Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The History and Future of Data Citation in Practice Cover

The History and Future of Data Citation in Practice

Data Science Journal
Volume 18 (2019): Issue 1
By: Mark A. Parsons,  Ruth E. Duerr and  Matthew B. Jones  
Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. 1Aalbersberg, IJ, et al. 2018. Making science transparent by default; introducing the TOP statement. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/sm78t
    Back to article
  2. 2Allen, L, et al. 2014. Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature, 508: 312–313. DOI: 10.1038/508312a
    Back to article
  3. 3Alliez, P, et al. 2019. Attributing and referencing (research) software: Best practices and outlook from Inria. Computing in Science & Engineering. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11123.
    Back to article
  4. 4Altman, M and King, G. 2007. A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data. D-Lib Magazine, 13. http://dlib.org/dlib/march07/altman/03altman.html accessed 2019-07-25.
    Back to article
  5. 5Baker, KS and Yarmey, L. 2009. Data stewardship: Environmental Data Curation and a Web-of-Repositories. International Journal of Digital Curation, 4. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v4i2.90
    Back to article
  6. 6Ball, A and Duke, M. 2015. How to Cite Datasets and Link to Publications. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides accessed 2019-02-06.
    Back to article
  7. 7Bechhofer, S, et al. 2010. Research objects: Towards exchange and reuse of digital knowledge. The Future of the Web for Collaborative Science (FWCS 2010). https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268555/ accessed 2019-07-28.
    Back to article
  8. 8Bechhofer, S, et al. 2011. Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
    Back to article
  9. 9Bernknopf, R, et al. 2016. The cost-effectiveness of satellite Earth observations to inform a post-wildfire response. Working Paper, 19–16. https://media.rff.org/documents/Valuables_Wildfires.pdf accessed 2019-07-28.
    Back to article
  10. 10Berquist, CR, Jr. 1999. Digital map production and publication by geological survey organizations: A proposal for authorship and citation guidelines. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 99–386. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1999/of99-386/berquist.html accessed 2019-03-02.
    Back to article
  11. 11Bizer, C, Heath, T and Berners-Lee, T. 2009. Linked data – the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5: 1–22. DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2009081901
    Back to article
  12. 12Bolikowski, L, Nowiński, A and Sylwestrzak, W. 2015. A system for distributed minting and management of persistent identifiers. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10: 280–286. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.368
    Back to article
  13. 13Borgman, C. 2015. Big Data, Little Data, No Data. Boston: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001
    Back to article
  14. 14Borgman, C. 2016. Data citation as a bibliometric oxymoron. In: Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication, Sugimoto, CR (ed.), 93–115. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. https://escholarship.org/content/qt8w36p9zf/qt8w36p9zf.pdf accessed 2019-07-26.
    Back to article
  15. 15Brinckman, A, et al. 2019. Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the “whole tale”. Future Generation Computer Systems, 94: 854–867. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.12.029
    Back to article
  16. 16Buneman, P, Davidson, S and Frew, J. 2016. Why data citation is a computational problem. Commun ACM, 59: 50–57. DOI: 10.1145/2893181
    Back to article
  17. 17Burton, A, et al. 2017. The Scholix framework for interoperability in data-literature information exchange. D-Lib Magazine, 23. DOI: 10.1045/january2017-burton
    Back to article
  18. 18Callaghan, S, et al. 2009. Overlay journals and data publishing in the meteorological sciences. Ariadne. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue60/callaghan-et-al/ accessed 2011-11-27.
    Back to article
  19. 19Chard, K, et al. 2019. Implementing computational reproducibility in the Whole Tale environment. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Practical Reproducible Evaluation of Computer Systems – P-RECS ‘19. DOI: 10.1145/3322790.3330594
    Back to article
  20. 20Cooke, R and Golub, A. 2019. Market-based methods for monetizing uncertainty reduction: A case study. Working Paper, 19–15. https://media.rff.org/documents/WP_Cooke_Golub_4.pdf accessed 2019-07-28.
    Back to article
  21. 21Costello, MJ. 2009. Motivating online publication of data. Bioscience, 59: 418–427. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.5.9
    Back to article
  22. 22Cousijn, H, et al. 2018. A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers. Sci Data, 5: 180259. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.259
    Back to article
  23. 23Cousijn, H, et al. 2019. Bringing citations and usage metrics together to make data count. Data Science Journal, 18. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-009
    Back to article
  24. 24Crosas, M. 2014. The evolution of data citation: From principles to implementation. IASSIST Quarterly, 37: 62. DOI: 10.29173/iq504
    Back to article
  25. 25DCSG – Data Citation Synthesis Group. 2014. Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. DOI: 10.25490/a97f-egyk
    Back to article
  26. 26Di Cosmo, R, Gruenpeter, M and Zacchiroli, S. 2018. Identifiers for digital objects: The case of software source code preservation. Open Science Framework. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KDE56
    Back to article
  27. 27Donovan, C and Hanney, S. 2011. The payback framework explained. Research Evaluation, 20: 181–183. DOI: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635756
    Back to article
  28. 28Downs, RR, Duerr, R, Hills, DJ and Ramapriyan, HK. 2015. Data stewardship in the Earth sciences. D-Lib Magazine, 21. DOI: 10.1045/july2015-downs
    Back to article
  29. 29EDPSC – ESIP Data Preservation and Stewardship Committee. 2019. Data Citation Guidelines for Earth Science Data, Version 2. Earth Science Information Partners. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8441816.v1
    Back to article
  30. 30ESSCC – ESIP Software and Services Citation Cluster. 2019. Software and Services Citation Guidelines and Examples. Ver. 1. Earth Science Information Partners. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7640426
    Back to article
  31. 31Fenner, M, et al. 2019. A data citation roadmap for scholarly data repositories. Scientific Data, 6(1) (1): 28. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0031-8
    Back to article
  32. 32Fenner, M, et al. 2018. Code of practice for research data usage metrics release 1. DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26505v1
    Back to article
  33. 33Guralnick, RP, et al. 2015. Community next steps for making globally unique identifiers work for biocollections data. Zookeys, 133–154. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.494.9352
    Back to article
  34. 34Haak, LL, et al. 2012. Orcid: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25: 259–264. DOI: 10.1087/20120404
    Back to article
  35. 35Hackett, EJ, et al. 2008. Ecology transformed: The national center for ecological analysis and synthesis and the changing patterns of ecological research. In: Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, 277–296. The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262151207.003.0016
    Back to article
  36. 36Hayes, PJ and Halpin, H. 2008. In defense of ambiguity. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 4: 1–18. DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2008040101
    Back to article
  37. 37Howison, J and Bullard, J. 2016. Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67: 2137–2155. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23538
    Back to article
  38. 38Kafkas, Ş, Kim, JH and McEntyre, JR. 2013. Database citation in full text biomedical articles. PLoS One, 8: e63184. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063184
    Back to article
  39. 39Kahn, R and Wilensky, R. 1995. A framework for distributed digital object services. http://handle.net/cnri.dlib/tn95-01 accessed 2019-07-20.
    Back to article
  40. 40Kahn, RE, et al. 2018. Digital Object Interface Protocol Specification, Ver. 2.0. DONA. https://www.dona.net/sites/default/files/2018-11/DOIPv2Spec_1.pdf accessed 2019-07-25.
    Back to article
  41. 41Katz, DS. 2014. Transitive credit as a means to address social and technological concerns stemming from citation and attribution of digital products. Journal of Open Research Software, 2: e20. DOI: 10.5334/jors.be
    Back to article
  42. 42Katz, DS and Chue Hong, NP. 2018. Software citation in theory and practice. Arxiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.08149.pdf accessed 2018-12-06.
    Back to article
  43. 43Klump, J, et al. 2006. Data publication in the open access initiative. Data Science Journal, 5: 79–83. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.5.79
    Back to article
  44. 44Klump, J, Huber, R and Diepenbroek, M. 2015. DOI for geoscience data-how early practices shape present perceptions. Earth Science Informatics, 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-015-0231-5
    Back to article
  45. 45Klump, J, Murphy, F, Weigel, T and Parsons, MA. 2017. 20 years of persistent identifiers–applications and future directions. Data Science Journal, 16. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-052
    Back to article
  46. 46Kratz, JE and Strasser, C. 2015a. Comment: Making data count. Sci Data, 2: 150039. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2015.39
    Back to article
  47. 47Kratz, JE and Strasser, C. 2015b. Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data. PLoS One, 10: e0117619. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117619
    Back to article
  48. 48Lawrence, B, et al. 2011. Citation and peer review of data: Moving towards formal data publication. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205
    Back to article
  49. 49Lawrence, S, et al. 2001. Persistence of web references in scientific research. Computer, 34: 26–31. DOI: 10.1109/2.901164
    Back to article
  50. 50Ma, X, et al. 2017. Weaving a knowledge network for deep carbon science. Frontiers in Earth Science, 5. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2017.00036
    Back to article
  51. 51Mayernik, MS, Phillips, J and Nienhouse, E. 2016. Linking publications and data: Challenges, trends, and opportunities. D-Lib Magazine, 22. DOI: 10.1045/may2016-mayernik
    Back to article
  52. 52McMurry, JA, et al. 2017. Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data. PLoS Biol, 15: e2001414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414
    Back to article
  53. 53Mooney, H and Newton, MP. 2012. The anatomy of a data citation: Discovery, reuse, and credit. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 1: 1–16. https://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.1035/ accessed 2017-10-03. DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.1035
    Back to article
  54. 54NISO. 2016. Outputs of the NISO alternative assessment metrics project: A recommended practice of the National Information Standards Organization. NISO RP-25-2016. https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-25-2016-altmetrics accessed 2019-07-22.
    Back to article
  55. 55Parsons, MA, et al. 2008. Managing permafrost data: Past approaches and future directions. Permafrost Ninth International Conference 29 June–3 July 2008 Proceedings, 1369–1374. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3519368
    Back to article
  56. 56Parsons, MA and Fox, PA. 2013. Is data publication the right metaphor? Data Science Journal, 12. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.WDS-042
    Back to article
  57. 57Parsons, MA and Fox, PA. 2018. Power and persistent identifiers. International Data Week 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1495321
    Back to article
  58. 58Paskin, N. 2000. E-citations: Actionable identifiers and scholarly referencing. Learned Publishing, 13: 159–166. DOI: 10.1087/09531510050145308
    Back to article
  59. 59Peters, I, et al. 2016. Research data explored: An extended analysis of citations and altmetrics. Scientometrics, 107: 723–744. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4
    Back to article
  60. 60Rauber, A, Asmi, A, van Uytvanck, D and Proell, S. 2015. Data Citation of Evolving Data: Recommendations of the Working Group on Data Citation (WGDC). Research Data Alliance. Accessed 2019-07-14. DOI: 10.15497/RDA00016
    Back to article
  61. 61Schopf, JM. 2012. Treating data like software: A case for production quality data. Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 11–14 June 2012. Washington DC. DOI: 10.1145/2232817.2232846
    Back to article
  62. 62Silvello, G. 2018. Theory and practice of data citation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69: 6–20. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23917
    Back to article
  63. 63Smith, AM, Katz, DS, Niemeyer, KE, FORCE11 and SCWG. 2016. Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2: e86. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.86
    Back to article
  64. 64Stall, S, et al. 2018. Advancing FAIR data in Earth, space, and environmental science. Eos, 99. DOI: 10.1029/2018EO109301
    Back to article
  65. 65Stockhause, M and Lautenschlager, M. 2017. CMIP6 data citation of evolving data. Data Science Journal, 16. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-030
    Back to article
  66. 66Stuart, D. 2017. Data bibliometrics: Metrics before norms. Online Information Review, 41: 428–435. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-01-2017-0008
    Back to article
  67. 67TGDCSP – Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices, CODATA-ICSTI. 2013. Out of cite, out of mind: The current state of practice, policy, and technology for the citation of data. Data Science Journal, 12: CIDCR1–CIDCR75. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.OSOM13-043
    Back to article
  68. 68Wilkinson, MD, et al. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  69. 69Wittenburg, P, Hellström, M, Zwölf, CM, Abroshan, H, et al. (eds.) 2017. Persistent identifiers: Consolidated assertions. Research Data Alliance. DOI: 10.15497/RDA00027
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-052 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 30, 2019
Accepted on: Oct 4, 2019
Published on: Nov 1, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
data citation,
FAIR,
credit,
access,
impact,
micro-citation,
persistent identifiers

© 2019 Mark A. Parsons, Ruth E. Duerr, Matthew B. Jones, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 18 (2019): Issue 1Next article