Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Research Data Management for Master’s Students: From Awareness to Action Cover

Research Data Management for Master’s Students: From Awareness to Action

Data Science Journal
Volume 19 (2020): Issue 1
By: Daen Adriaan Ben Smits and  Marta Teperek  
Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. 1Akhmerov, A and Steele, G. 2019. TU Delft Open Data Policy of the Quantum Nanoscience Department. TU Delft. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2556949
    Back to article
  2. 2Baker, M. 2016. 1,500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility, 25 May 2016. Nature News. [Last accessed 30 April 2020]. DOI: 10.1038/533452a
    Back to article
  3. 3Berg, J. 2017. Editorial Retraction. Science, 356(6340): 812. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan5763
    Back to article
  4. 4Bloom, T, Ganley, E and Winker, M. 2014. Data Access for the Open Access Literature: PLOS’s Data Policy. PLOS Biology, 12(2): 1–3. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797
    Back to article
  5. 5Carlson, J, Fosmire, M, Miller, CC and Nelson, MS. 2011. Determining Data Information Literacy Needs: A Study of Students and Research Faculty. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2): 629–657. DOI: 10.1353/pla.2011.0022
    Back to article
  6. 6Carlson, J and Stowell-Bracke, M. 2013. Data Management and Sharing from the Perspective of Graduate Students: An Examination of the Culture and Practice at the Water Quality Field Station. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(4): 343–361. DOI: 10.1353/pla.2013.0034
    Back to article
  7. 7Cruz, M. 2019. Bringing Researchers Along on the Road to FAIR data. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3249802
    Back to article
  8. 8Cruz, M, Dintzner, N, Dunning, A, Kuil, A. van der, Plomp, E, Teperek, M, der Velden, YT and Versteeg, A. 2019. Policy Needs to Go Hand in Hand with Practice: The Learning and Listening Approach to Data Management. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 45. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-045
    Back to article
  9. 9Dunning, A. 2018. TU Delft Research Data Framework Policy. TU Delft. Available at: https://www.tudelft.nl/en/library/current-topics/research-data-management/r/policies/tu-delft-faculty-policies/. [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  10. 10European Commission. 2018. Turning FAIR into Reality. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Available at: http://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7769a148-f1f6-11e8-9982-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF [Last accessed 30 April 2020].
    Back to article
  11. 11European Commission. n.d. Data management – H2020 Online Manual. Belgium: European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/open-access-data-management/data-management_en.htm [Last accessed 30 April 2020].
    Back to article
  12. 12Fane, B, Ayris, P, Hahnel, M, Hrynaszkiewicz, I, Baynes, G and Farrell, E. 2019. The State of Open Data Report 2019. Digital Science. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9980783.v2
    Back to article
  13. 13Feijen, M. 2011. What Researchers Want. SURF Foundation. Available at: https://www.bvekennis.nl/wp-content/uploads/documents/11-0198-What-researchers-want.pdf [Last accessed 30 April 2020].
    Back to article
  14. 14Given, LM. 2008. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781412963909
    Back to article
  15. 15KNAW; NFU; NWO; TO2-federatie; Vereniging Hogescholen; VSNU. 2018. Wetenschappelijke Gedragscode Integriteit [Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity]. The Hague, Netherlands. Available at: https://www.vsnu.nl/files/documents/Netherlands%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20for%20Research%20Integrity%202018.pdf [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  16. 16Kolb, SM. 2012. Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method: Valid Research Strategies for Educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1): 83–86. Available at: http://jeteraps.scholarlinkresearch.com/articles/Grounded%20Theory%20and%20the%20Constant%20Comparative%20Method.pdf [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  17. 17Leaders Activating Research Networks. 2017. Model Policy for Research Data Management (RDM) at Research Institutions/Institutes: 133–136. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1546606/1/25_Learn_Model%20Policy_133-136.pdf [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  18. 18Mancilla, HA, Teperek, M, van Dijck, J., den Heijer, K, Eggermont, R, Plomp, E, der Velden, YT and Kurapati, S. 2019. On a Quest for Cultural Change – Surveying Research Data Management Practices at Delft University of Technology. LIBER Quarterly, 29(1): 1–27. DOI: 10.18352/lq.10287
    Back to article
  19. 19Miyakawa, T. 2020. No Raw Data, No Science: Another Possible Source of the Reproducibility Crisis. Molecular Brain, 13(24). DOI: 10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2
    Back to article
  20. 20NUFFIC. 2018. Onderwijssysteem Nederland [Education system in The Netherlands]. The Hague, Netherlands: Nuffic. Available at: https://www.nuffic.nl/publicaties/onderwijssysteem-nederland/ [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  21. 21NWO. n.d. Open (FAIR) data. The Hague, The Netherlands: NWO. Available at: https://www.nwo.nl/en/policies/open+science/data+management [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  22. 22Piorun, M, Kafel, D, Leger-Hornby, T, Najafi, S, Martin, E, Colombo, P and LaPelle, N. 2012. Teaching Research Data Management: An Undergraduate/Graduate Curriculum. JESLIB, 1(1): 46–50. DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2012.1003
    Back to article
  23. 23Roche, DG. 2017. Evaluating Science’s Open-data Policy. Science, 357(6352): 654. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan8158
    Back to article
  24. 24Sales, L, Henning, P, Veiga, V, Costa, MM, Sayão, LF, da Silva Santos, LOB and Pires, LF. 2020. GO FAIR Brazil: A Challenge for Brazilian Data Science. Data Intelligence, 2(1): 238–245. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00046
    Back to article
  25. 25Science. n.d. Science Journals: editorial policies. Washington, DC, United States of America: Science. Available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/authors/science-journals-editorial-policies [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  26. 26Smits, DAB. 2020. Research Data Attitudes of Recently Graduated Master Students (interview notes and code) [Dataset]. DOI: 10.4121/uuid:ee978f4b-4b2a-4fb1-aeed-829f773eb316
    Back to article
  27. 27Springer Nature. n.d. Research Data Policies. Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature. Available at: https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  28. 28Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. n.d. Wat is Research Data Management? Eindhoven, The Netherlands: TUE. Available at: https://www.tue.nl/universiteit/bibliotheek/ondersteuning-onderwijs-onderzoek/wetenschappelijk-publiceren/data-coach/begrippen-en-achtergrond/wat-is-research-data-management/ [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  29. 29Tongco, M. 2007. Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5(1): 147–158. Available at: Ethnobotany Research Journal [Last accessed 1 May 2020]. DOI: 10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
    Back to article
  30. 30TU Delft. n.d. Personal Data: Personal Research Data Workflow. Delft, The Netherlands: TUD. Available at: https://www.tudelft.nl/en/library/current-topics/research-data-management/r/manage/confidential-data/personal-data/ [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
  31. 31TU Delft Faculty of Mechanical Maritime and Materials Engineering. 2019. The Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering Research Data Management Policy. Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3524106
    Back to article
  32. 32Van Reisen, M, Stokmans, M, Mawere, M, Basajja, M, Ong’ayo, AO, Nakazibwe, P, Kirkpatrick, C and Chindoza, K. 2020. FAIR Practices in Africa. Data Intelligence, 2(1): 246–256. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00047
    Back to article
  33. 33Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Bouwman, J, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(160018). DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  34. 34Wittenburg, P, Lautenschlager, M, Thiemann, H, Baldauf, C and Trilsbeek, P. 2019. FAIR Practices in Europe. Data Intelligence, 2(1): 257–263. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00048
    Back to article
  35. 35ZonMw. n.d. ZonMw-procedure Datamanagement. The Hague, The Netherlands: ZonMW. Available at: https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/over-zonmw/toegang-tot-data/zonmw-procedure-datamanagement/ [Last accessed 1 May 2020].
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-030 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 17, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 2, 2020
Published on: Aug 5, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Research Data Management,
Master Students,
Interview,
Education,
Reproducibility crisis,
FAIR Data Principles,
University,
Survey

© 2020 Daen Adriaan Ben Smits, Marta Teperek, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 19 (2020): Issue 1Next article