References
- Akers, KG and Doty, J. 2013. Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(2): 5–26. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.263
- Borer, ET, Seabloom, EW, Jones, MB and Schildhauer, M. 2009. Some Simple Guidelines for Effective Data Management. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 90(2): 205–214. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9623-90.2.205
- Borycz, J and Carroll, B. 2018. Managing Digital Research Objects in an Expanding Science Ecosystem: 2017 Conference Summary Digital Objects – The Core of Our Complex Data Market. Data Science Journal. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2018-016
- Borycz, J and Carroll, B. 2020. Implementing FAIR data for people and machines: Impacts and implications – results of a research data community workshop. Information Services & Use, 1(Preprint): 1–15. DOI: 10.3233/ISU-200083
- Brocke, J and Lippe, S. 2015. Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5): 1022–1039. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.001
- Burnette, M, Williams, S and Imker, H. 2016. From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1):
e1101 . DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101 - Carroll, AJ, Eskridge, HN and Chang, BP. 2020. Lab-integrated librarians: A model for research engagement. College and Research Libraries, 81(1): 8–26. DOI: 10.5860/crl.81.1.8
- COS. 2020. The Open Science Framework. Retrieved January 11, 2021, from
https://www.cos.io/products/osf . - Cox, AM, Kennan, MA, Lyon, L and Pinfield, S. 2017. Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9): 2182–2200. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23781
- Cox, AM, Kennan, MA, Lyon, L, Pinfield, S and Sbaffi, L. 2019. Maturing research data services and the transformation of academic libraries. Journal of Documentation, 75(6): 1432–1462. DOI: 10.1108/JD-12-2018-0211
- Curdt, C. 2019. Supporting the Interdisciplinary, Long-Term Research Project ‘Patterns in Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere-Systems’ by Data Management Services. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-005
- Curdt, C and Hoffmeister, D. 2015. Research data management services for a multidisciplinary, collaborative research project: Design and implementation of the TR32DB project database. Program, 49(4): 494–512. DOI: 10.1108/PROG-02-2015-0016
- Curty, RG, Crowston, K, Specht, A, Grant, BW and Dalton, ED. 2017. Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PLoS ONE, 12(12): 1–22. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189288
- Divine, P. 2018. Case Styles: Camel, Pascal, Snake, and Kebab Case. Retrieved December 15, 2020, from BetterProgramming website:
https://medium.com/better-programming/string-case-styles-camel-pascal-snake-and-kebab-case-981407998841 . - Dorch, SBF, Drachen, TM and Ellegaard, O. 2015. The data sharing advantage in astrophysics. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 11(A29A): 172–175. Retrieved from
http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02512 . DOI: 10.1017/S1743921316002696 - GitHub. 2020. GitHub Desktop. Retrieved July 29, 2020, from
https://desktop.github.com/ . - Henneken, EA and Accomazzi, A. 2011. Linking to Data – Effect on Citation Rates in Astronomy. Retrieved from
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3618 . - Hothorn, T and Leisch, F. 2011. Case studies in reproducibility. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 12(3): 288–300. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbq084
- Jones, S. 2013. The range and components of RDM infrastructure and services. In: Whyte, A, Pryor, G and Jones, S (eds.), Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of Good Practice. pp. 89–114. DOI: 10.29085/9781783300242.006
- Kim, J, Schuler, ER and Pechenina, A. 2018. Predictors of Data Sharing and Reuse Behavior in Academic Communities. In: Alemneh, DG, Allen, J and Hawamdeh, S (eds.), Knowledge Discovery and Data Design Innovation, 14: 1–25. DOI: 10.1142/9789813234482_0001
- Kim, Y and Yoon, A. 2017. Scientists’ Data Reuse Behaviors: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(12): 2709–2719. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23892
- Kollen, C, Kouper, I, Ishida, M, Williams, S, Fear, K, Kouper, I, Williams, SC, et al. 2017. Research Data Services Maturity in Academic Libraries. In: Curating Your Reserch Data: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository, 1st ed. pp. 153–170. Retrieved from
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/622168 . - Lage, K, Losoff, B and Maness, J. 2011. Receptivity to library involvement in scientific data curation: A case study at the University of Colorado Boulder. Portal, 11(4): 915–937. DOI: 10.1353/pla.2011.0049
- Li, X, and Prasad, C. 2005. Effectively teaching coding standards in programming. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information Technology Education, SIGITE 2005, 239–244. DOI: 10.1145/1095714.1095770
- MIT. 2018. Organize your files. Retrieved July 29, 2020, from
https://libraries.mit.edu/data-management/store/organize/ . - Mons, B. 2020, February 1. Invest 5% of research funds in ensuring data are reusable. Nature, 578: 491. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-00505-7
- Murray, M, O’Donnell, M, Laufersweiler, M, Novak, J, Rozum, B and Thompson, S. 2019. A survey of the state of research data services in 35 U.S. academic libraries, or “Wow, what a sweeping question.” Research Ideas and Outcomes, 5: 48809. DOI: 10.3897/rio.5.e48809.figure1
- NOAA. 2007. NOAA National Weather Service NWS/OHD General Software Coding Standards and Guidelines General Software Development Standards and Guidelines Version 3.5.
- Noble, WS. 2009. A Quick Guide to Organizing Computational Biology Projects. PLoS Computational Biology, 5(7): e1000424. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000424
- Ogier, A, Brown, A, Petters, J, Hilal, A and Porter, N. 2018. Enhancing collaboration across the research ecosystem: Using libraries as hubs for discipline-specific data experts. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1–6. DOI: 10.1145/3219104.3219126
- OpenRefine. 2020. OpenRefine. Retrieved January 11, 2021, from
https://openrefine.org/ . - Petters, JL, Brooks, GC, Smith, JA and Haas, CA. 2019. The Impact of Targeted Data Management Training for Field Research Projects – A Case Study. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 1–7. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-043
- Pisani, E, Aaby, P, Breugelmans, JG, Carr, D, Groves, T, Helinski, M, Guerin, PJ, et al. 2016. Beyond open data: realising the health benefits of sharing data. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 355: i5295. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5295
- Piwowar, HA, Day, RS and Fridsma, DB. 2007. Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PloS One, 2(3): e308–e308. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
- Popic, S, Velikic, G, Jaroslav, H, Spasic, Z and Vulic, M. 2018. The Benefits of the Coding Standards Enforcement and it’s Influence on the Developers’ Coding Behaviour: A Case Study on Two Small Projects. 2018 26th Telecommunications Forum, TELFOR 2018 – Proceedings. DOI: 10.1109/TELFOR.2018.8612149
- Popkin, G. 2019, May 1. Data sharing and how it can benefit your scientific career. Nature, 569: 445–447. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01506-x
- Reed, M. 2013. Workshops Don’t Work. Retrieved July 30, 2020, from Inside Higher Ed website:
https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/confessions-community-college-dean/workshops-don’t-work . - Rethlefsen, ML, Farrell, AM, Osterhaus Trzasko, LC and Brigham, TJ. 2015. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6): 617–626. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
- Roesch, EB, Scrivener, CL, Ras, I, Malik, A, Lindner, M, Dubuc, TT, Figueiredo, N, et al. 2016. EBRLab. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EDE88
- Ruder, D and Ge, J. 2014. All-In-One Code Framework Coding Standards.
- Si, L, Zeng, Y, Guo, S and Zhuang, X. 2019. Investigation and analysis of research support services in academic libraries. Electronic Library, 37(2): 281–301. DOI: 10.1108/EL-06-2018-0125
- Soehner, C, Steeves, C and Ward, J. 2010. E-Science and Data Support Services: A Study of ARL Member Institutions. Retrieved from Association of Research Libraries; Web site:
www.arl.org . - Software Carpentry. 2020. Our Lessons. Retrieved January 11, 2021, from
https://software-carpentry.org/lessons/ . - Strasser, C, Cook, R, Michener, W and Budden, A. 2011. Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know. Retrieved from
www.dataone.org . - Tenopir, C, Allard, S, Douglass, K, Aydinoglu, AU, Wu, L, Read, E, Frame, M, et al. 2011. Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLoS ONE, 6(6):
e21101 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 - Tenopir, C, Christian, L, Allard, S and Borycz, J. 2018. Research Data Sharing: Practices and Attitudes of Geophysicists. Earth and Space Science, 5(12): 891–902. DOI: 10.1029/2018EA000461
- Tenopir, C, Dalton, ED, Allard, S, Frame, M, Pjesivac, I, Birch, B, Dorsett, K, et al. 2015. Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide. PLOS ONE, 10(8):
e0134826 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826 - Tenopir, C, Rice, NM, Allard, S, Baird, L, Borycz, J, Christian, L, Sandusky, RJ, et al. 2020. Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide. PLOS ONE, 15(3):
e0229003 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229003 - Tenopir, C, Sandusky, RJ, Allard, S and Birch, B. 2014. Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians. Library and Information Science Research, 36(2): 84–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003
- TUDelft. 2020. Data Stewardship. Retrieved January 11, 2021, from
https://www.tudelft.nl/en/library/current-topics/research-data-management/r/support/data-stewardship/ . - Wilson, G, Aruliah, DA, Brown, CT, Chue Hong, NP, Davis, M, Guy, RT, Wilson, P, et al. 2014. Best Practices for Scientific Computing. PLoS Biology, 12(1):
e1001745 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745 - Wilson, G, Bryan, J, Cranston, K, Kitzes, J, Nederbragt, L and Teal, TK. 2016. Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computing. Retrieved from
http://software-carpentry.org/ DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510 - Wyble, B, Glenn, A, Hess, M, Maceyko, A, Callahan-Flintoft, C, Swan, G, O’Donnell, RE, et al. 2017. Wyble Lab. Retrieved from
https://osf.io/ur3a4/ . - Yu, F, Deuble, R and Morgan, H. 2017. Designing research data management services based on the research lifecycle – a consultative leadership approach. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 66(3): 287–298. DOI: 10.1080/24750158.2017.1364835