References
- Aronson, M.F.J., La Sorte, F.A., Nilon, C.H., Katti, M., Goddard, M.A., Lepczyk, C.A., Warren, P.S. et al. (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1780),
20133330 . 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330 - August, T., Fox, R., Roy, D.B., and Pocock, M.J.O. (2020) Data-derived metrics describing the behaviour of field-based citizen scientists provide insights for project design and modelling bias. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article
1 . 10.1038/s41598-020-67658-3 - Baker, R.S. (2020) Why is the American South Poorer? Social Forces, Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 126–154, 10.1093/sf/soz149
- Barrett, T., Dowle, M., Srinivasan, A., Gorecki, J., Chirico, M., Hocking, T., Schwendinger, B. et al. (2025) data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame’. R package version 1.17.0, <
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table > - Barve, V.V., Brenskelle, L., Li, D., Stucky, B.J., Barve, N.V., Hantak, M.M., McLean, B.S. et al. (2020) Methods for broad-scale plant phenology assessments using citizen scientists’ photographs. Applications in Plant Sciences, 8(1). 10.1002/aps3.11315
- Barve, V. and Hart, E. (2022). rinat: Access ‘iNaturalist’ Data Through APIs. R package version 0.1.9, <
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rinat > - Bedessem, B., Gawrońska-Nowak, B., and Lis, P. (2021) Can citizen science increase trust in research? A case study of delineating Polish metropolitan areas. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 17(2). 10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1185
- Boakes, E.H., Gliozzo, G., Seymour, V., Harvey, M., Smith, C., Roy, D.B., and Hakley, M. (2016) Patterns of contribution to citizen science biodiversity projects increase understanding of volunteers’ recording behaviour. Scientific Reports 6,
33051 10.1038/srep33051 - Botts, E.A., Erasmus, B.F.N., and Alexander, G.J. (2011) Geographic sampling bias in the South African Frog Atlas Project: Implications for conservation planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20(1), 119–139. 10.1007/s10531-010-9950-6
- Bowler, D.E., Bhandari, N., Repke, L., Beuthner, C., Callaghan, C.T., Eichenberg, D., Henle, K. et al. (2022) Decision-making of citizen scientists when recording species observations. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article
1 . 10.1038/s41598-022-15218-2 - Bowser, A., Hansen, D., Preece, J., He, Y., Boston, C., and Hammock, J. (2014) Gamifying Citizen Science: A Study of Two User Groups. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Baltimore, MD, USA,
Association for Computing Machinery : New York, NY, USA,2014 ; pp. 137–140. 10.1145/2556420.2556502 - Butler, B.J. and Wear, D.N. (2013).
Forest ownership dynamics of southern forests . In D.N. Wear and J.G. Greis (Eds.), The Southern Forest Futures Project: Technical report (pp. 103–121). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. - Callaghan, C.T., Bino, G., Major, R.E., Martin, J.M., Lyons, M.B., and Kingsford, R.T. (2019) Heterogeneous urban green areas are bird diversity hotspots: Insights using continental-scale citizen science data. Landscape Ecology, 34(6), 1231–1246. 10.1007/s10980-019-00851-6
- Callaghan, C.T., Ozeroff, I., Hitchcock, C., and Chandler, M. (2020) Capitalizing on opportunistic citizen science data to monitor urban biodiversity: A multi-taxa framework. Biological Conservation, 251,
108753 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108753 - Callaghan, C.T., Thompson, M., Woods, A., Poore, A.G.B., Bowler, D.E., Samonte, F., Rowley, J.J.L. et al. (2023) Experimental evidence that behavioral nudges in citizen science projects can improve biodiversity data. BioScience, 73(4), 302–313. 10.1093/biosci/biad012
- Callaghan, C.T., Winnebald, C., Smith, B., Mason, B.M., and López-Hoffman, L. (2025) Citizen science as a valuable tool for environmental review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 23(1),
e2808 . 10.1002/fee.2808 - Campbell, C.J., Barve, V., Belitz, M.W., Doby, J.R., White, E., Seltzer, C., Di Cecco, G. et al. (2023) Identifying the identifiers: How iNaturalist facilitates collaborative, research-relevant data generation and why it matters for biodiversity science. BioScience, 73(7), 533–541. 10.1093/biosci/biad051
- Carlen, E.J., Estien, C.O., Caspi, T., Perkins, D., Goldstein, B.R., Kreling, S.E.S., Hentati, Y. et al. (2024) A framework for contextualizing social-ecological biases in contributory science data. People and Nature, 6(2), 377–390. 10.1002/pan3.10592
- Courter, J.R., Johnson, R.J., Stuyck, C.M., Lang, B.A., and Kaiser, E.W. (2013) Weekend bias in Citizen Science data reporting: implications for phenology studies. International Journal of Biometeorology, 57(5), 715–20. doi: 10.1007/s00484-012-0598-7. Epub 2012
- Crimmins, T.M., Posthumus, E., Schaffer, S., and Prudic, K.L. (2021) COVID-19 impacts on participation in large scale biodiversity-themed community science projects in the United States. ScienceDirect, 256,
109017 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109017 - Davis, A.K., Nibbelink, N., and Deneka, C.J. (2022). Revisiting geographic variation in melanism of monarch butterfly larvae in North America using iNaturalist photos. Journal of Thermal Biology, 110,
103374 . 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103374 - Deitsch, J., Chuang, A., Nelsen, D., Sitvarin, M., and Coyle, D. (2024) Quantifying how natural history traits contribute to bias in community science engagement: A case study using orbweaver spiders. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 9(1). 10.5334/cstp.690
- Di Cecco, G.J., Barve, V., Belitz, M.W., Stucky, B.J., Guralnick, R.P. and Hurlbert, A.H. (2021) Observing the observers: How participants contribute data to iNaturalist and implications for biodiversity science. BioScience, 71(11), 1179–1188. 10.1093/biosci/biab093
- Dimson, M. and Gillespie, T.W. (2023) Who, where, when: Observer behavior influences spatial and temporal patterns of iNaturalist participation. Applied Geography, 153,
102916 . 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102916 - Dowthwaite, L., Spence, A., Lintott, C., Miller, G., Sprinks, J., Blickhan, S., and Houghton, R. (2025) Exploring the relationship between basic psychological needs and motivation in online citizen science. Transactions on Social Computing, 8, 1–2, Article
4 . 10.1145/3702210 - Ellis-Soto, D., Chapman, M., and Locke, D.H. (2023) Historical redlining is associated with increasing geographical disparities in bird biodiversity sampling in the United States. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(11), 1869–1877. 10.1038/s41562-023-01688-5
- Estien, C.O., Carlen, E.J., and Schell, C.J. (2024) Examining the influence of sociodemographics, residential segregation, and historical redlining on eBird and iNaturalist data disparities in three U.S. cities. Ecology and Society, 29(3),
16 . 10.5751/ES-15263-290316 - Fogg-Rogers, L., Sardo, A.M., Csobod, E., Boushel, C., Laggan, S., and Hayes, E. (2024) Citizen-led emissions reduction: Enhancing enjoyment and understanding for diverse citizen engagement with air pollution and climate change decision making. Environmental Science & Policy, 154,
103692 . 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103692 - Fourcade, Y. (2016) Comparing species distributions modelled from occurrence data and from expert-based range maps. Implication for predicting range shifts with climate change. Ecological Informatics, 36, 8–14. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.09.002
- Grolemund, G. and Wickham, H. (2011) Dates and Times Made Easy with lubridate. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(3), 1–25. URL
https://www.jstatsoft.org/v40/i03/ . - Hart, A., Adcock, D., Barr, M., Church, S., Clegg, T., Copland, S., De Meyer, K., et al. (2022) Understanding engagement, marketing, and motivation to benefit recruitment and retention in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1). Available at: 10.5334/cstp.436
- Hijmans, R. (2024) _terra: Spatial Data Analysis_. R package version 1.7–78, <
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra >. - iNaturalist. (2025) Observations.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations . Accessed: April 23, 2025 - Larson, L.R., Cooper, C.B., Futch, S., Singh, D., Shipley, N.J., Dale, K., LeBaron, G.S. et al. (2020) The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: Does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses? Biological Conservation, 242,
108428 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428 - Lee, T.K., Crowston, K., Harandi, M., Østerlund, C., and Miller, G. (2018) Appealing to different motivations in a message to recruit citizen scientists: Results of a field experiment. Journal of Science Communication, 17(01),
A02 . 10.22323/2.17010202 - Leong, M., Dunn, R.R., and Trautwein, M.D. (2018) Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biology Letters, 14(5). 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0082
- Li, D., Barve, N., Brenskelle, L., Earl, K., Barve, V., Belitz, M.W., and Doby, J. et al. (2021) Climate, urbanization, and species traits interactively drive flowering duration. Global Change Biology, 27: 892–903. 10.1111/gcb.15461
- López-Guillén, E., Herrera, I., Bensid, B., Gómez-Bellver, C., Ibáñez, N., Jiménez-Mejías, P., Mairal, M. et al. (2024). Strengths and challenges of using iNaturalist in plant research with focus on data quality. Diversity, 16(1),
42 . 10.3390/d16010042 - Lowe, K.L., Mason, B.M., Guralnick, R., Morales, N.A., and Callaghan, C.T. (2025) Participant intensity influences motivations for contributing to iNaturalist. Citizen Science Theory and Practice, 10(1), p.
25 . 10.5334/cstp.823. - Moon, K., Yates, S., Callaghan, C.T., and Thompson, M. (2024). The relational nature of citizen science. People and Nature, 6, 2060–2076. 10.1002/pan3.10709
- Noss, R.F., Platt, W.J., Sorrie, B.A., Weakley, A.S., Means, D.B., Costanza, J., and Peet, R.K. (2015) How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Diversity and Distributions, 21: 236–244. 10.1111/ddi.12278
- Overdevest, C., Orr, C.H., and Stepenuck, K. (2004) Volunteer stream monitoring and local participation in natural resource issues. Human Ecology Review, 11(2), 177–185.
- Pebesma, E. and Bivand, R. (2023) Spatial Data Science: With Applications in R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 10.1201/9780429459016
- Pernat, N., Memedemin, D., August, T., Preda, C., Reyserhove, L., Schirmel, J., and Groom, Q. (2024) Extracting secondary data from citizen science images reveals host flower preferences of the Mexican grass-carrying wasp Isodontia mexicana in its native and introduced ranges. Ecology and Evolution, 14,
e11537 . 10.1002/ece3.11537 - Pocock, M.J.O., Hamlin, I., Christelow, J., Passmore, H.A., and Richardson, M. (2023a) The benefits of citizen science and nature-noticing activities for well-being, nature connectedness and pro-nature conservation behaviours. People and Nature, 5, 591–606. 10.1002/pan3.10432
- Pocock, M.J.O., Logie, M., Isaac, N.J.B., Fox, R., and August, T. (2023b) The recording behaviour of field-based citizen scientists and its impact on biodiversity trend analysis. Ecological Indicators, 151,
110276 . 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110276 - R Core Team. (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org/ - Robinson, J.A., Kocman, D., Speyer, O., and Gerasopoulos, E. (2021) Meeting volunteer expectations — a review of volunteer motivations in citizen science and best practices for their retention through implementation of functional features in CS tools. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(12). 10.1080/09640568.2020.1853507
- Rosenblatt, C.J., Dayer, A.A., Duberstein, J.N., Phillips, T.B., Harshaw, H.W., Fulton, D.C., Cole, N.W. et al. (2022) Highly specialized recreationists contribute the most to the citizen science project eBird. Ornithological Applications, 124(2),
duac008 . 10.1093/ornithapp/duac008 - Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J., Hansen, D., Boston, C., Bowser, A. and He, Y. (2014) Motivations Affecting Initial and Long-Term Participation in Citizen Science Projects in Three Countries. iConference 2014 Proceedings. 10.9776/14054
- Rowley, J.J.L., Callaghan, C.T., Cutajar, T., Portway, C., Potter, K., Mahony, S., Trembath, D.F., et al. (2019). FrogID: Citizen scientists provide validated biodiversity data on frogs of Australia. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 14:1, 155–170.
- Skarlatidou, A., Moreu, M., and Haklay, M. (2024) The utilization of maps in geographic citizen science: A preliminary analysis of usability and user experience issues and opportunities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 115(2), 316–333. 10.1080/24694452.2024.2426714
- Thompson, M.M., Moon, K., Woods, A., Rowley, J.J.L., Poore, A.G.B., Kingsford, R.T. and Callaghan, C.T. (2023) Citizen science participant motivations and behaviour: Implications for biodiversity data coverage. Biological Conservation, 282,
110079 . 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110079 - Tredennick, A.T., Hooker, G., Ellner, S.P., and Adler, P.B. (2021) A practical guide to selecting models for exploration, inference, and prediction in ecology. Ecology 102(6):
e03336 . 10.1002/ecy.3336 - Trust for Public Land. (2024) U.S. ParkServe Dataset.
https://www.tpl.org/park-data-downloads - U.S. Census Bureau. (2020) TIGER/Line Shapefiles, Nation, U.S., 2020 Census Urban Area.
https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/tiger-line-file.html . - U.S. Census Bureau. (2022) American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, 2016–2020: Tables B17020 and B19113.
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2022) Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) 3.0. 10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B.
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2023) Annual NLCD Collection 1 Science Products. 10.5066/P94UXNTS
- Venables, W.N. and Ripley, B.D. (2002)
Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition . Springer, New York. ISBN 0–387–95457-0. 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 - Visit Florida Research,
https://www.visitflorida.org/resources/research/ . Accessed Sept. 2025 - West, S.E., Pateman, R.M., and Dyke, A. (2021) Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), p.
14 . 10.5334/cstp.370 - Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L.D., François, R., Grolemund, G. et al. (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43),
1686 . doi: 10.21105/joss.01686 - Wood, C., Sullivan, B., Iliff, M., Fink, D., and Kelling, S. (2011) eBird: Engaging birders in science and conservation. PLOS Biology, 9(12),
e1001220 . 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001220