References
- Almeida, A.V. de, Borges, M.M., and Roque, L. (2017) The European Open Science Cloud: A new challenge for Europe. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. TEEM 2017.
18 October 2017 New York, NY, USA:Association for Computing Machinery . pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1145/3144826.3145382 - Baker, E., Drury, J.P., Judge, J., Roy, D.B., Smith, G.C., and Stephens, P.A. (2021) The verification of ecological citizen science data: Current approaches and future possibilities, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1): 12. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.351
- Bedessem, B., Dozières, A., Prévot, A.-C., and Julliard, R. (2023) Science knowledge and trust in science in biodiversity citizen science projects, Journal of Science Communication, 22(1): A05. DOI: 10.22323/2.22010205
- Bernard, L., Kanellopoulos, I., Annoni, A., and Smits, P. (2005) The European geoportal—one step towards the establishment of a European Spatial Data Infrastructure, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(1): 15–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.009
- Bowser, A. (2017) Standardizing Citizen Science?, Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 1:
e21123 . DOI: 10.3897/tdwgproceedings.1.21123 - Branon, S. (2019) Scaling Innovations in Science Education: Lessons Learned From the Students Discover Project, Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting, DOI: 10.3102/1440942
- Budnicki, B. and Newman, G. (2021)
CitSci.org & PPSR Core: Sharing biodiversity observations across platforms, Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 5:e75666 . DOI: 10.3897/biss.5.75666 - Celjak, D., Vodopijevec, A., Celjak, D., and Vodopijevec, A. (2022) Open Science in an open cloud, PUBMET, 36–36. DOI: 10.15291/pubmet.3932
- Chandler, M., See, L., Buesching, C.D., Cousins, J.A., Gillies, C., Kays, R.W., Newman, C., Pereira, H.M., and Tiago, P. (2017a)
Involving citizen scientists in biodiversity observation . In: Walters, M. and Scholes, R.J. (eds.) The GEO Handbook on Biodiversity Observation Networks. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 211–237. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27288-7_9 - Chandler, M., See, L., Copas, K., Bonde, A.M.Z., López, B.C., Danielsen, F., Legind, J.K., Masinde, S., Miller-Rushing, A.J., Newman, G., Rosemartin, A. and Turak, E. (2017b) Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring, Biological Conservation, 213: 280–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004
- Chase, S.K. and Levine, A. (2016) A framework for evaluating and designing citizen science programs for natural resources monitoring, Conservation Biology, 30(3): 456–466. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12697
- Chesser, S., Porter, M.M., and Tuckett, A.G. (2020) Cultivating citizen science for all: ethical considerations for research projects involving diverse and marginalized populations, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(5): 497–508. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2019.1704355
- Collins, M., Arienzo, M.M., Nieminen, S., Hatchett, B.J., Nolin, A., and Jennings, K.S. (2023) Effective Engagement While Scaling Up: Lessons from a Citizen Science Program Transitioning from Single- to Multi-Region Scale 8(1): 65. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.622
- de Sherbinin, A., Bowser, A., Chuang, T.-R., Cooper, C., Danielsen, F., Edmunds, R., Elias, P., et al. (2021) The critical importance of citizen science data, Frontiers in Climate, 3. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.650760
- Dittmann, S., Kiessling, T., Mederake, L., Hinzmann, M., Knoblauch, D., Böhm-Beck, M., Knickmeier, K. and Thiel, M. (2023) Sharing communication insights of the citizen science program Plastic Pirates—best practices from 7 years of engaging schoolchildren and teachers in plastic pollution research, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11: 1233103. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1233103
- European Commission 2024. EU Missions in Horizon Europe – European Commission. 15 October 2024. Available at
https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eu-missions-horizon-europe_en [Last accessed 17 October 2024]. - Eyng, V., Gomes, M., Campera, L., and Hercos, A. (2022) Engagement in a citizen science project in the Amazon Basin, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1): 28. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.453
- García, F.S., Pelacho, M., Woods, T., Fraisl, D., See, L., Haklay, M. (Muki), and Arias, R. (2021)
Finding what you need: A guide to citizen science guidelines . In: Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., and Wagenknecht, K. (eds.) The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 419–437. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_21 - Gilfedder, M., Robinson, C.J., Watson, J.E.M., Campbell, T.G., Sullivan, B.L., and Possingham, H.P. (2019) Brokering trust in citizen science, Society & Natural Resources, 32(3): 292–302. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1518507
- Guerrini, C. and McGuire, A. (2022) An ethics framework for evaluating ownership practices in biomedical citizen science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1): 48. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.537
- Hart, A.G., Adcock, D., Barr, M., Church, S., Clegg, T., Copland, S., Meyer, K.D., et al. (2022) Understanding engagement, marketing, and motivation to benefit recruitment and retention in citizen science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1): 5. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.436
- Haumann, A.-R. and Smolarski, R. (2021) Digital project meets analog community – Expectations and experiences of a digital citizen science project on GDR history. In: Proceedings of Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2020 — PoS(ACSC2020).
SISSA Medialab . p. 010. DOI: 10.22323/1.393.0010 - Heinisch, B. (2021) Knowledge translation and its interrelation with usability and accessibility. Biocultural diversity translated by means of technology and language—The case of citizen science contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainability, 13(1): 54. DOI: 10.3390/su13010054
- Herodotou, C., Aristeidou, M., Sharples, M., and Scanlon, E. (2018) Designing citizen science tools for learning: lessons learnt from the iterative development of nQuire, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s41039-018-0072-1
- Herrick, J.E., Cox, D.W., Lundgren, B., and Nindi, S. (2018) Global citizen science for people, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(9): 491–491. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1969
- Howlett, R., Sitbon, L., Hoogstrate, M., and Balasuriya, S.S. (2021) Accessible Citizen Science, by people with intellectual disability. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ASSETS ’21.
17 October 2021 New York, NY, USA:Association for Computing Machinery . pp. 1–3. DOI: 10.1145/3441852.3476558 - Hull, R. and King, R. (1987) Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues, ACM Computing Surveys, 19(3): 201–260. DOI: 10.1145/45072.45073
- Ilse, M., Kieslinger, B., Stefanie, S., and Schaefer, T. (2023) Adapting public funding schemes for participatory research: Managing expectations, overcoming structural constraints. In: Proceedings of Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2022 — PoS(ACSC2022). SISSA Medialab. p. 027. DOI: 10.22323/1.407.0027
- Johnson, N.E. and Grey, F. (2016) Landfill Hunter: Learning about Waste through Public Participation, Human Computation, 3(1): 243–252. DOI: 10.15346/hc.v3i1.11
- Kieslinger, B., Schäfer, T., Heigl, F., Dörler, D., Richter, A., and Bonn, A. (2017) The Challenge of Evaluation: An Open Framework for Evaluating Citizen Science Activities, SocArXiv. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/enzc9
- Koedel, U., Dietrich, P., Herrmann, T., Liang, C., Ritter, O., Roettenbacher, J., Schuetze, F.M., et al. (2024) Enhancing citizen science impact in environmental monitoring: Targeted engagement strategies with stakeholder groups, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12: 2024. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1375675
- Kosmala, M., Crall, A., Cheng, R., Hufkens, K., Henderson, S. and Richardson, A.D. (2016) Season Spotter: Using citizen science to validate and scale plant phenology from near-surface remote sensing, Remote Sensing, 8(9): 726. DOI: 10.3390/rs8090726
- Lasky, M., Parsons, A., Schuttler, S., Mash, A., Larson, L., Norton, B., Pease, B., et al. (2021) Candid Critters: Challenges and solutions in a large-scale citizen science camera trap project, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1): 4. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.343
- Liu, H.-Y., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., and Grossberndt, S. (2021)
Citizen Science Platforms . In: Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., and Wagenknecht, K. (eds.) The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 439–459. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_22 - Lynn, S.J., Kaplan, N., Newman, S., Scarpino, R., and Newman, G. (2019) Designing a platform for ethical citizen science: A case study of
CitSci.org , Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.227 - Mačiulienė, M., Butkevičienė, E., Vaidelytė, E., and Balázs, B. (2021) Co-creating Social Change through Citizen Science: Systematic Literature Analysis, Filosofija. Sociologija, 32(2): 2021. DOI: 10.6001/fil-soc.v32i2.4416
- Minkman, E., van Overloop, P.J., and van der Sanden, M.C.A. (2015) Citizen science in water quality monitoring: Mobile crowd sensing for water management in the Netherlands. In: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015. Proceedings. pp. 1399–1408. DOI: 10.1061/9780784479162.138
- Mons, B., Neylon, C., Velterop, J., Dumontier, M., da Silva Santos, L.O.B., and Wilkinson, M.D. (2017) Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud, Information Services & Use, 37(1): 49–56. DOI: 10.3233/ISU-170824
- Newman, G., Graham, J., Crall, A., and Laituri, M. (2011) The art and science of multi-scale citizen science support, Ecological Informatics, 6(3): 217–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.03.002
- Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., and Crowston, K. (2012) The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 298–304. DOI: 10.1890/110294
- Ottinger, G. (2010) Buckets of resistance: standards and the effectiveness of citizen science, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2): 244–270. DOI: 10.1177/0162243909337121
- Pantoja, F.L., Filho, M.A. de C., and Santanchè, A. (2024) Harena Semantics: A Framework to Support Semantic Annotation in Citizen Science Systems, Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 5: pp. 336–343. DOI: 10.5220/0010785300003123
- Pocock, M., August, T., Fox, R., and Logie, M. (2019) The information content of biodiversity datasets is affected by patterns of citizen science participation both between and within projects, Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3:
e38435 . DOI: 10.3897/biss.3.38435 - Radicchi, A., Leo, G., and Haklay, M. (2023) Mutual learning exercise on citizen science initiatives – Policy and practice. Fifth thematic report, Scaling up citizen science, Publication Office of the European Union, 5. DOI:
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/527361 - Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D. et al. (2012) Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. CSCW ’12.
11 February 2012 New York, NY, USA:Association for Computing Machinery . pp. 217–226. DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145238 - Russell, E., Switzer, A., and Edelson, D. (2011) National Geographic FieldScope: A Collaboratory Geospatial Platform for Citizen Science. In: 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops.
December 2011 pp. 34–38. DOI: 10.1109/eScienceW.2011.24 - Sachs, J. and Finin, T. (2011) Social and Semantic Computing in Support of Citizen Science, CSWS 2011 Proceedings, 46–51.
- Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., Balázs, B., Göbel, C., Karatzas, K., Mooney, P., et al. (2020) Citizen science and sustainability transitions, Research Policy, 49(5): 103978. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978
- Sharma, N., Colucci-Gray, L., van der Wal, R., and Siddharthan, A. (2022) Consensus Building in On-Line Citizen Science, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2): 434:1–434:26. DOI: 10.1145/3555535
- Soltani, S., Ferlian, O., Eisenhauer, N., Feilhauer, H., and Kattenborn, T. (2024) From simple labels to semantic image segmentation: leveraging citizen science plant photographs for tree species mapping in drone imagery, Biogeosciences, 21(11): 2909–2935. DOI: 10.5194/bg-21-2909-2024
- Sprinks, J., Ceccaroni, L., Woods, S., Parkinson, S., and Gumiero, B. (2022) Design of a platform to measure the impact of citizen science. In: Proceedings of Engaging Citizen Science Conference 2022 — PoS(CitSci2022). SISSA Medialab. p. 006. DOI: 10.22323/1.418.0006
- Sprinks, J., Maccani, G., Fraisl, D., Leal, A.S., Gras-Velazquez, A., Liconti, A., Fritz, S., et al. (2024) CROPS: changing the scale of citizen science towards the transnational level, ARPHA Proceedings, 6: 101–105. DOI: 10.3897/ap.e126305
- Sprinks, J., Woods, S.M., Parkinson, S., Wehn, U., Joyce, H., Ceccaroni, L., and Gharesifard, M. (2021) Coordinator perceptions when assessing the impact of citizen science towards sustainable development goals, Sustainability, 13(4): 2377. DOI: 10.3390/su13042377
- Tengö, M., Austin, B.J., Danielsen, F., and Fernández-Llamazares, Á. (2021) Creating synergies between citizen science and Indigenous and local knowledge, BioScience, 71(5): 503–518. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab023
- Unterfrauner, E., Fabian, C.M., Casado, J., de la Vega, G., Garcia, B., and Díaz-Merced, W. (2021)
Citizen Science for All? In: Antona, M. and Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User Experience. 2021 Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 326–335. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_21 - Usländer, T. (2012)
Maximizing the use of EO products: how to leverage the potential of open geospatial service architectures . In: Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications III. 25 October 2012 SPIE. p. 853802. DOI: 10.1117/12.2012149 - van Dien, L.C. and Fuchs, L.E. (2023) One Million Voices Global Review: A review and analysis of existing citizen science initiatives and projects supporting agroecology and agroecological transitions. CIFOR-ICRAF. Available at
https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/8921/ [Last accessed 22 October 2024]. - Vohland, K., Weißpflug, M., and Pettibone, L. (2019) Citizen science and the neoliberal transformation of science – an ambivalent relationship, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 25. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.186
- von Aschen, H. and Krafft, H. (2017) Das EU-Portal: Aufgaben, Bedeutung, Funktion, Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz, 60(8): 812–816. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2581-2
- Wagenknecht, K., Woods, T., Sanz, F.G., Gold, M., Bowser, A., Rüfenacht, S., Ceccaroni, L., et al. (2021) EU-Citizen.Science: A platform for mainstreaming citizen science and open science in Europe, Data Intelligence, 3(1): 136–149. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00085
- Wehn, U., Gharesifard, M., Ceccaroni, L., Joyce, H., Ajates, R., Woods, S., Bilbao, et al. (2021) Impact assessment of citizen science: state of the art and guiding principles for a consolidated approach, Sustainability Science, 16(5): 1683–1699. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-00959-2
- Wildschut, D. (2017) The need for citizen science in the transition to a sustainable peer-to-peer-society, Futures, 91: 46–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.010
- Wolff, G.B. and Zachmann, G. (2015)
European climate finance- securing the best return . In: Bruegel Policy Brief 9518. Bruegel: Bruegel. pp. 1–8. - Yadav, P. and Darlington, J. (2016) Conceptual frameworks for building online citizen science projects, Human Computation, 3(1): 213–223. DOI: 10.15346/hc.v3i1.12