References
- 1Banerjee, SB. 2003.
The Practice of Stakeholder Colonialism: National Interest and Colonial Discourses in the Management of Indigenous Stakeholders . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781403982292_11 - 2Berry, A. 2009. Two forests under the big sky: Tribal v. federal management, PERC Policy Series No. 45. Available at
http://www.perc.org/articles/article1174.php . - 3British Columbia First Nation’s Data Governance Initiative. 2018. British Columbia First Nation’s Data Governance Initiative. Available at
http://www.bcfndgi.com/ [Last accessed 23 August 2018]. - 4Bruhn, J. 2014. Identifying Useful Approaches to the Governance of Indigenous Data. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(2). Retrieved from:
http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol5/iss2/5 . DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2014.5.2.5 - 5Cajete, G. 2000.
Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence . Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers. - 6Champagne, D. 2012.
Captured justice: Native Nations and Public Law 280 . Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press - 7Cornell, S, Curtis, C and Jorgensen, M. 2004. The Concept of Governance and its Implications for First Nations. February 2004. Available at
https://hpaied.org/sites/default/files/publications/The%20Concept%20of%20Governance%20and%20its%20Implications%20for%20First%20Nations.pdf [Last date accessed 30 August 2018]. - 8Cornell, S and Kalt, J. 2007.
Two approaches to the development of Native Nations: One works, the other doesn’t . In: Jorgensen, M (ed.), Rebuilding Native nations, pp. 1–33. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. - 9Cross, T, Fox, K, Becker-Green, J, Smith, J and Willeto, AAA. 2004. Case studies in tribal data collection and use. Seattle, WA: National Indian Child Welfare Association.
- 10Davis, M. 2016. Data and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.). DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.02
- 11De Beer, J. 2016.
Ownership and Open Data: Governance Options for Agriculture and Nutrition . Oxfordshire: GODAN – Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition. Available athttp://www.godan.info/sites/default/files/documents/Godan_Ownership_of_Open_Data_Publication_lowres.pdf . - 12Deloria, V,
Jr and Lytle, CM. 1983.American Indians, American Justice Introduction . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. - 13de Sousa Santos, B. 2007. Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledge. Eurozine, 33: 45–89.
- 14Donatuto, J, Grossman, E, Konovsky, J, Grossman, S and Campbell, L. 2014. Indigenous Community Health and Climate Change: Integrating Biophysical and Social Science Indicators. Coastal Management, 42(4): 355–373. DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2014.923140
- 15Duthu, NB. 2008.
American Indians and the Law . London: Penguin Publishing Group. ISBN978-1-101-15791-6 . - 16Edwards, K, Morris, P and Red Thunder, S. 2009. Exercising sovereignty and expanding economic opportunity through tribal land management. Available at
http://www.issuelab.org/resources/2938/2938.pdf [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 17Federal Register. 2019.
Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs , Washington DC. - 18First Nation’s Information Governance Centre. 2018. First Nation’s Information Governance Centre. Available at
https://fnigc.ca/ [Last date accessed 23 August 2018]. - 19Galloway, WC. 1995. Tribal water quality standards under the Clean Water Act: Protecting traditional cultural uses. Washington Law Review, 70: 177.
- 20Garrison, N, Hudson, M, Ballantine, L, Garba, I, Martinez, A, Taualii, M, Arbour, L, Caron, NR and Rainie, SC. 2019. “Genomic Research through an Indigenous Lens: Understanding the Expectations.” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics Volume 20. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015434
- 21Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development. 2006.
Honoring nations: Celebrating excellence in tribal governance . Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. - 22Holm, T, Pearson, JD and Chavis, B. 2003. Peoplehood: A Model for the Extension of Sovereignty in American Indian Studies. Wicazo Sa Review, 18(1): 7–24.
Spring 2003. Press. DOI: 10.1353/wic.2003.0004 - 23Hudson, M, Anderson, T, Dewes, TK, Temara, P, Whaanga, H and Roa, T. 2018.
He Matapihi ki te Mana Raraunga: Conceptualising Big Data through a Maori lens . In: Whaanga, H, Keegan, TT and Apperley, M (eds.), He Whare Hangarau Māori -Language, culture & technology[Ebook], pp. 62–71. Hamilton: Te PuaWānanga ki te Ao, Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato. - 24Independent Expert Advisory Group. 2014. Mobilising the data revolution for sustainable development. Available at
http://www.undatarevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/execsum.pdf [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 25Jorgensen, M. (ed.) 2007.
Rebuilding Native Nations . Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. - 26Khatri, V and Brown, CV. 2010. Designing Data Governance Communications of the ACM. 53(1): 148–152. DOI: 10.1145/1629175.1629210
- 27Krepps, MB and Caves, RE. 1994. Bureaucrats and Indians: Principal agent relations and efficient management of tribal forest resources. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24(2): 133–151. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90022-1
- 28Kukutai, T and Taylor, J. 2016.
Data Sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Current Practice and Future Needs . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, pp. 79–97. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.01 - 29Lujan, CC. 2014. American Indians and Alaska Natives Count: The US Census Bureau’s Efforts to Enumerate the Native Population. American Indian Quarterly, 38(3): 319–341. DOI: 10.5250/amerindiquar.38.3.0319
- 30Martinez Cobo, J. 1982. Study of the Problem of Discrimination Against Indigenous Populations Final Report. Available at
https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/publications/martinez-cobo-study.html [Last date accessed 9 March 2019]. - 31National Conference of State Legislatures. 2016. Federal and State Recognized Tribes. October 2016. Available at
http://www.ncsl.org/research/state-tribal-institute/list-of-federal-and-state-recognized-tribes.aspx#State [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 32National Congress of American Indians. 2018. Resolution KAN-18-011: Support of US Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Inclusion of Tribes in the Development of Tribal Data Governance Principles. 4 June 2018. Available at
http://www.ncai.org/attachments/Resolution_gbuJbEHWpkOgcwCICRtgMJHMsUNofqYvuMSnzLFzOdxBlMlRjij_KAN-18-011%20Final.pdf [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 33National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center. 2017. Recommendations from tribal experiences with tribal censuses and surveys. October 2017. Available at
http://www.ncai.org/policy-research-center/initiatives/Tribal_Experiences_10_31_2017_FINAL.pdf [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 34National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center and MSU Center for Native Health Partnerships. 2012. ‘Walk softly and listen carefully’: Building research relationships with tribal communities. Available at
http://www.ncai.org/attachments/PolicyPaper_SpMCHTcjxRRjMEjDnPmesENPzjHTwhOlOWxlWOIWdSrykJuQggG_NCAI-WalkSoftly.pdf [Last date accessed 30 August 2018]. - 35National Institutes of Health. 2014. Genomic Data Sharing Policy, 79 Fed. Reg. 51345–54. 28 August 2014. Available at
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/08/28/2014-20385/final-nih-genomic-data-sharing-policy . - 36National Park Service. 2018. What is the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, unknown. Available at
https://www.nps.gov/nagpra/FAQ/INDEX.HTM#What_is_NAGPRA [Last accessed date 23 August 2018]. - 37Navajo Nation. 2009. Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board. Unknown. Available at
http://www.nnhrrb.navajo-nsn.gov/ [Last accessed date 23 August 2018]. - 38Nickerson, M. 2017. First Nation’s Data Governance: Measuring the Nation-to-Nation Relationship Discussion Paper, May 2017. Available at
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/558c624de4b0574c94d62a61/t/5ade9674575d1fb25a1c873b/1524536949054/NATION-TO-NATION_FN_DATA_GOVERNANCE_-_FINAL_-_EN.DOCX . - 39Norris, T, Vines, PL and Hoeffel, EM. 2012. The American Indian and Alaska Native Population: 2010. Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-10.pdf . - 40Rainie, SC, Kukutai, T, Walter, M, Figueroa-Rodriguez, OL, Walker, J and Axelsson, P. 2019.
Issues in Open Data: Indigenous Data Sovereignty . In: Davies, T, Walker, S, Rubinstein, M and Perini, F (eds.), The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons, pp. 300–319. Cape Town and Ottawa: African Minds and International Development Research Centre. - 41Rainie, SC, Rodriguez-Lonebear, D and Martinez, A. 2017a. Policy Brief: Indigenous Data Sovereignty in the United States. Available at
http://nni.arizona.edu/application/files/1715/1579/8037/Policy_Brief_Indigenous_Data_Sovereignty_in_the_United_States.pdf . - 42Rainie, SC, Rodriguez-Lonebear, D and Martinez, A. 2017b. Policy Brief: Data Governance for Native Nation Rebuilding (Version 2). Available at
http://nni.arizona.edu/application/files/8415/0007/5708/Policy_Brief_Data_Governance_for_Native_Nation_Rebuilding_Version_2.pdf . - 43Rainie, SC, Schultz, JL, Briggs, E, Riggs, P and Palmanteer-Holder, NL. 2017c. Data as strategic resource: Self-determination and the data challenge for United States Indigenous nations. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2). Retrieved from
http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol8/iss2/1 . DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.1 - 44Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. 2016.
Building a data revolution in Indian country . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, pp. 253–272. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.14 - 45Rouse, M. 2013. Data Sovereignty. 8 April 2017. Available at
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/data-sovereignty [Last date accessed 30 August 2018]. - 46Smith, D. 2016.
Governing data and data for governance: the everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, pp. 253–272. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.07 - 47Swinomish Climate Change Initiative. Undated Swinomish tribe and climate change, Unknown. Available at
http://www.swinomish-nsn.gov/climate_change/index2.html [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 48The Economist. 2017. The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data, 6 May 2017. Available at
https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21721656-data-economy-demands-new-approach-antitrust-rules-worlds-most-valuable-resource [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 49The School for Advanced Research. 2018. Community + Museum Guidelines for Collaboration. Unknown. Available at
https://sarweb.org/guidelinesforcollaboration/ [Last date accessed 23 August 2018]. - 50Thompson, JH. 2015. Happy Census Day. 1 April 2015. Available at
https://www.census.gov/people/news/issues/vol3issue6.html . - 51United Nations. 2009. State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. Unknown. Available at
https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP/en/SOWIP_web.pdf [Last accessed 28 August 2018]. - 52United Nations Development Programme. 2011. Governance Principles, Institutional Capacity and Quality. Towards Human Resilience: Sustaining MDG Progress in an Age of Economic Uncertainty. 13 October 2011. Available at
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/poverty-reduction/inclusive_development/towards_human_resiliencesustainingmdgprogressinanageofeconomicun.html [Last date accessed 29 August 2018]. - 53United Nations Human Rights. 2018. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy. 17 October 2018. Available at
https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Privacy/SR_Privacy/A_73_45712.docx [Last data accessed 10 March 2019]. - 54United States Census Bureau. 2012. Census Bureau Releases Estimates of Undercount and Overcount in the 2010 Census. 22 May 2012. Available at
https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb12-95.html [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. - 55Urban Indian Health Institute. 2018. Urban Indian Health Institute website. Unknown. Available at
http://www.uihi.org/ [Last date accessed 23 August 2018]. - 56Wakeling, S, Jorgensen, M, Michaelson, S and Begay, M. 2001.
Policing on American Indian reservations . July 2001. Washington: US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs. Available athttp://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS55710 [Last date accessed 30 August 2018]. DOI: 10.1037/e527932006-002 - 57Walter, M. 2016.
Data politics and Indigenous representation in Australian statistics . In: Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, pp. 79–98. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.05 - 58Walter, M. 2018. The Voice of Indigenous Data: Beyond the markers of disadvantage First Things First. Griffith Review, 60: 256–263, Available at
https://griffithreview.com/articles/voice-indigenous-data-beyond-disadvantage/ [Last date accessed 9 March 2019]. - 59Walter, M, Lovett, R, Bodkin Andrews, G and Lee, V. 2018.
Indigenous Data Sovereignty Briefing Paper 1 . Miaim nayri Wingara Data Sovereignty Group and the Australian Indigenous Governance Institute. We acknowledge the pioneering contribution of John Taylor. - 60Walter, M and Suina, M. 2018. Indigenous data, indigenous methodologies and Indigenous data sovereignty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology [Last date accessed 28 August 2018]. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1531228
- 61Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Mons, B, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 6(1). DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18