Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Public Perceptions of Citizen Science Cover
Open Access
|Jul 2017

Figures & Tables

cstp-2-1-77-g1.png
Figure 1

Age of participants. N = 361.

Table 1

Regression coefficients for three measures of familiarity with the concept of citizen science: Familiarity with the term, recollection of hearing about citizen science after being provided with a definition, and familiarity with other similar terms. For details on independent variables, see text. Asterisks indicate significant p-values for coefficients: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. N = 357.

FamiliarityInterceptCS ExperienceEducationAgeGender (Male)Fair CSPseudo R2
Term–2.17***0.95**0.43***–0.010.120.330.27
Definition–0.331.26***0.16–0.01–0.070.140.30
Other Terms1.74***0.82*0.10–0.02*–0.11–0.64*0.31
cstp-2-1-77-g2.png
Figure 2

Confidence in citizen science findings compared to those generated by professional scientists. Pairwise comparisons were conducted within each confidence level (e.g. collect data vs. collaborate fully for results of “less confident”). Different number combinations for each letter indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on pairwise chi-square tests with Bonferroni corrections. Ntotal = 479.

cstp-2-1-77-g3.png
Figure 3

Percentage of participants who reported that they would feel confident (a) or enjoy (c) science process tasks; percentage of participants who reported that they would feel confident (b) or enjoy (d) engaging in nature-based data collection tasks. Details on tasks can be found in the text. Different letters between tasks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on pairwise chi-square tests with Bonferroni corrections. Ntotal = 484.

Table 2

Regression coefficients with confidence in citizen science activities as dependent variables, and prior citizen science experience, education, age, gender, and participation in other fair activities as independent variables. Bolded coefficients indicate significant p-values: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < .001. N = 357.

ConfidenceInterceptCS ExperienceEducationAgeGender (Male)Fair CSPseudo R2
Question0.280.58*0.29**–0.04***0.59*0.040.32
Design–0.010.95**0.17–0.04***0.75**–0.130.32
Collect0.680.76*0.16–0.03***0.310.160.31
Analyze0.290.59*0.02–0.03***0.81***0.170.27
Write–0.140.75**0.20–0.03***0.60*0.170.30
Describe–0.071.22***0.25*–0.03***0.68**0.440.33
Rainfall0.360.170.22–0.010.270.200.28
ID Plants–1.42***0.78**0.130.000.330.47*0.29
Phenology–0.520.90**0.13–0.010.390.150.29
One-time Obs–0.040.270.11–0.010.090.440.27
Monitoring–0.550.400.06–0.010.240.64**0.29
Table 3

Regression coefficients with enjoyment of citizen science activities as dependent variables, and prior citizen science experience, education, age, gender, and participation in other fair activities as independent variables. Bolded coefficients indicate significant p-values: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < .001. N = 357.

EnjoymentInterceptCS ExperienceEducationAgeGender (Male)Fair CSPseudo R2
Question–0.560.79**0.040.000.030.140.28
Design–0.570.72**0.06–0.010.05–0.050.27
Collect–0.300.320.030.00–0.120.310.27
Analyze–0.320.56*0.11–0.02*0.270.180.28
Write–1.64***0.520.27*–0.010.200.110.28
Describe–0.440.520.13–0.01–0.070.210.27
Rainfall–1.17**0.190.200.01–0.140.300.28
ID Plants–0.580.410.090.00–0.51*0.60**0.29
Phenology–0.770.75**0.080.00–0.50*0.120.29
One-time Obs–0.010.490.010.00–0.220.400.28
Monitoring–0.560.49–0.080.01–0.300.130.27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.77 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 11, 2016
Accepted on: Mar 28, 2017
Published on: Jul 4, 2017
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Eva Lewandowski, Wendy Caldwell, Dane Elmquist, Karen Oberhauser, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.