chapman, C, Leibovici, DG, Lois, G, Matheus, A, Oggioni, A, Schade, S, See, L and van Genuchten, PPL. 2018. Maximising the impact and reuse of citizen science data. In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J, and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, 321–336. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339
    Back to article
  81. 81Wolf, M, Trejos, G, Hoeberechts, M, Flagg, R, Jenkyns, R, Morley, M, Biffard, B, Kot, M, Hogman, N and Tomlin, M. 2019. Best Practices in Data Management at Ocean Networks Canada: a Citizen Scientist case study. In: OCEANS 2019 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, 1–6. Ocean Networks Canada, Victoria, Canada: IEEE. DOI: 10.23919/OCEANS40490.2019.8962800
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2021-025 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 29, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 2, 2021
Published on: Aug 18, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
research data management,
citizen science,
FAIR principles,
university library

© 2021 Jitka Stilund Hansen, Signe Gadegaard, Karsten Kryger Hansen, Asger Væring Larsen, Søren Møller, Gertrud Stougård Thomsen, Katrine Flindt Holmstrand, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 20 (2021): Issue 1Next article