Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sample Identifiers and Metadata to Support Data Management and Reuse in Multidisciplinary Ecosystem Sciences Cover

Sample Identifiers and Metadata to Support Data Management and Reuse in Multidisciplinary Ecosystem Sciences

Data Science Journal
Volume 20 (2021): Issue 1
By: Joan E. Damerow,  Charuleka Varadharajan,  Kristin Boye,  Eoin L. Brodie,  Madison Burrus,  K. Dana Chadwick,  Robert Crystal-Ornelas,  Hesham Elbashandy,  Ricardo J. Eloy Alves,  Kim S. Ely,  Amy E. Goldman,  Ted Haberman,  Valerie Hendrix,  Zarine Kakalia,  Kenneth M. Kemner,  Annie B. Kersting,  Nancy Merino,  Fianna O'Brien,  Zach Perzan,  Emily Robles,  Patrick Sorensen,  James C. Stegen,  Ramona L. Walls,  Pamela Weisenhorn,  Mavrik Zavarin and  Deborah Agarwal  
Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1Avraham, S, Tung, C-W, Ilic, K, Jaiswal, P, Kellogg, EA, McCouch, S, Pujar, A, Reiser, L, Rhee, SY, Sachs, MM, Schaeffer, M, Stein, L, Stevens, P, Vincent, L, Zapata, F and Ware, D. 2008. The Plant Ontology Database: a community resource for plant structure and developmental stages controlled vocabulary and annotations. Nucleic acids research, 36(Database issue): D449–54. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm908
    Back to article
  2. 2Ball-Damerow, JE, Brenskelle, L, Barve, N, Soltis, PS, Sierwald, P, Bieler, R, LaFrance, R, Ariño, AH and Guralnick, RP. 2019. Research applications of primary biodiversity databases in the digital age. PloS one, 14(9): e0215794. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215794
    Back to article
  3. 3Beck, MW, O’Hara, C, Stewart Lowndes, JS, Mazor, RD, Theroux, S, Gillett, DJ, Lane, B and Gearheart, G. 2020. The importance of open science for biological assessment of aquatic environments. PeerJ, 8: e9539. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9539
    Back to article
  4. 4Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC). 2017. Grand Challenges for Biological and Environmental Research: Progress and Future Vision 2017: A Report from the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (No. DOE/SC–0190). BERAC Subcommittee on Grand Research Challenges for Biological and Environmental Research. Available at https://genomicscience.energy.gov/BERfiles/BERAC-2017-Grand-Challenges-Report.pdf.
    Back to article
  5. 5Buttigieg, PL, Pafilis, E, Lewis, SE, Schildhauer, MP, Walls, RL and Mungall, CJ. 2016. The environment ontology in 2016: bridging domains with increased scope, semantic density, and interoperation. Journal of biomedical semantics, 7(1): 57. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-016-0097-6
    Back to article
  6. 6Chadwick, KD, Brodrick, PG, Grant, K, Goulden, T, Henderson, A, Falco, N, Wainwright, H, Williams, KH, Bill, M, Breckheimer, I, Brodie, EL, Steltzer, H, Williams, CFR, Blonder, B, Chen, J, Dafflon, B, Damerow, J, Hancher, M, Khurram, A, Lamb, J, Lawrence, CR, McCormick, M, Musinsky, J, Pierce, S, Polussa, A, Hastings Porro, M, Scott, A, Singh, HW, Sorensen, PO, Varadharajan, C, Whitney, B and Maher, K. 2020. Integrating airborne remote sensing and field campaigns for ecology and Earth system science. Methods in ecology and evolution/British Ecological Society, 1: 83. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13463
    Back to article
  7. 7Chase, JH, Bolyen, E, Rideout, JR and Caporaso, JG. 2016. cual-id: Globally Unique, Correctable, and Human-Friendly Sample Identifiers for Comparative Omics Studies. mSystems, 1(1): e00010–15. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00010-15
    Back to article
  8. 8Conze, R, Lorenz, H, Ulbricht, D, Elger, K and Gorgas, T. 2017. Utilizing the International Geo Sample Number Concept in Continental Scientific Drilling During ICDP Expedition COSC-1. Data Science Journal, 16: 2. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-002
    Back to article
  9. 9Cordeiro, AL, Norby, RJ, Andersen, KM, Valverde-Barrantes, O, Fuchslueger, L, Oblitas, E, Hartley, IP, Iversen, CM, Gonçalves, NB, Takeshi, B, Lapola, DM and Quesada, CA. 2020. Fine-root dynamics vary with soil depth and precipitation in a low-nutrient tropical forest in the Central Amazonia. Plant-Environment Interactions, 1(1): 3–16. DOI: 10.1002/pei3.10010
    Back to article
  10. 10Cousijn, H, Kenall, A, Ganley, E, Harrison, M, Kernohan, D, Lemberger, T, Murphy, F, Polischuk, P, Taylor, S, Martone, M and Clark, T. 2018. A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers. Scientific Data, 5(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.259
    Back to article
  11. 11Cox, SJD. 2017. Ontology for observations and sampling features, with alignments to existing models. Semantic Web, 8(3): 453–470. DOI: 10.3233/SW-160214
    Back to article
  12. 12Damerow, J, Varadharajan, C, Boye, K, Brodie, E, Chadwick, D, Cholia, S, Elbashandy, H, Ely, K, Goldman, A, Hendrix, V, Jones, C, Jones, M, Kakalia, Z, Kemner, K, Kersting, A, Maher, K, Merino, N, O’Brien, F, Perzan, Z, Robles, E, Snavely, C, Sorensen, P, Stegen, J, Weisenhorn, P, Whitenack, K, Zavarin, M and Agarwal, D. 2020. Sample Identifiers and Metadata Reporting Format for Environmental Systems Science. Environmental Systems Science Data Infrastructure for a Virtual Ecosystem (ESS-DIVE). DOI: 10.15485/1660470
    Back to article
  13. 13Darwin Core Task Group. 2014. Darwin Core: 2014-11-08. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12694
    Back to article
  14. 14DataCite Metadata Working Group. 2019. DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. DataCite e.V. DOI: 10.5438/rv0g-av03 [Last accessed 16 September 2020].
    Back to article
  15. 15DCMI Usage Board. 2020. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) Metadata Terms. Available at https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/.
    Back to article
  16. 16Devaraju, A, Klump, J, Cox, SJD and Golodoniuc, P. 2016. Representing and publishing physical sample descriptions. Computers & geosciences, 96: 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.018
    Back to article
  17. 17Devaraju, A, Klump, J, Tey, V, Fraser, R, Cox, S and Wyborn, L. 2017. A Digital Repository for Physical Samples: Concepts, Solutions and Management. In: Kamps, J, Tsakonas, G, Manolopoulos, Y, Iliadis, L and Karydis, I (eds.), Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Springer International Publishing, 74–85. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_7
    Back to article
  18. 18Diepenbroek, M, Grobe, H, Reinke, M, Schindler, U, Schlitzer, R, Sieger, R and Wefer, G. 2002. PANGAEA – an information system for environmental sciences. Computers & Geosciences, 28(10): 1201–1210. DOI: 10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00039-0
    Back to article
  19. 19Duerr, RE, Downs, RR, Tilmes, C, Barkstrom, B, Lenhardt, WC, Glassy, J, Bermudez, LE and Slaughter, P. 2011. On the utility of identification schemes for digital earth science data: an assessment and recommendations. Earth Science Informatics, 4(3): 139. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-011-0083-6
    Back to article
  20. 20Enke, N, Thessen, A, Bach, K, Bendix, J, Seeger, B and Gemeinholzer, B. 2012. The user’s view on biodiversity data sharing — Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data —. Ecological informatics, 11: 25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004
    Back to article
  21. 21Esteva, M, Walls, RL, Magill, AB, Xu, W, Huang, R, Carson, J and Song, J. 2019. Identifier Services: Modeling and Implementing Distributed Data Management in Cyberinfrastructure. Data and Information Management, 3(1): 26–39. DOI: 10.2478/dim-2019-0002
    Back to article
  22. 22Farrell, J and Simcoe, T. 2012. Four Paths to Compatibility. In: Peitz, M (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195397840.013.0002
    Back to article
  23. 23Ferguson, C, McEntrye, J, Bunakov, V, Lambert, S, van der Sandt, S, Kotarski, R, Stewart, S, MacEwan, A, Fenner, M, Cruse, P, van Horik, R, Dohna, T, Koop-Jacobsen, K, Schindler, U and McCafferty, S. 2018. Survey of Current PID Services Landscape. FREYA Consortium.
    Back to article
  24. 24Field, D, Amaral-Zettler, L, Cochrane, G, Cole, JR, Dawyndt, P, Garrity, GM, Gilbert, J, Glöckner, FO, Hirschman, L, Karsch-Mizrachi, I, Klenk, H-P, Knight, R, Kottmann, R, Kyrpides, N, Meyer, F, San Gil, I, Sansone, S-A, Schriml, LM, Sterk, P, Tatusova, T, Ussery, DW, White, O and Wooley, J. 2011. The Genomic Standards Consortium. PLoS biology, 9(6): e1001088. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001088
    Back to article
  25. 25Freedman, LP, Cockburn, IM and Simcoe, TS. 2015. The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research. PLoS biology, 13(6): e1002165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165
    Back to article
  26. 26Gaiji, S, Chavan, V, Ariño, AH, Otegui, J, Hobern, D, Sood, R and Robles, E. 2013. Content assessment of the primary biodiversity data published through GBIF network: Status, challenges and potentials. Biodiversity Informatics, 8(2). DOI: 10.17161/bi.v8i2.4124
    Back to article
  27. 27Gardner, T. 2014. A swan in the making. Science, 345(6199): 855–855. DOI: 10.1126/science.1259740
    Back to article
  28. 28Goldstein, S, Lehnert, K and Hofmann, A. 2014. Requirements for the Publication of Geochemical Data. Available at http://doi.iedadata.org/100426 [Last accessed 11 February 2019].
    Back to article
  29. 29Guralnick, R, Conlin, T, Deck, J, Stucky, BJ and Cellinese, N. 2014. The Trouble with Triplets in Biodiversity Informatics: A Data-Driven Case against Current Identifier Practices. PloS one, 9(12): e114069. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114069
    Back to article
  30. 30Guralnick, RP, Cellinese, N, Deck, J, Pyle, RL, Kunze, J, Penev, L, Walls, R, Hagedorn, G, Agosti, D, Wieczorek, J, Catapano, T and Page, R. 2015. Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data. ZooKeys, 494: 133–154. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.494.9352
    Back to article
  31. 31Hanson, B. 2016. AGU Opens Its Journals to Author Identifiers. Available at https://eos.org/agu-news/agu-opens-its-journals-to-author-identifiers [Last accessed 28 September 2020]. DOI: 10.1029/2016EO043183
    Back to article
  32. 32Horsburgh, JS, Aufdenkampe, AK, Mayorga, E, Lehnert, KA, Hsu, L, Song, L, Jones, AS, Damiano, SG, Tarboton, DG, Valentine, D, Zaslavsky, I and Whitenack, T. 2016. Observations Data Model 2: A community information model for spatially discrete Earth observations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 79: 55–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.010
    Back to article
  33. 33Jetz, W, Thomas, GH, Joy, JB, Hartmann, K and Mooers, AO. 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature, 491(7424): 444–448. DOI: 10.1038/nature11631
    Back to article
  34. 34Kelling, S, Hochachka, WM, Fink, D, Riedewald, M, Caruana, R, Ballard, G and Hooker, G. 2009. Data-intensive Science: A New Paradigm for Biodiversity Studies. Bioscience, 59(7): 613–620. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.12
    Back to article
  35. 35Klump, J, Huber, R and Diepenbroek, M. 2016. DOI for geoscience data - how early practices shape present perceptions. Earth Science Informatics, 9(1): 123–136. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-015-0231-5
    Back to article
  36. 36Lehnert, K. 2018. IGSN: Toward a Mature and Generic Persistent Identifier for Samples. Available at https://www.slideshare.net/klehnert/igsn-toward-a-mature-and-generic-persistent-identifier-for-samples [Last accessed 25 January 2019].
    Back to article
  37. 37Lehnert, KA, Klump, J, Arko, RA, Bristol, S, Buczkowski, B, Chan, C, Chan, S, Conze, R, Cox, SJ, Habermann, T, Hangsterfer, A, Hsu, L, Milan, A, Miller, SP, Noren, AJ, Richard, SM, Valentine, DW, Whitenack, T, Wyborn, LA and Zaslavsky, I. 2011. IGSN e.V.: Registration and Identification Services for Physical Samples in the Digital Universe. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 13: IN13B–1324. Available at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFMIN13B1324L [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
    Back to article
  38. 38Lehnert, K, Klump, J, Wyborn, L and Ramdeen, S. 2019a. Persistent, Global, Unique: The three key requirements for a trusted identifier system for physical samples. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3: e37334. DOI: 10.3897/biss.3.37334
    Back to article
  39. 39Lehnert, K, Wyborn, L and Klump, J. 2019b. FAIR Geoscientific Samples and Data Need International Collaboration. Acta Geologica Sinica – English Edition, 93(S3): 32–33. DOI: 10.1111/1755-6724.14236
    Back to article
  40. 40Lin, J and Strasser, C. 2014. Recommendations for the Role of Publishers in Access to Data. PLoS biology, 12(10): e1001975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001975
    Back to article
  41. 41Malik, AA, Martiny, JBH, Brodie, EL, Martiny, AC, Treseder, KK and Allison, SD. 2020. Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change. The ISME journal, 14(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-019-0510-0
    Back to article
  42. 42McMurry, JA, Juty, N, Blomberg, N, Burdett, T, Conlin, T, Conte, N, Courtot, M, Deck, J, Dumontier, M, Fellows, DK, Gonzalez-Beltran, A, Gormanns, P, Grethe, J, Hastings, J, Hériché, J-K, Hermjakob, H, Ison, JC, Jimenez, RC, Jupp, S, Kunze, J, Laibe, C, Le Novère, N, Malone, J, Martin, MJ, McEntyre, JR, Morris, C, Muilu, J, Müller, W, Rocca-Serra, P, Sansone, S-A, Sariyar, M, Snoep, JL, Soiland-Reyes, S, Stanford, NJ, Swainston, N, Washington, N, Williams, AR, Wimalaratne, SM, Winfree, LM, Wolstencroft, K, Goble, C, Mungall, CJ, Haendel, MA and Parkinson, H. 2017. Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data. PLoS biology, 15(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414
    Back to article
  43. 43McNutt, M, Lehnert, K, Hanson, B, Nosek, BA, Ellison, AM and King, JL. 2016. Liberating field science samples and data. Science, 351(6277): 1024–1026. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad7048
    Back to article
  44. 44Michener, WK. 2015. Ecological data sharing. Ecological informatics, 29: 33–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.010
    Back to article
  45. 45Michener, WK, Brunt, JW, Helly, JJ, Kirchner, TB and Stafford, SG. 1997. Nongeospatial Metadata for the Ecological Sciences. Ecological applications: a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 7(1): 330–342. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0330:NMFTES]2.0.CO;2
    Back to article
  46. 46Open Geospatial Consortium Inc. 2010. ISO 19156:2011 – Geographic information — Observations and measurements. International Organization for Standardization. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.1142.3042
    Back to article
  47. 47Page, R. 2016. Towards a biodiversity knowledge graph. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 2: e8767. DOI: 10.3897/rio.2.e8767
    Back to article
  48. 48Peters, DPC, Loescher, HW, SanClements, MD and Havstad, KM. 2014. Taking the pulse of a continent: expanding site-based research infrastructure for regional- to continental-scale ecology. Ecosphere, 5(3): art29. DOI: 10.1890/ES13-00295.1
    Back to article
  49. 49Rocca-Serra, P, Sansone, S-A, Brandizi, M, et al. 2008. ISA-TAB Specification Documentation. Available at http://isatab.sourceforge.net/docs/ISA-TAB_release-candidate-1_v1.0_24nov08.pdf.
    Back to article
  50. 50Piwowar, HA and Vision, TJ. 2013. Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1: e175. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.175
    Back to article
  51. 51Poisot, T, Bruneau, A, Gonzalez, A, Gravel, D and Peres-Neto, P. 2019. Ecological Data Should Not Be So Hard to Find and Reuse. Trends in ecology & evolution, 34(6): 494–496. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.005
    Back to article
  52. 52Ponsero, AJ, Bomhoff, M, Blumberg, K, Youens-Clark, K, Herz, NM, Wood-Charlson, EM, Delong, EF and Hurwitz, BL. 2020. Planet Microbe: a platform for marine microbiology to discover and analyze interconnected ‘omics and environmental data. Nucleic acids research. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa637
    Back to article
  53. 53Rauber, A, Asmi, A, Van Uytvanck, D and Proell, S. 2016. Data Citation of Evolving Data: Recommendations of the RDA Working Group on Data Citation (WGDC). Research Data Alliance. DOI: 10.15497/rda00016
    Back to article
  54. 54Reddy, TBK, Thomas, AD, Stamatis, D, Bertsch, J, Isbandi, M, Jansson, J, Mallajosyula, J, Pagani, I, Lobos, EA and Kyrpides, NC. 2015. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.5: a metadata management system based on a four level (meta)genome project classification. Nucleic acids research, 43(Database issue): D1099–106. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku950
    Back to article
  55. 55Renaut, S, Budden, AE, Gravel, D, Poisot, T and Peres-Neto, P. 2018. Management, Archiving, and Sharing for Biologists and the Role of Research Institutions in the Technology-Oriented Age. Bioscience, 68(6): 400–411. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biy038
    Back to article
  56. 56Robertson, T, Döring, M, Guralnick, R, Bloom, D, Wieczorek, J, Braak, K, Otegui, J, Russell, L and Desmet, P. 2014. The GBIF integrated publishing toolkit: facilitating the efficient publishing of biodiversity data on the internet. PloS one, 9(8): e102623. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102623
    Back to article
  57. 57Roche, DG, Kruuk, LEB, Lanfear, R and Binning, SA. 2015. Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing? PLoS biology, 13(11): e1002295. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295
    Back to article
  58. 58Serbin, SP, Wu, J, Ely, KS, Kruger, EL, Townsend, PA, Meng, R, Wolfe, BT, Chlus, A, Wang, Z and Rogers, A. 2019. From the Arctic to the tropics: multibiome prediction of leaf mass per area using leaf reflectance. The New phytologist, 224(4): 1557–1568. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16123
    Back to article
  59. 59Soranno, PA and Schimel, DS. 2014. Macrosystems ecology: big data, big ecology. Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 12(1): 3–3. DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295-12.1.3
    Back to article
  60. 60Stall, S, Yarmey, L, Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J, Hanson, B, Lehnert, K, Nosek, B, Parsons, M, Robinson, E, and Wyborn, L. 2019. Make scientific data FAIR. Nature, 570(7759): 27. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01720-7
    Back to article
  61. 61Stegen, JC and Goldman, AE. 2018 WHONDRS: a Community Resource for Studying Dynamic River Corridors. mSystems, 3(5): e00151–18. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00151-18
    Back to article
  62. 62System for Earth Sample Registration (SESAR). 2020a. SESAR Batch Registration Quick Guide. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3874923
    Back to article
  63. 63System for Earth Sample Registration (SESAR). 2020b. SESAR XML Schema for samples. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3875531
    Back to article
  64. 64Teal, TK, Cranston, KA, Lapp, H, White, E, Wilson, G, Ram, K and Pawlik, A. 2015. Data Carpentry: Workshops to Increase Data Literacy for Researchers, 10(1): 135–143. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.351
    Back to article
  65. 65Toyoda, JG, Goldman, AE, Chu, RK, Danczak, RE and Daly, RA. 2020. WHONDRS Summer 2019 Sampling Campaign: Global River Corridor Surface Water FTICR-MS, NPOC, and Stable Isotopes. Available at https://data.ess-dive.lbl.gov/view/doi:10.15485/1603775 [Last accessed 16 November 2020].
    Back to article
  66. 66Treloar, A and Klump, J. 2019. Updating the Data Curation Continuum: not just Data, still focused on Curation, more about Domains. International Journal of Digital Curation, 14(1): 87–101. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v14i1.643
    Back to article
  67. 67Treseder, KK, Balser, TC, Bradford, MA, Brodie, EL, Dubinsky, EA, Eviner, VT, Hofmockel, KS, Lennon, JT, Levine, UY, MacGregor, BJ, Pett-Ridge, J and Waldrop, MP. 2012. Integrating microbial ecology into ecosystem models: challenges and priorities. Biogeochemistry, 109(1): 7–18. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-011-9636-5
    Back to article
  68. 68Varadharajan, C, Cholia, S, Snavely, C, Hendrix, V, Procopiou, C, Riley, W and Agarwal, DA. 2018. Launching an Accessible Archive of Environmental Data. Eos, 100. DOI: 10.1029/2019EO111263
    Back to article
  69. 69Voytek, B. 2016. The Virtuous Cycle of a Data Ecosystem. PLoS computational biology, 12(8): e1005037. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005037
    Back to article
  70. 70Walls, R, Davies, N, Kansa, S, Kunze, J, Lehnert, K and Vieglais, D. 2020. Building transdisciplinary infrastructure for natural history material samples with the Internet of Samples (iSamples). Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/4002440
    Back to article
  71. 71Walls, RL, Deck, J, Guralnick, R, Baskauf, S, Beaman, R, Blum, S, Bowers, S, Buttigieg, PL, Davies, N, Endresen, D, Gandolfo, MA, Hanner, R, Janning, A, Krishtalka, L, Matsunaga, A, Midford, P, Morrison, N, Tuama, ÉÓ, Schildhauer, M, Smith, B, Stucky, BJ, Thomer, A, Wieczorek, J, Whitacre, J and Wooley, J. 2014. Semantics in Support of Biodiversity Knowledge Discovery: An Introduction to the Biological Collections Ontology and Related Ontologies. PloS one, 9(3): e89606. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089606
    Back to article
  72. 72Weart, S. 2013. Rise of interdisciplinary research on climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(Suppl 1): 3657–3664. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1107482109
    Back to article
  73. 73Webb, CO, Ackerly, DD, McPeek, MA and Donoghue, MJ. 2003. Phylogenies and Community Ecology. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448
    Back to article
  74. 74Whitlock, MC. 2011. Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends in ecology & evolution, 26(2): 61–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006
    Back to article
  75. 75Wieczorek, J, Bloom, D, Guralnick, R, Blum, S, Döring, M, Giovanni, R, Robertson, T and Vieglais, D. 2012. Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard. PloS one, 7(1): e29715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715
    Back to article
  76. 76Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, CT, Finkers, R, Gonzalez-Beltran, A, Gray, AJG, Groth, P, Goble, C, Grethe, JS, Heringa, J, ’t Hoen, PAC, Hooft, R, Kuhn, T, Kok, R, Kok, J, Lusher, SJ, Martone, ME, Mons, A, Packer, AL, Persson, B, Rocca-Serra, P, Roos, M, van Schaik, R, Sansone, S-A, Schultes, E, Sengstag, T, Slater, T, Strawn, G, Swertz, MA, Thompson, M, van der Lei, J, van Mulligen, E, Velterop, J, Waagmeester, A, Wittenburg, P, Wolstencroft, K, Zhao, J and Mons, B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  77. 77Wu, J, Rogers, A, Albert, LP, Ely, K, Prohaska, N, Wolfe, BT, Oliveira, RC, Jr, Saleska, SR and Serbin, SP. 2019. Leaf reflectance spectroscopy captures variation in carboxylation capacity across species, canopy environment and leaf age in lowland moist tropical forests. The New phytologist, 224(2): 663–674. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16029
    Back to article
  78. 78Wu, J, Serbin, SP, Ely, KS, Wolfe, BT, Dickman, LT, Grossiord, C, Michaletz, ST, Collins, AD, Detto, M, McDowell, NG, Wright, SJ and Rogers, A. 2020. The response of stomatal conductance to seasonal drought in tropical forests. Global change biology, 26(2): 823–839. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14820
    Back to article
  79. 79Yilmaz, P, Kottmann, R, Field, D, Knight, R, Cole, JR, Amaral-Zettler, L, Gilbert, JA, Karsch-Mizrachi, I, Johnston, A, Cochrane, G, Vaughan, R, Hunter, C, Park, J, Morrison, N, Rocca-Serra, P, Sterk, P, Arumugam, M, Bailey, M, Baumgartner, L, Birren, BW, Blaser, MJ, Bonazzi, V, Booth, T, Bork, P, Bushman, FD, Buttigieg, PL, Chain, PSG, Charlson, E, Costello, EK, Huot-Creasy, H, Dawyndt, P, DeSantis, T, Fierer, N, Fuhrman, JA, Gallery, RE, Gevers, D, Gibbs, RA, Gil, IS, Gonzalez, A, Gordon, JI, Guralnick, R, Hankeln, W, Highlander, S, Hugenholtz, P, Jansson, J, Kau, AL, Kelley, ST, Kennedy, J, Knights, D, Koren, O, Kuczynski, J, Kyrpides, N, Larsen, R, Lauber, CL, Legg, T, Ley, RE, Lozupone, CA, Ludwig, W, Lyons, D, Maguire, E, Methé, BA, Meyer, F, Muegge, B, Nakielny, S, Nelson, KE, Nemergut, D, Neufeld, JD, Newbold, LK, Oliver, AE, Pace, NR, Palanisamy, G, Peplies, J, Petrosino, J, Proctor, L, Pruesse, E, Quast, C, Raes, J, Ratnasingham, S, Ravel, J, Relman, DA, Assunta-Sansone, S, Schloss, PD, Schriml, L, Sinha, R, Smith, MI, Sodergren, E, Spor, A, Stombaugh, J, Tiedje, JM, Ward, DV, Weinstock, GM, Wendel, D, White, O, Whiteley, A, Wilke, A, Wortman, JR, Yatsunenko, T and Glöckner, FO. 2011. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nature biotechnology, 29(5): 415–420. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1823
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2021-011 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 5, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 12, 2021
Published on: Mar 18, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Global Sample Number (IGSN),
physical samples,
soil,
water,
plant,
leaf,
microbial communities,
related identifiers,
persistent identifiers

© 2021 Joan E. Damerow, Charuleka Varadharajan, Kristin Boye, Eoin L. Brodie, Madison Burrus, K. Dana Chadwick, Robert Crystal-Ornelas, Hesham Elbashandy, Ricardo J. Eloy Alves, Kim S. Ely, Amy E. Goldman, Ted Haberman, Valerie Hendrix, Zarine Kakalia, Kenneth M. Kemner, Annie B. Kersting, Nancy Merino, Fianna O'Brien, Zach Perzan, Emily Robles, Patrick Sorensen, James C. Stegen, Ramona L. Walls, Pamela Weisenhorn, Mavrik Zavarin, Deborah Agarwal, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 20 (2021): Issue 1Next article