Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Alter-Value in Data Reuse: Non-Designated Communities and Creative Processes Cover

Alter-Value in Data Reuse: Non-Designated Communities and Creative Processes

Open Access
|May 2020

References

  1. Abella, A, Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M and De-Pablos-Heredero, C. 2019. The process of open data publication and reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(3): 296300. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24116
  2. Akmon, D, Zimmerman, A, Daniels, M and Hedstrom, M. 2011. The application of archival concepts to a data-intensive environment: working with scientists to understand data management and preservation needs. Archival Science, 11(3–4): 329348. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-011-9151-4
  3. Arzberger, P, Schroeder, P, Beaulieu, A, Bowker, G, Casey, K, Laaksonen, L, Wouters, P, et al. 2004. Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development. Data Science Journal, 3: 135152. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.3.135
  4. Baker, KS, Duerr, RE and Parsons, MA. 2015. Scientific Knowledge Mobilization: Coevolution of Data Products and Designated Communities. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2): 110135. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.346
  5. Barry, A, Born, G and Weszkalnys, G. 2008. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37(1): 2049. DOI: 10.1080/03085140701760841
  6. Bettivia, RS. 2016. The Power of Imaginary Users: Designated Communities in the OAIS Reference Model. In Proceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 38:1–38:9. Silver Springs, MD, USA: American Society for Information Science. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301038
  7. Birnbaum, D and Wallenstein, S-O. 2015. From Immaterials to Resistance: The Other Side of Les Immatériaux. In Hui, Y and Broeckmann, A (eds.), 30 Years After Les Immatériaux: Art, Science and Theory, 245267. Meson Press.
  8. Bishop, L and Kuula-Luumi, A. 2017. Revisiting Qualitative Data Reuse: A Decade On. SAGE Open, 7(1). DOI: 10.1177/2158244016685136
  9. Borgman, CL, Scharnhorst, A and Golshan, MS. 2019. Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures: Mediating data sharing and reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(8): 888904. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24172
  10. Born, G. 2010. For a Relational Musicology: Music and Interdisciplinarity, Beyond the Practice Turn. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 135(2): 205243. DOI: 10.1080/02690403.2010.506265
  11. Brunner, C. 2016. (Digital) anarchival platforming. In The Go-To How-To Book of Anarchiving, 7579. Montreal, QC: The Senselab.
  12. Cai, L and Zhu, Y. 2015. The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, 14(0): 2. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2015-002
  13. Chow-White, PA and Sandy Green, J. 2013. Data Mining Difference in the Age of Big Data: Communication and the Social Shaping of Genome Technologies from 1998 to 2007. International Journal of Communication, 7(0): 28.
  14. Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information. 2020. Research Data Management Glossary. Retrieved 2020-04-24, from https://casrai.org/rdm-glossary/ (Library Catalog: casrai.org).
  15. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. 2012. Reference Model OAIS (Tech. Rep. No. Magenta Book). Washington, DC: Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems.
  16. Cook, S. 2016. Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (OCLC: 945730189).
  17. Cragin, MH, Palmer, CL, Carlson, JR and Witt, M. 2010. Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926): 40234038. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0165
  18. Curty, RG, Crowston, K, Specht, A, Grant, BW and Dalton, ED. 2017. Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PLOS ONE, 12(12): e0189288. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189288
  19. Davenport, JH, Grant, J and Jones, CM. 2020. Data Without Software Are Just Numbers. Data Science Journal, 19(1): 3. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-003
  20. Drisko, JW and Maschi, T. 2016. Content analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001
  21. Duguet, A-M. 2019. The “anarchive” Series as a Challenge between Art and Information. A singular approach of media art history. In Grau, O, Hoth, J and Wandl-Vogt, E (eds.), Digital art through the looking glass: new strategies for archiving, collecting and preserving in digital humanities, 7377. Donau: Edition Donau-Universität.
  22. Edwards, D. 2009. DYAD. In Barral, X, Ikeda, R and Naphegyi, C (eds.), V\(\neq\) L. Paris: Éditions Xavier Barral.
  23. Faniel, IM, Frank, RD and Yakel, E. 2019. Context from the data reuser’s point of view. Journal of Documentation, 75(6): 12741297. DOI: 10.1108/JD-08-2018-0133
  24. Feldman, S and Shaw, L. 2019. The Epistemological and Ethical Challenges of Archiving and Sharing Qualitative Data. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(6): 699721. DOI: 10.1177/0002764218796084
  25. Frické, M. 2008. The knowledge pyramid: a critique of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 35(2): 131142. DOI: 10.1177/0165551508094050
  26. Gallo, F. 2015. Contemporary Art as “Immatériaux”: Yesterday and Today (M. Desmond & P. Polidori, Trans.). In Hui, Y and Broeckmann, A (eds.), 30 Years After Les Immatériaux: Art, Science and Theory, 119135. Meson Press.
  27. Gottschalk, J. 2016. Experimental Music Since 1970. New York; London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  28. Grisey, G. 2019. Écrits ou l’invention de la musique spectrale (2nd ed.; Lelong, G and Reby, A-M (eds.)). Paris: éditions MF.
  29. Guerlot-Kourouklis, A, Royo-Letelier, J and Wilhelm, A. 2019. Murs Invisibles. Retrieved from http://iakeri.fr/content/Murs_Invisibles_Collectif_Iakeri_2019.pdf.
  30. Guffond, J. 2015. Anywhere, All the Time, A Permanent Soundtrack to Your Life. Retrieved 2020-02-27, from http://www.jasmineguffond.com/?path=art/Anywhere+All+The+Time.
  31. Guffond, J and González Fuster, G. 2020. Sounds Of Surveillance – The Wire. Retrieved 2020-04-24, from https://www.thewire.co.uk/audio/tracks/sounds-of-surveillance.
  32. Harvey, R. 2007. Appraisal and Selection. In Ross, S and Day, M (eds.), DCC Digital Curation Manual (1st ed.). Glasgow: HATII, University of Glasgow. Retrieved from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resource/curation-manual/chapters/appraisal-and-selection.
  33. Hui, Y and Broeckmann, A. 2015. Introduction. In Hui, Y and Broeckmann, A (eds.), 30 Years After Les Immatériaux: Art, Science and Theory, 924. Meson Press.
  34. Johnston, LR. 2017. Introduction to data curation. In Johnston, LR (Ed.), Curating Research Data Volume One: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository, 1: 130. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
  35. Johnston, LR. 2020, February. How a network of data curators can unlock the tremendous reuse value of research data. Retrieved 2020-02-21, from http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/data-curators-network/.
  36. Johnston, LR, Carlson, J, Hudson-Vitale, C, Imker, H, Kozlowski, W, Olendorf, R and Stewart, C. 2018. How Important is Data Curation? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(1): eP2198. DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2198
  37. Kaase, M. 2001. Databases, core: political science and political behavior. In Smelser, NJ and Baltes, PB (eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 5). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00034-6
  38. Kahn, D. 2013. Earth Sound Earth Signal: Energies and Earth Magnitude in the Arts. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520257801.001.0001
  39. Kethers, S, Treloar, A and Wu, M. 2017. Building Tools to Facilitate Data Reuse. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(2): 112. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i2.409
  40. Kirilova, D and Karcher, S. 2017. Rethinking Data Sharing and Human Participant Protection in Social Science Research: Applications from the Qualitative Realm. Data Science Journal, 16(0): 43. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-043
  41. Klein, A. 2019. Archive(s), mémoire, art: éléments pour une archivistique critique. Québec, QC: Presses de l’Université Laval.
  42. Lemay, Y and Klein, A. 2012. Les archives et l’émotion: un atelier d’exploration et d’échanges. Archives, 44(2): 91109.
  43. Ma, L. 2012, April. Meanings of information: The assumptions and research consequences of three foundational LIS theories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4): 716723. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21711
  44. Manovich, L. 2000. Database as a genre of new media. AI & SOCIETY, 14(2): 176183. DOI: 10.1007/BF01205448
  45. Mason, J. 2007. ‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: On the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology. Sociological Research Online, 12(3): 3942. DOI: 10.5153/sro.1507
  46. Massumi, B. 2018. 99 theses on the revaluation of value: a postcapitalist manifesto. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/9781452958484
  47. Mauthner, NS and Parry, O. 2009. Qualitative data preservation and sharing in the social sciences: On whose philosophical terms? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3): 291307. DOI: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2009.tb00147.x
  48. McAllister, JW. 2018. Scientists’ Reuse of Old Empirical Data: Epistemological Aspects. Philosophy of Science, 85(5): 755766. DOI: 10.1086/699695
  49. Miranda, E and Brouse, A. 2005. Toward direct brain-computer musical interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, 216219. Vancouver, Canada.
  50. Morris, R. 2020. Intimate mapping – In conversation with Jonathon Reus & Sissel Marie Tonn. Retrieved 2020-04-25, from https://www.fiber-space.nl/news/intimate-mapping-in-conversation-with-jonathon-reus-sissel-marie-tonn/.
  51. Morton, T. 2013. Hyperobjects: philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  52. Mumma, G. 1974. Live-Electronic Music. In Appleton, JH and Perera, RC (eds.), The development and practice of electronic music, 286335. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  53. Nielsen, HJ and Hjørland, B. 2014, March. Curating research data: the potential roles of libraries and information professionals. Journal of Documentation, 70(2): 221240. DOI: 10.1108/JD-03-2013-0034
  54. Nyman, M. 1974. Experimental music: Cage and beyond. New York: Schirmer Books.
  55. Oliveros, P. 2005. Deep listening: a composers’s sound practice. New York; Shanghai: iUniverse. (OCLC: 470106497).
  56. Ortiz, M. 2012. A Brief History of Biosignal-Driven Art: From biofeedback to biophysical performance. eContact!, 14(2). Retrieved 2020-02-26, from https://econtact.ca/14_2/ortiz_biofeedback.html.
  57. Pasquetto, IV, Randles, BM and Borgman, CL. 2017. On the Reuse of Scientific Data. Data Science Journal, 16: 19. Retrieved from http://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2017-008/. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-008
  58. Paté, A, Boschi, L, Dubois, D, Le Carrou, J-L and Holtzman, B. 2017. Auditory display of seismic data: On the use of experts’ categorizations and verbal descriptions as heuristics for geoscience. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(3): 21432162. DOI: 10.1121/1.4978441
  59. Paul, C. 2008. Challenges for a ubiquitous museum: From the white cube to the black box and beyond. In Paul, C (ed.), New Media in the White Cube and Beyond: Curatorial Models for Digital Art, 5375. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  60. Ramapriyan, H, Moses, J and Duerr, R. 2012. Preservation of data for Earth system science – Towards a content standard. In Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 53045307. DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6352411
  61. Rhee, J. 2017. The Materialities of Big Data. In Willis, D, Braham, WH, Muramoto, K and Barber, DA (eds.), Energy Accounts: Architectural Representations of Energy, Climate, and the Future, 6877. New York, NY: Routledge.
  62. Slavnic, Z. 2013. Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2).
  63. Smith, JA, Flowers, P and Larkin, M. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  64. Straebel, V and Thoben, W. 2014. Alvin Lucier’s Music for Solo Performer: Experimental music beyond sonification. Organised Sound, 19(1): 1729. DOI: 10.1017/S135577181300037X
  65. Strauss, AL and Corbin, JM. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  66. Thieberger, EM and Dodge, C. 1995. An Interview with Charles Dodge. Computer Music Journal, 19(1): 1124. DOI: 10.2307/3681298
  67. van de Sandt, S, Dallmeier-Tiessen, S, Lavasa, A and Petras, V. 2019. The Definition of Reuse. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 119. Retrieved 2020-02-06, from https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2019-022/. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-022
  68. Vesna, V. 2007. Database Aesthetics: Art in the Age of Information Overflow. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/j.cttts7q7
  69. Weil, B. 2012. Notes on the immersive datascapes of Ryoji Ikeda. In Ryoji Ikeda: datamatics, 121129. Milano: Charta. (OCLC: 769430108).
  70. Yoon, A. 2017. Role of Communication in Data Reuse. In Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Crystal City, VA.
  71. Yoon, A and Lee, YY. 2019. Factors of trust in data reuse. Online Information Review, 43(7): 12451262. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-01-2019-0014
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 28, 2020
|
Accepted on: May 1, 2020
|
Published on: May 22, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Guillaume Boutard, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.