References
- Anhalt-Depies, C., Stenglein, J.L., Zuckerberg, B., Townsend, P.A., and Rissman, A.R. (2019) Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science. Biological Conservation, 238, 108195. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108195
- Astorga, F., Rodrigues, A., and Waller, J. (2024) Sensitive species data generalization: Exploring risks, benefits and best practices. GBIF Secretariat. DOI: 10.35035/doc-yr9g-nx02
- Atlas of Living Australia (2023) National framework for the sharing of restricted access species data in Australia. DOI: 10.54102/ala.94894
- Auliya, M., Altherr, S., Ariano-Sanchez, D., Baard, E.H., Brown, C., Brown, R.M., Cantu, J.-C., et al. (2016) Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market. Biological Conservation, 204, pp. 103–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.017
- Averyanov, L., Pham, T.V., Phan, L.P., Tien, H.N., Xuan, C.C., Tien, V.N., and Quang, H.N. (2014) Field survey of Paphiopedilum canhii: From discovery to extinction. Slipper Orchids, pp. 2–11.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288701667_Field_survey_of_Paphiopedilum_canhii_from_discovery_to_extinction - Bowser, A., Cooper, C., Sherbinin, A. de, Wiggins, A., Brenton, P., Chuang, T.-R., Faustman, E., et al. (2020) Still in need of norms: The state of the data in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 18. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.303
- Bowser, A., and Wiggins, A. (2015) Privacy in participatory research: Advancing policy to support human computation. Human Computation, 2, pp. 19–44. DOI: 10.15346/hc.v2i1.3
- Chandler, M., See, L., Copas, K., Bonde, A.M.Z., López, B.C., Danielsen, F., Legind, J.K., et al. (2017) Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation, 213, pp. 280–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004
- Chapman, A.D. (2006) Questionnaire on dealing with sensitive primary species occurrence data: Summary of responses. GBIF Secretariat. DOI: 10.35035/vs84-0p13
- Chapman, A.D. (2020) Current best practices for generalizing sensitive species occurrence data. GBIF Secretariat. DOI: 10.15468/doc-5jp4-5g10
- Contreras-Díaz, R.G., Nori, J., Chiappa-Carrara, X., Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., and Osorio-Olvera, L. (2023) Well-intentioned initiatives hinder understanding biodiversity conservation: Cloaked iNaturalist information for threatened species. Biological Conservation, 282, 110042. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110042
- Cooper, C.B., Rasmussen, L.M., and Jones, E.D. (Eds.). (2022) A toolkit for data ethics in the participatory sciences. Citizen Science Association. DOI: 10.18130/6tg8-7c78
- Eitzel, M.V., Cappadonna, J.L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R.E., Virapongse, A., West, S.E., Kyba, C.C.M., et al. (2017) Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
- Feng, X., Enquist, B.J., Park, D.S., Boyle, B., Breshears, D.D., Gallagher, R.V., Lien, A., et al. (2022) A review of the heterogeneous landscape of biodiversity databases: Opportunities and challenges for a synthesized biodiversity knowledge base. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31(7), pp. 1242–1260. DOI: 10.1111/geb.13497
- Ganzevoort, W., van den Born, R.J.G., Halffman, W., and Turnhout, S. (2017) Sharing biodiversity data: Citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(12), pp. 2821–2837. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1391-z
- GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility). (2025) GBIF. Available at
https://www.gbif.org/ (Last accessed 31 October 2025). - Groom, Q., Weatherdon, L., and Geijzendorffer, I.R. (2017) Is citizen science an open science in the case of biodiversity observations? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2), pp. 612–617. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12767
- Kaehrle, M. and Eschenfelder, K. (2025). Justifying biodiversity data access restrictions: A global comparison of data policies. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), pp. 324–334. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.1259
- Lindenmayer, D., and Scheele, B. (2017) Do not publish. Science, 356(6340), pp. 800–801. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan1362
- McKinley, D.C., Miller-Rushing, A.J., Ballard, H.L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S.C., Evans, D.M., et al. (2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, pp. 15–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
- Miljødirektoratet. (2016). Veileder M-606: Retningslinjer for håndtering av sensitive artsdata. Available at
https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/m606/m606.pdf (Last accessed 31 March 2025). - Petty, R.E., Priester, J.R., and Briñol, P. (2002)
Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion . In Bryant, J. & Zillmann, D. (eds.). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. pp. 155–198. DOI: 10.4324/9781410602428 - Roman, D., Reeves, N., Gonzalez, E., Celino, I., Abd El Kader, S., Turk, P., Soylu, A., et al. (2021) An analysis of pollution citizen science projects from the perspective of data science and open science. Data Technologies and Applications, 55(5), pp. 622–642. DOI: 10.1108/DTA-10-2020-0253
- Sterner, B., Elliott, S., Gilbert, E.E., and Franz, N.M. (2023) Unified and pluralistic ideals for data sharing and reuse in biodiversity. Database, 2023, baad048. DOI: 10.1093/database/baad048
- Stuart, B.L., Rhodin, A.G.J., Grismer, L.L., and Hansel, T. (2006) Scientific description can imperil species. Science, 312(5777), pp. 1137–1137. DOI: 10.1126/science.312.5777.1137b
- Stvilia, B., Twidale, M., Smith, L.C., and Gasser, L. (2008) Information quality work organization in Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), pp. 983–1001. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20813
- Suter, S., Barrett, B., and Welden, N. (2023) Do biodiversity monitoring citizen science surveys meet the core principles of open science practices? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(2): 295. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10887-y
- TDWG (Biodiversity Information Standards). (2025a) DWC Restricted Access Species Data (RASD) extension: RASD reason and treatment vocabularies, version 6 (July 2025). Available at
https://github.com/tdwg/sensitive-species-extension/blob/main/SensitivityReasonsTreatments_V6_July2025.docx (Last accessed 9 August 2025). - TDWG (Biodiversity Information Standards). (2025b) Meeting minutes: TDWG Sensitive Species Data Task Group, 21 May 2025. Available at
https://github.com/tdwg/sensitive-species-extension/blob/main/TDWG%20-%20Sensitive%20Species%20Extension%20TG%20May%202025%20Minutes.docx (Last accessed 8 August 2025). - TDWG (Biodiversity Information Standards). (2025c) Sensitive species extension. Available at
https://www.tdwg.org/community/dwc/sensitive-species/ (Last accessed 3 April 2025). - Thuermer, G., Guardia, E.G., Reeves, N., Corcho, O., and Simperl, E. (2023) Data management documentation in citizen science projects: Bringing formalisation and transparency together. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.538
- Tulloch, A.I.T., Auerbach, N., Avery-Gomm, S., Bayraktarov, E., Butt, N., Dickman, C.R., Ehmke, G., et al. (2018) A decision tree for assessing the risks and benefits of publishing biodiversity data. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, pp. 1209–1217. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0608-1
- Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., et al. (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Yang, J.-H., and Chan, B.P.-L. (2015) Two new species of the genus Goniurosaurus (Squamata: Sauria: Eublepharidae) from southern China. Zootaxa, 3980(1), pp. 67–80. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3980.1.4