References
- 1Bechhofer, S, et al. 2010.
Research Objects: Towards Exchange and Reuse of Digital Knowledge . Nature Precedings. Nature Publishing Group. DOI: 10.1038/npre.2010.4626.1 - 2Bizer, C, Heath, T and Berners-Lee, T. 2009. Linked Data – The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 5(3): 1–22. DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2009081901
- 3Blumenfeld, J. no date. The Global Change Master Directory: Data, Services, and Tools Serving the International Science Community. Available at:
https://earthdata.nasa.gov/gcmd-retrospective-and-future (Accessed: 11 May 2018). - 4Duerr, RE, et al. 2011.
On the utility of identification schemes for digital earth science data: An assessment and recommendations . Earth Science Informatics, 4(3): 139–160. Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-011-0083-6 - 5Force11. no date. Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. DOI: 10.25490/a97f-egyk
- 6Goodman, A, et al. 2014.
Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data . Bourne, PE (ed.), PLoS Computational Biology, 10(4):e1003542 . Public Library of Science. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542 - 7Hart, EM, et al. 2016.
Ten Simple Rules for Digital Data Storage . Markel, S (ed.), PLOS Computational Biology, 12(10):e1005097 . Public Library of Science. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005097 - 8Husen, SE, et al. 2017.
Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap . Data Science Journal, 16: 42. Ubiquity Press. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-042 - 9McQuilton, P, et al. 2016.
BioSharing: Curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences . Database, 2016: baw075. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/database/baw075 - 10Members of the RDA Research Data Repository Interoperability and Group. 2017. Research Data Repository Interoperability Primer. DOI: 10.15497/RDA00020
- 11Michener, WK, et al. 2012.
Participatory design of DataONE—Enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences . Ecological Informatics, 11: 5–15. Elsevier B.V. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.08.007 - 12PLOS ONE Editors. no date. PLOS Criteria for Recommended Data Repositories|EveryONE: The PLOS ONE blog. Available at:
http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2018/03/01/criteria-for-recommended-data-repositories/ (Accessed: 11 May 2018). - 13Porter, J. 2010.
A Controlled Vocabulary for LTER Datasets . LTER DataBits. Spring. Available at:http://databits.lternet.edu/issues/115 (Accessed: 11 May 2018). - 14Raskin, RG and Pan, MJ. 2005.
Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET) . Computers & Geosciences, 31(9): 1119–1125. Pergamon. DOI: 10.1016/J.CAGEO.2004.12.004 - 15Schentz, H, Peterseil, J and Bertrand, N. 2013.
EnvThes – interlinked thesaurus for long term ecological research, monitoring, and experiments . In: EnviroInfo 2013: Environmental Informatics and Renewable Energies, 824–832. Aachen: Shaker Verlag. Available at:https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2606/44046e0a0cb1583a002a56449e512183b913.pdf (Accessed: 11 May 2018). - 16Smith, B, et al. 2007.
The OBO Foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration . Nature Biotechnology, 25(11): 1251–1255. Nature Publishing Group. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1346 - 17The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). 2012. Reference Model for an open Archival Information System (OAIS). CCSDS 650.0-M-2. Available at:
https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf (Accessed: 19 March 2018). - 18Waide, RB, Brunt, JW and Servilla, MS. 2017.
Demystifying the Landscape of Ecological Data Repositories in the United States . BioScience, 67(12): 1044–1051. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bix117 - 19Warner, S, et al. 2007.
Pathways: Augmenting interoperability across scholarly repositories . International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1–2): 35–52. Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-007-0016-7 - 20Wilkinson, MD, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18