Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Expanding the Research Data Management Service Portfolio at Bielefeld University According to the Three-pillar Principle Towards Data FAIRness Cover

Expanding the Research Data Management Service Portfolio at Bielefeld University According to the Three-pillar Principle Towards Data FAIRness

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. 1Ayer, V, Pietsch, C, Vompras, J, Schirrwagen, J, Wiljes, C, et al. 2017a. Conquaire: Towards an architecture supporting continuous quality control to ensure reproducibility of research. D-Lib Magazine, CNRI (USA), 23(1/2). DOI: 10.1045/january2017-ayer
  2. 2Ayer, V, Pietsch, C, Vompras, J, Schirrwagen, J, Wiljes, C, et al. 2017b. Enabling Git based research data quality control for institutional repositories. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-29161886. Presented at Research Data Alliance (RDA), Repository Platforms for Research Data IG, 9th Plenary meeting, Barcelona.
  3. 3Bibliotheksverband, D. 2018. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken 2025. https://www.bibliotheksverband.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Sektionen/sektion4/Publikationen/WB2025_Endfassung_endg.pdf.
  4. 4Cimiano, P, McCrae, J, Jahn, N, Pietsch, C, Schirrwagen, J, et al. 2015. CONQUAIRE: Continuous quality control for research data to ensure reproducibility: An institutional approach. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.31298
  5. 5Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. 2015. DFG Guidelines on the Handling of Research Data. http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/antragstellung/forschungsdaten/guidelines%20research%20data.pdf.
  6. 6Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. 2017. Guidelines Collaborative Research Centres. http://www.dfg.de/formulare/50_06/50_06_en.pdf.
  7. 7Edler, S, Meyermann, A, Gebel, T, Liebig, S and Diewald, M. 2012. The German Data Service Center for Business and Organizational Data (DSC-BO). Schmollers Jahrbuch, 132(4): 619634. DOI: 10.3790/schm.132.4.619
  8. 8EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research & Innovation. 2016. Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf.
  9. 9German Rector’s Conference (HRK). 2014. Management of research data a key strategic challenge for university management. Recommendation by the 16th General Meeting of the HRK on 13 May 2014 in Frankfurt/Main. https://www.hrk.de/fileadmin/vmigrated/content_uploads/HRK_Empfehlung_Forschungsdaten_13052014_EN.pdf.
  10. 10Kehm, BM. 2013. To be or not to be? The impacts of the excellence initiative on the German system of higher education. In: Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition, 8197. Springer DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4975-7_6
  11. 11Knorn, B. 2017. Strategieprozess der Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld und seine Folgen. Pro Libris, 22(3). https://www.bibliotheken-nrw.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Daten/Aktuelles/170921-Pro_Libris-web_Einzelseiten.pdf.
  12. 12Meier zu Verl, C and Horstmann, W. (eds.) 2011. Studies on Subject-Specific Requirements for Open Access Infrastructure. Universittsbibliothek. DOI: 10.2390/PUB-2011-1
  13. 13Pasquetto, I, Randles, B and Borgman, C. 2017. On the reuse of scientific data. Data Science Journal, 16: 8. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-008
  14. 14Peng, RD. 2009. Reproducible research and biostatistics. Biostatistics, 10(3): 405408. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp014
  15. 15Ram, K. 2013. Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science. Source Code for Biology and Medicine, 8(1): 7. ISSN: 1751-0473. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0473-8-7
  16. 16Steering Committee for the “Digital Information” Initiative of the Alliance of Science Organisations in Germany. 2017. Shaping digital transformation in science. “Digital Information” Initiative by the Alliance of Science Organizations in Germany. Mission statement 2018–2022. DOI: 10.2312/allianzoa.016
  17. 17Stodden, V, Guo, P and Ma, Z. 2013. Toward reproducible computational research: an empirical analysis of data and code policy adoption by journals. PloS one, 8(6): e67111. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067111
  18. 18Tenopir, C, Talja, S, Horstmann, W, Late, E, Hughes, D, et al. 2017. Research data services in European academic research libraries. Liber Quarterly, 27(1): 2344. ISSN: 2213-056X. DOI: 10.18352/lq.10180
  19. 19Vogl, R, Rudolph, D, Thoring, A, Angenent, H, Stieglitz, S, et al. 2016. How to Build a Cloud Storage Service for Half a Million Users in Higher Education: Challenges Met and Solutions Found. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 53285337. ISSN: 1530-1605. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.658
  20. 20Wiljes, C, Jahn, N, Lier, F, Paul-Stueve, T, Vompras, J, et al. 2013. Towards Linked Research Data: An Institutional Approach. In: Garca Castro, A, Lange, C, Lord, P and Stevens, R (eds.), 3rd Workshop on Semantic Publishing (SePublica), 994: 2738.
  21. 21Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  22. 22Wilms, K, Meske, C, Stieglitz, S, Rudolph, D and Vogl, R. 2016. How to Improve Research Data Management. In: Yamamoto, S (ed.), Human Interface and the Management of Information: Applications and Services, 434442. Cham: Springer International Publishing. ISBN: 978-3-319-40397-7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40397-7_41
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2018
Accepted on: Dec 14, 2018
Published on: Jan 15, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Jochen Schirrwagen, Philipp Cimiano, Vidya Ayer, Christian Pietsch, Cord Wiljes, Johanna Vompras, Dirk Pieper, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.