References
- 1Aceves-Bueno, E., Adeleye, A.S., Feraud, M., Huang, Y., Tao, M., Yang, Y., and Anderson, S.E. (2017) The accuracy of citizen science data: a quantitative review. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 98(4): 278–290. DOI: 10.1002/bes2.1336
- 2Alender, B. (2016) Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3): A04. DOI: 10.22323/2.15030204
- 3Alfonso, L., Gharesifard, M. and When, U. (2022) Analysing the value of environmental citizen-generated data: Complementarity and cost per observation. Journal of Environmental Management, 303(1): 114157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114157
- 4Andrews, K., Nichols K., Harvey, C., Tolimieri, N., Obaza, A., Garner, R. and Tonnes, D. (2019) All hands on deck: local ecological knowledge and expert volunteers contribute to the first delisting of a marine fish species under the Endangered Species Act. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 37, 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.221
- 5Bear, M. (2016) Perspectives in marine citizen science. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(1): 56–59. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1037
- 6Biber, E. (2011) The problem of environmental monitoring. University of Colorado Law Review, 83(1): 1–82.
- 7Boiral, O., Talbot, D. and Paillé, P. (2013) Leading by example: a model of organizational citizenship behavior for the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6): 532–550. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1835
- 8Branchini, S., Pensa, F., Neri, P., Tonucci, P., Mattielli, L., Collavo A., Sillingardi, M.E., Piccinetti, C., Zaccanti, F. and Goffredo, S. (2015) Using a citizen science program to monitor coral reef biodiversity through space and time. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24: 319–336. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0810-7
- 9Browning, H., Masters, J.K., Sojka, B. and Whiteaker, W.L.N. (2013)
Cooperative research program design & implementation planning for Puget Sound rockfish management: Using volunteer dive networks for long-term monitoring of kelp bed habitats . Technical Report to NOAA Fisheries, Protected Resources Division, Seattle, WA. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3829.1446 - 10Butcher, G.S., Fuller, M.R., McAllister, L.S. and Geissler, P.H. (1990) An evaluation of the Christmas Bird Count for monitoring population trends of selected species. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 18(2): 129–134.
- 11COSEWIC. (2020)
COSEWIC assessment and status report on the yelloweye rockfish Sebastes ruberrimus, Pacific Ocean outside waters population and Pacific Ocean inside waters population in Canada . Ottawa: Committee on the Status of Endangered Species in Canada.https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry/cosewic-assessments-status-reports/yelloweye-rockfish-2020.html - 12Dalby, O., Sinha, I., Unsworth, R.K., McKenzie, L.J., Jones, B.L. and Cullen-Unsworth, L.C. (2021) Citizen science driven big data collection requires improved and inclusive societal engagement. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8: 610397. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.610397
- 13Dambly, L.I., Jones, K.E., Boughey, K.L. and Isaac, N.J. (2021) Observer retention, site selection and population dynamics interact to bias abundance trends in bats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(2): 236–247. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13760
- 14Darch, P.. (2017) When scientists become social scientists: how citizen science projects learn about volunteers. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12(2): 61–75. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.551
- 15Domhnaill, M., Lyons, C. and Nolan, A. (2020) The citizens in citizen science: demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics of biodiversity recorders in Ireland. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 1–17. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.283
- 16Domroese, M.C. and Johnson, E.A. (2017) Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation, 2018: 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
- 17Drake, J.S., Berntson, E.A., Cope J.M., Gustafson, R.G., Holmes, E.E., Levin, P.S., Tolimieri, N., Waples, R.S., Sogard, S.M. and Williams, G.D. (2010)
Status review of five rockfish species in Puget Sound, Washington: Bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis), canary rockfish (S. pinniger), yelloweye rockfish (S. ruberrimus), greenstriped rockfish (S. elongatus), and redstripe rockfish (S. proriger) . NOAA Fisheries, NMFS-NWFSC-108, Seattle, WA.https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/status-review-five-rockfish-species-puget-sound-washington-bocaccio-canary - 18Feldman, M.J., Imbeau, L., Marchand, P., Mazerolle, M.J., Darveau, M. and Fenton, N.J. (2021) Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review. PloS One, 16(3):
e0134587 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234587 - 19Field, J.C., Miller, R.R., Santora, J.A., Tolimieri, N., Haltuch, M.A., Brodeur, R.D., Auth, T.D., Dick, E.J., Monk, M.H., Sakuma, K.M. and Wells, B.K. (2021) Spatiotemporal patterns of variability in the abundance and distribution of winter-spawned pelagic rockfish in the California Current. PloS One, 16(5):
e0251638 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251638 - 20Field J.C. and Ralston, S. (2005) Spatial variability in rockfish (Sebastes spp.) recruitment events in the California Current System. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62(10): 2199–2210. DOI: 10.1139/f05-134
- 21Forrest, S.A., Holman L., Murphy, M. and Vermaire, J.C. (2019) Citizen science sampling programs as a technique for monitoring microplastic pollution: results, lessons learned and recommendations for working with volunteers for monitoring microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191: 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7297-3
- 22Goldstein, E.A., Lawton, C., Sheehy, E. and Butler, F. (2014) Locating species range frontiers: a cost and efficiency comparison of citizen science and hair-tube survey methods for use in tracking an invasive squirrel. Wildlife Research, 41: 64–75. DOI: 10.1071/WR13197
- 23Hansen, B., and Bonney, P. (2021) Learning from successful long-term citizen science programs. Pacific Conservation Biology 29(4): 292–299. DOI: 10.1071/PC21065
- 24Harvell, C.D., Montecion-Latorre, D., Caldwell J.M., Burt, J.M., Bosley, K., Keller, A., Heron, S.F., Salomon, A.K., Lee, L., Pointer, O., Pattengill-Semmens, C. and Gaydos, J.K. (2019) Disease Epidemic and a Marine Heat Wave are Associated with the Continental-Scale Collapse of a Pivotal Predator (Pycnopodia helianthoides). Science Advances, 5(1):
eaau7042 . DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau7042 - 25Hermoso, M., Narváez, S. and Thiel, M. (2021) Engaging recreational scuba divers in marine citizen science: differences according to popularity of the diving area. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 31(2): 441–455. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00239
- 26Hermoso, M.I., Martin V.Y., Stotz, W., Gelcich, S. and Thiel, M. (2019) How does the diversity of divers affect the design of citizen science projects. Frontiers in Marine Science, 239: 1–15. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00239
- 27Hyde, M.K., Dunn, J., Bax, C. and Chambers, S.K. (2016) Episodic volunteering and retention: An inte- grated theoretical approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1): 45–63. DOI: 10.1177/0899764014558934
- 28Kam, W., Haklay, M. and Lorke, J. (2021) Exploring factors associated with participation in citizen science among UK museum visitors aged 40–60: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the capability opportunity motivation-behaviour model. Public Understanding of Science, 30(2): 212–228. DOI: 10.1177/0963662520963511
- 29Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A. and Simmons, B. (2016) Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10): 551–560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
- 30Larson, L.R., Cooper C.B., Futch, S., Singh, D., Shipley, N.J., Dale, K., LeBaron, G.S. and Takekawa, J.Y. (2020) The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses? Biological Conservation, 242: 108428. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428
- 31Lenth, R.V. (2016) Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1)L 1–33. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v069.i01
- 32Lewandowski, E., Caldwell, W., Elmquist, D. and Oberhauser, K. (2017) Public perceptions of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.77
- 33Lewandowski, E.J. and Oberhauser, K.S. (2017) Butterfly citizen scientists in the United States increase their engagement in conservation. Biological Conservation, 208: 106–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.029
- 34Locke, C.M., Anhalt-Depies, C.M., Frett, S., Stenglein, J.L., Cameron, S., Malleshappa, V., Peltier, T., Zuckerberg, B. and Townsend, P.A. (2019) Managing a large citizen science project to monitor wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 43(1): 4–10. DOI: 10.1002/wsb.943
- 35Lovett, G.M., Burns, D.A., Driscoll, C.T., Jenkins, J.C., Mitchell, M.J., Rustad, L., Shanley, J.B., Likens, G.E. and Haeuber, R. (2007) Who needs environmental monitoring? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5(5): 253–260. DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[253:WNEM]2.0.CO;2
- 36Lowry, D., Selleck, J., Andrews, K. and Cope, J. (2024)
Yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) and Bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis) of the Puget Sound/Georgia Basin 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation . NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. Seattle, WA. 50 pp.https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3//2024-05/5-year-review-bocaccio-yelloweye-rockfish-2024.pdf - 37Lucrezi, S., Milanese, M., Palma, M. and Cerrano, C. (2018a) Stirring the strategic direction of scuba diving marine citizen science: a survey of active and potential participants. PLoS One, 13(8):
e0202484 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202484 - 38Lucrezi, S., Milanese M., Sarà, A., Palma, M., Saayman, M. and Cerrano, C. (2018b) Profiling scuba divers to assess their potential for the management of temperate marine protected areas: a conceptual model. Tourism in marine environments, 13(2): 85–108. DOI: 10.3727/154427318X15225542424207
- 39Martin, V., Smith, L., Bowling, A., Christidis, L., Lloyd, D. and Pecl, G. (2016) Citizens as scientists: what influences public contributions to marine research. Science Communication, 38(4): 495–522. DOI: 10.1177/1075547016656191
- 40Mason, E.T., Kellum, A.N., Chiu, J.A., Waltz, G.T., Murray, S., Wendt, D.E., Starr, R.M. and Semmens, B.X. (2020) Long-term participation in collaborative fisheries research improves angler opinions on marine protected areas. PeerJ, 8:
e10146 . DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10146 - 41National Marine Fisheries Service. (2017) Rockfish recovery plan: Puget Sound/Georgia Basin yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) and bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis). National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle, WA.
https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/16866 - 42Northern Economics, Inc. (2016)
Economic impacts of Washington state resident scuba divers . Prepared for SeaDoc Society, Eastsound, WA. - 43Obaza, A.K., Lowry, D., Selleck, J., Andrews, K.S. and Shelton, A.O. (2023)
Young-of-the-year rockfish monitoring plan for the southern Salish Sea . National Marine Fisheries Service, WA. 29 pp. - 44Palsson, W.A., Tsou, T.S., Bargmann, G.G., Buckley, R.M., West, J.E., Mills, M.L., Cheng, Y.W. and Pacunski, R.E. (2009)
The biology and assessment of rockfishes in Puget Sound . Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, FPT 09-04, Olympia, WA. - 45Parsons, J, Lukyanenko, R and Wiersma, Y. (2011) Easier citizen science is better. Nature, 471(7336):37. DOI: 10.1038/471037a
- 46R Core Team. 2023.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing . R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.https://www.R-project.org/ - 47Robinson, J.A., Kocman, D., Speyer, O. and Gerasopoulos, E. (2021) Meeting volunteer expectations – a review of volunteer motivations in citizen science and best practices for their retention through implementation of functional features in CS tools. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(12): 2089–2113. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1853507
- 48Robinson, L.D., Cawthray, J.L., West, S.E., Bonn, A. and Ansine, J. (2018)
Ten principles of citizen science . In: Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. UCL Press. pp. 27–40. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339 - 49Rotman, D., Hammock, J., Preece, J.J., Boston, C.L., Hansen, D.L., Bowser, A. and He, Y. (2014) Does motivation in citizen science change with time and culture? In: Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, New York, NY on
February 15, 2014 , pp. 229:232. DOI: 10.1145/2556420.2556492 - 50Sandahl, A. and Tøttrup, A.P. (2020) Marine citizen science: recent developments and future recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.270
- 51Sawchuk, J.H., Beaudreau, A.H., Tonnes, D. and Fluharty, D. (2015) Using stakeholder engagement to inform endangered species management and improve conservation. Marine Policy, 54: 98–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.014
- 52Schade, S. and Tsinaraki, C. (2016)
Survey report: data management in citizen science projects . Publications Office of the European Union, EUR 27920 EN, Luxemourg. - 53Schulwitz, S.E., Hill, G.C., Fry, V. and McClure, C.J.W. (2021) Evaluating citizen science outreach: a case-study with The Peregrine Fund’s American Kestrel Partnership. PLoS ONE, 16(3):
e0248948 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248948 - 54Seymour, V. and Haklay, M. (2017) Exploring engagement characteristics and behaviors of environmental volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.66
- 55Thiel, M., Álvarez, J.B., Diaz, M., de Veer, D., Dittman, S., Guevara-Torrejón, V., Ahumada, G.H., Honorato-Zimmer, D., Kiessling, T., Leyton Muñoz, A. and López-Xalín, N. (2023) Communication strategies in an international school citizen science program investigating marine littler. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11: 1270413. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1270413
- 56Tiago, P., Gouveia, M.J., Capinha, C., Santos-Reis, M. and Pereira, H.M. (2017) The influence of motivational factors on the frequency of participation in citizen science activities. Nature Conservation, 18: 61–78. DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.18.13429
- 57Tulloch, A.I.T., Possingham, H.P., Joseph, L.N., Szabo, J. and Martin, T.G. (2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation, 165: 128–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025
- 58Westreicher, F., Cieslinski, M., Ernst, M., Frigerio, D., Heinisch, B., Hübner, T., and Rüdisser, J. (2021) Recognizing failures in citizen science projects: Lessons Learned. Proceedings of Science: 007. DOI: 10.22323/1.393.0007
- 59Williams, G.D., Levin, P.S. and Palsson, W.A. (2010) Rockfish in Puget Sound: An ecological history of exploitation. Marine Policy, 34(5): 1010–1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.008
- 60Yanamandra-Fisher, P., Angel, A., Clark, W., Feliciano, C. and Usher, H. (2020) The synergy of scientific research and citizen science. In: European Planetary Science Congress, pp. EPSC2020–1002. DOI: 10.5194/epsc2020-1002