Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data Discovery Paradigms: User Requirements and Recommendations for Data Repositories Cover

Data Discovery Paradigms: User Requirements and Recommendations for Data Repositories

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. 1Assante, M, Candela, L, Castelli, D and Tani, A. 2016. Are Scientific Data Repositories Coping with Research Data Publishing? Data Science Journal, 15: 6. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2016-006
  2. 2Borgman, CL. 2015. Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. MIT press.
  3. 3Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  4. 4de Waard, A, Khalsa, SJ, Psomopoulos, F and Wu, M. 2017. RDA IG Data Discovery Paradigms IG: Use Cases data [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1050976
  5. 5Fenner, M, Crosas, M, Grethe, J, Kennedy, D, Hermjakob, H, Roca-Serra, P, Berjon, R, Martone, M and Clark, T. 2016. A Data Citation Roadmap for Scholarly Data Repositories. In: BioArxiv. DOI: 10.1101/097196
  6. 6Ferguson, N. 2016. Jisc Research Data Shared Service metadata focus group use cases [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.193011
  7. 7Gregory, K, Khalsa, SJ, Michener, WK, Psomopoulos, FE, de Waard, A and Wu, M. 2018. Eleven quick tips for finding research data. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(4): e1006038. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006038
  8. 8Hammond, T. 2010. nature.com OpenSearch: A Case Study in OpenSearch and SRU integration. D-Lib Magazine. Volume 16, Number , July/August 2010. DOI: 10.1045/july2010-hammond
  9. 9Hearst, M, Elliott, A, English, J, Sinha, R, Swearingen, K and Yee, K. 2002. Finding the Flow in Web Site Search. In: Communications of the ACM, 45(9): 4249. Sept. 2002. DOI: 10.1145/567498.567525
  10. 10Iosifescu Enescu, I, Plattner, G-K, Espona Pernas, L, Haas-Artho, D, Bischof, S, Lehning, M and Steffen, K. 2018. The EnviDat Concept for an Institutional Environmental Data Portal. Data Science Journal, 17: 28. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2018-028
  11. 11Joo, S and Lee, JY. 2011. Measuring the usability of academic digital libraries: Instrument development and validation. Electronic Library, 29(4): 523537. DOI: 10.1108/02640471111156777
  12. 12Kim, JY, Feild, H and Cartright, MA. 2012. Understanding Book Search Behavior on the Web. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM’12), 744753. Oct 29–Nov. 2, 2012, Maui, HI, USA.
  13. 13Koloniari, G, Ntarmos, N, Pitoura, E and Souravlias, D. 2011. One is enough: Distributed filtering for duplicate elimination. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM ‘11), Berendt, B, de Vries, A, Fan, W, Macdonald, C, Ounis, I and Ruthven, I (Eds.), 433442. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/2063576.2063643
  14. 14Lóscio, BF, Burle, C and Calegari, N. (eds.) 2017. Data on the Web Best Practices. (W3C Recommendation 31 January 2017). Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/ Accessed on 9 August 2017.
  15. 15Michener, WK, Allard, S, Budden, A, Cook, RB, Douglass, K, Frame, M, Kelling, S, Koskela, R, Tenopir, C and Vieglais, DA. 2012. Participatory Design of DataONE Enabling Cyberinfrastructure for the Biological and Environmental Sciences. United States. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.08.007
  16. 16Mihajlovic, V, Hiemstra, D, Blok, HE and Apers, PMG. 2006. Exploiting Query Structure and Document Structure to Improve Document Retrieval Effectiveness. Report from Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, is Available at: https://core.ac.uk/display/11470014.
  17. 17Murphy, D and Gautier, J. 2017. A comparative review of various data repositories. Accessed from: https://dataverse.org/blog/comparative-review-various-data-repositories on 29 Nov. 2017.
  18. 18Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. Publisher: Morgan Kaufmann.
  19. 19Nielsen, J. 1995. How to Conduct a Heuristic Evaluation. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-conduct-a-heuristic-evaluation/ accessed on 31 Oct. 2017.
  20. 20Niu, X and Hemminger, BM. 2010. Beyond text querying and ranking list: How people are searching through faceted catalogs in two library environments. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 47(1): 19. November/December 2010. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504701294
  21. 21Noy, N and Brickley, D. 2017. Facilitating the discovery of public datasets. Retrieved on 25 Oct. 2018 from Google AI Blog: https://ai.googleblog.com/2017/01/facilitating-discovery-of-public.html.
  22. 22Sanderson, M and Croft, WB. 2012. The History of Information Retrieval Research. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 100. Special Centenial Issue, 14441451. ISSN: 0018-9219. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2189916
  23. 23Shearer, K, Rodrigues, E, Walk, P and Perakakis, P. (2016, October). Next Generation Repositories. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.163264
  24. 24Soy, SK. 2018. The Case Study as a Research Method. Accessed 26/10/2018 from: http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~ssoy/usesusers/l391d1b.htm.
  25. 25Spärck, JK. 2006. Information retrieval and digital libraries: Lessons of research. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Research issues in digital libraries (IWRIDL ‘06), Majumder, P, Mitra, M and Parui, SK (Eds.), Article 1, 7 pages. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/1364742.1364743
  26. 26Spink, S, Wolfram, D, Jansen, BJ and Saracevic, T. 2001. Searching the Web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(3): 226234. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<;::AID-ASI1591>3.0.CO;2-R
  27. 27Turpin, A, Scholer, F, Jarvelin, K, Wu, M and Culpepper, JS. 2009. Including Summaries in System Evaluations. Proc. 32nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 508515. Boston, MA. July 2009. DOI: 10.1145/1571941.1572029
  28. 28Weissman, S, Ayhan, S, Bradley, J and Lin, J. 2015. Identifying Duplicate and Contradictory Information in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL ‘15), 5760. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/2756406.2756947
  29. 29Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data, 3: 160018 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  30. 30Wu, M, Fuller, M and Wilkinson, R. 2001. Searcher performance in question answering. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR ‘01), 375381. ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/383952.384028
  31. 31Wu, M and Treloar, A. 2015. Metadata in Research Data Australia and the Open Provenance Model: A Proposed Mapping. In: Weber, T, McPhee, MJ and Anderssen, RS (eds.), MODSIM2015, 21st International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 641647. December 2015, ISBN: 978-0-9872143-5-5. http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2015/C4/wu.pdf.
  32. 32Wu, M, Turpin, A, Puglisi, SJ, Scholer, F and Thom, JA. 2010. Presenting query aspects to support exploratory search. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on User Interface, 106: 2332.
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 22, 2018
Accepted on: Dec 13, 2018
Published on: Jan 8, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Mingfang Wu, Fotis Psomopoulos, Siri Jodha Khalsa, Anita de Waard, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.