References
- Arctic Research Consortium of the United States. (2024) Community and citizen science.
https://www.arcus.org/ccs - Bahnke, M., Korthuis, V., Philemonoff, A., and Johnson, M. (2020, March 19) Letter to the National Science Foundation.
https://kawerak.org/knowledge-sovereignty-and-the-indigenization-of-knowledge-2/ - Ballard, H., Dixon, C., and Harris, E. (2017) Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208, pp. 65–75. 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024
- Benyei, P., Skarlatidou, A., Argyriou, D., Hall, R., Theilade, I., Turreira-García, N., Latreche, D. et al. (2023) Challenges, strategies, and impacts of doing citizen science with marginalised and Indigenous communities: Reflections from project coordinators. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), pp. 1–15. 10.5334/cstp.514
- Bergmann, M., Lutz, B., Tekman, M., and Gutow, L. (2017) Citizen scientists reveal: Marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wildlife. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 125(1–2), pp. 535–540. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.055
- Besley, J., Dudo, A., Yuan, S., and Lawrence, F. (2018) Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage. Science Communication, 40(5), pp. 559–590.
- Bína, P., Brounéus, F., Kasperowski, D., Hagen, N., Bergman, M., Bohlin, G., Jönsson, M. et al. (2021) Awareness, views and experiences of citizen science among Swedish researchers – two surveys. Journal of Science Communication, 20(6). 10.22323/2.20060210
- Bowser, A., Cooper, C., de Sherbinin, A., Wiggins, A., Brenton, P., Chuang, T., Faustman, E. et al. (2020) Still in need of norms: The state of data in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5(1). 10.5334/cstp.303
- Carson, S., and Rock, J. (2023) How do New Zealand marine scientists perceive the benefits and limitations of citizen science? New Zealand Science Review, 79. 10.26686/nzsr.v79.8344
- Castleden, H., Morgan, V.S., and Lamb, C. (2012) “I spent the first year drinking tea”: Exploring Canadian university researchers’ perspectives on community-based participatory research involving Indigenous peoples. Canadian Geographies, 56(2), pp. 160–179. 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00432.x
- Cicchetti, D. (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
- Clement, S., Spellman, K.V., Oxtoby, L., Kealy, K., Bodony, K., Sparrow, E., and Arp, C.D. (2023) Redistributing power in community and citizen science: Effects on youth science self-efficacy and interest. Sustainability, 15(11). 10.3390/su15118876
- Collins, S., Sullivan, M., and Bray, H. (2022) Exploring scientists’ perceptions of citizen science for public engagement with science. Journal of Science Communication, 21(7). 10.22323/2.21070201
- Cooper, C., Hawn, C., Larson, L., Parrish, J., Bowser, G., Cavalier, D., Dunn, R. et al. (2021) Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372(6549), pp. 1386–1388. 10.1126/science.abi6487
- Crain, R., Cooper, C., and Dickinson, J. (2014) Citizen science: A tool for integrating studies of human and natural systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, pp. 641–645. 10.1146/annurev-environ-030713-154609
- Creswell. J. (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Danielsen, F., Burgess, N., Balmford, A., Donald, P., Funder, M., Jones, J., Alviola, P. et al. (2009) Local participation in natural resource monitoring: A characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology, 23(1), pp. 31–42. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x
- Danielsen, F., Johnson, N., Lee, O., Fidel, M., Iversen, L., Poulsen, M.K., Eicken, H. et al. (2021) Community-Based Monitoring in the Arctic. University of Alaska Press: Fairbanks, Alaska.
- David-Chavez, D.M., and Gavin, M.C. (2018) A global assessment of Indigenous community engagement in climate research. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12). 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf300
- David-Chavez, D.M., Gavin, M.C., Ortiz, N., Valdez, S., and Carroll, S.R. (2024) A values-centered relational science model: Supporting Indigenous rights and reconciliation in research. Ecology and Society, 29(2). 10.5751/ES-14768-290211
- De Sherbinin, A., Bowser, A., Chuang, T.R., Cooper, C., Danielsen, F., Edmunds, R., Elias, P. et al. (2021) The critical importance of citizen science data. Frontiers in Climate, 3. 10.3389/fclim.2021.650760
- Doering, N.N., Dudeck, S., Elverum, S., Fisher, C., Henriksen, J.E., Herrmann, T.M., Kramvig, B. et al. (2022) Improving the relationships between Indigenous rights holders and researchers in the Arctic: An invitation for change in funding and collaboration. Environmental Research Letters, 17(6). 10.1088/1748-9326/ac72b5
- Druckenmiller, M.L. (2022) Co-production of knowledge in Arctic research: Reconsidering and reorienting amidst the Navigating the New Arctic initiative. Oceanography, 25 (3/4), pp. 189–191. 10.5670/oceanog.2022.134
- Easterling, W. (2021, May 4) Dear Colleague Letter: Update on NSF’s efforts to improve the inclusion of local and Indigenous voices in Arctic research.
https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf21077 - Eicken, H., Danielsen, F., Sam, J., Fidel, M., Johnson, N., Poulsen, M.K., Lee, O. et al. (2021) Connecting top-down and bottom-up approaches in environmental observing. BioScience, 71(5), pp. 467–483. 10.1093/biosci/biab018
- Finger, L., Van dan Bogaert, V., Schmidt, L., Stadler, M., Sommer, K., and Wirth, J. (2023) The science of citizen science: A systematic literature review on educational and scientific outcomes. Frontiers in Education, 8. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1226529
- Ford, J., Stephenson, E., Willox, A., Edge, V., Farahbakhsh, K., Furgal, C., Harper, S. et al. (2015) Community-based adaptation research in the Canadian Arctic. WIREs Climate Change, 7(2), pp. 175–191. 10.1002/wcc.376
- Gardner-Vandy, K., Scalice, D., Chavez, J.C., David-Chavez, D.M., Daniel, K.J., Gonzales, E., Lee, A. et al. (2021) Relationships first and always: A guide to collaborations with Indigenous communities. Bulletin of the AAS, 53(4). 10.3847/25c2cfeb.0de1af1a
- Golumbic, Y.N., Orr, D., Baram-Tsabari, A., and Fishbain, B. (2017) Between vision and reality: A study of scientists’ views on citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1). 10.5334/cstp.53
- Goolsby, J., Cravens, A., and Rozance, M.A. (2023) Becoming an actionable scientist: Challenges, competency, and the development of expertise. Environmental Management, 72, pp. 1128–1145. 10.1007/s00267-023-01863-4
- Herrmann, T.M., Brunner Alfani, F., Chahine, A., Doering, N., Dudeck, S., Elster, J., Fjellheim, E. et al. (2023)
Comprehensive policy-brief to the EU Commission: Roadmap to decolonial Arctic research . University of Oulu, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, The Indigenous Voices research group – Álgoálbmogii jienat, Arctic University of Norway UiT, Saami Council. Áltá – Káráš-johka – Leipzig – Oulu. 10.25365/phaidra.400 - Hird, C., David-Chavez, D.M., Gion, S.S., and Van Uitregt, V. (2023) Moving beyond ontological (worldview) supremacy: Indigenous insights and a recovery guide for settler-colonial scientists. Journal of Experimental Biology, 226(12). 10.1242/jeb.245302
- Jennings, L., Jones, K., Taitingfong, R., Martinez, A., David-Chavez, D., Alegado, R.A., Tofighi-Niaki, A. et al. (2025) Governance of Indigenous data in open earth systems science. Nature Communications, 16. 10.1038/s41467-024-53480-2
- Johnson, N., Alessa, L., Behe, C., Danielsen, F., Gearhead, S., Gofman-Wallingford, V., Kliskey, A. et al. (2015) The contributions of community-based monitoring and Traditional Knowledge to Arctic observing networks: Reflections on the state of the field. Arctic, 68, pp. 28–40. 10.14430/arctic4447
- Jordan, R., Crall, A., Gray, S., Phillips, T., and Mellor, D. (2015) Citizen science as a distinct field of inquiry. BioScience, 65(2), pp. 208–211. 10.1093/biosci/biu217
- Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A., and Simmons, B. (2016) Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10), pp. 551–560. 10.1002/fee.1436
- L’Astorina, A., Davis, C., Pugnetti, A., Campanaro, A., Oggioni, A., and Bergami, C. (2023) Scientists’ attitudes about citizen science at Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1130022
- Lenart-Gansiniec, R., Czakon, W., and Meyer, N. (2024) Antecedents of researchers’ behavioral intentions to use crowdsourcing in science: A multilevel approach. Review of Managerial Science. 10.1007/s11846-024-00797-3
- Meadow, A., and Owen, G. (2021) Planning and evaluating the societal impacts of climate change research project: A guidebook for natural and physical scientists looking to make a difference. The University of Arizona: Arizona Institutes for Resilience. 10.2458/10150.658313
- Mercer, L., Whalen, D., Lim, M., Cockney, K., Cormier, S., Irish, C., and Mann, P. (2023) Towards more inclusive and solution orientated community-based environmental monitoring. Environmental Research Letters, 18(6). 10.1088/1748-9326/accfb0
- Navigating the New Arctic Community Office. (2023) Arctic research is relationship.
https://nna-co.org/sites/default/files/2023-08/Arctic_Research_is_Relationship.pdf - O’Brien, J.M., Blais, N., Butler, C., White, N., Bustead, A., Figler, C., Wells, M. et al. (2024) Ten “simple” rules for non-Indigenous researchers engaging Indigenous communities in Arctic research. PLOS Computational Biology, 20(6). 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012093
- Owen, G. (2021) Evaluating socially engaged climate research: Scientists’ vision of a climate resilient U.S. Southwest. Research Evaluation, 30(1), pp. 26–38. 10.1093/reseval/rvaa028
- Petrov, A., Hinzman, L., Kullerud, L., Degai, T., Holmberg, L., Pope, A., and Yefimenko, A. (2020) Building resilient Arctic science amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Communications, 11(1). 10.1038/s41467-020-19923-2
- Pettibone, L., Vohland, K., and Ziegler, D. (2017) Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria. PLoS ONE, 12(6). 10.1371/journal.pone.0178778
- Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M., and Bonney, R. (2018) A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2), Article
3 . 10.5334/cstp.126 - Riesch, H., and Potter, C. (2014) Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 107–120.
- Rios, M., and Neas, S. (2024) Community-engaged learning in graduate education. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement 12(1). 10.37333/001c.127560
- Rudolf, M.H.C., Trainor, S.F., O’Connor, J., Figus, E., and Hum, R. (2025) Factors in and perspectives of achieving co-production of knowledge with Arctic Indigenous peoples. Community Science, 4. 10.1029/2023CSJ000074
- Saldaña, J. (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Schwoerer, T., Spellman, K.V., Davis, T.J., Lee, O., Martin, A., Mulder, C.P.H., Swenson, N.Y. et al. (2021) Harnessing the power of community science to address data gaps in Arctic observing: Invasive species in Alaska as case examples. Arctic, 74(5). 10.14430/arctic73773
- Shirk, J., Ballard, H., Wilderman, C.C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E. et al. (2012) Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
- Silvertown, J. (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24(9), pp. 467–471. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
- Sinclair, R. (2024)
Sanikiluarmiut harvest data for Qikigtait Protected Area development: Exploring the capacity of SIKU to support Inuit-led conservation . [Master’s thesis, McMaster’s University]. MacSphere: McMaster University Libraries Institutional Repository.http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29470 - Smith, L.T. (2021) Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (3rd ed). Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Spellman, K.V., and Mulder, C.P.H. (2016) Validating herbarium-based phenology models using citizen-science data. BioScience 66(10), pp. 897–906. 10.1093/biosci/biw116
- Spellman, K.V., Sparrow, E.B., Chase, M., Larson, A., and Kealy, K. (2018) Connected climate change learning through citizen science: An assessment of priorities and needs of formal and informal educators and community members in Alaska. Connected Science Learning, 1(6), 1–24. 10.1080/24758779.2018.12420500
- Stevens, M., Vitos, M., Altenbuchner, J., Conquest, G., Lewis, J., and Haklay, M. (2014) Taking participatory science to extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 13(2), pp. 20–29. 10.1109/MPRV.2014.37
- Tengö, M., Austin, B., Danielsen, F., and Fernández-Llamazares, Á. (2021) Creating synergies between citizen science and Indigenous and local knowledge. BioScience 71(5). 10.1093/biosci/biab023
- Van Noordwijk, T., Bishop, I., Staunton-Lamb, S., Oldfield, A., Loiselle, S., Geoghegan, H., and Ceccaroni, L. (2021)
Creating positive environmental impact through citizen science . In Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R. et al. (2021) The Science of Citizen Science, pp. 373–395. Springer International Publishing. - West, S., and Pateman, R. (2016) Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2). 10.5334/cstp.8
- Yua, E., Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Daniel, R.A., and Behe, C. (2022) A framework for co-production of knowledge in the context of Arctic research. Ecology and Society, 2(7). 10.5751/ES-12960-270134