References
- 1Afuah, A. and Tucci, C. L. (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37: 355–375. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2010.0146
- 2Barbosu, S. and Gans, J. S. (2022) Storm crowds: Evidence from Zooniverse on crowd contribution design. Research Policy, 51:
104414 . DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104414 - 3Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M.L., Di Marco, D., Distel, A.P., Dobusch, L., Dörler, D. Effert, A., Fecher, B., Filiou, D., Frederiksen, L., Gillier, T., Grimpe, C., Gruber, M., Haeussler, C., Heigl, F., Hoisl, K., Hyslop, K., Kokshagina, O., LaFlamme, M., Lawson, C., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Lukas, W., Nordberg, M., Norn, M. T., Poetz, M. K., Ponti, M., Pruschak, G., Pujol Priego, L., Radziwon, A., Rafner, J., Romanova, G., Ruser, A., Sauermann, H., Shah, S. K., Sherson, J. F., Suess-Reyes, J., Tucci, C. L., Tuertscher, P., Vedel, J. B., Velden, T., Verganti, R., Wareham, J., Wiggins, A., and Xu S. (2022a) The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, 29: 136–185. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
- 4Beck, S., Brasseur, T.-M., Poetz, M. and Sauermann, H. (2022b) Crowdsourcing research questions in science. Research Policy, 51:
104491 . DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104491 - 5Beck, S., Burda, E., Poetz, M., and Sauermann, H. (2023) Listening to the crowd? Experts responsiveness to scientific project evaluations by members of the general public. OIS Research Conference 2023. Vienna.
- 6Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., and Shirk, J. (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59: 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- 7Chiaravalloti, R.M., Skarlatidou, A., Hoyte, S., Badia, M.M., Haklay, M., and Lewis, J. (2022) Extreme citizen science: Lessons learned from initiatives around the globe. Conservation Science and Practice, 4:
e577 . DOI: 10.1111/csp2.577 - 8Cooper, C.B., Hawn, C.L., Larson, L.R., Parrish, J.K., Bowser, G., Cavalier, D., Dunn, R.R., Haklay, M., Gupta, K.K., and Jelks, N.T.O. (2021) Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372: 1386–1388. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6487
- 9Dahlander, L., Jeppesen, L.B., and Piezunka, H. (2019)
How organizations manage crowds: Define, broadcast, attract, and select . Managing inter-organizational collaborations: Process views. Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000064016 - 10Den Oudendammer, W.M., Noordhoek, J., Abma-Schouten, R.Y., Van Houtum, L., Broerse, J.E., and Dedding, C.W. (2019) Patient participation in research funding: An overview of when, why and how amongst Dutch health funds. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5: 1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-019-0163-1
- 11Fraisl, D., Hager, G., Bedessem, B., Gold, M., Hsing, P.-Y., Danielsen, F., Hitchcock, C.B., Hulbert, J.M., Piera, J., and Spiers, H. (2022a) Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2: 64. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4
- 12Fraisl, D., See, L., Bowers, R., Seidu, O., Fredua, K.B., Bowser, A., Meloche, M., Weller, S., Amaglo-Kobla, T., and Ghafari, D. (2023) The contributions of citizen science to SDG monitoring and reporting on marine plastics. Sustainability Science, 18: 2629–2647. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-023-01402-4
- 13Fraisl, D., See, L., Sturn, T., Macfeely, S., Bowser, A., Campbell, J., Moorthy, I., Danylo, O., Mccallum, I., and Fritz, S. (2022b) Demonstrating the potential of Picture Pile as a citizen science tool for SDG monitoring. Environmental Science & Policy, 128: 81–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.034
- 14Franzoni, C., Poetz, M., and Sauermann, H. (2022) Crowds, citizens, and science: a multi-dimensional framework and agenda for future research. Industry and Innovation, 29: 251–284. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1976627
- 15Franzoni, C. and Sauermann, H. (2014) Crowd Science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43: 1–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
- 16Franzoni, C., Sauermann, H., and Di Marco, D. (2021) When citizens judge science: Evaluations of social impact and support for research. Working Paper.
- 17Galton, F. 1907. Vox populi. Nature, 75: 450–451. DOI: 10.1038/075450a0
- 18Haklay, M. (2013)
Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation . In: Sui, D., Elwood, S. and Goodchild, M. (eds.) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 - 19Haklay, M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Manzoni, M., Hecker, S., and Vohland, K. (2021)
What Is Citizen Science? The challenges of definition . In: Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perello, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R. and Wagenknecht, K. (eds.) The Science of Citizen Science. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2 - 20Hesselbein, C. and Franzoni, C. (2023) Grassroots science: A mixed-method study of crowdfunding for scientific research. OIS Research Conference 2023. Vienna.
- 21Jeppesen, L.B. and Lakhani, K.R. (2010) Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search. Organization Science, 21: 1016–1033. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0491
- 22Lee, J., Kladwang, W., Lee, M., Cantu, D., Azizyan, M., Kim, H., and EteRNA Participants. (2014) RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 6: 2122–2127. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313039111
- 23Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63: 746–82. DOI: 10.1177/0001839217747876
- 24Lyons, E. and Zhang, L. (2019) Trade-offs in motivating volunteer effort: Experimental evidence on voluntary contributions to science. PloS ONE, 14:
e0224946 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224946 - 25Majchrzak, A. and Malhotra, A. (2020) Unleashing the Crowd: Collaborative Solutions to Wicked Business and Societal Problems, Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25557-2
- 26Poetz, M.K. and Schreier, M. (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29: 245–256. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x
- 27Sauermann, H. and Franzoni, C. (2015) Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112: 679–684. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1408907112
- 28Sauermann, H., Shafi, K., and Franzoni, C. (2019) Crowdfunding scientific research: Descriptive insights and correlates of funding success. PLOS ONE, 14:
e0208384 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208384 - 29Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., Balaz, B., Goebel, C., Karatzas, K., Mooney, P., Perello, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., and Winter, S. (2020) Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 49:
103978 . DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978 - 30Shirk, J.L., Ballard, H.L., Wilderman, C.C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., Mccallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B.V., and Krasny, M.E. (2012) Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and society, 17:
A29 . DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229 - 31Singh, J. and Fleming, L. (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?. Management Science, 56: 41–56. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1072
- 32Suess-Reyes, J., Beck, S., Brehm, R., Poetz, M., and Sauermann, H. (2022) Increasing the depth of crowd involvement: Decision making and co-creation challenges in science. Working Paper. DOI: 10.5465/AMPROC.2023.12159abstract
- 33Sun, Y. (2023) Understanding knowledge sharing and collaboration dynamics in crowdsourced citizen science. OIS Research Conference 2023. Vienna.
- 34Surowiecki, J. (2005) The wisdom of crowds, Anchor.
- 35Theobald, E.J., Ettinger, A.K., Burgess, H.K., Debey, L.B., Schmidt, N.R., Froehlich, H.E., Wagner, C., Hillerislambers, J., Tewksbury, J., and Harsch, M. (2015) Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181: 236–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
- 36Tucci, C.L., Afuah, A., and Viscusi, G. (2018) Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198816225.001.0001
- 37US GSA. 2022. Citizen science toolkit: basic steps for your project planning [Online]. Available:
https://www.citizenscience.gov/toolkit/howto/ . - 38Vachelard, J., Gambarra-Soares, T., Augustini, G., Riul, P. and Maracaja-Coutinho, V. (2016) A guide to scientific crowdfunding. PLOS Biology, 14:
e1002373 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002373 - 39Van Brussel, S. and Huyse, H. (2018) Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62: 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1428183
- 40Von Hippel, E. and Katz, R. (2002) Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48: 821–833. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817
- 41Vrolijk, A. and Szajnfarber, Z. (2023) Unlocking useful input in crowdsourcing: The need for deep information exchange when the crowd (re)formulates the problem. OIS Research Conference 2023. Vienna. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4439327
- 42Wiggins, A., Bonney, R., Graham, E., Henderson, S., Kelling, S., Lebuhn, G., Litauer, R., Lots, K., Michener, W., and Newman, G. (2013) Data management guide for public participation in scientific research. DataOne Working Group: 1–41.
- 43Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. (2011) From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS),
2011 .IEEE , 1–10. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207