References
- 1Albert, A., Balázs, B., Butkevičienė, E., Mayer, K., and Perelló, J. (2021)
Citizen social science: new and established approaches to participation in social research . In K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, R. Samson, and K. Wagenknecht (Eds.), The Science of Citizen Science. Springer International Publishing, pp. 119–138. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_7 - 2Alvarez, M. (Ed.). (2016) Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- 3Axelrod, R.M. (2006) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
- 4Boullier, D. (1984) Les recherches comme échange de langues, de styles et de codes. Actions et recherches sociales, Travail social. Modèles d’analyse III, pp. 13–24.
- 5Boullier, D. and Pidoux, J. (2021) Cooperation Quality Assessment: Development and Implementation of the Cooperation Analytics (COESO D.5.1). DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5599052
- 6Bradbury, H., and Reason, P. (2003) Action research: An opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), pp. 155–175. DOI: 10.1177/1473325003002002003
- 7Chibois, J., and Caria, A. (2020) Les journalistes et les chercheurs mènent l’enquête: Étude de trois collaborations interprofessionnelles. OpenEdition Center Report [online access at
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03082706 last accessed 14 April 2024]. - 8COACT conference (2022) Available at
https://coactproject.eu/events/forum-on-impact-assessment-in-citizen-science/ [Last accessed 25 September 2023]. - 9Cornwall, A. (2008) Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), pp. 269–283. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsn010
- 10Davis, C., Del Bianco, V., Peterman, K., Grover, A., Phillips, T., and Becker-Klein, R. (2022) Diverse and important ways evaluation can support and advance citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1), pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.482
- 11Desrosières, A. (2014) Prouver et Gouverner: Une Analyse Politique des Statistiques Publiques (E. Didier, Ed.). Paris: La Découverte. DOI: 10.3917/dec.desro.2014.01
- 12de Vries, M., Land-Zandstra, A., and Smeets, I. (2019) Citizen scientists’ preferences for communication of scientific output: A literature review. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1):
2 , pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.136 - 13ECSA (2015) 10 Principles of citizen science. European Citizen Science Association. [online access at
https://osf.io/xpr2n/ last accessed 14 April 2024]. - 14Eymard-Duvernay, F. (1989) Conventions de qualité et formes de coordination. Revue Économique, 40(2), pp. 329–359. DOI: 10.2307/3502117
- 15Freitag, A. (2016) A typology for strategies to connect citizen science and management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(519). DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5513-y
- 16Gagnepain, J. (1994) Leçons d’Introduction à la Théorie de la Médiation. Louvain-La-Neuve: Peeters Publishers.
- 17Göbel, C., Mauermeister, S., and Henke, J. (2022) Citizen social science in Germany—Cooperation beyond invited and uninvited participation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1):
193 , pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01198-1 - 18Göbel, C., Nold, C., Berditchevskaia, A., and Haklay, M. (2019) How does citizen science “do” governance? Reflections from the DITOs project. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1):
31 , pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.204 - 19Goldin, J., Suransky, C., and Kanyerere, T. (2023) Keep the flow: Citizen science as agonistic learning. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1):
5 , pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.515 - 20Góngora Y Moreno, S.F., and Gutierrez-Garcia, J.O. (2018) Collective action in organizational structures. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 24(1), pp. 1–33. DOI: 10.1007/s10588-017-9244-6
- 21Groom, Q., Strubbe, D., Adriaens, T., Davis, A.J.S., Desmet, P., Oldoni, D., Reyserhove, L., Roy, H.E., and Vanderhoeven, S. (2019) Empowering Citizens to inform decision-making as a way forward to support invasive alien species policy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 33. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.238
- 22Haklay, M., Fraisl, D., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hecker, S., Gold, M., Hager, G., Ceccaroni, L., Kieslinger, B., Wehn, U., Woods, S., Nold, C., Balázs, B., Mazzonetto, M., Ruefenacht, S., Shanley, L.A., Wagenknecht, K., Motion, A., Sforzi, A., Riemenschneider, D., … Vohland, K. (2021) Contours of citizen science: A vignette study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8):
202108 , pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202108 - 23Heigl, F., Dörler, D., Bartar, P., Brodschneider, R., Cieslinski, M., Ernst, M., Fritz, S., Greilhuber, I., Hatlauf, J., Hecker, S., Hübner, T., Kieslinger, B., Kraker, P., Krennert, T., Oberraufner, G., Paul, K. T., Tiefenthaler, B., Vignoli, M., Walter, T., … Ziegler, D. (2018) Quality criteria for citizen science projects on Österreich forscht, Version 1.1 (Prepublication). DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/48j27
- 24Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K. T., Uhlik, J., Frigerio, D., and Dörler, D. (2020) Co-creating and implementing quality criteria for citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1):
23 , pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.294 - 25Heinisch, B., and Seltmann, M. E.-H. (2018) Cooperation between citizen science projects: An overview of joint initiatives. Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2018, Salzburg, pp. 1–102. DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88945-587-4
- 26Jamali, D., Khoury, G., and Sahyoun, H. (2006) From bureaucratic organizations to learning organizations: An evolutionary roadmap. The Learning Organization, 13(4), pp. 337–352. DOI: 10.1108/09696470610667724
- 27Josserand, E. (2004) Cooperation within bureaucracies: Are communities of practice an answer? M@n@gement, 7(3), pp. 307–339. DOI: 10.3917/mana.073.0307
- 28Kariotis, T., Borda, A., Winkel, K., and Gray, K. (2022) Citizen science for one digital health: A rapid qualitative review of studies in air quality with reflections on a conceptual model. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1):
39 , pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.531 - 29Khawaji, A., Chen, F., Marcus, N., and Zhou, J. (2013) Trust and cooperation in text-based computer-mediated communication. Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, pp. 37–40. DOI: 10.1145/2541016.2541058
- 30Kieslinger, B., Schäfer, T., Heigl, F., Dörler, D., Richter, A., and Bonn, A. (2017) The challenge of evaluation: an open framework for evaluating citizen science activities. Prepublication. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/enzc9
- 31Koster, F., Stokman, F., Hodson, R., and Sanders, K. (2007) Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams. Employee Relations, 29(2), pp. 117–137. DOI: 10.1108/01425450710719978
- 32Kullenberg, C., and Kasperowski, D. (2016) What is citizen science? – a scientometric meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(1):
e0147152 , pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152 - 33Latour, B., and Callon, M. (1991) La science telle qu’elle se fait: Anthologie de la sociologie des sciences de langue anglaise. Paris: La Découverte. DOI: 10.3917/dec.callo.1991.01
- 34Le Cardinal, G., Guyonnet, J.-F., and Pouzoullic, B. (1997) La dynamique de la confiance: Construire la coopération dans les projets complexes. Paris: Dunod.
- 35Liu, P.-J. (2008) Technology use, cooperation, and organizational learning in patient safety reporting (PhD), University of Missouri, Columbia. DOI: 10.32469/10355/7200
- 36Liu, P.-J., Laffey, J. M., and Cox, K. R. (2008) Operationalization of technology use and cooperation in CSCW. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’08, pp. 505–514. DOI: 10.1145/1460563.1460644
- 37Livet, P. (1994) La Communauté Virtuelle: Action et Communication. Combas: Editions de l’éclat.
- 38Lopez, C. (2021) Motives for citizen science program participation and the role of the organization: lessons from water quality monitors in texas. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.341
- 39Millerand, F. (2021) La participation citoyenne dans les sciences participatives: Formes et figures d’engagement. Études de Communication, 56, pp. 21–38. DOI: 10.4000/edc.11360
- 40Morillon, L. (2021) Faire science avec les praticiens. Divergences épistémologiques et innovation de rupture. Etudes de communication, 56(1), pp. 39–54. DOI: 10.4000/edc.11404
- 41Parkinson, S., Woods, S. M., Sprinks, J., and Ceccaroni, L. (2022) A practical approach to assessing the impact of citizen science towards the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(8), pp. 1–26. DOI: 10.3390/su14084676
- 42Passani, A., Janssen, A., and Hölscher, K. (2021) Impact assessment framework. Action Project Report. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4432132
- 43Peters, M. A. (2020). Citizen science and ecological democracy in the global science regime: The need for openness and participation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(3), 221–226. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1584148
- 44Pidoux, J., Boullier, D., Avanesova, N., and Soubrié, T. (2022) Report on test and final development of the cooperation analytics (COESO D.5.2). COESO project report. [JP: also Zenodo]. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.6787834
- 45Schaefer, T., Kieslinger, B., Brandt, M., and Van Den Bogaert, V. (2021)
Evaluation in citizen science: the art of tracing a moving target . In K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, R. Samson, and K. Wagenknecht (Eds.), The Science of Citizen Science, pp. 495–514. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_25 - 46Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B. V., Krasny, M. E., and Bonney, R. (2012) Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2):
29 . DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229 - 47Sousa, L. B., Craig, A., Chitkara, U., Fricker, S., Webb, C., Williams, C., and Baldock, K. (2022) Methodological diversity in citizen science mosquito surveillance: a scoping review. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1):
8 , pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.469 - 48Stonbely, S. (2017). Comparing models of collaborative journalism. Montclair State University Report. Available at URL
https://collaborativejournalism.org/models/ [Last accessed 14 April 2024]. - 49Thévenot, L. (1986)
Les investissements de forme . In Conventions économiques. Presses Universitaires de France: Cahiers de Centre d’Etude de l’Emploi, pp. 21–71. - 50VERA (2023) COESO Project. Available at URL
https://vera.operas-eu.org/ [Last accessed 14 April 2024]. - 51Vohland, K., Weißpflug, M., and Pettibone, L. (2019) Citizen science and the neoliberal transformation of science – an ambivalent relationship. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1):
25 , pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.186 - 52West, S., and Pateman, R. (2016) Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2):
15 , pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8 - 53Wiggins, A., and Crowston, K. (2011) From conservation to crowdsourcing: a typology of citizen science. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207