Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
GLAM Special Collection: A Generalized Framework for Participatory Transcription: Lessons, Challenges, and Interdisciplinary Impact from the Zooniverse Platform Cover

GLAM Special Collection: A Generalized Framework for Participatory Transcription: Lessons, Challenges, and Interdisciplinary Impact from the Zooniverse Platform

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Barber, S.T. (2018) The Zooniverse is expanding: crowdsourced solutions to the hidden collections problem and the rise of the revolutionary cataloging interface, Journal of Library Metadata, 18(2): 85111. DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2018.1489449
  2. Blake, C., Rhanor, A., and Pajic, C. (2020) The demographics of citizen science participation and its implications for data quality and environmental justice, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): DOI: 10.5334/cstp.320
  3. Blaser, L. (2014) Old Weather: Approaching collections from a different angle. In: Ridge, M. (ed.) Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 4555.
  4. Blickhan, S. (2020) Anti-slavery Manuscripts final project update, 31 August 2020. Available at https://www.bpl.org/blogs/post/anti-slavery-manuscripts-final-project-update [Last accessed 18 May 2026].
  5. Blickhan, S. (2021) New developments in crowdsourced text transcription, 21 July 2021. Available at https://sites.google.com/zooniverse.org/new-developments-in-ctt/home [Last accessed 18 May 2026].
  6. Blickhan, S., Bird, E., Lacey, A., and Wolf, A. (2024) The benefits of ‘slow’ development: towards a best practice for sustainable technical infrastructure through the Davy Notebooks Project, Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 78(4): 647668. DOI: 10.1098/rsnr.2024.0003
  7. Blickhan, S., Granger, W., Noordin, S.A., and Rother, B. (2021) “Strangers in the landscape”: On research development and making things for making, Startwords, 2. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5750679
  8. Blickhan, S., Krawczyk, C., Hanson, D., Boyer, A., Simenstad, A., and Van Hyning, V. (2019) Individual vs. collaborative methods of crowdsourced transcription, Journal of Data Mining and Digital Humanities, Special Issue on Collecting, Preserving, and Disseminating Endangered Cultural Heritage for New Understandings through Multilingual Approaches. DOI: 10.46298/jdmdh.5759
  9. Borgman, C.L. (2015) Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001
  10. Bowser, A., Cooper, C., de Sherbinin, A., Wiggins, A., Brenton, P., Chuang, T.-R., Faustman, E., et al. (2020) Still in need of norms: The state of the data in citizen science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 18. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.303
  11. Brabham, D.C. (2013) Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9693.001.0001
  12. Brohan, P. (2018) Approaches to transcription of weather observations. Available at https://brohan.org/transcription_methods_review/ [Last accessed 18 May 2026].
  13. Brumfield, B. (2012) Quality control for crowdsourced transcription, 5 March 2012. Available at https://manuscripttranscription.blogspot.com/2012/03/quality-control-for-crowdsourced.html [Last accessed 13 May 2026].
  14. Brumfield, B. (2020) The decade in crowdsourcing transcription, 13 January 2020. Available at https://crowdsourcingweek.com/blog/decade-in-crowdsourcing-transcription/ [Last accessed 7 May 2026].
  15. Brusuelas, J. (2016) Engaging Greek: Ancient Lives. In: Bodard, G. and Romanello, M. (eds.) Digital Classics Outside the Echo-Chamber: Teaching, Knowledge Exchange & Public Engagement. London: Ubiquity Press. pp. 187204. DOI: 10.5334/bat.k
  16. Brusuelas, J. (2019) Ancient Lives: A final report, 5 November 2019. Available at https://ancientlives.blog/2019/11/05/ancient-lives-a-final-report/ [Last accessed 8 July 2021].
  17. Causer, T. and Terras, M. (2014) “Many hands make light work. Many hands together make merry work”: Transcribe Bentham and crowdsourcing manuscript transcription. In: Ridge, M. (ed.) Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage. Ashgate. pp. 5788.
  18. Cohen, D. (2025) The writing is on the wall for handwriting recognition, 25 November 2025. Available at https://newsletter.dancohen.org/archive/the-writing-is-on-the-wall-for-handwriting-recognition/ [Last accessed 18 May 2026].
  19. Deines, N. (2018) Six lessons from our first crowdsourcing project in the digital humanities, 7 February 2018. Available at https://www.getty.edu/news/six-lessons-learned-from-our-first-crowdsourcing-project-in-the-digital-humanities/ [Last accessed 18 May 2026].
  20. Eveleigh, A., Jennett, C., Blandford, A., Brohan, P., and Cox, A.L. (2014) Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. In: CHI ’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, on 26 May 2014. pp. 29852994. DOI: 10.1145/2556288.2557262
  21. Ferriter, M., Zwaard, K., Kamlley, E., Storey, R., Adams, C., Algee, L., Van Hyning, V., et al. (2019) “With One Heart”: Agile approaches for developing Concordia and crowdsourcing at the Library of Congress. The Code4Lib Journal, (46). DOI: https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14901
  22. Grayson, R. (2016) A life in the trenches? The use of Operation War Diary and crowdsourcing methods to provide an understanding of the British Army’s day-to-day life on the Western Front, British Journal for Military History, 2(2): 160185.
  23. Griffiths-Lee, J., Nicholls, E., and Goulson, D. (2023) Sow Wild! Effective methods and identification bias in pollinator-focused experimental citizen science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1): DOI: 10.5334/cstp.550
  24. Guralnick, R., LaFrance, R., Denslow, M., Blickhan, S., Bouslog, M., Miller, S., Yost, J., et al. (2024) Humans in the loop: Community science and machine learning synergies for overcoming herbarium digitization bottlenecks, Applications in Plant Sciences, 12(1): e11560. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11560
  25. Haythornthwaite, C. (2009) Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. In: 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI on 05–08 January 2009, pp. 110. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.137
  26. Hedges, M. and Dunn, S.E. (2018) Academic Crowdsourcing in the Humanities: Crowds, Communities and Co-production. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing, Elsevier.
  27. Hill, A., Guralnick, R., Smith, A., Sallans, A., Gillespie, R., Denslow, M., Gross, J., et al. (2012) The notes from nature tool for unlocking biodiversity records from museum records through citizen science, ZooKeys, (209): 219233. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.209.3472
  28. Hines, G. (2017) Zooniverse aggregation engine documentation, release 0.9. Available at https://developer.zooniverse.org/_/downloads/aggregation/en/latest/pdf/ [Last accessed 6 October 2025].
  29. Holley, R. (2010) Crowdsourcing: How and why should libraries do it? D-Lib Magazine, 16(3/4). DOI: 10.1045/march2010-holley
  30. Ipeirotis, P.G., Provost, F., and Wang, J. (2010) Quality management on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, Washington DC on 25 July 2010. pp. 6467. DOI: 10.1145/1837885.1837906
  31. Lincoln, M. and Gill, M. (2018) Mutual Muses results. Available at https://github.com/thegetty/mutual-muses [Last accessed 21 September 2025].
  32. Lintott, C.J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., Raddick, M.J., et al. (2008) Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389: 11791189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
  33. Matsunaga, A., Mast, A., and Fortes, J.A.B. (2016) Workforce-efficient consensus in crowdsourced transcription of biocollections information, Future Generation Computer Systems, 56: 526536. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2015.07.004
  34. Mika, K.A., De Veer, J. and Rinaldo, C. (2017) Crowdsourcing natural history archives: Tools for extracting transcriptions and data. Biodiversity Informatics, 12. DOI: 10.17161/bi.v12i0.6646
  35. Nockels, J., Gooding, P., Ames, S., and Terras, M. (2022) Understanding the application of handwritten text recognition technology in heritage contexts: a systematic review of Transkribus in published research, Archival Science, 22(3): 367392. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-022-09397-0
  36. NYPL Staff (2015) Scribe: Toward a general framework for community transcription, 23 November 2015. Available at https://www.nypl.org/blog/2015/11/23/scribe-framework-community-transcription [Last accessed 21 September 2025].
  37. Oomen, J. and Aroyo, L. (2011) Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Brisbane Australia on 29 June 2011. pp. 138149. DOI: 10.1145/2103354.2103373
  38. Owens, T. (2014) Making Crowdsourcing Compatible with the Missions and Values of Cultural Heritage Organisations. In: Ridge, M. (ed.) Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage. Ashgate. pp. 269280.
  39. Prats López, M., Soekijad, M., Berends, H., and Huysman, M. (2020) A knowledge perspective on quality in complex citizen science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 15. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.250
  40. Rawson, K. and Muñoz, T. (2019) Against cleaning. In: Gold, M. and Klein, L. (eds.) Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/9781452963785
  41. Ridge, M. (ed.) (2014) Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage. London, UK: Ashgate.
  42. Ridge, M., Blickhan, S., Ferriter, M., Prytz, Y.B., Brumfield, B., Brumfield, S., Burgher, D., et al. (2021) The Collective Wisdom Handbook: Perspectives on Crowdsourcing in Cultural Heritage. DOI: 10.23636/jm0p-yt17
  43. Roberts, E. (2022) Measuring the ANZACs: Lessons from digital history writ large, The New Zealand Journal of Public History 8, pp. 6074. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438912/
  44. Sankar, R., Mantha, K., Fortson, L., Spiers, H., Pengo, T., Mashek, D., Mo, M., et al. (2023) TCuPGAN: A novel framework developed for optimizing human-machine interactions in citizen science. In: Meo, R., Silvestri, F. (eds.) Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases: International Workshops of ECML PKDD, Part II, Turin, Italy on 18–22 September 2023, pp. 310315. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-74627-7_23
  45. Singh, R., Hélouët, L., and Miklos, Z. (2021) Reducing the cost of aggregation in crowdsourcing. In: Hameurlain, A., Tjoa, A.M., Amann, B., and Goasdoué, F. (eds.) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XLIX. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. pp. 3369. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-64148-4_2
  46. Smith, A. (2013) How the Zooniverse works: Keeping it personal, 23 July 2013. Available at https://blog.zooniverse.org/2013/07/23/keeping-it-personal/ [Last accessed 13 May 2026].
  47. Smith, P., King, O.N.F., Pennington, A., et al. (2023) Online citizen science with the Zooniverse for analysis of biological volumetric data. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 160(3): 253276. DOI: 10.1007/s00418-023-02204-6
  48. Soacha-Godoy, K., Prakash, P., Álvarez, A., Tejada, A.G., López-Borrull, A., Salvador, X., Rodero, C., et al. (2025) Research infrastructures in citizen science: state of knowledge and taxonomic framework as a pathway to sustainability, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 10(1): DOI: 10.5334/cstp.831
  49. Stanley, J. (2026) Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future. 2nd ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  50. Surowiecki, J. (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. 1st ed. New York: Doubleday.
  51. Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C. and Packer, C. (2016) A generalized approach for producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images. Conservation Biology, 30: 520531. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12695
  52. Terras, M. (2016) Crowdsourcing in the digital humanities. In: Schreibman, S. and Siemens, R. (eds.) Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 420439. DOI: 10.1002/9781118680605.ch29
  53. Thomer, A. and Guralnick, R. (2014) Notes from Nature: Citizen science meets museum collections and the trouble with transcriptions, 29 January 2014. Available at https://pages.scistarter.org/2014/01/notes-nature-citizen-science-meets-museum-collections-trouble-transcriptions/ [Last accessed 16 September 2025].
  54. Trouille, L., Lintott, C.J. and Fortson, L.F. (2019) Citizen science frontiers: Efficiency, engagement, and serendipitous discovery with human–machine systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6): 19021909. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807190116
  55. Van Hyning, V. (2016) ‘What’s up with those grey dots?’ you ask, 24 February 2016. Available at https://blog.shakespearesworld.org/2016/02/24/whats-up-with-those-grey-dots-you-ask/ [Last accessed 6 October 2025].
  56. Van Hyning, V. (2019) Harnessing crowdsourcing for scholarly and GLAM purposes, Literature Compass, 16(3–4): e12507. DOI: 10.1111/lic3.12507
  57. Van Hyning, V., Bibeault, B., Purves, M., and Heikes, R. (2023) Shifting roles of citizen scientists accelerates high-quality data collection for climate change research. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, London UK on 27–31 October 2023, pp. 11551157. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.976
  58. Van Hyning, V., Blickhan, S., Trouille, L., and Lintott, C. (2017) Transforming libraries and archives through crowdsourcing, D-Lib Magazine, 23(5/6): DOI: 10.1045/may2017-vanhyning
  59. Van Hyning, V. and Jones, M.A. (2021) Data’s destinations: Three case studies in crowdsourced transcription data management and dissemination, Startwords, (2): DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5750691
  60. Van Hyning, V. and Wang, Z. (2024) The Shakespeare’s World crowdsourced transcription project datasets, Journal of Open Humanities Data, 10: 52. DOI: 10.5334/johd.237
  61. Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. (2011) From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS), 2011. IEEE, 110. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
  62. Williams, A. C. (2014) Computationally accelerated papyrology. Unpublished thesis (Master of Science in Computer Science), Middle Tennessee State University.
  63. Williams, A.C., Carroll, H.D., Wallin, J.F., Brusuelas, J., Fortson, L., Lamblin, A.-F., and Yu, H. (2014) Identification of ancient Greek papyrus fragments using genetic sequence alignment algorithms. In: 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Science, Sao Paulo, Brazil, on 20–24 October 2014, pp. 510. DOI: 10.1109/eScience.2014.14
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.934 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 19
Submitted on: Oct 15, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 12, 2026
Published on: Jul 27, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Samantha Blickhan, Victoria Van Hyning, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.