Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Connecting the Persistent Identifier Ecosystem: Building the Technical and Human Infrastructure for Open Research Cover

Connecting the Persistent Identifier Ecosystem: Building the Technical and Human Infrastructure for Open Research

Data Science Journal
Volume 16 (2017): Issue 0
By: Angela Dappert,  Adam Farquhar,  Rachael Kotarski and  Kirstie Hewlett  
Open Access
|Jun 2017

References

  1. Akers K G Sarkozy A Wu W Slyman A ORCID Author Identifiers: A Primer for Librarians Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2016 35 2 135 144 10.1080/02763869.2016.1152139
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Armstrong D Haak L Meadows A Stone A ORCID 2015 Survey Report 2015 10.6084/m9.figshare.2008206
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Austin T Towards a digital infrastructure for engineering materials data Materials Discovery 2016 10.1016/j.md.2015.12.003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Biden J Cancer Moonshot Report to the President from the Vice President 2016 Washington The White House Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/finalvp_exec_report_10-17-16final_3.pdf 2016/12/01
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bilder G Brown J Demeranville T Organisation identifiers: current provider survey 2016 10.5438/4716
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Cancer Research UK Why aren’t we sharing? 2016 London Cancer Research UK Retrieved from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/funding-for-researchers/research-features/2016-08-10-why-arent-we-sharing 2016/12/01
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. COPDESS COPDESS Statement of Commitment – COPDESS 2015 Retrieved from: http://www.copdess.org/statement-of-commitment/ 1 Nov. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. CrossRef, DataCite, ORCID and the THOR Project THOR Project Dashboard Overview 2016 The graph is generated from data retrievable from http://dashboard.project-thor.eu/api/data?type=aggregate. The graph image was accessed from http://dashboard.project-thor.eu/dashboard/ December 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Cruse P Haak L Pentz E Organization Identifier Project: A Way Forward 2016 10.5438/2906
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. DataCite Metadata Working Group DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Version 4.0 DataCite e.V 2016 10.5438/0012
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Davidson J Persistent Identifiers. DCC Briefing Papers: Introduction to Curation 2006 Edinburgh Digital Curation Centre Handle: 1842/3368. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/introduction-curation/persistent-identifiers#sthash.jpZBaD5T.dpuf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Edmunds S Notes from an E. coli “tweenome” – lessons learned from our first data DOI 2011 Retrieved from: http://blogs.biomedcentral.com/gigablog/2011/08/03/notes-from-an-e-coli-tweenome-lessons-learned-from-our-first-data-doi/ 4 Dec. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Edmunds S Pollard T Hole B Basford AT Adventures in data citation: sorghum genome data exemplifies the new gold standard BMC Research Notes 2012 2012 5 233 10.1186/1756-0500-5-223
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Eklund A Nichols T E Knutsson H Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016 7900 10.1073/pnas.1602413113
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Fenner M Demeranville T Kotarski R Dasler R McEntyre J de Mello G Vision T Dappert A Farquhar A THOR: Conceptual Model of Persistent Identifier Linking 2016 10.5281/zenodo.48705
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Ferguson N Moore R Schmoller S Review of selected organisational IDs and development of use cases for the Jisc CASRAI-UK Organisational Identifiers Working Group 2015 Retrieved from: http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/id/eprint/5853 20 Dec. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Haak L Publishers to Start Requiring ORCID iDs [Text] 2016 Retrieved from: https://orcid.org/blog/2016/01/07/publishers-start-requiring-orcid-ids 5 May 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Haak L L Fenner M Paglione L Pentz E Ratner H ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers Learned Publishing 2012 25 4 259 264 10.1087/20120404
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Huber R Klump J How dead is dead in the PID Zombie Zoo? 2016 Retrieved from: https://www.rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/attachment/20160902-RDA_EU_View_on_PID_Systems_Garching-Robert_Huber-Jens_Klump-How_dead_is_dead_in_the_PID_Zombie_zoo.pdf 23 Dec. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Kerridge S The UK Recommends ORCID [Text] 2015 Retrieved from: http://orcid.org/blog/2015/07/16/uk-recommends-orcid 5 May 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kunze J Towards electronic persistence using ARK identifiers Proceedings of the 3rd ECDL Workshop on Web Archives 2003 Retrieved from: https://wiki.umiacs.umd.edu/adapt/images/0/0a/Arkcdl.pdf 20 Dec. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Lawrence K F Bodard G Prosopography is Greek for Facebook: The SNAP: DRGN Project Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference 2015 ACM June 44 10.1145/2786451.2786496
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. MacEwan A Angjeli A Gatenby J The International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI): The evolving future of name authority control Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2012 51 1–3 55 71 10.1080/01639374.2012.730601
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. McNutt M Lehnert K Hanson B Nosek BA Ellison AM King JL Liberating field science samples and data Science 2016 351 6277 1024 1026 10.1126/science.aad7048
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. ODIN Consortium Fenner M Thorisson G Ruiz S Brase J D4.1 Conceptual model of interoperability figshare 2013 10.6084/m9.figshare.824314.v1
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Rauber A Asmi A van Uytvanck D Pröll S Identification of Reproducible Subsets for Data Citation, Sharing and Re-Use 2016 Retrieved form: https://www.rd-alliance.org/system/files/documents/TCDL-RDA-Guidelines_160411.pdf Retreived 01 Dec. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. re3data Re3data API with documentation 2016 available from http://www.re3data.org/api/doc. Data extracted 15 November 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Rhodes S Breaking down link rot: the Chesapeake project legal information archive’s examination of URL stability Law Libr. J 2010 102 581
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Sheridan J Legislation.gov.uk. VOXPOPULII 2010 Retrieved from: https://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2010/08/15/legislationgovuk/ 23 Dec. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Shotton D CiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2010 Springer Nature 10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s6
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Sloan C A Chan E T Davidson J M Malladi V S Strattan J S Hitz B C Cherry J M ENCODE data at the ENCODE portal Nucleic Acids Research 2016 44 D1 D726 D732 10.1093/nar/gkv1160
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Spinosa P Francesconi E Lupo C A uniform resource name (URN) namespace for sources of law (LEX) 2010 Retrieved from: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-spinosa-urn-lex-05.txt 23 Dec. 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Tyler D C McNeil B Librarians and link rot: A comparative analysis with some methodological considerations portal: Libraries and the Academy 2003 3 4 615 632 10.1353/pla.2003.0098
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Walter P I am a number! 2016 February 2 Retrieved from: http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2016/02/researcher-number-orcid-news-leader-editorial
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Wellcome Trust Who are you? Recognising researchers with ORCID identifiers 2015 Retrieved from: https://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2015/06/30/who-are-you-recognising-researchers-with-orcid-identifiers/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Williams S C Practices, Policies, and Persistence: A Study of Supplementary Materials in Crop Science Journals Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 2016 17 1 11 22 10.1080/10496505.2015.1120213
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-028 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 11, 2017
|
Accepted on: May 26, 2017
|
Published on: Jun 15, 2017
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
persistent identifiers,
research infrastructure,
interoperable services,
data citation,
scholarly communication

© 2017 Angela Dappert, Adam Farquhar, Rachael Kotarski, Kirstie Hewlett, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 16 (2017): Issue 0Next article