Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Contributions of Citizen Science to the Sustainable Development Goals: Is Transformative “Global” Citizen Science Possible? Cover

Contributions of Citizen Science to the Sustainable Development Goals: Is Transformative “Global” Citizen Science Possible?

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. 1Anzaldúa, G. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
  2. 2Baker, K, Eichhorn, MP and Griffiths, M. 2019. Decolonizing field ecology. Biotropica, 51(3): 288292. DOI: 10.1111/btp.12663
  3. 3Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
  4. 4Benjamin, R. 2016. Informed refusal: Toward a justice-based bioethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(6): 967990. DOI: 10.1177/0162243916656059
  5. 5Benjamin, R. 2022. Viral Justice: How We Grow the World We Want. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691222899
  6. 6Bhawra, J. 2022. Decolonizing digital citizen science: Applying the bridge framework for climate change preparedness and adaptation. Societies, 12(2): 71. DOI: 10.3390/soc12020071
  7. 7Carruthers, P. 2002. The roots of scientific reasoning: Infancy, modularity, and the art of tracking. In: Carruthers, P, Stich, S and Siegal, M, The Cognitive Basis of Science, 7395. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613517.00
  8. 8Collins, PH. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York and London: Routledge.
  9. 9Cooper, CB and Lewenstein, BV. 2016. Two meanings of citizen science. In: Cavalier, D (ed.), The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, 5162. Arizona: Arizona State University Press.
  10. 10Domínguez, L and Luoma, C. 2020. Decolonising conservation policy: How colonial land and conservation ideologies persist and perpetuate indigenous injustices at the expense of the environment. Land, 9(3): 65. DOI: 10.3390/land9030065
  11. 11Forsyth, T. 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203017562
  12. 12Fraisl, D, Campbell, J, See, L, Wehn, U, Wardlaw, J, Gold, M, Moorthy, I, Arias, R, Piera, J, Oliver, JL and Masó, J. 2020. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15(6): 17351751. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7
  13. 13Fraisl, D, Hager, G, Bedessem, B, Gold, M, Hsing, PY, Danielsen, F, Hitchcock, CB, Hulbert, JM, Piera, J, Spiers, H and Thiel, M. 2022. Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1): 120. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4
  14. 14Fritz, S, See, L, Carlson, T, Haklay, MM, Oliver, JL, Fraisl, D, Mondardini, R, Brocklehurst, M, Shanley, LA, Schade, S and Wehn, U. 2019. Citizen science and the United Nations sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(10): 922930. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3
  15. 15Gabay, C and Ilcan, S. 2017. Leaving no-one behind? The politics of destination in the 2030 sustainable development goals. Globalizations, 14(3): 337342. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2017.1281623
  16. 16Grahe, JE, Cuccolo, K, Leighton, DC and Cramblet Alvarez, LD. 2020. Open science promotes diverse, just, and sustainable research and educational outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1): 520. DOI: 10.1177/1475725719869164
  17. 17Grosfoguel, R. 2009. A decolonial approach to political-economy: Transmodernity, border thinking and global coloniality. Kult, 6(1): 1038.
  18. 18Ground Truth 2.0. 2019. Community-based sustainable natural resource management. Available at https://gt20.eu/cases/community-based-sustainable-natural-resource-management/ (Last accessed 6 October 2022).
  19. 19Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: Sui, D, Elwood, S, and Goodchild, M (eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice, 105122. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
  20. 20Haraway, DJ. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575599. DOI: 10.2307/3178066
  21. 21Haraway, DJ. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
  22. 22Herzog, L and Lepenies, R. 2022. Citizen science in deliberative systems: Participation, epistemic injustice, and civic empowerment. Minerva, 60: 489508. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-022-09467-8
  23. 23Ilcan, S and Phillips, L. 2010. Developmentalities and calculative practices: The millennium development goals. Antipode, 42(4): 844874. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00778.x
  24. 24Kapoor, I. 2008. The Postcolonial Politics of Development. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203946145
  25. 25Krauss, JE. 2022. Unpacking SDG 15, its targets and indicators: Tracing ideas of conservation. Globalizations, 116. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2022.2035480
  26. 26Liebenberg, L, Lombard, M, Shermer, M, Xhukwe, U, Biesele, M, Carruthers, P, Kxao, O, Hansson, SO, Langwane, HK, Elbroch, LM and Keeping, D. 2021. Tracking Science: An alternative for those excluded by citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.284
  27. 27Lorde, A. 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
  28. 28Lorenz, L. 2020. Addressing diversity in science communication through citizen social science. Journal of Science Communication, 19(4): p. A04. DOI: 10.22323/2.19040204
  29. 29Lyons, K, Parreñas, JS, Tamarkin, N, Subramaniam, B, Green, L and Pérez-Bustos, T. 2017. Engagements with decolonization and decoloniality in and at the interfaces of STS. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 3(1): 147. DOI: 10.28968/cftt.v3i1.28794
  30. 30Mamo, L and Fishman, JR. 2013. Why justice? Introduction to the special issue on entanglements of science, ethics, and justice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(2): 159175. DOI: 10.1177/0162243912473162
  31. 31Merry, SE. 2011. Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current anthropology, 52(S3): S83S95. DOI: 10.1086/657241
  32. 32Mignolo, WD. 2000. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  33. 33Murphy, M. 2017. Alterlife and decolonial chemical relations. Cultural Anthropology, 32(4): 494503. DOI: 10.14506/ca32.4.02
  34. 34Parkinson, S, Woods, SM, Sprinks, J and Ceccaroni, L. 2022. A practical approach to assessing the impact of citizen science towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 14(8): 4676. DOI: 10.3390/su14084676
  35. 35Pollock, A and Subramaniam, B. 2016. Resisting power, retooling justice: Promises of feminist postcolonial technosciences. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(6): 951966. DOI: 10.1177/0162243916657879
  36. 36Purdam, K. 2014. Citizen social science and citizen data? Methodological and ethical challenges for social research. Current sociology, 62(3): 374392. DOI: 10.1177/0011392114527997
  37. 37Tichenor, M, Merry, SE, Grek, S and Bandola-Gill, J. 2022. Global public policy in a quantified world: Sustainable development goals as epistemic infrastructures. Policy and Society, 41(4): 431444. DOI: 10.1093/polsoc/puac015
  38. 38Todd, Z. 2016. An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1): 422. DOI: 10.1111/johs.12124
  39. 39Tomaselli, KG and Grant, J. 2020. The literacy of tracking. Critical Arts, 33(4–5): 191208. DOI: 10.1080/02560046.2019.1696850
  40. 40Tuck, E, McKenzie, M and McCoy, K. 2014. Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1): 123. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2013.877708
  41. 41Tuck, E and Yang, KW. 2021. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Tabula Rasa, 38: 61111. DOI: 10.25058/20112742.n38.04
  42. 42UN (United Nations) Sustainable Development Group. 2022. Leave No One Behind. Available at https://unsdg.un.org/2030-agenda/universal-values/leave-no-one-behind (Last accessed 6 October 2022).
  43. 43Wehn, U, Pfeiffer, E, Gharesifard, M, Alfonso, L and Anema, K. 2019. Deliverable D1.12: Updated validation and socio-economic impacts report. IHE Delft.
  44. 44WeObserve. 2018a. H2020 COs PROJECTS. Available at https://www.weobserve.eu/about/h2020-cos-projects/ (Last accessed 6 October 2022).
  45. 45WeObserve. 2018b. SDG CoP: UN Sustainable Development Goals and Citizen Observatories. Available at https://www.weobserve.eu/weobserve-cop4-sdgs/ (Last accessed 6 October 2022).
  46. 46WeObserve. 2018c. WeObserve project. Available at https://www.weobserve.eu/about/wo/ (Last accessed 6 October 2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.595 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 7, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2023
Published on: Jun 27, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Lissette Lorenz, Robert Lepenies, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.