References
- 1Amano, T., Lamming, J.D.L. and Sutherland, W.J. (2016). Spatial gaps in global biodiversity information and the role of citizen science, BioScience, 66(5), pp. 393–400. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw022
- 2Balázs, B., Mooney, P., Nováková, E., Bastin, L. and Jokar Arsanjani, J. (2021).
Data quality in citizen science . In: The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 139–157. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_8 - 3Bonney, R., Phillips, T.B., Ballard, H.L. and Enck, J.W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), pp. 2–16. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515607406
- 4Bonney, R., Shirk, J.L., Phillips, T.B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H.L., Miller-Rushing, A.J. and Parrish, J.K. (2014). Citizen science: next steps for citizen science, Science, 343(6178): 1436–1437. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554
- 5Courter, J.R., Johnson, R.J., Stuyck, C.M., Lang, B.A. and Kaiser, E.W. (2013). Weekend bias in citizen science data reporting: implications for phenology studies, International Journal of Biometeorology, 57(5), pp. 715–720. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-012-0598-7
- 6Di Cecco, G.J., Barve, V., Belitz, M.W., Stucky, B.J., Guralnick, R.P. and Hurlbert, A.H. (2021). Observing the observers: how participants contribute data to iNaturalist and implications for biodiversity science, BioScience, 71(11), pp. 1179–1188. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab093
- 7Dickinson, J.L., Zuckerberg, B. and Bonter, D.N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41(1), pp. 149–172. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
- 8Frigerio, D., Richter, A., Per, E., Pruse, B. and Vohland, K. (2021).
Citizen science in the natural sciences . In: The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 79–96. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_5 - 9Haklay, M. (2013).
Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation . In: Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 105–122. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 - 10Haklay, M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Manzoni, M., Hecker, S. and Vohland, K. (2021).
What is citizen science? The challenges of definition . In: The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 13–33. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2 - 11Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K.T., Uhlik, J. and Dörler, D. (2019). Toward an international definition of citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (17), pp. 8089–8092. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903393116
- 12Kahl, S., Wood, C.M., Eibl, M. and Klinck, H. (2021). BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring, Ecological Informatics, 61,
101236 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101236 - 13Knape, J., Coulson, S.J., van der Wal, R. and Arlt, D. (2022). Temporal trends in opportunistic citizen science reports across multiple taxa, Ambio, 51(1), pp. 183–198. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01550-w
- 14Land-Zandstra, A., Agnello, G. and Gültekin, Y.S. (2021).
Participants in citizen science . In: The science of citizen science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 243–259. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_13 - 15Lauha, P., Somervuo, P., Lehikoinen, P., Geres, L., Richter, T., Seibold, S. and Ovaskainen, O. (2022). Domain-specific neural networks improve automated bird sound recognition already with small amount of local data, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(12), pp. 2799–2810. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.14003
- 16Lehikoinen, P., Rannisto, M., Camargo, U., Aintila, A., Lauha, P., Piirainen, E., Somervuo, P. and Ovaskainen, O. (2022). Data from: Crowdsourcing training material for automated bird sound classification – a pilot study. zenodo.org, 12 September 2022. Available at
https://zenodo.org/records/7030863 [Last accessed 1 November 2023]. - 17Lehikoinen, P., Rannisto, M., Camargo, U., Aintila, A., Lauha, P., Piirainen, E., Somervuo, P. and Ovaskainen, O. (2023). A successful crowdsourcing approach for bird sound classification, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.556
- 18MacLeod, C.J. and Scott, K. (2021). Mechanisms for enhancing public engagement with citizen science results, People and Nature, 3(1), pp. 32–50. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10152
- 19Meschini, M., Machado Toffolo, M., Marchini, C., Caroselli, E., Prada, F., Mancuso, A., Franzellitti, S., Locci, L., Davoli, M., Trittoni, M., Nanetti, E., Tittarelli, M., Bentivogli, R., Branchini, S., Neri, P. and Goffredo, S. (2021). Reliability of data collected by volunteers: a nine-year citizen science study in the Red Sea, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9:
694258 . DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.694258 - 20Moran, I.G., Lukianchuk, K.C., Doucet, Stéphanie.M., Newman, A.E.M., Williams, H., Norris, D.R. and Mennill, D.J. (2019). Diel and seasonal patterns of variation in the singing behaviour of Savannah Sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis), Avian Research, 10(1), 26. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0165-6
- 21Pelacho, M., Rodríguez, H., Broncano, F., Kubus, R., García, F.S., Gavete, B. and Lafuente, A. (2021).
Science as a commons: improving the governance of knowledge through citizen science . In: The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 57–78. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_4 - 22Robbins, C.S. (1981). Effect of time of day on bird activity, Studies in Avian Biology, 6, pp. 275–286.
- 23Rüfenacht, S., Woods, T., Agnello, G., Gold, M., Hummer, P., Land-Zandstra, A. and Sieber, A. (2021).
Communication and dissemination in citizen science . In: The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 475–494. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_24 - 24Santangeli, A., Haukka, A., Morris, W., Arkkila, S., Delhey, K., Kempenaers, B., Valcu, M., Dale, J., Lehikoinen, A. and Mammola, S. (2023). What drives our aesthetic attraction to birds?, npj Biodiversity, 2(1), 20, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1038/s44185-023-00026-2
- 25Statistics Finland, Population Grid Data. (2022). 5 km × 5 km, retrieved from Statistics Finland’s interface service on 13.11.2023 with the licence CC BY 4.0.
- 26Stuber, E.F., Robinson, O.J., Bjerre, E.R., Otto, M.C., Millsap, B.A., Zimmerman, G.S., Brasher, M.G., Ringelman, K.M., Fournier, A.M.V., Yetter, A., Isola, J.E. and Ruiz-Gutierrez, V. (2022). The potential of semi-structured citizen science data as a supplement for conservation decision-making: Validating the performance of eBird against targeted avian monitoring efforts, Biological Conservation, 270:
109556 . DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109556 - 27Sullivan, B.L., Aycrigg, J.L., Barry, J.H., Bonney, R.E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C.B., Damoulas, T., Dhondt, A.A., Dietterich, T., Farnsworth, A., Fink, D., Fitzpatrick, J.W., Fredericks, T., Gerbracht, J., Gomes, C., Hochachka, W.M., Iliff, M.J., Lagoze, C., La Sorte, F.A., Merrifield, M., Morris, W., Phillips, T.B., Reynolds, M., Rodewald, A.D., Rosenberg, K. V., Trautmann, N.M., Wiggins, A., Winkler, D.W., Wong, W.-K., Wood, C.L., Yu, J. and Kelling, S. (2014). The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science, Biological Conservation, 169, pp. 31–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003
- 28Thompson, M.M., Moon, K., Woods, A., Rowley, J.J.L., Poore, A.G.B., Kingsford, R.T. and Callaghan, C.T. (2023). Citizen science participant motivations and behaviour: Implications for biodiversity data coverage, Biological Conservation, 282:
110079 . DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110079 - 29Tiago, P., Ceia-Hasse, A., Marques, T.A., Capinha, C. and Pereira, H.M. (2017a). Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups, Scientific Reports, 7(1):
12832 . DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13130-8 - 30Tiago, P., Gouveia, M.J., Capinha, C., Santos-Reis, M. and Pereira, H.M. (2017b). The influence of motivational factors on the frequency of participation in citizen science activities. Nature Conservation, 18, pp.61–78. DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.18.13429
- 31Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R. and Wagenknecht, K. (2021).
Editorial: The science of citizen science evolves . In: The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_1 - 32Xeno-canto Foundation. (2005). xeno-canto: Sharing wildlife sounds from around the world. xeno-canto.org, 2005. Available at
https://xeno-canto.org/ [Last accessed 1 November 2023]. - 33Xie, J., Zhong, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Ding, C. and Triantafyllopoulos, A. (2023). A review of automatic recognition technology for bird vocalizations in the deep learning era, Ecological Informatics, 73:
101927 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101927