Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Connecting the Persistent Identifier Ecosystem: Building the Technical and Human Infrastructure for Open Research Cover

Connecting the Persistent Identifier Ecosystem: Building the Technical and Human Infrastructure for Open Research

Open Access
|Jun 2017

References

  1. 1
    Akers K G Sarkozy A Wu W Slyman A ORCID Author Identifiers: A Primer for Librarians Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2016 35 2 135 144 10.1080/02763869.2016.1152139
  2. 2
    Armstrong D Haak L Meadows A Stone A ORCID 2015 Survey Report 2015 10.6084/m9.figshare.2008206
  3. 3
    Austin T Towards a digital infrastructure for engineering materials data Materials Discovery 2016 10.1016/j.md.2015.12.003
  4. 4
    Biden J Cancer Moonshot Report to the President from the Vice President 2016 Washington The White House Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/finalvp_exec_report_10-17-16final_3.pdf 2016/12/01
  5. 5
    Bilder G Brown J Demeranville T Organisation identifiers: current provider survey 2016 10.5438/4716
  6. 6
    Cancer Research UK Why aren’t we sharing? 2016 London Cancer Research UK Retrieved from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/funding-for-researchers/research-features/2016-08-10-why-arent-we-sharing 2016/12/01
  7. 7
    COPDESS COPDESS Statement of Commitment – COPDESS 2015 Retrieved from: http://www.copdess.org/statement-of-commitment/ 1 Nov. 2016
  8. 8
    CrossRef, DataCite, ORCID and the THOR Project THOR Project Dashboard Overview 2016 The graph is generated from data retrievable from http://dashboard.project-thor.eu/api/data?type=aggregate. The graph image was accessed from http://dashboard.project-thor.eu/dashboard/ December 2016
  9. 9
    Cruse P Haak L Pentz E Organization Identifier Project: A Way Forward 2016 10.5438/2906
  10. 10
    DataCite Metadata Working Group DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Version 4.0 DataCite e.V 2016 10.5438/0012
  11. 11
    Davidson J Persistent Identifiers. DCC Briefing Papers: Introduction to Curation 2006 Edinburgh Digital Curation Centre Handle: 1842/3368. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/introduction-curation/persistent-identifiers#sthash.jpZBaD5T.dpuf
  12. 12
    Edmunds S Notes from an E. coli “tweenome” – lessons learned from our first data DOI 2011 Retrieved from: http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/gigablog/2011/08/03/notes-from-an-e-coli-tweenome-lessons-learned-from-our-first-data-doi/ 4 Dec. 2016
  13. 13
    Edmunds S Pollard T Hole B Basford AT Adventures in data citation: sorghum genome data exemplifies the new gold standard BMC Research Notes 2012 2012 5 233 10.1186/1756-0500-5-223
  14. 14
    Eklund A Nichols T E Knutsson H Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016 7900 10.1073/pnas.1602413113
  15. 15
    Fenner M Demeranville T Kotarski R Dasler R McEntyre J de Mello G Vision T Dappert A Farquhar A THOR: Conceptual Model of Persistent Identifier Linking 2016 10.5281/zenodo.48705
  16. 16
    Ferguson N Moore R Schmoller S Review of selected organisational IDs and development of use cases for the Jisc CASRAI-UK Organisational Identifiers Working Group 2015 Retrieved from: http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/id/eprint/5853 20 Dec. 2016
  17. 17
    Haak L Publishers to Start Requiring ORCID iDs [Text] 2016 Retrieved from: https://orcid.org/blog/2016/01/07/publishers-start-requiring-orcid-ids 5 May 2016
  18. 18
    Haak L L Fenner M Paglione L Pentz E Ratner H ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers Learned Publishing 2012 25 4 259 264 10.1087/20120404
  19. 19
    Huber R Klump J How dead is dead in the PID Zombie Zoo? 2016 Retrieved from: https://www.rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/attachment/20160902-RDA_EU_View_on_PID_Systems_Garching-Robert_Huber-Jens_Klump-How_dead_is_dead_in_the_PID_Zombie_zoo.pdf 23 Dec. 2016
  20. 20
    Kerridge S The UK Recommends ORCID [Text] 2015 Retrieved from: http://orcid.org/blog/2015/07/16/uk-recommends-orcid 5 May 2016
  21. 21
    Kunze J Towards electronic persistence using ARK identifiers Proceedings of the 3rd ECDL Workshop on Web Archives 2003 Retrieved from: https://wiki.umiacs.umd.edu/adapt/images/0/0a/Arkcdl.pdf 20 Dec. 2016
  22. 22
    Lawrence K F Bodard G Prosopography is Greek for Facebook: The SNAP: DRGN Project Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference 2015 ACM June 44 10.1145/2786451.2786496
  23. 23
    MacEwan A Angjeli A Gatenby J The International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI): The evolving future of name authority control Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2012 51 1–3 55 71 10.1080/01639374.2012.730601
  24. 24
    McNutt M Lehnert K Hanson B Nosek BA Ellison AM King JL Liberating field science samples and data Science 2016 351 6277 1024 1026 10.1126/science.aad7048
  25. 25
    ODIN Consortium Fenner M Thorisson G Ruiz S Brase J D4.1 Conceptual model of interoperability figshare 2013 10.6084/m9.figshare.824314.v1
  26. 26
    Rauber A Asmi A van Uytvanck D Pröll S Identification of Reproducible Subsets for Data Citation, Sharing and Re-Use 2016 Retrieved form: https://www.rd-alliance.org/system/files/documents/TCDL-RDA-Guidelines_160411.pdf Retreived 01 Dec. 2016
  27. 27
    re3data Re3data API with documentation 2016 available from http://www.re3data.org/api/doc. Data extracted 15 November 2016
  28. 28
    Rhodes S Breaking down link rot: the Chesapeake project legal information archive’s examination of URL stability Law Libr. J 2010 102 581
  29. 29
    Sheridan J Legislation.gov.uk. VOXPOPULII 2010 Retrieved from: https://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2010/08/15/legislationgovuk/ 23 Dec. 2016
  30. 30
    Shotton D CiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2010 Springer Nature 10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s6
  31. 31
    Sloan C A Chan E T Davidson J M Malladi V S Strattan J S Hitz B C Cherry J M ENCODE data at the ENCODE portal Nucleic Acids Research 2016 44 D1 D726 D732 10.1093/nar/gkv1160
  32. 32
    Spinosa P Francesconi E Lupo C A uniform resource name (URN) namespace for sources of law (LEX) 2010 Retrieved from: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-spinosa-urn-lex-05.txt 23 Dec. 2016
  33. 33
    Tyler D C McNeil B Librarians and link rot: A comparative analysis with some methodological considerations portal: Libraries and the Academy 2003 3 4 615 632 10.1353/pla.2003.0098
  34. 34
    Walter P I am a number! 2016 February 2 Retrieved from: http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2016/02/researcher-number-orcid-news-leader-editorial
  35. 35
    Wellcome Trust Who are you? Recognising researchers with ORCID identifiers 2015 Retrieved from: https://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2015/06/30/who-are-you-recognising-researchers-with-orcid-identifiers/
  36. 36
    Williams S C Practices, Policies, and Persistence: A Study of Supplementary Materials in Crop Science Journals Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 2016 17 1 11 22 10.1080/10496505.2015.1120213
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 11, 2017
Accepted on: May 26, 2017
Published on: Jun 15, 2017
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Angela Dappert, Adam Farquhar, Rachael Kotarski, Kirstie Hewlett, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.