References
- 1Becker-Klein, R, Davis, C, Phillips, T, Del Bianco, V, Grack Nelson, A and Christian Ronning, EC. 2023. Using a shared embedded assessment tool to understand participant skills: Processes and lessons learned. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1): 20. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.487
- 2Bela, G, Peltola, T, Young, JC, Balázs, B, Arpin, I, Pataki, G, Hauck, J, Kelemen, E, Kopperoinen, L, Van Herzele, A and Keune, H. 2016. Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5): 990–999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
- 3Bell, P, Lewenstein, B, Shouse, AW and Feder, MA. (eds.) 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- 4Bonney, R, Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Kelling, S, Phillips, T, Rosenberg, KV and Shirk, J. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11): 977–984. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
- 5Bowser, A, Cooper, C, de Sherbinin, A, Wiggins, A, Brenton, P, Chuang, T.-R, Faustman, E, Haklay, M and Meloche, M. 2020. Still in Need of Norms: The State of the Data in Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 18. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.303
- 6Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Froehlich, HE, Schmidt, N, Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, H and Parrish, JK. 2017. The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208: 113–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014
- 7Cohen, J. 1988. Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4): 425–434. DOI: 10.1177/014662168801200410
- 8Crall, AW, Newman, GJ, Stohlgren, TJ, Holfelder, KA, Graham, J and Waller, DM. 2011. Assessing citizen science data quality: An invasive species case study. Conservation Letters, 4(6): 433–442. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00196.x
- 9Davis, C, Del Bianco, V, Peterman, K, Grover, A, Phillips, T and Becker-Klein, R. 2022. Diverse and Important Ways Evaluation can Support and Advance Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1): 30. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.482
- 10Eberbach, C and Crowley, K. 2009. From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1): 39–68. DOI: 10.3102/0034654308325899
- 11Fenichel, M and Schweingruber, HA. 2010.
Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments . Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. - 12Fernandez-Gimenez, ME, Ballard, HL and Sturtevant, VE. 2008. Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: a study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02400-130204
- 13Fischer, T, Oppl, S and Stabauer, M. 2022. Micro-credential Development: Tools, Methods and Concepts Supporting the European Approach. Paper presented at 17th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Nuremberg, Germany.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356568140_Micro-Credential_Development_Tools_Methods_and_Concepts_Supporting_the_European_Approach . - 14Fishman, B, Teasley, S and Cederquist, S. 2018. Micro-credentials as evidence of college readiness: Report of an NSF workshop.
https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/143851 . - 15Fu, AC, Kannan, A and Shavelson, RJ. 2019. Direct and unobtrusive measures of informal STEM education outcomes. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161): 35–57. DOI: 10.1002/ev.20348
- 16Furnham, A. 1986. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3): 385–400. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0
- 17Haywood, BK, Parrish, JK and Dolliver, J. 2016. Place-based and data-rich citizen science as a precursor for conservation action. Conservation Biology, 30(3): 476–486. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12702
- 18Heimlich, JE and Ardoin, NM. 2008. Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14(3): 215–237. DOI: 10.1080/13504620802148881
- 19Hines, G, Swanson, A, Kosmala, M and Lintott, C. 2015. Aggregating user input in ecology citizen science projects. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29(2): 3975–3980. DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19057
- 20Kelling, S, Johnston, A, Hochachka, WM, Iliff, M, Fink, D, Gerbracht, J, Lagoze, C, La Sorte, FA, Moore, T, Wiggins, A and Wong, WK. 2015. Can observation skills of citizen scientists be estimated using species accumulation curves? PloS One, 10(10):
e0139600 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139600 - 21National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Learning through citizen science: Enhancing opportunities by design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/25183
- 22National Research Council. 2012 A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/13165/a-framework-for-k-12-science-education-practices-crosscutting-concepts . - 23National Research Council. 2014. Developing assessments for the next generation science standards.
- 24Peter, M, Diekötter, T and Kremer, K. 2019. Participant outcomes of biodiversity citizen science projects: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 11(10): 2780. DOI: 10.3390/su11102780
- 25Peter, M, Diekötter, T, Kremer, K and Höffler, T. 2021. Citizen science project characteristics: Connection to participants’ gains in knowledge and skills. PLoS ONE, 16(7):
e0253692 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253692 - 26Peterman, K, Del Bianco, V, Grover, A, Davis, C and Rosser, H. 2022. Hiding in Plain Sight: Secondary Analysis of Data Records as a Method for Learning about Citizen Science Projects and Volunteers’ Skills. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1): 35. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.476
- 27Phillips, T, Porticella, N, Constas, M and Bonney, R. 2018. A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2): 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.126
- 28Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL, Lewenstein, BV and Bonney, R. 2019. Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3): 665–690. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21501
- 29Richards, KAR and Hemphill, MA. 2018. ‘A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis’. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2): 225–231. DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084
- 30Shirk, JL, Ballard, HL, Wilderman, CC, Phillips, T, Wiggins, A, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Minarchek, M, Lewenstein, BV, Krasny, ME and Bonney, R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and society, 17(2).
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269051 . DOI: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229 - 31Stylinski, CD, Peterman, K, Phillips, T, Linhart, J and Becker-Klein, R. 2020. Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: A snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(1): 77–92. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288
- 32Tøttrup, AP, Svenningsen, L, Rytter, M, Lillemark, MR, Møller, P and Knudsen, SW. 2021. Citizens in the lab: performance and validation of eDNA results. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1): 35. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.382
- 33van der Wal, R, Sharma, N, Mellish, C, Robinson, A and Siddharthan, A. 2016. The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(3): 550–561. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12705