Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap Cover

Recommended versus Certified Repositories: Mind the Gap

Open Access
|Sep 2017

Figures & Tables

dsj-16-667-g1.png
Figure 1

Flowchart of the methodology used to create the umbrella categories.

dsj-16-667-g2.png
Figure 2

Pie-chart showing the number of repositories that are recommended by 1 to 17 organisations. The highest number of recommendations received is 12.

dsj-16-667-g3.png
Figure 3

Pie-chart showing the percentage of recommended repositories that have obtained one of the following certifications: DSA, ICSU-WDS, and both DSA and ICSU-WDS.

Table 1

Table listing 7 common terms, referred to as “umbrella categories”, based on a comparison between the Recommended Criteria Cluster and the Certification Criteria Cluster. The second column describes the shared meaning of the umbrella category, followed by differences in characteristics of recommended repository criteria and repository certification scheme criteria.

Umbrella CategoriesSharedRecommended Repository CriteriaRepository Certification Scheme Criteria
MissionExplicit mission statement in providing long-term responsibility, persistence, and management of data(sets)
Community/RecognitionEvidence of use by downloads or citations from an identifiable and active user communityUnderstand and meet the needs of the designated and defined target community
Legal and Contractual ComplianceRepository operates within a legal framework/Ensures compliance with legal regulationsWhen applicable, have contractual regulations governing the protection of human subjectsContracts and agreements maintained with relevant parties on relevant subjects
Access/AccessibilityPublic access to the scientific/repository designated communityAnonymous referees (including peer-reviewers) have access to the data before public release as indicated by policies
Technical Structure/InterfaceThe software system supports data organisation and searchability by both humans and computers. The interface is intuitive and mobile user-friendlyThe technical (infra)structure is appropriate, protective, and secure
RetrievabilityData need to have enough metadata. All data receive a persistent identifier
PreservationLong-term and formal preservation/succession plan for the data, even if the repository ceases to existIf the data are retracted, the persistent identifier needs to be maintainedPreservation of data information properties and metadata
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 31, 2016
Accepted on: Aug 10, 2017
Published on: Sep 4, 2017
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Sean Edward Husen, Zoë G. de Wilde, Anita de Waard, Helena Cousijn, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.