Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From Crowd to Collection: Mapping the Integration Gap in GLAM Crowdsourcing Cover

From Crowd to Collection: Mapping the Integration Gap in GLAM Crowdsourcing

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., and Lampis, A. (2020) Italian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: From onsite closure to online openness. Museum Management and Curatorship, 35(4), pp.362372. DOI: 10.1080/09647775.2020.1790029
  2. Allahbakhsh, M., Benatallah, B., Ignjatovic, A., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Bertino, E., and Dustdar, S. (2013) Quality control in crowdsourcing systems: Issues and directions. IEEE Internet Computing, 17(2), pp.7681. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2013.20
  3. Anderson, S.R., and Allen, R.B. (2009) Envisioning the archival commons. The American Archivist, 72(2), pp.383400. DOI: 10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
  4. Blickhan S., Krawczyk C., Hanson D., Boyer A., Simenstad A., and Van Hyning V. (2019) Individual vs. collaborative methods of crowdsourced transcription. Journal of Data Mining and Digital Humanities, Special Issue on Collecting, Preserving, and Disseminating Endangered Cultural Heritage for New Understandings through Multilingual Approaches. DOI: 10.46298/jdmdh.5759
  5. Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A., Pett, D., and Wexler, J. (2019) Participation in heritage crowdsourcing. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(2), pp.166182. DOI: 10.1080/09647775.2018.1559080
  6. Borgman, C.L. (2016) Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001
  7. Bowser A., Cooper C., Sherbinin A. de, Wiggins A., Brenton P., Chuang T.-R., Faustman E., et al. (2020) Still in need of norms: The state of the data in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 18. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.303
  8. Carletti L., McAuley D., Price D., Giannachi G., and Benford S. (2013) Digital humanities and crowdsourcing: An exploration. In: Museums and the Web 2013 Proceedings, Portland, OR on 17–20 April 2013.
  9. Christen K. (2015) Tribal archives, traditional knowledge, and local contexts: Why the ‘s’ matters. Journal of Western Archives, 6(1). DOI: 10.26077/78d5-47cf
  10. Collections Trust. (2017) SPECTRUM 5.0: The UK museum collections management standard. London: Collections Trust. Available at: https://collectionstrust.org.uk/spectrum/ [Last accessed 28 September 2025].
  11. Collections Trust. (n.d.) Choose collections software. Available at: https://collectionstrust.org.uk/software/ [Last accessed 28 September 2025].
  12. Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2017) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  13. Crowe K., Fenlon K., Frisch H., Marsh D. and Van Hyning V. (2021) Inviting and honoring user-contributed content. In: The Lighting the Way Handbook: Case Studies, Guidelines, and Emergent Futures for Archival Discovery and Delivery. Stanford University Libraries, pp.115131. DOI: 10.25740/gg453cv6438
  14. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp.532550. DOI: 10.2307/258557
  15. Esguerra, A. and van der Hel, S. (2021) Participatory designs and epistemic authority in knowledge platforms for sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 21(1), pp.130151. Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/781793 [Last accessed 28 September 2025]
  16. Eveleigh A. (2014) Crowding out the archivist? Locating crowdsourcing within the broader landscape of participatory archives. In: Ridge M. (ed.) Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.211229.
  17. Feinberg M. (2007) From hidden bias to responsible bias: An approach to information systems based on Haraway’s situated knowledges. Information Research, 12(4). Available at: https://www.informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis07.html [Last accessed 28 September 2025].
  18. Finnis J. and Kennedy A. (2020) The digital transformation agenda and GLAMs: A quick scan report for Europeana. Brighton: Culture24.
  19. Guest G. and Fleming, P.J. (2015) Mixed methods research. In: Guest G. and Namey E. (eds.), Public Health Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp.581610. DOI: 10.4135/9781483398839.n19
  20. Haklay M. (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: Sui D., Elwood S., and Goodchild M. (eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer. pp.105122. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
  21. Heritage Alliance. (2024) On the brink: Heritage in the cost of living crisis. London: Heritage Alliance.
  22. Irwin A. (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203202395
  23. Jansson I.-M. (2017) Organization of user-generated information in image collections and impact of rhetorical mechanisms. Knowledge Organization 44(7): pp. 515528. DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2017-7-515
  24. Kaldeli E., Menis-Mastromichalakis O., Bekiaris S., Ralli M., Tzouvaras V., and Stamou G. (2021) CrowdHeritage: Crowdsourcing for improving the quality of cultural heritage metadata. Information, 12(2), 64. DOI: 10.3390/info12020064
  25. Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A., and Simmons, B. (2016) Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10), pp. 551560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
  26. Krawczyk C. (2018) Aggregating annotations in the anti-slavery manuscripts project. Boston Public Library blog post, November 26, 2018. Available at: https://www.bpl.org/blogs/post/aggregating-annotations-in-the-anti-slavery-manuscripts-project. [Last accessed 28 September 2025].
  27. Liew, C.L. (2016) Participatory culture in memory institutions: Of diversity, ethics and trust? D-Lib Magazine, 22(7/8). DOI: 10.1045/july2016-liew
  28. Light M., and Hyry T. (2002) Colophons and annotations: New directions for the finding aid. The American Archivist 65(2), pp. 216230. DOI: 10.17723/aarc.65.2.l3h27j5x8716586q
  29. Lintott, C.J., Schawinski K., Slosar A., Land K., Bamford S., Thomas D., Raddick, M.J., et al. (2008) Galaxy Zoo: Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), pp. 11791189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
  30. McCracken K. and Hogan-Stacey S.-S. (2023) Decolonial Archival Futures. Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman.
  31. Merritt E. (2021) TrendsWatch: Navigating a Disrupted Future. Washington, DC: American Alliance of Museums, Center for the Future of Museums.
  32. Noordegraaf J., Bartholomew A. and Eveleigh A. (2014) Modeling crowdsourcing for cultural heritage. In: Museums and the Web, 2014, Florence, Italy, 8–11 April 2014, pp.2537.
  33. Oomen J. and Aroyo L. (2011) Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: Opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Brisbane, QLD, Australia on 29 June-2 July 2011, pp.138149. DOI: 10.1145/2103354.2103373
  34. Owens T. (2012) The crowd and the library. [online access at: https://www.trevorowens.org/2012/05/the-crowd-and-the-library/ last accessed 28 September 2025]
  35. Owens, T. (2013) Digital cultural heritage and the crowd. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(1), pp.121130. DOI: 10.1111/cura.12012
  36. Owens T. (2014) Making crowdsourcing compatible with the missions and values of cultural heritage organizations. In: Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage, ed. M. Ridge pp. 269280. Farnham: Ashgate.
  37. Peccatte P. (2011) Liberating archival images: The PhotosNormandie project on Flickr. Trans. Lynne M. Thomas. In: A Different Kind of Web: New Connections between Archives and Our Users, ed. Kate Theimer. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  38. Ridge, M. (2013) From tagging to theorizing: Deepening engagement with cultural heritage through crowdsourcing. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(4), pp.435450. DOI: 10.1111/cura.12046
  39. Ridge M. (ed.) (2014) Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage. Farnham: Ashgate.
  40. Ridge M., Blickhan S., Ferriter M., Mast A., Brumfield B., Wilkins B., Cybulska D. et al. (2021a) What is crowdsourcing in cultural heritage? In: The Collective Wisdom Handbook: Perspectives on Crowdsourcing in Cultural Heritage. DOI: 10.21428/a5d7554f.1b80974b
  41. Ridge M., Blickhan S., Ferriter M., Mast A., Brumfield B., Wilkins B., Cybulska D. et al. (2021b) Working with crowdsourced data. In: The Collective Wisdom Handbook: Perspectives on Crowdsourcing in Cultural Heritage. DOI: 10.21428/a5d7554f.1b80974b
  42. Rinaldo C., Rielinger D., Deveer J., and Castronovo D. (2023) Connecting libraries, archives, and museums: Collections in support of natural history science. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 16(1), pp. 124. DOI: 10.1145/3570905
  43. Scott, W.R. (2014) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  44. Sharma, N., Colucci-Gray, L., van der Wal, R., and Siddharthan, A. (2022) Consensus building in on-line citizen science. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), pp.126. DOI: 10.1145/3555535
  45. Simon N. (2010) The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0.
  46. Smith L. (2006) Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203602263
  47. Spradley, J.P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  48. Srinivasan, R., Boast, R., Furner, J., and Becvar, K.M. (2009) Digital museums and diverse cultural knowledges: Moving past the traditional catalog. Information Society, 25(4), pp.265278. DOI: 10.1080/01972240903028714
  49. Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C., and Packer, C. (2016) A generalized approach for producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images. Conservation Biology, 30(3), pp.520531. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12695
  50. Terras M. (2016) Crowdsourcing in the digital humanities. In: Schreibman S., Siemens R., and Unsworth J. (eds.), A New Companion to Digital Humanities. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. pp.420439.
  51. Thomer, A.K. and Rayburn, A.J. (2024) A patchwork of datasystems: Quilting as an analytic lens and stabilizing practice for knowledge infrastructures. Science, Technology, & Human Values 49(5), pp.10731102. DOI: 10.1177/01622439231175535
  52. Tuhiwai Smith L. (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Dunedin, NZ: Otago University Press.
  53. Van Hooland S. (2006) From spectator to annotator: Possibilities offered by user-generated metadata for digital cultural heritage collections. Paper presented at CILIP Cataloguing and Indexing Group Annual Conference-Immaculate Catalogues: Taxonomy, Metadata and Resource Discovery in the 21st Century, University of East Anglia, September 13–15, 2006.
  54. Van Hyning V. (2019) Harnessing crowdsourcing for scholarly and GLAM purposes. Literature Compass, 16(3–4). e12507. DOI: 10.1111/lic3.12507
  55. Van Hyning V., and Jones, M.A. (2021) Data’s destinations: Three case studies in crowdsourced transcription data management and dissemination. Startwords (1). DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5750691
  56. Vessio, I.E., MacIvor, J.S., Persaud N., Xia C., and Filazzola A. (2025) Improving data reliability in community science projects with post-validation criteria. Journal for Nature Conservation, 87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127001
  57. Wiggins A., Newman G., Stevenson, R.D. and Crowston K. (2011) Mechanisms for data quality and validation in citizen science. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on e-Science. Stockholm: IEEE. pp.1419. DOI: 10.1109/eScienceW.2011.27
  58. Wynne, B. (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), pp.281304. DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
  59. Yakel E. (2011) Balancing archival authority with encouraging authentic voices to engage with records. In: Theimer K. (ed.) A Different Kind of Web: New Connections between Archives and Our Users. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, pp.75101.
  60. Yin, R.K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.919 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 13
Submitted on: Sep 29, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 28, 2026
Published on: May 15, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Federica Papiccio, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.