Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Policy Needs to Go Hand in Hand with Practice: The Learning and Listening Approach to Data Management Cover

Policy Needs to Go Hand in Hand with Practice: The Learning and Listening Approach to Data Management

Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. 4TU.Federation. 2019. Available at https://www.4tu.nl/en/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  2. 4TU.ResearchData. 2019. Available at https://researchdata.4tu.nl/en/home/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  3. Akhmerov, A and Steele, G. 2019. Open Data Policy of the Quantum Nanoscience Department, TU Delft. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2556949
  4. Andrews Mancilla, H, Teperek, M, van Dijck, J, den Heijer, K, Eggermont, R, Plomp, E, Turkyilmaz-van der Velden, Y and Kurapati, S. 2019. On a Quest for Cultural Change – Surveying Research Data Management Practices at Delft University of Technology. LIBER Quarterly, 29(1): 127. DOI: 10.18352/lq.10287
  5. Ball, M, Bloemers, M, Carr, D, Cavalli, V, Haglund, M, Kalaitzi, V, Papadopoulou, E, Quattroni, P, Robertson, D, Stojanovski, J, Teperek, M, Turkyilmaz-van der Velden, Y and Vandevelde, K. 2018. A Vision for Open Science. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1491302
  6. Benedictus, R, Miedema, F and Ferguson, MWJ. 2016. Fewer numbers, better science. Nature, 538(7626): 453455. DOI: 10.1038/538453a
  7. Byrne, M. 2017. Making Progress Toward Open Data: Reflections on Data Sharing at PLOS ONE. Available at https://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2017/05/08/making-progress-toward-open-data [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  8. Center for Open Science (COS). n.d. TOP Guidelines. Available at https://cos.io/top/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  9. Chen, X, Dallmeier-Tiessen, S, Dasler, R, Feger, S, Fokianos, P, Gonzalez, JB, Hirvonsalo, H, Kousidis, D, Lavasa, A, Mele, S, Rodriguez, DR, Šimko, T, Smith, T, Trisovic, A, Trzcinska, A, Tsanaktsidis, I, Zimmermann, M, Cranmer, K, Heinrich, L, Watts, G, Hildreth, M, Lloret Iglesias, L, Lassila-Perini, K and Neubert, S. 2019. Open is not enough. Nature Physics, 15(2): 113119. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0342-2
  10. CoreTrustSeal. 2016. Data Seal of Approval 2013 for Repository 4TU.Datacentrum. Available at https://assessment.datasealofapproval.org/assessment_187/seal/html/ [Last accessed 29 January 2019].
  11. Cruz, M. 2018. Take research data management seriously and organize discipline specific support. Available at https://www.ub.vu.nl/en/news-agenda/news-archive/2018/okt-dec/take-research-data-management-seriously-and-organize-discipline-specific-support.aspx [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  12. Cruz, M and Gramsbergen, E. 2018. NetCDF At The 4TU.Centre For Research Data. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1465950
  13. Cruz, MJ and Dunning, A. 2018. Research Data Management within the 4TU Research Centres. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/sgftw
  14. Data Stewards. 2018. Templated For Structured RDM Interviews. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1472098
  15. Dintzner, N, den Heijer, K and Teperek, M. 2019 Coding problems? Just pop over! Available at https://openworking.wordpress.com/2019/02/04/coding-problems-just-pop-over/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  16. Domingus, M. 2017. Graag niet al te generiek. Gewetensvol datamanagement. Th&ma 2017-3 Zwemmen of verzuipen: zeeën van data, 2017(3): 5459.
  17. Dunning, A. 2018. TU Delft Research Data Framework Policy. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2573160
  18. Dunning, A. 2019. Research Data Policy for PhDs at TU Delft. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2599775
  19. European Commission. 2016. H2020 Programme: Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020 Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf [Last accessed 19 February 2019].
  20. Figueras i Ventura, J and Russchenberg, HWJ. 2008. IDRA, IRCTR drizzle radar: First results. In: 2008 IEEE Radar Conference, Presented at the 2008 IEEE Radar Conference (RADAR), 16. Rome, Italy: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/RADAR.2008.4721065
  21. Gunawan, D and Amalia, A. 2016. The Implementation of open data in Indonesia. In: 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE), 16. Denpasar on 26–27 October 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ICODSE.2016.7936164
  22. Higman, R, Teperek, M and Kingsley, D. 2018. Creating a Community of Data Champions. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12(2): 96106. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.562
  23. Hrynaszkiewicz, I, Birukou, A, Astell, M, Swaminathan, S, Kenall, A and Khodiyar, V. 2017. Standardising and Harmonising Research Data Policy in Scholary Publishing. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12(1): 6571. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.531
  24. Jahnke, L, Asher, AD and Keralis, SDC. 2012. The problem of data. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
  25. Johnson, R and Chiarelli, A. 2017. Monitoring sector progress towards compliance with funder open access policies. Available at https://re.ukri.org/documents/2018/annex-a-research-consulting-development-of-an-oa-assessment-pdf/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  26. Kurapati, S and Teperek, M. 2018. 4TU.Centre for Research Data partners with The Carpentries: Impressions from the first workshop at TU Delft. Available at https://openworking.wordpress.com/2018/12/16/4tu-centre-for-research-data-partners-with-the-carpentries-impressions-from-the-first-workshop-at-tu-delft/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  27. Landelijk Coördinatiepunt Research Data Management (LCRDM). n.d. RDM in de praktijk (Put into practice). Available at https://www.edugroepen.nl/sites/RDM_platform/Datamanagement/Wikipages/Home.aspx [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  28. Love, JS. 2019a. A Subjective Assessment of Research Data in Design. Available at https://openworking.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/a-subjective-assessment-of-research-data-in-design/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  29. Love, JS. 2019b. Design Research Data – A Subjective Tale. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2592281
  30. Lowndes, JSS, Best, BD, Scarborough, C, Afflerbach, JC, Frazier, MR, O’Hara, CC, Jiang, N and Halpern, BS. 2017. Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(6): 0160. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0160
  31. Molenbroek, JFM. 2018. DINED – anthropometric database. 4TU.Centre for Research Data. DOI: 10.4121/uuid:199467d8-5c40-4a1f-a2f2-f2040db26270
  32. National Science Foundation (NSF). n.d. Open Data at NSF. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/data/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  33. Nature Research. n.d. Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols. Available at https://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  34. Naughton, L and Kernohan, D. 2016. Making sense of journal research data policies. Insights, 29(1): 8489. DOI: 10.1629/uksg.284
  35. Open Access Directory (OAD). 2018. Journal open-data policies. Available at http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Journal_open-data_policies [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  36. Open-source Project for a Network Data Access Protocol (OPeNDAP). 2019. Advanced Software for Remote Data Retrieval. Available at https://www.opendap.org/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  37. Otto, T, Russchenberg, HWJ, Reinoso Rondinel, RR, Unal, CMH and Yin, J. 2010. IDRA weather radar measurements – all data. TU Delft. DOI: 10.4121/uuid:5f3bcaa2-a456-4a66-a67b-1eec928cae6d
  38. Piwowar, HA and Vision, TJ. 2013. Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1: e175. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.175
  39. Plomp, E. 2019. Data Champion kick off meeting. Available at https://openworking.wordpress.com/2019/01/14/data-champion-kick-off-meeting/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  40. PLOS ONE. n.d. Data Availability. Available at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  41. Pryor, G, Jones, S and Whyte, A. 2013. Options and approaches to RDM service provision. In: Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of Good Practice. Facet Publishing. DOI: 10.29085/9781783300242
  42. Rans, J and Jones, S. 2013. RDM strategy: moving from plans to action. DCC RDM Services case studies. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available at: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/developing-rdm-services/rdm-strategy-moving-plans-action [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  43. Teperek, M. 2018. Views on Data Stewardship – report of preliminary findings at the Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management (TPM) at TU Delft. Open Science Framework. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8ce5v
  44. Teperek, M, Cruz, M, Verbakel, E, Böhmer, J and Dunning. 2018. Data Stewardship Addressing Disciplinary Data Management Needs. International Journal of Digital Curation, 13(1): 141149. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v13i1.604
  45. Teperek, M, Higman, R and Kingsley, D. 2018. Is Democracy the Right System? Collaborative Approaches to Building an Engaged RDM Community. International Journal of Digital Curation, 2017, 12(2): 8695 DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.561
  46. The Carpentries. n.d. Become a Member Organisation. Available at https://carpentries.org/membership/[Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  47. The Dutch Research Council (NWO). 2014. DANS: Dutch Song Database and DINED receive Dutch Data Prize 2014. Available at https://www.nwo.nl/en/news-and-events/news/2014/dans/dans-dutch-song-database-and-dined-receive-dutch-data-prize-2014.html [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  48. The Dutch Research Council (NWO). n.d. Open (FAIR) data. Available at https://www.nwo.nl/en/policies/open+science/data+management [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  49. TU Delft Data Stewards, EPFL Library Research Data Team, Krause, J, Lambeng, N, Andrews, H, Boehmer, J, Cruz, M, van Dijck, J, den Heijer, K, van der Kruyk, M and Teperek, M. 2018. Quantitative assessment of research data management practice. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2613680
  50. TU Delft Library. 2018. Data Champions. Available at https://www.tudelft.nl/en/library/current-topics/research-data-management/research-data-management/data-stewardship/data-champions/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  51. TU Delft Library. 2019. Our Data Champions. Available at https://www.tudelft.nl/en/library/current-topics/research-data-management/research-data-management/data-stewardship/data-champions/our-data-champions/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  52. Utrecht University. 2016. University policy framework for research data Utrecht University. Available at https://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/university_policy_framework_for_research_data_utrecht_university_-_january_2016_0.pdf [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  53. van Belle, JP. 2018. Africa Data Revolution Report 2018: Status and Emerging Impact to Open Data in Africa. Available at https://namati.org/resources/africa-data-revolution-report-2018-status-and-emerging-impact-to-open-data-in-africa/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  54. Vandewalle, P. 2012. Code Sharing Is Associated with Research Impact in Image Processing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 14(4): 4247. DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2012.63
  55. van Dijck, J. 2018. Do as you preach: results of 2017/2018 data management survey now published. Available at https://openworking.wordpress.com/2018/02/07/do-as-you-preach-results-of-2017-data-management-survey-now-published/ [Last accessed 26 August 2019].
  56. van Wezenbeek, W, Touwen, H, Versteeg, A and van Wesenbeeck, A. 2017. Nationaal plan open science. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. DOI: 10.4233/uuid:9e9fa82e-06c1-4d0d-9e20-5620259a6c65
  57. van Zeeland, H and Ringersma, J. 2017. The Development of a Research Data Policy at Wageningen University & Research: Best Practices as a Framework. Liber Quarterly, 27(1): 153170. DOI: 10.18352/lq.10215
  58. Verhaar, P, Schoots, F, Sesink, L and Frederiks, F. 2017. Fostering Effective Data Management Practices at Leiden University. Liber Quarterly, 27(1): 122. DOI: 10.18352/lq.10185
  59. Versteeg, A, van der Kuil, A and Dunning, AC. 2016. Motivations for Sharing Research Data at Delft University of Technology. TU Delft. DOI: 10.4121/uuid:d20e37bc-3f74-4c64-b88a-fe089ffae2f2
  60. Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, CT, Finkers, R, Gonzalez-Beltran, A, Gray, AJG, Groth, P, Goble, C, Grethe, JS, Heringa, J, ’t Hoen, PAC, Hooft, R, Kuhn, T, Kok, R, Kok, J, Lusher, SJ, Martone, ME, Mons, A, Packer, AL, Persson, B, Rocca-Serra, P, Roos, M, van Schaik, R, Sansone, S-A, Schultes, E, Sengstag, T, Slater, T, Strawn, G, Swertz, MA, Thompson, M, van der Lei, J, van Mulligen, E, Velterop, J, Waagmeester, A, Wittenburg, P, Wolstencroft, K, Zhao, J and Mons, B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 45
Submitted on: Mar 29, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 29, 2019
Published on: Sep 12, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Maria Cruz, Nicolas Dintzner, Alastair Dunning, Annemiek van der Kuil, Esther Plomp, Marta Teperek, Yasemin Turkyilmaz-van der Velden, Anke Versteeg, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.