Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interdisciplinary Comparison of Scientific Impact of Publications Using the Citation-Ratio Cover

Interdisciplinary Comparison of Scientific Impact of Publications Using the Citation-Ratio

By: Arthur R. Bos and  Sandrine Nitza  
Open Access
|May 2019

References

  1. Bartneck, C and Kokkelmans, S. 2011. Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 87(1): 8598. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0306-5
  2. Bornmann, L, Mutz, R, Neuhaus, C and Daniel, HD. 2008. Use of citation counts for research evaluation: Standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8: 93102. DOI: 10.3354/esep00084
  3. Bos, AR, Gumanao, GS and Salac, FN. 2008. A newly discovered predator of the crown-of-thorns starfish. Coral Reefs, 27(3): 581. DOI: 10.1007/s00338-008-0364-9
  4. Castellano, C and Radicchi, F. 2009. On the fairness of using relative indicators for comparing citation performance in different disciplines. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapia Experimentalis, 57: 8590. DOI: 10.1007/s00005-009-0014-0
  5. Egghe, L. 2010. The Hirsch-index and related impact measures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44: 65144. DOI: 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440109
  6. Glänzel, W and Moed, H. 2002. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2): 171193. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014848323806
  7. Han, H, Zha, H and Giles, CL. 2005. Name disambiguation in author citations using a k-way spectral clustering method. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference, Denver, TX, 334343. DOI: 10.1145/1065385.1065462
  8. Hirsch, JE. 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46): 1656916572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  9. Lillquist, E and Green, S. 2010. The discipline dependence of citation statistics. Scientometrics, 84(3): 749762. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0162-3
  10. Porter, AL and Rafols, I. 2009. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3): 719745. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
  11. Schubert, A and Braun, T. 1993. Reference standards for citation based assessments. Scientometrics, 26(1): 2135. DOI: 10.1007/BF02016790
  12. Thijs, B and Glänzel, W. 2006. The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric meso-indicators. The case of European universities. Scientometrics, 66(1): 7180. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0006-3
  13. Thomson Reuters. 2016. Web of Science. Available at http://webofknowledge.com [Last accessed 14 January 2016].
  14. Vieira, ES and Gomes, JANF. 2010. Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features. Journal of Informetrics, 4: 113. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002
  15. Wagner, CS, Roessner, JD, Bobb, K, Thompson Klein, J, Boyack, KW, Keyton, J, Rafols, I and Börner, K. 2011. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 165: 1426. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 26, 2017
|
Accepted on: May 5, 2019
|
Published on: May 27, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Arthur R. Bos, Sandrine Nitza, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.