References
- Anaya, J. 2004. Indigenous Peoples and International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Anderson, I, Griew, R, et al. 2003. Ethics Guidelines, Health Research and Indigenous Australians. New Zealand Bioethics Journal, 20–29.
- Anderson, J. 2009. Law, Knowledge, Culture: The Production of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Press.
- Anderson, J. 2015. Intellectual Property and Indigenous Knowledge. 2nd ed. International Encyclopedia for Social and Behavioral Sciences, 769–778 DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64078-3
- Cajete, G. 2000. Native science: Native laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light.
- Carroll, SR, Rodriguez-Lonebear, D and Martinez, A. 2019. Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations. Data Science Journal, 18(31): 1–15. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-031
- Castellano, MB. 2004. Ethics of Aboriginal research. Journal of Aboriginal Health, January, 98–114.
- Creative Commons. 2019. When We Share, Everyone Wins. 2019. Available at
https://creativecommons.org/ [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Davis, M. 2016.
Data and the United Nations Declarations on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 25–38. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.01 - Demchenko, Y, Los, W and de Laat, C. 2018.
Data as Economic Goods: Definitions, Properties, Challenges, Enabling Technologies for Future Data Markets . ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries 2(23). University of Amsterdam Available athttps://www.itu.int/en/journal/002/Documents/ITU2018-12.pdf [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Drugge, A-L. 2016.
Ethics in Indigenous Research: Past Experiences - Future Challenges . Umea, Sweden: Vaartoe Centre for Sami Research, Umea University. - Echo-Hawk, W. 2013. In the Light of Justice: The Rise of Human Rights in Native America and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. London: Fulcrum Press.
- First Nation’s Information Governance Centre. 2018. The First Nations Principles of OCAP®. Available at
https://fnigc.ca/ocap [Last date accessed 2 December 2019]. - Garrison, N, Hudson, M, Ballantine, L, Garba, I, Martinez, A, Taualii, M, Arbour, L, Caron, NR and Rainie, SC. 2019. Genomic Research through an Indigenous Lens: Understanding the Expectations. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics Volume 20. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015434
- Hudson, M, Milne, M, Russell, K, Smith, B, Reynolds, P and Atatoa-Carr, P. 2016.
The Development of Guidelines for Indigenous Research Ethics in Aotearoa/New Zealand . In A.-L. Drugge (ed.), Ethics in Indigenous Research, Past Experiences – Future Challenges, 157–174. Umea, Sweden: Vaartoe Centre for Sami Research, Umea University. - Independent Expert Advisory Group. 2014. Mobilising the data revolution for sustainable development. Available at
http://www.undatarevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/execsum.pdf [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. 2018. National Inuit Strategy on Research. 2018. Available at
https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/National-Inuit-Strategy-on-Research.pdf [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Jackson, L, Kuhlman, C, Jackson, F and Keolu Fox, P. 2019. Including Vulnerable Populations in the Assessment of Data From Vulnerable Populations. Frontiers in Big Data Volume 2. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00019
- Janke, T. 1998. Our Culture: Our Future. Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies: Canberra.
- Janke, T. 2004.
Minding Culture: Case Studies in Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions . Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. Available athttps://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=286 [Last accessed 22 January 2020]. - Julayinbul Statement in Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights. 1993. The Julayinbul Conference on Intellectual and Cultural Property. Australia:
Jingarrba . - Kovach, M. 2009. Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Kukutai, T and Cormack, D. 2019. Mana motuhake ā-raraunga: datafication and social science research in Aotearoa, Kōtuitui. New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 14(2): 201–208, DOI: 10.1080/1177083X.2019.1648304
- Kukutai, T and Taylor, J. 2016a. Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
- Kukutai, T and Taylor, J. 2016b.
Data Sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Current Practice and Future Needs . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 1–22. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.01 - Kukutai, T and Walter, M. 2015. Recognition and indigenizing official statistics: Reflections from Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 31(2) 317–326. DOI: 10.3233/sji-150896
- Local Contexts. 2018. Cultural Institution Notices. 2018. Available at
https://localcontexts.org/ci-notices [Last accessed January 2020]. - Lovett, R, Lee, V, Kukutai, T, Cormack, D, Rainie, SC and Walker, J. 2019.
Good data practices for Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Governance . In: Daly, A, Devitt, K and Monique, M (eds.), Good Data. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures Inc. ISBN 978-94-92302-27-4. - Maiam nayri Wingara. 2018. Indigenous Data Sovereignty Communique. Indigenous Data Sovereignty Summit.
20th June 2018 , Canberra:Australian Capital Territory . Available athttps://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b3043afb40b9d20411f3512/t/5b6c0f9a0e2e725e9cabf4a6/1533808545167/Communique%2B-%2BIndigenous%2BData%2BSovereignty%2BSummit.pdf . - Martinez Cobo, J. 1982. Study of the Problem of Discrimination Against Indigenous Populations Final Report. Available at
https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/publications/martinez-cobo-study.html [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Mātaatua Declaration on Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 1993. First International Conference on the Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
12-18 June 1993 . Aotearoa, New Zealand. Available athttps://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/databases/creative_heritage/docs/mataatua.pdf . - McGregor, D, Restoule, JP and Johnston, R. (eds.) 2018. Indigenous research: Theories, practices, and relationships. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
- Metis Centre. 2011.
Principles of Ethical Métis Research. 2011 . National Aboriginal Health Organization. Available athttps://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/30555/1/2011_04_ethics.pdf [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Nickerson, M. 2017. First Nations’ data governance: Measuring the nation-to-nation relationship discussion paper. British Columbia First Nations’ Data Governance Initiative.
- Open Data Charter. 2015. Open Data Charter Principles. 2015. Available at
https://opendatacharter.net/principles/ [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Rainie, SC, Schultz, JL, Briggs, E, Riggs, P and Palmanteer-Holder, NL. 2017. Data as strategic resource: Self-determination and the data challenge for United States Indigenous nations. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2). DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.1
- Rainie, SC, Kukutai, T, Walter, M, Figueroa-Rodriguez, OL, Walker, J and Axelsson, P. 2019.
Issues in Open Data: Indigenous Data Sovereignty . In: Davies, T, Walker, S, Rubinstein, M and Perini, F (eds.), The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons. Cape Town and Ottawa: African Minds and International Development Research Centre. pp. 300–319. - Ratima, M. 2001. Kia uruuru mai a hauora being healthy, being Maori: Conceptualising Maori health promotion. Published thesis (PhD) Department of Public Health. Dunedin, University of Otago.
- Research Data Alliance. 2017. International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Intertest Group. Available at
https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/international-indigenous-data-sovereignty-ig [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Research Data Alliance. 2019. RDA Announces Memorandum of Understanding with the Global Indigenous Data Alliance. Available at
https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-announces-memorandum-understanding-global-indigenous-data-alliance [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Research Data Alliance International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group. September 2019. CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. The Global Indigenous Data Alliance. GIDA-global.org. Available at
gida-global.org/care [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. 2016.
Building a data revolution in Indian country . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. pp. 253–272. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.14 - Smith, D. 2016.
Governing data and data for governance: the everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. pp. 117–135. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.07 - Smith, LT. 2012.
Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples . Zed Books. London: University of Otago Press. - Smithsonian Institution. 2012.
Access and Benefit Sharing Policy on Genetics Resources . Washington, DC: National Museum of American History. Available athttps://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/file/nmnhabspolicys508issues.pdf [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Smithsonian Institution. 2019. Smithsonian Directive 609 – Digital Asset Access and Use. Available at
https://www.si.edu/content/pdf/about/sd/SD609.pdf [Last accessed 31 January 2020]. - Snipp, CM. 2016.
What does data sovereignty imply: what does it look like? In: Kukutai and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. pp. 39–55. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.01 - Stebbins, M. 2013. Expanding Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research. Available at
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2013/02/22/expanding-public-access-results-federally-funded-research [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Stone, P and Calderon A. 2019. [Spotlight] CARE Principles Unpacking Indigenous Data Governance. Available at
https://medium.com/@opendatacharter/spotlight-care-principles-f475ec2bf6ec [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Taylor, J and Kukutai, T. 2015.
Report to the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia on the Workshop Data Sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Current Practice and Future Needs . 9–10 July 2015. University House, Australian National University. Available athttps://socialsciences.org.au/publications/data-sovereignty-for-indigenous-peoples-current-practice-and-future-needs/ [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.01 - Te Mana Raraunga. 2016. Māori Data Sovereignty Network Charter. Available at
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58e9b10f9de4bb8d1fb5ebbc/t/5913020d15cf7dde1df34482/1494417935052/Te+Mana+Raraunga+Charter+%28Final+%26+Approved%29.pdf [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Te Mana Raraunga. 2018. Principles of Māori Data Sovereignty Brief #1. October 2018. Available at
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d3799de845604000199cd24/t/5d6f940cc5442b00013e4dab/1567593484780/TMR%2BMa%CC%84ori%2BData%2BSovereignty%2BPrinciples%2BOct%2B2018.pdf [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - The Economist. 2017. The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data, 6 May 2017. Available at
https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21721656-data-economy-demands-new-approach-antitrust-rules-worlds-most-valuable-resource [Last date accessed 17 January 2020]. - Tsosie, R. 1997. Indigenous Peoples Claims to Cultural Property: A Legal Perspective. Museum Anthropology, 21(3): 5–11. DOI: 10.1525/mua.1997.21.3.5
- Tsosie, R. 2019. Tribal Data Governance and Informational Privacy: Constructing ‘Indigenous Data Sovereignty.’ Montana Law Review, 80(2). Available at
https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/mlr/vol80/iss2/4/ [Last accessed 9 February 2020]. - United Nations. 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Resolution/Adopted by the General Assembly, 2 October 2007, A/RES/61/295. Available at:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/471355a82.html [Last date accessed 17 January 2020]. - United Nations. 2011. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at
https://www.cbd.int/abs/ [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - United Nations. 2009. State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. Unknown. Available at
https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP/en/SOWIP_web.pdf [Last accessed 28 August 2018]. - United State Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network. 2020. The US Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network Indigenous Data Governance Principles.
- Walter, M. 2018. The Voice of Indigenous Data: Beyond the markers of disadvantage First Things First. Griffith Review, 60: 256–263. Available at
https://griffithreview.com/articles/voice-indigenous-databeyond-disadvantage/ . - Wikimedia. 2019. Available at
wikimedia.org [Last accessed 17 January 2020]. - Wilkinson, M, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, I, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data, 15 March 2016, DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Wilson, S. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Winnipeg: Fernwood.
- Wilson, WA. 2004. Introduction: Indigenous knowledge recovery is indigenous empowerment. American Indian Quarterly, 359–372. DOI: 10.1353/aiq.2004.0111