Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improving Opportunities for New Value of Open Data: Assessing and Certifying Research Data Repositories Cover

Improving Opportunities for New Value of Open Data: Assessing and Certifying Research Data Repositories

Data Science Journal
Volume 20 (2021): Issue 1
By: Robert R. Downs  
Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. 1Baker, KS Duerr, RE and Parsons, MA. 2015. Scientific knowledge mobilization: Co-evolution of data products and designated communities. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2): 110–135. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.346
    Back to article
  2. 2Bierer, BE, Crosas, M and Pierce, HH. 2017. Data Authorship as an Incentive to Data Sharing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376: 1684–1687. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb1616595
    Back to article
  3. 3Borgerud, C and Borglund, E. 2020. Open research data, an archival challenge? Archival Science, 20: 279–302. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3
    Back to article
  4. 4Boté, JJ and Térmens, M. 2019. Reusing Data: Technical and Ethical Challenges. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(6): 329–337. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.39.06.14807
    Back to article
  5. 5Burgelman, JC, Pascu, C, Szkuta, K, Von Schomberg, R, Karalopoulos, A, Repanas, K and Schouppe, M. 2019. Open science, open data and open scholarship: European policies to make science fit for the 21st century. Frontiers in Big Data, 2: 43. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00043
    Back to article
  6. 6Callaghan, S, Tedds, J, Kunze, J, Khodiyar, V, Lawrence, R, Mayernik, MS, Murphy, F, Roberts, T and Whyte, A. 2014. Guidelines on Recommending Data Repositories as Partners in Publishing Research Data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(1): 152–163. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.309
    Back to article
  7. 7Carrera, F and Hoyt, L. 2006. From plan-demanded data to plan-ready information: A rationale for comprehensive urban knowledge infrastructures. Journal of Urban Technology, 13(2): 3–23. DOI: 10.1080/10630730600871999
    Back to article
  8. 8Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. 2002. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Also published as ISO 14721:2002. Superseded by CCSDS, 2012.
    Back to article
  9. 9Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. 2011. Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Also published as ISO 16363:2012. Available at https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/652x0m1.pdf [Last Accessed 30 September 2020].
    Back to article
  10. 10Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. 2012. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Also published as ISO 14721. Available at https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/650x0m2.pdf [Last Accessed 30 September 2020].
    Back to article
  11. 11CoreTrustSeal. 2020. Meeting Community Needs: Exploring Opportunities for Expanding CoreTrustSeal Certification to Meet Community Needs. Available at https://www.coretrustseal.org/why-certification/meeting-community-needs/ [Last Accessed 30 September 2020].
    Back to article
  12. 12CoreTrustSeal Standards and Certification Board. 2019. CoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements 2020–2022. (Version v02.00-2020-2022). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3638211
    Back to article
  13. 13Dillo, I and de Leeuw, L. 2015. Ten years back, five years forward: The Data Seal of Approval. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(1): 230–239. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.363
    Back to article
  14. 14Donaldson, DR. 2020. Certification information on trustworthy digital repository websites: A content analysis. Plos One, 15(12): p.e0242525. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242525
    Back to article
  15. 15Donaldson, DR, Dillo, I, Downs, RR and Ramdeen, S. 2017. The Perceived Value of Acquiring Data Seals of Approval. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12(1): 130–151. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.481
    Back to article
  16. 16Downs, RR. 2019. International Standards for Trustworthy Data Repositories. In: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Trustworthy Data Repositories Workshop. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Rockville, MD, 8–9 Apr 2019. DOI: 10.7916/d8-h7xf-ha70
    Back to article
  17. 17European Framework for Audit and Certification of Digital Repositories. Available at http://trusteddigitalrepository.eu/ [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  18. 18Garrett, J, Giaretta, D, Downs, RR, Hughes, JS, Conrad, M, Ambacher, B, Lambert, S and Tibbo, H. 2015. Certification of Digital Archives – A Brief History and Status Report. In: Proceedings of the 2015 PV Conference, Ensuring Long-Term Data Preservation, and Adding Value to Scientific and Technical Data, Darmstadt, Germany, Nov 3–5 2015. Available at http://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/ConferencesandEvents/DAT_2447480.html [Last Accessed 30 September 2020].
    Back to article
  19. 19Grand, A, Wilkinson, C, Bultitude, K and Winfield, AF. 2016. Mapping the hinterland: Data issues in open science. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 88–103. DOI: 10.1177/0963662514530374
    Back to article
  20. 20Group on Earth Observations. 2020. Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Data Management Principles. Available at http://earthobservations.org/open_eo_data.php# [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  21. 21Group on Earth Observations. 2020. Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Data Sharing Principles. Available at http://earthobservations.org/open_eo_data.php# [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  22. 22Harmsen, H, Keitel, C, Schmidt, C, Schoger, A, Schrimpf, S, Stürzlinger, M and Wolf, S. 2013. Explanatory notes on the Nestor seal for trustworthy digital archives. Nestor Certification Working Group, Available at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0008-2013100901 [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  23. 23He, L and Nahar, V. 2016 Reuse of scientific data in academic publications. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(4): 478–494. DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-01-2016-0008
    Back to article
  24. 24ICSU World Data System. 2012. Certification of WDS Members. Available at https://www.worlddatasystem.org/files/wds-certification-summary-11-june-2012.pdf [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  25. 25Innocenti, P. 2007. Risk management foundations for digital libraries: DRAMBORA (Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment). https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/70481/ [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  26. 26International Organization for Standardization. 2012 ISO 14721:2012 (CCSDS 650.0-M-2) Space data and information transfer systems — Open archival information system (OAIS) — Reference model. Available at https://www.iso.org/standard/57284.html [Accessed 30 September 2020].
    Back to article
  27. 27International Organization for Standardization. 2012 ISO 16363:2012 (CCSDS 652.0-R-1) Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories. Available at https://www.iso.org/standard/56510.html [Accessed 30 September 2020].
    Back to article
  28. 28Jaillant, L. 2019. After the digital revolution: working with emails and born-digital records in literary and publishers’ archives. Archives and Manuscripts, 47(3): 285–304. DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1640555
    Back to article
  29. 29Khan, N, Pink, CJ and Thelwall, M. 2020. Identifying Data Sharing and Reuse with Scholix: Potentials and Limitations. Patterns, 1(1): 100007. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100007
    Back to article
  30. 30Khan, N, Thelwall, M and Kousha, K. 2019. Data Citation and Reuse Practice in Biodiversity – Challenges of Adopting a Standard Citation Model. Available at https://wlv.openrepository.com/handle/2436/623005 [Last Accessed 1 October 2020].
    Back to article
  31. 31Klump, J. 2011. Criteria for the Trustworthiness of Data Centres. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2). DOI: 10.1045/january2011-klump
    Back to article
  32. 32Koers, H, Bangert, D, Hermans, E, van Horik, R, de Jong, M and Mokrane, M. 2020. Recommendations for Services in a FAIR Data Ecosystem. Patterns, 1(5): 100058. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100058
    Back to article
  33. 33Koltay, T. 2020. Quality of Open Research Data: Values, Convergences and Governance. Information, 11(4): 175. DOI: 10.3390/info11040175
    Back to article
  34. 34Krzton, A. 2018. Supporting the Proliferation of Data-Sharing Scholars in the Research Ecosystem. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 7(2): e1145. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2018.1145
    Back to article
  35. 35L’Hours, H, Kleemola, M and de Leeuw, L. 2019. CoreTrustSeal: From academic collaboration to sustainable services. IASSIST Quarterly, 43(1): 1–17. DOI: 10.29173/iq936
    Back to article
  36. 36Levin, N, Leonelli, S, Weckowska, D, Castle, D and Dupré, J. 2016. How do scientists define openness? Exploring the relationship between open science policies and research practice. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(2): 128–41. DOI: 10.1177/0270467616668760
    Back to article
  37. 37Lin, D, Crabtree, J, Dillo, I, Downs, RR, Edmunds, R, Giaretta, D, De Giusiti, M, L’Hours, H, Hugo, W, Jenkyns, R, Khodiyar, V, Martone, M, Mokrane, M, Navale, V, Petters, J, Sierman, B, Sokolova, DV, Stockhause, M and Westbrook, J. 2020. The TRUST Principles for Digital Repositories. Scientific Data, 7(144): 1–5. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
    Back to article
  38. 38Lindlar, M and Schwab, F. 2018. All that work… for what? Return on investment for trustworthy archive certification processes–a case study. In: 15th International Conference of Digital Preservation, iPRES. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8A3SC
    Back to article
  39. 39Mokrane, M and Recker, J. 2019. CoreTrustSeal-certified repositories: enabling findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). In: 16th International Conference on Digital Preservation, iPRES, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9DA2X
    Back to article
  40. 40Peng, G. 2018. The State of Assessing Data Stewardship Maturity – An Overview. Data Science Journal, 17(7): 1–12. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2018-007
    Back to article
  41. 41Perrier, L, Blondal, E and MacDonald, H. 2020. The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta-synthesis. PloS One, 15(2): e0229182. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229182
    Back to article
  42. 42Rickards, L, Vardigan, M, Dillo, I, Genova, F, L’Hours, H, Minster, JB, Edmunds, R and Mokrane, M. 2016. DSA–WDS Partnership: Streamlining the landscape of data repository certification. In: SciDataCon16. https://pure.knaw.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/3998526/SciDataCon2016Dilloc.pdf [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  43. 43Robinson-García, N, Jiménez-Contreras, E and Torres-Salinas, D. 2016. Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12): 2964–2975. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23529
    Back to article
  44. 44Schellenberg, TR. 1956. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Back to article
  45. 45Stall, S. 2015. Good Data Can Be Better Data – How Data Management Maturity Can Help Repositories Improve Operations, Data Quality, And Usability, Helping Researchers. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2015, IN14A-06. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AGUFMIN14A..06S/abstract [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  46. 46Tenopir, C, Christian, L, Allard, S and Borycz, J. 2018. Research Data Sharing: Practices and Attitudes of Geophysicists. Earth and Space Science, 5(12): 891–902. DOI: 10.1029/2018EA000461
    Back to article
  47. 47The Center for Research Libraries and OCLC Online Computer Library Center. 2007. Trustworthy Repositories: Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist, Version 1.0. Available at https://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/d6/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf [Last Accessed 28 September 2020].
    Back to article
  48. 48Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, JW, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE and Bouwman, J. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  49. 49Yoon, A. 2014. End users’ trust in data repositories: definition and influences on trust development. Archival Science, 14(1): 17–34. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-013-9207-8
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2021-001 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 31, 2019
Accepted on: Jan 3, 2021
Published on: Jan 21, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Data Repositories,
Data Value,
Certification,
Assessment,
Data Management,
Data Reuse

© 2021 Robert R. Downs, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 20 (2021): Issue 1Next article