Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Column Styled Composable Schema Matcher for Semantic Data-Types Cover

A Column Styled Composable Schema Matcher for Semantic Data-Types

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Algergawy, A, Nayak, R and Saake, G. 2010. Element similarity measures in xml schema matching. Information Sciences 180(24): 49754998. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.022
  2. Amann, B, Fundulaki, I, Scholl, M, Beeri, C and Vercoustre, A-M. 2001. Mapping xml fragments to community web ontologies. WebDB 2001-International Workshop on the Web and Databases, pp. 97102.
  3. Berlin, J and Motro, A. 2002. Database schema matching using machine learning with feature selection. International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Springer, pp. 452466.
  4. Bex, GJ, Neven, F and Van den Bussche, J. 2004. Dtds versus xml schema: a practical study. Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on the web and databases: colocated with ACM SIGMOD/PODS 2004, ACM, pp. 7984. DOI: 10.1145/1017074.1017095
  5. Biron, PV, Malhotra, A, WWW Consortium, et al. 2004. Xml schema part 2: Datatypes.
  6. Bischof, S, Decker, S, Krennwallner, T, Lopes, N and Polleres, A. 2012. Mapping between rdf and xml with xsparql. Journal on Data Semantics 1(3): 147185. DOI: 10.1007/s13740-012-0008-7
  7. Breitling, F. 2009. A standard transformation from xml to rdf via xslt. Astronomische Nachrichten: Astronomical Notes 330(7): 755760. DOI: 10.1002/asna.200811233
  8. Brickley, D, Guha, RV and McBride, B. 2014. Rdf schema 1.1. W3C recommendation 25: 20042014.
  9. Davy Van, D, Chris, P, Gaëtan, M, Erik, M and Rik Van de, W. 2008. Xml to rdf conversion: A generic approach. 2008 International Conference on Automated Solutions for Cross Media Content and Multi-Channel Distribution, pp. 138144.
  10. Do, H-H and Rahm, E. 2002. Coma: A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB ’02, VLDB Endowment, pp. 610621. URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1287369.1287422. DOI: 10.1016/B978-155860869-6/50060-3
  11. Garcia-Gonzalez, H and Labra-Gayo, JE. 2018. Xmlschema2shex: Converting xml validation to rdf validation. Semantic Web (Preprint): 119. DOI: 10.3233/SW-180329
  12. Klein, M. 2002. Interpreting xml documents via an rdf schema ontology, Database and expert systems applications. 2002 proceedings 13th international workshop on IEEE, pp. 889893.
  13. Li, W-S and Clifton, C. 2000. Semint: A tool for identifying attribute correspondences in heterogeneous databases using neural networks. Data & Knowledge Engineering 33(1): 4984. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-023X(99)00044-0
  14. McGuinness, DL, Van Harmelen, F, et al. 2004. Owl web ontology language overview. W3C recommendation 10(10): 2004.
  15. Mikolov, T, Sutskever, I, Chen, K, Corrado, GS and Dean, J. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 31113119.
  16. Miller, GA. 1995. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM 38(11): 3941. DOI: 10.1145/219717.219748
  17. Nadeau, D and Sekine, S. 2007. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes 30(1): 326. DOI: 10.1075/li.30.1.03nad
  18. Nayak, R and Tran, T. 2007. A progressive clustering algorithm to group the xml data by structural and semantic similarity. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 21(4): 723743. DOI: 10.1142/S0218001407005648
  19. Prud’hommeaux, E, Labra Gayo, JE and Solbrig, H. 2014. Shape expressions: an rdf validation and transformation language. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Semantic Systems, ACM, pp. 3240. DOI: 10.1145/2660517.2660523
  20. Rahm, E and Bernstein, PA. 2001. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal 10(4): 334350. DOI: 10.1007/s007780100057
  21. Silla, CN and Freitas, AA. 2011. A survey of hierarchical classification across different application domains. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 22(1): 3172. DOI: 10.1007/s10618-010-0175-9
  22. Sun, A and Lim, E-P. 2001. Hierarchical text classification and evaluation. Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 521528.
  23. Tao, J, Sirin, E, Bao, J and McGuinness, DL. 2010. Integrity constraints in owl. AAAI.
  24. Thuy, PTT, Lee, Y-K and Lee, S. 2012. S-trans: Semantic transformation of xml healthcare data into owl ontology. Knowledge-Based Systems 35: 349356. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.04.009
  25. Thuy, PTT, Lee, Y-K and Lee, S. 2013. A semantic approach for transforming xml data into rdf ontology. Wireless Personal Communications 73(4): 13871402. DOI: 10.1007/s11277-013-1256-z
  26. Thuy, PTT, Lee, Y-K, Lee, S and Jeong, B-S. 2007. Transforming valid xml documents into rdf via rdf schema. Next Generation Web Services Practices, 2007. NWeSP 2007. Third International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 3540. DOI: 10.1109/NWESP.2007.23
  27. Yang, D and Powers, DM. 2005. Measuring semantic similarity in the taxonomy of wordnet. Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Australasian conference on Computer Science-Volume 38, Australian Computer Society, Inc., pp. 315322.
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 23, 2019
|
Accepted on: May 14, 2019
|
Published on: Jun 24, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Xiaofeng Liao, Jordy Bottelier, Zhiming Zhao, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.