Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Representing Neighborhood Health: Exploring Citizen Science as a Democratic Force Cover

Representing Neighborhood Health: Exploring Citizen Science as a Democratic Force

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. American Anthropological Association (2012) Principles of professional responsibility. Available at https://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/ Accessed 17 April 2024.
  2. Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., Bryant, J., Brozek, I., and Hughes, C. (2014) Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), pp. 129. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42
  3. Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., and Shirk, J. (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), pp. 977984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
  4. Bonney, R., Phillips, T.B., Ballard, H.L., and Enck, J.W. (2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), pp. 216. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
  5. De Weger, E., Drewes, H.W., VanVooren, N.J., Luijkx, K.G., and Baan, C.A. (2022) Engaging citizens in local health policymaking. A realist explorative case-study. Plos One, 17(3), p. e0265404. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265404
  6. Den Broeder, L., Devilee, J., Van Oers, H., Schuit, A.J., and Wagemakers, A. (2018) Citizen Science for public health. Health Promotion International, 33(3), pp. 505514. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw086
  7. Denzin, N., Lincoln Y. (eds.) (2017) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th edn. New York: SAGE.
  8. Dijkstra, I., and Horstman, K. (2021) ‘Known to be unhealthy’: Exploring how social epidemiological research constructs the category of low socioeconomic status. Social Science and Medicine, 285, p. 114263. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114263
  9. GGD Zuid-Limburg. Gezondheidsatlas Zuid-Limburg. 2018. https://www.gezondheidsatlaszl.nl/. Accessed 17 April 2024.
  10. Grootjans, S.J.M., Stijnen, M.M.N., Kroese, M.E.A.L., Ruwaard, D., and Jansen, I.M.W.J. (2022) Citizen science in the community: Gaining insight in community and participant health in four deprived neighborhoods in the Netherlands. Health and Place, 75, Article 102798. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102798
  11. Haklay, M. (2013) ‘Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation’. In: Sui, D., Elwood, S. & Goodchild, M. (eds.) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, pp. 105122. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
  12. Halvorsrud, K., Kucharska, J., Adlington, K., Rüdell, K., Brown Hajdukova, E., Nazroo, J., Haarmans, M., Rhodes, J., and Bhui, K. (2021) Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature. Journal of Public Health, 43(1), pp. 197208. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz126
  13. Hecker, S., Bonney, R., Haklay, M., Hölker, F., Hofer, H., Goebel, C., Gold, M., Makuch, Z., Ponti, M., and Richter, A. (2018) Innovation in citizen science–perspectives on science-policy advances. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.114
  14. Huron, A. (2015) Working with strangers in saturated space: Reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode, 47(4), pp. 963979. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12141
  15. Horstman, K., and Knibbe, M. (2022) Gezonde stad. Uitsluiting en ontmoeting in de publieke ruimte. Utrecht: Uitgeverij de Graaff.
  16. Irwin, A. (2002) Citizen Science: A Study Of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. Oxfordshire: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203202395
  17. Kasperowski, D., and Kullenberg, C. (2019) The many modes of citizen science. Science and Technology Studies, 32(2), pp. 27. DOI: 10.23987/sts.74404
  18. Kimura, A.H., and Kinchy, A. (2016) Citizen science: Probing the virtues and contexts of participatory research. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, pp. 331361. DOI: 10.17351/ests2016.99
  19. Kornberger, M., and Borch, C. (2015) Introduction: urban commons. In Urban Commons. Oxfordshire: Routledge. pp. 1131.
  20. Knibbe, M., de Vries, M., and Horstman, K. (2016). Bianca in the neighborhood: moving beyond the ‘reach paradigm’ in public mental health. Critical Public Health, 26(4), 434445. DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1142067
  21. Knibbe, M., and Horstman, K. (2022) Overcoming the tragedy of urban commons. Collective practices for a healthy city ecology in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Health Place, 75, 102777. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102777
  22. Lancione, M., and McFarlane, C. (2016) Life at the urban margins: Sanitation infra-making and the potential of experimental comparison. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(12), pp. 24022421. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X16659772
  23. Latour, B. (1993) The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.
  24. Latour, B. (2012) We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.
  25. Leask, C.F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D.A., Altenburg, T.M., Cardon, G., Chinapaw, M.J.M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verloigne, M., Chastin, S.F.M., GrandStand, Safe Step and Teenage Girls on the Move Research Groups (2019) Framework, principles and recommendations for utilizing participatory methodologies in the cocreation and evaluation of public health interventions. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(2). PMID: 30652027; PMCID: PMC6327557. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9
  26. Lezaun, J., Marres, N., and Tironi, M. (2017) Experiments in participation. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4, pp. 195221.
  27. Marres, N. (2007) The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), pp. 759780. DOI: 10.1177/0306312706077367
  28. Mirowski, P. (2018) The future (s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), pp. 171203. DOI: 10.1177/0306312718772086
  29. Moedas, C. (2018) Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press.
  30. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M. (2003) Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), pp. 179194. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025505528250
  31. PGP-UK Consortium (2018) Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK): a research and citizen science hybrid project in support of personalized medicine. BMC medical genomics, 11, pp. 112. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-018-0423-1
  32. Raap, S., Knibbe, M., and Horstman, K. (2022) Making health public: a philosophy café in a disadvantaged neighborhood. Health Promotion International, 38(4), pp.111. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daab206
  33. Raap, S., Knibbe, M., and Horstman, K. (2022a) Caring neighborhoods: Maintaining collective care under neoliberal care reforms. European Journal of Social Work, 25(5), pp. 867879. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2021.1997928
  34. Rosas, L.G., Espinosa, P.R., Jimenez, F.M., and King, A C. (2022) The role of citizen science in promoting health equity. Annual Review of Public Health, 43. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102856
  35. Strasser, B., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G., and Tancoigne, E. (2019) “Citizen science”? Rethinking science and public participation. Science and Technology Studies, 32(ARTICLE), pp. 5276. DOI: 10.23987/sts.60425
  36. Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K., Heinisch, B., Daskolia, M., Suškevičs, M., Portela, M., Balázs, B., and Prūse, B. (2020) Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), pp. 111. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0471-y
  37. Theobald, E.J., Ettinger, A.K., Burgess, H.K., DeBey, L.B., Schmidt, N.R., Froehlich, H.E., Wagner, C., HilleRisLambers, J., Tewksbury, J., and Harsch, M.A. (2015) Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181, pp. 236244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
  38. Toomey, A.H., Strehlau-Howay, L., Manzolillo, B., and Thomas, C. (2020) The place-making potential of citizen science: Creating social-ecological connections in an urbanized world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200, p. 103824. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103824
  39. Tracey, D., Gray, T., Manohar, N., Kingsley, J., Bailey, A., and Pettitt, P. (2023) Identifying key benefits and characteristics of community gardening for vulnerable populations: A systematic review. Health and Social Care in the Community, vol. 2023, pp123. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5570089
  40. Weibel, P., and Latour, B. (2005) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy.
  41. Woolley, J.P., McGowan, M.L., Teare, H.J., Coathup, V., Fishman, J.R., Settersten, R.A., Sterckx, S., Kaye, J., and Juengst, E.T. (2016) Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives. BMC Medical Ethics, 17(1), pp. 117. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.722 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 6, 2024
|
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2024
|
Published on: Jun 17, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Sanne Raap, Mare Knibbe, Klasien Horstman, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.