Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The State of Assessing Data Stewardship Maturity – An Overview Cover

The State of Assessing Data Stewardship Maturity – An Overview

By: Ge Peng  
Open Access
|Mar 2018

References

  1. Albani, M 2016 ESA – EO data stewardship maturity matrix. 41th CEOS Working Group on Information Systems and Services (WGISS) Meeting. Canberra, AUS. 14–18 March 2016. [Available online at: http://ceos.org/meetings/wgiss-41].
  2. Arndt, D S and Brewer, M 2016 Assessing service maturity through end user engagement and climate monitoring. 2016 ESIP summer meeting. 19–22 July 2016. Durham, NC, USA. [Available online at: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/Arndt_Brewer_ESIP_Service_Maturity.pdf].
  3. Austin, M and Peng, G 2015 A prototype for content-rich decision-making support in NOAA using data as an asset. Abstract #IN21A-1676. AGU Fall Meeting 2015. 14–18 December 2015. San Francisco, CA, USA.
  4. Bates, J J and Privette, J L 2012 A maturity model for assessing the completeness of climate data records. EOS, 93(44): 441. Trans. American Geophysical Union. DOI: 10.1029/2012EO440006
  5. Bates, J J, Privette, J L, Kearns, E, Glance, W G and Zhao, X P 2015 Sustained production of multidecadal climate data records – Lessons from the NOAA Climate Data Record Program. Bull. Meteor. Soc. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00015.1
  6. Becker, J, Knackstedt, R and Pöppelbuß, J 2009 Developing maturity models for IT management – A procedure model and its application. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3: 213222. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5
  7. CCSDS 2012a Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Recommended Practices, Issue 2. Version: CCSDS 650.0-M-2. 135 [Available online at: https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf].
  8. CCSDS 2012b Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories – Recommended Practices. Version: CCSDS 652.0-M-1. 77. [Available online at: https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/652x0m1.pdf].
  9. CMMI 2014 Data Management Maturity Model. CMMI Institute, 248. Version: 1.0 August 2014. Accessed: 7 July 2017.
  10. COPDESS 2015 Statement of commitment from Earth and Space Science publishers and data facilities. Version. January 14. [Available online at: http://www.copdess.org/statement-of-commitment/].
  11. Duerr, R, Leon, A, Miller, D and Scott, D J 2009 Level of services. National Snow and Ice Data Center. Version: v2 7/31/2009. [Available online at: https://nsidc.org/sites/nsidc.org/files/files/NSIDCLevelsOfService-V2_0a(2).pdf].
  12. EDMC (The Enterprise Data Management Council) 2015 Data Management Capability Assessment Model. Version: v1.0. July 2015.
  13. Edmunds, R, L’Hours, H, Rickards, L, Trilsbeek, P and Vardigan, M 2016 Core Trustworthy Data Repository Requirements. [Available online at: https://zenodo.org/record/168411-.WV_NQBPyuSN]. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.168411
  14. EUMETSAT 2013 CORE-CLIMAX Climate Data Record Assessment Instruction Manual. Version: 2. 25 November 2013. [The latest version is available online at: http://www.sat.ltu.se/members/viju/publication/core-clim/Core-Climax_System_Maturity_Matrix_Instruction_Manual.pdf].
  15. EUMETSAT 2015 CORE-CLIMAX European ECV CDR Capacity Assessment Report. Version: v1. 26 July 2015.
  16. Faundeen, J, Kirk, K and Brown, C 2017 Certifying Trusted Digital Repositories: USGS Use Case. 2017 ESIP Summer Meeting. 25–28 July 2017. Bloomington, IN, USA.
  17. FGDC 2015 National Geospatial Dataset Asset Management Plan – Lifecycle Maturity Assessment Tool. [Available online at: https://cms.geoplatform.gov/sites/default/files/a16themeleads/ActiveDocuments/1_NGDA_BaselineAssessment_01_IntroAndAssessment_FINAL.pdf].
  18. FGDC 2016 National Geospatial Data Asset Lifecycle Maturity Assessment 2015 Report – Analysis and Recommendations. Version. 8 December 2016. 93.
  19. GEO Data Sharing Working Group 2014 GEOSS Data Sharing Principles Post 2015. Version. March 10. [Available online at: http://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dswg/10_GEOSS%20Data%20Sharing%20Principles%20post%202015.pdf].
  20. Gorball, J 2016 Introduction to Data Management Maturity Models. Slideshare. Version. 28 July 2016. [Available online at: https://www.slideshare.net/Kingland_Systems/introduction-to-data-management-maturity-models].
  21. Hou, C-Y, Mayernik, M, Peng, G, Duerr, R and Rosati, A 2015 Assessing information quality: Use cases for the data stewardship maturity matrix. Abstract #IN21A-1675. AGU 2015 Fall Meeting. 14–18 December 2015. San Francisco, CA, USA.
  22. ISO 16363 2012 Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories. Version. ISO 16363:2012. Geneva, Switzerland.
  23. Lemieux, P, Peng, G and Scott, D J 2017 Data Stewardship Maturity Report for NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration. Version 2. figshare.
  24. Madonna, F, Thorne, P, Rosoldi, M, Tramutola, E, Buschmann, M and DeMaziere, M 2016a Report on data capabilities by ECV and by system of systems layer for ECVs measurable from space. GAIA-CLIM Deliverable D1.6. Version. 7 September 2016. [Available online at: http://www.gaia-clim.eu/system/files/workpkg_files/D1.6%20Report%20on%20data%20capabilities%20by%20ECV%20and%20by%20systems%20of%20systems%20layer.pdf].
  25. Madonna, F, Tramutola, E, Rosoldi, M, Thorne, P, Meier, A and Rannat, K 2016b Report on the collection of metadata from existing network and on the proposed protocol for a common metadata format. GAIA-CLIM Deliverable D1.7. Version. 14 September 2016. [Available online at: http://www.gaia-clim.eu/system/files/workpkg_files/D1.7%20Report%20on%20the%20collection%20of%20metadata%20from%20existing%20network.pdf].
  26. Maggio, I 2017 DMP IG as a Maturity Matrix. 44th CEOS WGISS meeting. 03–06 April. Annapolis, MD, USA. [Available online at: http://ceos.org/meetings/wgiss-43].
  27. McSweeney, A 2013 Review of data management maturity models. Version. 23 October 2013. Slideshare. [Available online at: https://www.slideshare.net/alanmcsweeney/review-of-data-management-maturity-models].
  28. Mecca, M 2015 CMMI Data management maturity model ecosystem and deep dive. Version. April 21. [Available online at: https://damapdx.org/docs/dama/Apr2015MelanieMecca.pdf].
  29. Mosely, M, Brackett, M, Early, S and Henderson, D (Eds.) 2009 The Data Management Body of Knowledge (DAMA-DMBOK Guide), 406. Bradley Beach, NJ, USA: Technics Publications, LLC. 2nd Print Edition.
  30. NAS (National Academy of Sciences) 2009 Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age. National Academies Press, 178. DOI: 10.17226/12615
  31. National Research Council 2007 Environmental data management at NOAA: Archiving, stewardship, and access. 130. The National Academies Press. Washington, D.C. DOI: 10.17226/12017 [Available online at: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12017.html].
  32. Nelson, G S 2017 Developing Your Data Strategy: A practical guide. Paper 0830-2017. ThotWave Technologies, Chapel Hill, NC. [Available online at: http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings17/0830-2017.pdf].
  33. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) 2010 NOAA Administrative Order 212-15 – Management of environmental and geospatial data. 4. [Available online at: http://www.corporateservices.noaa.gov/ames/administrative_orders/chapter_212/212-15.pdf].
  34. OMB 1999 Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations. OMB Circular A-110. [Available online at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/circulars/A110/2cfr215-0.pdf].
  35. OMB 2002a Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies. Federal Register, 67(36). OMB Notice February 22. [Available online at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/fedreg_final_information_quality_guidelines].
  36. OMB 2002b Coordination of Geographic Information and Related Spatial Data Activities. OMB Circular A-16. Revised. [Available online at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars].
  37. OMB 2013 Open Data Policy – Managing Information as an Asset. Version: OMB Memorandum May 9. [Available online at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-13.pdf].
  38. OSTP 2010 Scientific integrity. [Available online at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/scientific-integrity-memo-12172010.pdf].
  39. OSTP 2013 Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. Version: OSTP Memorandum. February 22. [Available online at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf].
  40. Peltz-Lewis, L A, Blake-Coleman, W, Johnston, J and DeLoatch, I B 2014 National Geospatial Data Asset Lifecycle Baseline Maturity Assessment for the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Abstract IN13A-3635, AGU 2014 Fall Meeting, 15–19. December 2014. San Francisco, CA, USA.
  41. Peng, G 2017 Getting to know and to use the NCEI/CICS-NC data stewardship maturity matrix (DSMM). Figshare. Version. August 25. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5346343
  42. Peng, G, Lawrimore, J, Toner, V, Lief, C, Baldwin, R, Ritchey, N A, Brinegar, D and Delgreco, S A 2016b Assessing Stewardship Maturity of the Global Historical Climatology Network-Monthly (GHCN-M) Dataset: Use Case Study and Lessons Learned. D.-Lib Magazine, 22. DOI: 10.1045/november2016-peng
  43. Peng, G, Privette, J L, Kearns, E J, Ritchey, N A and Ansari, A 2015 A unified framework for measuring stewardship practices applied to digital environmental datasets. Data Science Journal, 13. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.14-049
  44. Peng, G, Ritchey, N A, Casey, K S, Kearns, E J, Privette, J L, Saunders, D, Jones, P, Maycock, T and Ansari, S 2016a Scientific stewardship in the Open Data and Big Data era — Roles and responsibilities of stewards and other major product stakeholders. D.-Lib Magazine, 22. DOI: 10.1045/may2016-gepeng
  45. Peng, G, Ritchey, N, Milan, A, Zinn, S, Casey, K S, Neufeld, D, Lemieux, P, Ionin, R, Partee, R, Collins, D, Shapiro, J, Rosenberg, A, Jaensch, T and Jones, P 2017 Towards Consistent and Citable Data Quality Descriptive Information for End-Users. 2017 DataOne Annual Meeting. figshare. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5336191
  46. Privette, J L, Cramer, B, Ellingson, G, Ellingson, L, Hutchins, C, McPherson, T and Wunder, D 2017 Evolving NOAA’s Climate Data Portfolio in Response to Validated Sectoral Needs. AMS 97th Annual Meeting. 22–26 January 2017. Seattle, WA, USA.
  47. Ramapriyan, H K, Peng, G, Moroni, D and Shie, C L 2017 Ensuring and Improving Information Quality for Earth Science Data and Products. D.-Lib Magazine, 23. DOI: 10.1045/july2017-ramapriyan
  48. Reed, B 2013 Status of Operational Suomi NPP Algorithms. The first Community Satellite Processing Package Use Group Meeting. 21–23 May 2013. Madison, WI, USA. [Available online at: http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/meetings/cspp/2013/presentations/Reed-OperationalSNPPAlgorithmsStatus.pdf].
  49. Ritchey, N A, Peng, G, Jones, P, Milan, A, Lemieux, P, Partee, R, Lonin, R and Casey, K A 2016 Practical Application of the Data Stewardship Maturity Model for NOAA’s OneStop Project. Abstract #IN43D-08. 2016 AGU Fall Meeting. 12–16 December 2016. San Francisco, CA, USA.
  50. Schulz, J and 14 others 2015 System maturity assessment. Copernicus Workshop on Climate Observation Requirements. ECMWF. Reading, 29 June–2 July 2015.
  51. Stall, S 2016 AGU’s Data Management Maturity Model. SciDataCon 2016. 11–13 September. Denver, CO, USA.
  52. Thorne, P, Schulz, J, Tan, D, Ingleby, B, Madaoona, F, Pappalardo, G and Oakley, T 2015 GAIA-CLIM Measurement Maturity Matrix Guidance: Gap Analysis for Integrated Atmospheric ECV Climate Monitoring: Report on system of systems approach adopted and rationale. Version. 27 Nov 2015. [Available online at: http://www.gaia-clim.eu/system/files/workpkg_files/640276_Report%20on%20system%20of%20systems%20approach%20adopted%20and%20rationale.pdf].
  53. US Public Law 106-554 2001 Information Quality Act. Publ. L. 106–554, 101. [Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-106publ554/html/PLAW-106publ554.htm].
  54. US Public Law 107-347 2002 Federal Information Security Management Act. Pub.L. 107–347. [Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ347/html/PLAW-107publ347.htm].
  55. Valen, D and Blanchat, K 2015 Overview of OSTP Responses. figshare. Access date: March 5. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1367165
  56. WDS Scientific Committee 2015 WDS Data Sharing Principles. Version: v1. November 2015. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.34354
  57. WGISS DSIG 2018 WGISS Data stewardship maturity matrix. Document ID: CEOS.WGISS.DSIG.DSMM. Version: 1.0. 26 September 2017.
  58. Wilkinson, M D and 51 others 2016 The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  59. Witt, M, Kroll, M, Minor, D and Relly, B 2012 ISO 16363: Trustworthy Digital Repository Certification in Practice. 7th International Conference on Open Repositories. 9–13 July 2012. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. [Available online at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fspres/4].
  60. Zhou, L H, Divakarla, M and Liu, X P 2016 An Overview of the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Science Data Product Calibration and Validation. Remote Sensing, 8(2). DOI: 10.3390/rs8020139
  61. Zinn, S, Relph, J, Peng, G, Milan, A and Rosenberg, A 2017 Design and implementation of automation tools for DSMM diagrams and reports. 2017 ESIP winter meeting. January 11–13, in Bethesda, MD. [Available online at: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/Zinn_etal_OneStop_DSMM_ESIP%2020170113_0.pdf].
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 5, 2017
|
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2018
|
Published on: Mar 26, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Ge Peng, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.