Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data Without Software Are Just Numbers Cover

Data Without Software Are Just Numbers

Open Access
|Jan 2020

References

  1. ACM. 2018. Software and Data Artifacts in the ACM Digital Library. https://www.acm.org/publications/artifacts.
  2. Allison, DB, Shiffrin, RM and Stodden, V. 2018. Reproducibility of research: Issues and proposed remedies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11): 25612562. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802324115
  3. Barba, L. 2018. Terminologies for Reproducible Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311.
  4. Borwein, J and Bailey, D. 2013. The Reinhart-Rogoff error – or how not to Excel at economics. http://theconversation.com/the-reinhart-rogoff-error-or-how-not-to-excel-at-economics-13646.
  5. Chen, X, Dallmeier-Tiessen, S, Dasler, R, Feger, S, Fokianos, P, Gonzalez, JB, Neubert, S, et al. 2019. Open is not enough. Nature Physics, 15: 113119. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0342-2
  6. Cruz, M, Kurapati, S and Türkyilmaz-van der Velden, Y. 2018. Work-shop Report: Software Reproducibility – How to put it into practice? https://openworking.wordpress.com/2018/06/26/workshop-report-software-reproducibility-how-to-put-it-into-practice/. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/z48cm
  7. Darpa open catalogue. n.d. https://www.darpa.mil/opencatalog.
  8. Digital curation centre. n.d. https://www.dcc.ac.uk.
  9. Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council. 2017. Research Software Engineer Fellowships II. https://epsrc.ukri.org/funding/calls/research-software-engineer-fellowships-ii/.
  10. Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council. 2018. EPSRC CDT Outline call. https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/files/funding/calls/2018/2018cdtsoutlinescall/ (Accessed: 2019-08-12).
  11. F1000Research. n.d. https://f1000research.com/ (Accessed: 2019-08-12).
  12. Figshare. n.d. https://figshare.com (Accessed: 2019-08-12).
  13. Herndon, T, Ash, M and Pollin, R. 2013, 12. Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Cambridge J. Economics, 38(2): 257279. DOI: 10.1093/cje/bet075
  14. Hettrick, S, Antonioletti, MLC, Chue Hong, N, Crouch, S, De Roure, D, Sufi, S, et al. 2014. UK research software survey 2014. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14809
  15. Horizon 2020 Programme. 2016. Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grantsmanual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf (Accessed: 2019-08-12).
  16. Jiménez, R, Kuzak, M, Alhamdoosh, M, Barker, M, Batut, B, Borg, M, Crouch, S, et al. 2017. Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research, 6(876). DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11407.1
  17. Jones, C, Matthews, B, Gent, I, Griffin, T and Tedds, J. 2016. Persistent Identification and Citation of Software. International Journal of Data Curation, 11(2). DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i2.422
  18. Lyon, L, Jeng, W and Mattern, E. 2017. Research transparency: A preliminary study of disciplinary conceptualisation, drivers, tools and support services. International Journal of Data Curation, 12(1): 4664. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.530
  19. Mallona, I and Peidano, M. 2017. Truke, a web tool to check for and handle excel misidentified gene symbols. BMC Genomics, 18(242). DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3631-8
  20. Martone, M. (ed.). 2014. Data citation synthesis group: Joint declaration of data citation principles. DOI: 10.25490/a97f-egyk
  21. Mawdsley, D, Haines, R and Jay, C. 2017. Reproducible Research is Software Engineering. http://idinteraction.cs.manchester.ac.uk/RSE2017Talk/ReproducibleResearchIsRSE.html#/ (Accessed: 2019-08-12).
  22. Mesnard, O and Barba, LA. 2017. Reproducible and replicable computational fluid dynamics: It’s harder than you think. Computing in Science Engineering, 19(4): 4455. DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2017.3151254
  23. Munafò, M, Nosek, B, Bishop, D, Button, K, Chambers, C, du Sert, N, Ioannidis, J, et al. 2017. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1: 0021. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021
  24. Nature. n.d. Nature Availability Advice. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html.
  25. Plesser, HE. 2018. Reproducibility vs. replicability: A brief history of a confused terminology. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 11: 76. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00076
  26. Reinhart, C and Rogoff, K. 2010. Growth in a Time of Debt. American Economic Review, 100: 57378. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.2.573
  27. Research Councils UK. 2016. Concordat on Open Research Data. https://www.ukri.org/files/legacy/documents/concordatonopenresearchdata-pdf/.
  28. Smith, AM, Katz, DS, Niemeyer, KE and FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group. 2016. Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e86. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.86
  29. Software Carpentry. n.d. https://www.software-carpentry.org.
  30. Software Sustainability Institute. n.d. https://www.software.ac.uk.
  31. UK Research Software Engineer Association. n.d. http://rse.ac.uk/.
  32. Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Mons, B, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  33. Wilson, G, Bryan, J, Cranston, K, Kitzes, J, Nederbragt, L and Teal, TK. 2017. Good enough practices in scientific computing. PLoS computational biology, 13(6): e1005510. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005510
  34. WSSSPE. n.d. http://wssspe.researchcomputing.org.uk/proceedings/.
  35. Zenodo. n.d. https://zenodo.org.
  36. Ziemann, M, Eren, Y and El-Osta, A. 2016. Gene name errors are widespread in the scientific literature. Genome Biology, 17: 13. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1044-7
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 28, 2018
|
Accepted on: Nov 27, 2019
|
Published on: Jan 22, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 James Harold Davenport, James Grant, Catherine Mary Jones, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.