Have a personal or library account? Click to login

References

  1. ALLEA. (2017) The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Available at https://www.etag.ee/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017-really-final.pdf. (Last accessed 27 June 2024)
  2. Balázs, B., Mooney, P., Nováková, E., Bastin, L. and Jokar, A.J. (2021) Data quality in citizen science, in: Vohland, K, Land-Zandstra, A, Ceccaroni, L, Lemmens, R, Perelló, J, Ponti, M, Samson, R and Wagenknecht, K. (Eds.) The Science of Citizen Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 139157. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_8
  3. Bán, M., Boné, G.M., Bérces, S., Barta, Z., Kovács, I., Ecsedi, K. and Sipos, K. (2022) OpenBioMaps – self-hosted data management platform and distributed service for biodiversity related data. Earth Science Informatics, 15, pp. 20072016. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-022-00818-3
  4. Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J.C., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., Hauck, J., et al. (2016) Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science: Lessons from the Study of Nature. Conservation Biology, 30(5), pp. 990999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
  5. Bio Innovation Service. (2018) Citizen science for environmental policy: development of an EU-wide inventory and analysis of selected practices. Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment under the contract 070203/2017/768879/ETU/ENV.A.3, in collaboration with Fundacion Ibercivis and The Natural History Museum. Available at at https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/961304 last accessed 29 October 2023)
  6. Blaney, R.J.P., Philippe, A.C.V., Pocock, M.J.O. and Jones, G.D. (2016) Citizen Science and Environmental Monitoring: Towards a Methodology for Evaluating Opportunities, Costs and Benefits Final Report, UK Environmental Observation Framework, National Environment Research Council, Swindon, Wiltshire, UK.
  7. Bonney, R. (2021) Expanding the Impact of Citizen Science. BioScience, 71: 448451. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab041
  8. Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V. and Shirk, J. (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy BioScience, 59(11): 977984, DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
  9. Bonney, R., Shirk, J.L., Phillips, T.B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H.L., Miller-Rushing, A.J. and Parrish, J.K. (2014) Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178): 14361437, DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
  10. Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. and Bonney, R. (2005) Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, pp. 10991121. DOI: 10.1080/09500690500069483
  11. Ceccaroni, L. and Piera, J. (Eds). (2017) Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research: Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2
  12. Chandler, M., See, L., Copas, K., Bonde, A.M., López, B.C., Danielsen, F., Legind, J.K., et al. (2017) Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological conservation, 213, pp. 280294. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004
  13. Cox, J., Oh, E.Y., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Masters, K., Greenhill, A., Graham, G., et al. (2015) Defining and Measuring Success in Online Citizen Science: A Case Study of Zooniverse Projects. Computing in Science & Engineering, 17, pp. 2841. DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2015.65
  14. Czeglédi, A. (2022) Citizen science in the making: mapping participatory science projects in Hungary, in: Proceedings of Engaging Citizen Science Conference 2022 — PoS (CitSci2022). Engaging Citizen Science Conference 2022, Sissa Medialab, Aarhus University, Denmark. p37. DOI: 10.22323/1.418.0037
  15. D’Andrea, L., Kalpazidou S.E., Bužan, E., Vidal Merino, M., Dall, E., Colonnello, C., Graversen, E.K., et al. (2022) Evaluating citizen science initiatives through a citizen science-based approach. Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 54, pp. 4350. DOI: 10.22163/fteval.2022.570
  16. Danielsen, F., Pirhofer-Walzl, K., Adrian, T.P., Kapijimpanga, D.R., Burgess, N.D., Jensen, P.M., Bonney, R., et al. (2014) Linking Public Participation in Scientific Research to the Indicators and Needs of International Environmental Agreements: Monitoring environmental agreements. Conservation Letters, 7: 1224. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12024
  17. Davis, C., Del Bianco, V., Peterman, K., Grover, A., Phillips, T. and Becker-Klein, R. (2022) Diverse and Important Ways Evaluation can Support and Advance. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7, 30. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.482
  18. EPA. (2019) Quality Assurance Handbook and Guidance Documents for Citizen Science Projects (EPA QA Handbook) Environmental Protection Agency, USA. Available at https://www.epa.gov/participatory-science/quality-assurance-handbook-and-toolkit-participatory-science-projects (Last accessed 05 February 2024)
  19. Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L. and Marra, P.P. (2005) The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen-Science Ecological Research Project. Conservation Biology, 19, pp. 589594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x
  20. Freitag, A., Meyer, R., and Whiteman, L. (2016) Strategies Employed by Citizen Science Programs to Increase the Credibility of Their Data. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2, pp. 111. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.6
  21. Garamszegi, L., Kurucz, K. and Soltész, Z. (2023) Validating a Surveillance Program of Invasive Mosquitoes Based on Citizen Science in Hungary. Journal of Applied Ecology, 60(7):148194. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14417
  22. Hamer, A.J., Barta, B., Márton, Z., Vad, C.F., Szabó, B., Tornero, I. and Horváth, Z. (2024). Patterns and correlates in the distribution, design and management of garden ponds along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-024-01559-5
  23. HAS Hungarian Academy of Sciences. (2010) Science Ethics Code. Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Available at https://mta.hu/data/dokumentumok/english/background/Science_Ethics_Code_English.pdf (Last accessed 26 June 2024)
  24. Hecker, S., Garbe, L. and Bonn, A. (2018) The European Citizen Science Landscape – a Snapshot. Citizen Science, Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Bonn, A and Vogel, J (Eds.) UCL Press. London, UK. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2
  25. Jordan, R., Gray, S., Sorensen, A., Newman, G., Mellor, D., Newman, G., Hmelo-Silver, C., et al. (2016) Studying citizen science through adaptive management and learning feedbacks as mechanisms for improving conservation. Conservation Biology, 30: 487495. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12659
  26. Jordan, R.C., Gray S.A., Howe, D.V., Brooks, W.R. and Ehrenfeld, J.G. (2011) Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen-Science Programs: Citizen-Scientist Knowledge Gain. Conservation Biology, 25, pp. 11481154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x
  27. Juhász, E., and Biró, M. (2024) BeaverMap, a Citizen Science Program in the Service of Discovering the Beaver-Made Landscape Alteration. In: Abstract Book of Citizen Science Conference and Workshop SEEN HUNGARY 2024. 1313, Available at https://ecolres.hun-ren.hu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/SEEN_2024_abstractbook.pdf (Last accessed 15 June 2024)
  28. Károlyi, B. and Rédei, D. (2017) Acrosternum heegeri Fieber, 1861 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), another Mediterranean bug expanding to the north. Zootaxa, 4347. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4347.2.13
  29. Kelling, S., Fink, D., La Sorte, F.A., Johnston, A., Bruns, N.E. and Hochachka, W.M. (2015) Taking a ‘Big Data’ approach to data quality in a citizen science project. A Journal of Environment and Society, 44: 601611. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4.
  30. Kieslinger, B., Schäfer, T., Heigl, F., Dörler, D., Richter, A. and Bonn, A. (2018) Evaluating citizen science-Towards an open framework. In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (Eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press, pp. 8195. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339
  31. Kóbor, P., Kondorosy, E., Nagy, C. and Orosz, A. (2021) Acanalonia conica (Say, 1830): A new alien planthopper species established in Hungary (Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoroidea: Acanaloniidae). Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 56, pp. 201207. DOI: 10.1556/038.2021.00132
  32. Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A. and Simmons, B. (2016) Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 14, pp. 551560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
  33. Leonard, A., Wheeler, S. and McCulloch, M. (2023) Does Citizen Science Bring “Power to the People”? Evaluating a Remote Mapping Project to Identify Best Practices for Positive Impact on Volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1): 4, pp. 115. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.534
  34. Márton, Z., Barta, B., Vad, C., Szabó, B., Hamer, J., Kardos, V., Laskai, C., et al. (2023). Effects of Urbanisation, Habitat Characteristics, and Management on Garden Pond Biodiversity: A Citizen Science Approach. preprint. Ecology. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.08.570789
  35. Maynard, L., Monroe, M.C., Jacobson, S.K. and Savage, A. (2020) Maximizing biodiversity conservation through behavior change strategies. Conservation Science and Practice, 2(6), pp. 111. DOI: 10.1111/csp2.193
  36. McKinley, D.C., Miller-Rushing, A.J., Ballard, H.L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S.C., Evans, D.M., et al. (2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, pp. 1528. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
  37. Merkl, O., Károlyi, B. and Korányi, D. (2017) First record of Cybocephalus nipponicus in Hungary (Coleoptera: Cybocephalidae). Folia Entomologica Hungarica. 78, pp. 7176. DOI: 10.17112/FoliaEntHung.2017.78.71
  38. Mesaglio, T. and Callaghan, C.T. (2021) An overview of the history, current contributions and future outlook of iNaturalist in Australia. Wildlife Research. 48, pp. 289303. DOI: 10.1071/WR20154
  39. Miller, J. (2022) GBIF’s (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) New Strategic Framework to Address Biodiversity Data Needs. BISS Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 6: e91093. DOI: 10.3897/biss.6.91093
  40. Murray-Rust, P. (2008) Open Data in Science. Nature Precedings, pp. 5264. DOI: 10.1038/npre.2008.1526.1
  41. Newing, H., Eagle., C., Puri, R. and Watson, C.W., (2011) Conducting Research in Conservation. London. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203846452
  42. Peter, M., Diekötter, T., Höffler, T. and Kremer, K. (2021) Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens. People and Nature, 3, pp. 294311. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10193.
  43. Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M. and Bonney, R. (2018) A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science. Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3, pp. 119, DOI: 10.5334/cstp.126
  44. Pocock, M.J.O., Hamlin, I., Christelow, J., Passmore, H. and Richardson, M. (2023) The Benefits of Citizen Science and Nature-noticing Activities for Well-being, Nature Connectedness and Pro-nature Conservation Behaviours. People and Nature. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10432.
  45. Pocock, M.J.O., Roy, H.E., Preston, C.D. and Roy, D.B. (2015) The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115, pp. 475493. DOI: 10.1111/bij.12548
  46. Price-Jones, V., Brown, P.M.J., Adriaens, T., Tricarico, E., Farrow, R.A., Cardoso, A.C., Gervasini, E., et al. (2022) Eyes on the aliens: citizen science contributes to research, policy and management of biological invasions in Europe. NeoBiota 78, pp. 124. DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.78.81476
  47. Robinson, L.D., Cawthray, J.L., West, S.E., Bonn, A. and Ansine, J. (2018) Ten principles of citizen science. In Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (Eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, pp. 2740. UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.9
  48. Runnel, V., Wetzel, F., Groom, Q., Koch, W., Nils-Valland, I., Panteri, E. and Kõljalg, U. (2016) Summary Report and Strategy Recommendations for EU Citizen Science Gateway for Biodiversity Data. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 2:e11563. DOI: 10.3897/rio.2.e11563
  49. Santori, C., Keith, R.J., Whittington, C.M., Thompson, M.B., Van-Dyke, J.U. and Spencer, R. (2021) Changes in participant behavior and attitudes are associated with knowledge and skills gained by using a turtle conservation citizen science app. People and Nature, 3, pp. 6676. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10184
  50. Schaefer, T., Kieslinger, B., Brandt, M., and Van Den Bogaert, V. (2021) Evaluation in citizen science: the art of tracking a moving target. In Vohland, K, et al (Eds.), The Science of Citizen Science, pp. 495514. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_25
  51. Serrano-Sanz, F., Holocher-Ertl, T., Kieslinger, B., Sanz García, F. and Silva, C.G. (2014) White Paper on citizen science for Europe. European Commission. Available at www.zsi.at/object/project/2340/attach/White_Paper-Final-Print.pdf (Last accessed 15 March 2023)
  52. Shirk, J., Ballard, H.L., Wilderman, C.C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., et al. (2012) Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design. E&S, 17 (2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
  53. Sillero, N, Campos, J, Bonardi, A, Corti, C, Creemers, R, Crochet, PA, Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., et al. (2014) Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia, 35, pp. 131. DOI: 10.1126/science.1103538
  54. Somerwill, L. and When, U. (2022) How to Measure the Impact of Citizen Science on Environmental Attitudes, Behaviour and Knowledge? A Review of State-of-the-Art Approaches. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1):18. DOI: 10.1186/s12302-022-00596-1
  55. Starr, J., Schweik, C.M., Bush, N., Fletcher, L., Finn, J., Fish, J. and Bargeron, C.T. (2014) Lights, Camera…Citizen Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Video Training in Invasive Plant Identification. PLoS ONE 9, e111433. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111433
  56. Stevenson, R., Merrill, C. and Burn, P. (2021) Useful biodiversity data were obtained by novice observers using iNaturalist during college orientation retreats. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 6(1): 27, pp. 112. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.407
  57. Sullivan, B.L., Phillips, T., Dayer, A.A., Wood, C.L., Farnsworth, A., Iliff, M.J., Davies, I., et al. (2017) Using open access observational data for conservation action: A case study for birds. Biological Conservation 208, pp. 514. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.031
  58. Suškevičs, M., Raadom, T., Vanem, B., Kana, S., Roasto, R., Runnel, V. and Külvik, M. (2021) Challenges and opportunities of engaging biodiversity-related citizen science data in environmental decision-making: Practitioners’ perceptions and a database analysis from Estonia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 64: 126068. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126068
  59. Szép, T. and Gibbons, D. (2000) Monitoring of common breeding birds in Hungary using a randomized sampling design. The Ring, 22, pp. 4555.
  60. Szép, T., Csörgő, T., Halmos, G., Lovászi, P., Nagy, K. and Schmidt, A. (Eds.). (2021) Magyarország madáratlasza – Bird Atlas of Hungary. Ministry of Agriculture, Magyar Madártani és Természetvédelmi Egyesület-Hungarian Ornithological and Nature Conservation Society, pp. 799.
  61. Szép, T., Nagy, K., Nagy, Z. and Halmos, G. (2012) Population trends of common breeding and wintering birds in Hungary, decline of long distance migrant and farmland birds during 1999–2012. Ornis Hungarica, 20: 1363. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2013-0007.
  62. Tang, J., Zhou, X., (Chris) Zhao, Y. and Wang, T. (2021) How the type and valence of feedback information influence volunteers’ knowledge contribution in citizen science projects. Information Processing & Management, 58: 102633. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102633
  63. Theobald, E.J., Ettinger, A.K., Burgess, H.K., DeBey, L.B., Schmidt, N.R., Froehlich, H.E., Wagner, C., et al. (2015) Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181, pp. 236244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021.
  64. Turbé, A., Barba, J., Pelacho, M., Mugdal, S., Robinson, L.D., Serrano-Sanz, F., Sanz, F., et al. (2019) Understanding the Citizen Science Landscape for European Environmental Policy: An Assessment and Recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), pp. 34. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.239
  65. Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, A., Heigl, F., and Bonn, A. (2018) The threefold potential of environmental citizen science – Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225, pp. 176186. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024.
  66. VADONLESŐ GROUP. (2019) Experiences of the first decade of the WildWatcher Programme. Results of the National Biodiversity Monitoring System II, pp. 181198.
  67. VADONLESŐ GROUP, Berndt, M, Lukács, A, Oláh, BK and Farkas, A. (2019) Urban hedgehogs (Erinaceus roumanicus) in Budapest: Live or let die. Hungarian Agricultural Research, 28(3), pp. 2026.
  68. VADONLESŐ GROUP, Geng, B., Bakó, B., Bata, K., Bokor, V., Koczka, K., Váczi, O., et al. (2018) WildWatcher Programme: Volunteer Based, Biodiversity Data-Collector System. Results of the First Ten Years. Hungarian Agricultural Research, 27(4), pp. 1118.
  69. VERBI, S. (2021) MAXQDA 2022 (computer software).
  70. Vétek, G., Károlyi, B., Mészáros, Á., Horváth, D. and Korányi, D. (2018) The invasive brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) is now widespread in Hungary. Entomologia, 38, pp. 314. DOI: 10.1127/entomologia/2018/0631.
  71. Vohland, K., Göbel, C., Balázs, B., Butkevičienė, E., Daskolia, M., Duží, B., Hecker, S., et al. (2021) Citizen Science in Europe. in The Science of Citizen Science. In: Vohland, K, Land-Zandstra, Ceccaroni, L, Lemmens, R, Perelló, J, Ponti, M, Samson, R and Wagenknecht, K (Eds.) Springer International Publishing, pp. 3553. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_3
  72. Von Gönner, J., Herrmann, T.M., Bruckermann, T., Eichinger, M., Hecker, S., Klan, F., Lorke, J., et al. (2023). Citizen science’s transformative impact on science, citizen empowerment and socio-political processes. Socio-Ecological Practice Research 5, pp. 1133. DOI: 10.1007/s42532-022-00136-4
  73. Wiggins, A., Bonney, R., Graham, E., Henderson, S., Kelling, S., LeBuhn, G., Litauer, R., et al. (2013) Data management guide for public participation in scientific research. DataOne Working Group.
  74. Wiggins, A., Newman, G., Stevenson, R.D. and Crowston, K. (2011) Mechanisms for Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science, in: 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on E-Science Workshops. Presented at the 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops (eScienceW), IEEE, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 1419. DOI: 10.1109/eScienceW.2011.27.
  75. Yang, D., Wan, H., Huang, T.K and Liu, J. (2019) The Role of Citizen Science in Conservation under the Telecoupling Framework. Sustainability, 11, pp. 217. DOI: 10.3390/su11041108
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.762 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 15, 2024
|
Accepted on: Oct 10, 2024
|
Published on: Nov 22, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Johanna Maribel Soria Aguirre, Olivér Váczi, Marianna Biró, Erika Juhász, Zoltán Soltész, Barbara Barta, Zsuzsanna Márton, Tibor Szép, Bálint Halpern, István Szentirmai, Balázs Károlyi, Alexandra Czeglédi, Györgyi Bela, Eszter Tormáné Kovács, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.