References
- 1ANSI SDOs. n.d. Standards Developing Organizations (SDOs) [WWW Document]. URL:
https://www.standardsportal.org/usa_en/resources/sdo.aspx (accessed 9.23.18). - 2ASTM E56 on Nanotechnology [WWW Document]. n.d. URL:
https://www.astm.org/COMMITTEE/E56.htm (accessed 8.31.17). - 3ASTM International. n.d. ASTM International – Standards Worldwide [WWW Document]. URL:
https://www.astm.org/ (accessed 9.23.18). - 4Boverhof, DR, Bramante, CM, Butala, JH, Clancy, SF, Lafranconi, M, West, J and Gordon, SC. 2015. Comparative assessment of nanomaterial definitions and safety evaluation considerations. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol, 73: 137–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.001
- 5Bruno, I and Frey, JG. 2017. Connecting chemistry with global challenges through data standards. Chem. Int, 39: 5–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.001
- 6CEN. n.d. Home [WWW Document]. URL:
https://www.cen.eu/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 9.23.18). - 7CEN|HOME PAGE [WWW Document]. n.d. URL:
https://www.cen.org/index.cfm? (accessed 9.23.18). - 8CODATA. 2018. CODATA/VAMAS Joint Working Group on the Description of Nanomaterials – CODATA [WWW Document]. URL:
http://www.codata.org/nanomaterials (accessed 8.7.18). - 9CODATA. n.d. CODATA, The Committee on Data for Science and Technology [WWW Document]. URL:
http://www.codata.org/ (accessed 9.23.18). - 10Dale, AL, Casman, EA, Lowry, GV, Lead, JR, Viparelli, E and Baalousha, M. 2015a.
Modeling nanomaterial environmental fate in aquatic systems . ACS Publications. - 11Dale, AL, Lowry, GV and Casman, EA. 2015b. Stream Dynamics and Chemical Transformations Control the Environmental Fate of Silver and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in a Watershed-Scale Model. Environ. Sci. Technol, 49: 7285–7293. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01205
- 12Hall, SR and McMahon, B. 2005.
International Tables for Crystallography, Definition and Exchange of Crystallographic Data . Springer Science & Business Media. - 13Hanisch, RJ. 2015. The development, deployment, and impact of the virtual observatory, Part II. Astron. Comput, 11: 73–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2015.04.001
- 14Hastings, J, Jeliazkova, N, Owen, G, Tsiliki, G, Munteanu, CR, Steinbeck, C and Willighagen, E. 2015. eNanoMapper: Harnessing ontologies to enable data integration for nanomaterial risk assessment. J. Biomed. Semant, 6: 1. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-015-0005-5
- 15Hill, DP, Adams, N, Bada, M, Batchelor, C, Berardini, TZ, Dietze, H, Drabkin, HJ, Ennis, M, Foulger, RE and Harris, MA. 2013. Dovetailing biology and chemistry: integrating the Gene Ontology with the ChEBI chemical ontology. BMC Genomics, 14: 513. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-513
- 16ICSU. 2018. Home [WWW Document]. Int. Sci. Counc. URL:
https://council.science/ (accessed 9.23.18). - 17IEC. n.d. Welcome to the IEC – International Electrotechnical Commission [WWW Document]. URL:
https://www.iec.ch/ (accessed 9.23.18). - 18ISO – International Organization for Standardization [WWW Document]. n.d. URL:
https://www.iso.org/home.html (accessed 9.23.18). - 19ISO TC 229. 2016. ISO Technical Committee 229 Nanotechnologies [WWW Document]. ISO Tech. Comm. 229 Nanotechnologies. URL:
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_technical_committee?commid=381983 . - 20IUPAC. n.d. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry [WWW Document]. IUPAC Int. Union Pure Appl. Chem. URL:
https://iupac.org/ (accessed 9.23.18). - 21Karcher, S, Willighagen, EL, Rumble, J, Ehrhart, F, Evelo, CT, Fritts, M, Gaheen, S, Harper, SL, Hoover, MD and Jeliazkova, N. 2018. Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: Challenges and recommendations. NanoImpact, 9: 85–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2017.11.002
- 22Marchese-Robinson, RL, Lynch, I, Peijnenburg, W, Rumble, J, Klaessig, F, Marquardt, C, Rauscher, H, Puzyn, T, Purian, R, Åberg, C, Harper, S, et al. 2016. How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated? Nanoscale, 8: 9919–9943. DOI: 10.1039/C5NR08944A
- 23Mills, KC, Murry, D, Guzan, KA and Ostraat, ML. 2014. Nanomaterial registry: Database that captures the minimal information about nanomaterial physico-chemical characteristics. J. Nanoparticle Res, 16: 2219. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-2219-8
- 24OECD WPMN. 2016. OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials [WWW Document]. Saf. Nanomater. URL:
http://www.oecd.org/science/nanosafety/ . - 25Quinn, PJ, Barnes, DG, Csabai, I, Cui, C, Genova, F, Hanisch, B, Kembhavi, A, Kim, SC, Lawrence, A and Malkov, O. 2004. The International Virtual Observatory Alliance: Recent technical developments and the road ahead. In: Optimizing Scientific Return for Astronomy through Information Technologies. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 137–146. DOI: 10.1117/12.551247
- 26Roco, MC. 2011.
The Long View of Nanotechnology Development: The National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 Years . In: Roco, MC, Hersam, MC and Mirkin, CA (eds.), Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Retrospective and Outlook, 1–28. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1168-6_1 - 27Rumble, JR. 2017. Accessing Materials Data: Challenges and Directions in the Digital Era. Integrating Mater. Manuf. Innov, 6: 172–186. DOI: 10.1007/s40192-017-0095-2
- 28Sayle, R. 2009. Foreign language translation of chemical nomenclature by computer. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 49: 519–530. DOI: 10.1021/ci800243w
- 29WDS. n.d. Introduction — World Data System: Trusted Data Services for Global Science [WWW Document]. URL:
https://www.icsu-wds.org/organization (accessed 9.23.18).