References
- 1Aanensen, DM, Huntley, DM, Feil, EJ, Al-Own, FA and Spratt, BG. 2009. EpiCollect: Linking smartphones to web applications for epidemiology, ecology and community data collection. PLOS ONE, 4:
e6968 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006968 - 2Altinget. 2022. Danmark og Sydafrika skal være partnere i den grønne omstilling, 18 February 2022. Available as
https://www.altinget.dk/artikel/danmark-og-sydafrika-skal-vaere-partnere-i-den-groenne-omstilling . DOI: 10.7146/samfundsokonomen.v2022i2.132839 - 3Anderson, PL, Okereke, C, Rudd, A and Parnell, S. 2013.
Regional assessment of Africa . In: Elmqvist, T, Seto, KC and Wilkinson, C, Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. Netherlands: Springer. - 4Angelstam, P, Shackleton, RT and Stafford, W. 2017. Collaborative learning to unlock investments for functional ecological infrastructure: Bridging barriers in social-ecological systems in South Africa. Ecosystem Services, 27: 291–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.012
- 5Ansoms, A and Cioffo, GD. 2016. The exemplary citizen on the exemplary hill: The production of political subjects in contemporary rural Rwanda. Development and Change, 47: 1247–1268. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12271
- 6AU. 2022.
AU citizen science . Aarhus University (AU). Available athttps://projects.au.dk/citsci . - 7Ballard, HL, Dixon, CGH and Harris, EM. 2017. Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208: 65–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024
- 8Bonney, R. 2021. Expanding the impact of citizen science. BioScience, 71: 448–451. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biab041
- 9Breed, C and Mehrtens, H. 2022. Using “live” public sector projects in design teaching to transform urban green infrastructure in South Africa. Land, 11: 45. DOI: 10.3390/land11010045
- 10Brundtland, GH. 1987.
Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development . Geneva, UN-Dokument A/42/427. - 11BusinessTech. 2016. The “goodest” countries in the world – where does South Africa rank? Available at
https://businesstech.co.za/news/trending/125997/the-goodest-countries-in-the-world-where-does-south-africa-rank/ . - 12Chowdhury, S, Zamora-Gutierrez, V and Amano, T. 2022. Growth of non-English-language literature on biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 36(4):
e13883 . DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13883 - 13Cobbinah, PB, Gaisie, E, Oppong-Yeboah, NY and Anim, DO. 2020. Kumasi: Towards a sustainable and resilient cityscape. Cities, 97: 102567. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102567
- 14Cock, J. 2006. Connecting the red, brown and green: The environmental justice movement in South Africa. In: Voices of Protest: Social Movements in Post-Apartheid South Africa, pp. 179–201.
- 15Cocks, M, Alexander, J, Mogano, L and Vetter, S. 2016. Ways of belonging: Meanings of “nature” among Xhosa-speaking township residents in South Africa. Journal of Ethnobiology, 36: 820–841. DOI: 10.2993/0278-0771-36.4.820
- 16Danielsen, F, Thorne, P and Enghoff, M. 2021. Community-Based Monitoring in the Arctic. University of Alaska Press.
- 17DEA. 2019.
A socio-economic, environmental and economic impact evaluation of selected EPWP programmes within the Environmental Programmes branch for the period 2012–2016. Draft 1c . Department of Environemntal Affairs (DEA). - 18Denhardt, J, Terry, L, Delacruz, ER and Andonoska, L. 2009. Barriers to citizen engagement in developing countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 32: 1268–1288. DOI: 10.1080/01900690903344726
- 19DFID. 1999.
Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheet . London, UK: Department for International Development. - 20Eitzel, MV, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, RE, Virapongse, A, West, SE, Kyba, C, Bowser, A, Cooper, CB, Sforzi, A, Metcalfe, AN, Harris, ES, Thiel, M, Haklay, M, Ponciano, L, Roche, J, Ceccaroni, L, Shilling, FM, Dörler, D, Heigl, F, Kiessling, T, Davis, BY and Jiang, Q. 2017. Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2: 1–20. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
- 21Engels, A and Walz, K. 2018. Dealing with multi-perspectivity in real-world laboratories: Experiences from the transdisciplinary research project urban transformation laboratories. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27: 39–45. DOI: 10.14512/gaia.27.S1.10
- 22Engemann, K, Breed, C, Brom, P and Pasgaard, M. unpublished. Multifunctional and unmanaged: Unexpected synergies between health and biodiversity benefits from urban green spaces in the City of Tshwane, South Africa. In preperation for journal submission.
- 23Ernstson, H and Sverker, S. 2019. Grounding Urban Natures: Histories and Futures of Urban Ecologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11600.001.0001
- 24Farnsworth, BE. 2011. Conservation photography as environmental education: Focus on the pedagogues. Environmental Education Research, 17: 769–787. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2011.618627
- 25Fraisl, D, Penker, M and Fritz, S. 2020. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15: 1735–1751. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7
- 26Golding, J. 2021. South African groundwater project shows the power of citizen science. The Conversation. Available at
https://theconversation.com/south-african-groundwater-project-shows-the-power-of-citizen-science-172309 . - 27Good Country Index. 2022. The Good Country Index. Available at
https://index.goodcountry.org/ . - 28Graham, M. 2015. Everyday human (in)securities in protected urban nature – collaborative conservation at Macassar/Wolfgat dunes nature reserves, Cape Town, South Africa. Geoforum, 64: 25–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.016
- 29Guinand, S, Rojo, AM and Scherner, M. 2021. Exploring lived space of new build urban environment through photovoice interview. Cidades, 43. DOI: 10.15847/cct.23864
- 30Heines, M. 2022.
Political opportunities and threats impacting the emergence of environmental justice movements in urban green spaces . University of Copenhagen. Available athttps://bio.au.dk/en/research/research-centres/biochange/research/grip . - 31Hosking, SG and Du Preez, M. 2004. A cost-benefit analysis of the Working for Water Programme on selected sites in South Africa. Water SA, 30(2): 143–152. DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v30i2.5059
- 32iNaturalist. 2022. How it works. Available at
https://www.inaturalist.org/ . - 33IPBES. 2019.
Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services . The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). - 34Johnson, N, Behe, C, Danielsen, F, Krümmel, EM, Nickels, S and Pulsifer, PL. 2016. Community-based monitoring and indigenous knowledge in a changing arctic: A review for the sustaining arctic observing networks. Sustain Arctic Observing Network Task, 9: 74.
- 35Johnson, N, Druckenmiller, ML, Danielsen, F and Pulsifer, PL. 2021. The use of digital platforms for community-based monitoring. BioScience, 71: 452–466. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa162
- 36Kay, AD, Scherber, E, Gaitan, H and Lovelee, A. 2019. Transitional ecology: Embedding ecological experiments into temporary urban public art. Journal of Urban Ecology, 5. DOI: 10.1093/jue/juz020
- 37Klopp, JM and Petretta, DL. 2017. The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, 63: 92–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019
- 38Knudsen, L. 2023.
Abandonment or opportunity? A situated study of sense of place and place-making in the Mabopane River Corridor . University of Copenhagen. Available athttps://bio.au.dk/en/research/research-centres/biochange/research/grip . - 39Knudsen, L, Heines, M, Pasgaard, M, Colo, L and Ngcobo, S. 2022.
My Mabopane: Opportunities of photo-voice to support inclusive urban green space engagement and plannings . The City is [Not] a Tree: The Urban Ecologies of Divided Cities, South Africa. - 40Kosmala, M, Wiggins, A, Swanson, A and Simmons, B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14: 551–560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436
- 41Lang, DJ, Wiek, A, Bergmann, M, Stauffacher, M, Martens, P, Moll, P, Swilling, M and Thomas, CJ. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7: 25–43. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
- 42Lannas, KSM and Turpie, JK. 2009. Valuing the provisioning services of wetlands contrasting a rural wetland in Lesotho with a peri-urban wetland in South Africa. Ecology and Society, 14. DOI: 10.5751/ES-02919-140218
- 43Masterson, VA, Mahajan, SL and Tengö, M. 2018. Photovoice for mobilizing insights on human well-being in complex social-ecological systems case studies from Kenya and South Africa. Ecology and Society, 23. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10259-230313
- 44McConnachie, MM, Cowling, RM, Shackleton, CM and Knight, AT. 2013. The challenges of alleviating poverty through ecological restoration: Insights from South Africa’s “Working for Water” program. Restoration Ecology, 21: 544–550. DOI: 10.1111/rec.12038
- 45McDonald, DA. 2002. Environmental Justice in South Africa. Ohio: Ohio University Press.
- 46Moodley, S. 2019. Why do planners think that planning has failed post-apartheid? The case of eThekwini Municipality, Durban, South Africa. Urban Forum, 30: 307–323. DOI: 10.1007/s12132-018-9357-0
- 47Musyoki, A, Thifhulufhelwi, R and Murungweni, FM. 2016. The impact of and responses to flooding in Thulamela Municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 8. DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v8i2.166
- 48Ocean Cleanup. 2022. Become a citizen scientists. Available at
https://theoceancleanup.com/research/citizen-science/ . - 49Olesen, RS, Rasmussen, LV, Fold, N and Shackleton, S. 2021. Direct and indirect socio-economic benefits from ecological infrastructure interventions in the Western Cape, South Africa. Restoration Ecology, 29:
e13423 . DOI: 10.1111/rec.13423 - 50Ortega-Álvarez, R, Tobón, W, Urquiza-Haas, T, Ruiz-González, SP and Koleff, P. 2021. Exploring local perceptions, implementation, benefits, and limitations of community-based restoration projects in Mexico. Restoration Ecology,
e13604 . DOI: 10.1111/rec.13604 - 51Otto, FEL, Odoulami, RC and New, M. 2018. Anthropogenic influence on the drivers of the Western Cape drought 2015–2017. Environmental Research Letters, 13. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aae9f9
- 52Pasgaard, M, Rasmussen, LV, Rebelo, A and Shackleton, S. 2021. Policy Brief: How can investment in ecological infrastructure increase water security and alleviate poverty?
- 53Pasgaard, M, Dalsgaard, B, Maruyama, PK, Sandel, B and Strange, N. 2015. Geographical imbalances and divides in the scientific production of climate change knowledge. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 35: 279–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.018
- 54Pasgaard, M, Dawson, N, Rasmussen, LV, Enghoff, M and Jensen, A. 2017. The research and practice of integrating conservation and development: Self-reflections by researchers on methodologies, objectives and influence. Global Ecology and Conservation, 9: 50–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2016.11.006
- 55Pasgaard, M and Fold, N. unpublished. How to assess livelihoods? Critical reflections on using common indicators capturing socioeconomic impacts for ecological restoration workers in South Africa. Submitted to Journal of South African Studies.
- 56Pocock, MWanjiru, A and Trevelyan, R. 2019. Developing the global potential of citizen science: Assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56: 274–281. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13279
- 57Pretty, J. 2003. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302. DOI: 10.1126/science.1090847
- 58Quinlivan, L, Chapman, DV and Sullivan, T. 2020. Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: A review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192: 218. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-8193-6
- 59Requier, F, Andersson, GK, Oddi, FJ and Garibaldi, LA. 2020. Citizen science in developing countries: How to improve volunteer participation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18: 101–108. DOI: 10.1002/fee.2150
- 60Rogers, H. 2011. Amateur knowledge: Public art and citizen science. Configurations, 19: 101–115. DOI: 10.1353/con.2011.0009
- 61Roux, DJ, Nel, JL, Cundill, G, O’Farrell, P and Fabricius, C. 2017. Transdisciplinary research for systemic change: who to learn with, what to learn about and how to learn. Sustainability Science, 12(5): 711–726. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-017-0446-0
- 62Scoones, I. 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36: 171–196. DOI: 10.1080/03066150902820503
- 63Skarlatidou, A, Suskevics, M, Göbel, C, Barrett, J and Haklay, M. 2019. The value of stakeholder mapping to enhance co-creation in citizen science initiatives. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.226
- 64Sullivan, JJ and Molles, LE. 2016. Biodiversity monitoring by community-based restoration groups in New Zealand. Ecological Management and Restoration, 17: 210–217. DOI: 10.1111/emr.12225
- 65TBA. 2022.
Citizen science Africa . Tropical Biology Association (TBA). Available athttps://tropical-biology.org/citizen-science-in-africa/ . - 66Toomey, AH, Strehlau-Howay, L, Manzolillo, B and Thomas, C. 2020. The place-making potential of citizen science: Creating social-ecological connections in an urbanized world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200: 103824. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103824
- 67UN. 2015.
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development . United Nations (UN). - 68UN. 2022.
The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 . Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), United Nations (UN). - 69Wehn, U and Almomani, A. 2019. Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environmental monitoring and information systems: A critical analysis and integration of the literature. Environmental Science and Policy, 101: 341–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002
- 70Whitley, CT, Kalof, L and Flach, T. 2021. Using animal portraiture to activate emotional affect. Environment and Behavior, 53: 837–863. DOI: 10.1177/0013916520928429
- 71Wiggins, A and He, Y. 2016. Community-based data validation practices in citizen science. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Association for Computing Machinery, San Francisco, CA, USA. DOI: 10.1145/2818048.2820063
- 72Zha, CC, Rogers, J and King, AC. 2022. Integrating photovoice and citizen science: The our voice initiative in practice. Health Promotion Practice, 23: 241–249. DOI: 10.1177/15248399211054784