References
- 1Aldrich, DP and Meyer, MA. 2015. Social capital and community resilience. American behavioral scientist, 59(2): 254–269. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214550299
- 2Allf, BC, Cooper, CB, Larson, LR, Dunn, RR, Futch, SE, Sharova, M and Cavalier, D. 2022. Citizen science as an ecosystem of engagement: implications for learning and broadening participation. BioScience, 72(7): 651–663. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac035
- 3Archer, L, Dawson, E, DeWitt, J, Seakins, A and Wong, B. 2015. “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of research in science teaching, 52(7): 922–948. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21227
- 4Baker, E, Jeger, M, Mumford, JD and Brown, N. 2019. Enhancing plant biosecurity with citizen science monitoring: comparing methodologies using reports of acute oak decline. Journal of Geographical Systems, 21(1): 111–131. DOI: 10.1007/s10109-018-0285-2
- 5Ballard, H, Phillips, T and Robinson, L. 2018.
Conservation outcomes of citizen science . In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press. pp. 254–268. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339 - 6Bela, G, Peltola, T, Young, JC, Balázs, B, Arpin, I, Pataki, G, Hauck, J, Kelemen, E, Kopperoinen, L and Van Herzele, A. 2016. Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5): 990–999. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12762
- 7Benyei, P, Pardo-de-Santayana, M, Aceituno-Mata, L, Calvet-Mir, L, Carrascosa-García, M, Rivera-Ferre, M, Perdomo-Molina, A and Reyes-García, V. 2021. Participation in citizen science: insights from the CONECT-e case study. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(4): 755–788. DOI: 10.1177/0162243920948110
- 8Blake, C, Rhanor, A and Pajic, C. 2020. The demographics of citizen science participation and its implications for data quality and environmental justice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 21. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.320
- 9Center for Theory of Change. n.d.-a. Backwards Mapping and Connecting Outcomes. Available at
https://www.theoryofchange.org/what-is-theory-of-change/how-does-theory-of-change-work/example/backwards-mapping/ [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. - 10Center for Theory of Change. n.d.-b. TOC Origins. Available at
https://www.theoryofchange.org/what-is-theory-of-change/toc-background/toc-origins/ [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. - 11Chandra, A, Acosta, JD, Howard, S, Uscher-Pines, L, Williams, MV, Yeung, D, Garnett, J and Meredith, LS. 2011.
Building Community Resilience to Disasters: A Way Forward to Enhance National Health Security . Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Available athttps://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR915.html . [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. DOI: 10.7249/TR915 - 12Charleston, L, Adserias, RP, Lang, NM and Jackson, JF. 2014. Intersectionality and STEM: The role of race and gender in the academic pursuits of African American women in STEM. Journal of Progressive Policy & Practice, 2(3): 273–293.
- 13Cheraghi-Sohi, S, Panagioti, M, Daker-White, G, Giles, S, Riste, L, Kirk, S, Ong, BN, Poppleton, A, Campbell, S and Sanders, C. 2020. Patient safety in marginalised groups: a narrative scoping review. International journal for equity in health, 19(1): 1–26. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-1103-2
- 14Danielsen, F, Enghoff, M, Magnussen, E, Mustonen, T, Degteva, A, Hansen, KK, Levermann, N, Mathiesen, SD, Slettemark, Ø and Bieling, C. 2017. Citizen science tools for engaging local stakeholders and promoting local and traditional knowledge in landscape stewardship. The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship, 80–98. DOI: 10.1017/9781316499016.009
- 15Domroese, MC and Johnson, EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation, 208: 40–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
- 16Doyle, EEH, Lamblei, E, Orchiston, C, Becker, JS, McLaren, L, Johnston, D and Leonard, G. 2020. Citizen science as a catalyst for community resilience building: A two-phase tsunami case study. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 24(1): 23–49. Available at
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/citizen-science-as-catalyst-community-resilience/docview/2434441556/se-2 [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. - 17Edwards, R, Kirn, S, Hillman, T, Kloetzer, L, Mathieson, K, McDonnell, D and Phillips, T. 2018.
Learning and developing science capital through citizen science . In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press. pp. 381–390. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339 - 18Gurstein, MB. 2011. Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday, 16(2). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i2.3316
- 19Kieslinger, B, Schäfer, T, Heigl, F, Dörler, D, Richter, A and Bonn, A. 2018.
Evaluating citizen science-Towards an open framework . In: Hecker, S, Haklay, M, Bowser, A, Makuch, Z, Vogel, J and Bonn, A (eds.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press. pp. 81–95. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781787352339 - 20Lewenstein, BV. 2022. Is Citizen Science a Remedy for Inequality? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 700(1): 183–194. DOI: 10.1177/00027162221092697
- 21Mahmoudi, D, Hawn, CL, Henry, EH, Perkins, DJ, Cooper, CB and Wilson, SM. 2022. Mapping for whom? Communities of color and the citizen science gap. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 21(4): 372–388. Available at
https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/2178 [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. - 22Martin, VY. 2017. Citizen science as a means for increasing public engagement in science: presumption or possibility? Science Communication, 39(2): 142–168. DOI: 10.1177/1075547017696165
- 23McLafferty, S, Schneider, D and Abelt, K. 2020. Placing volunteered geographic health information: Socio-spatial bias in 311 bed bug report data for New York City. Health & Place, 62:
102282 . DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102282 - 24MICS. n.d. Available from
https://mics.tools/ [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. - 25Moczek, N, Hecker, S and Voigt-Heucke, SL. 2021. The Known Unknowns: What Citizen Science Projects in Germany Know about Their Volunteers—And What They Don’t Know. Sustainability, 13(20):
11553 . DOI: 10.3390/su132011553 - 26National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. 2018. Learning through citizen science: Enhancing opportunities by design. DOI: 10.17226/25183
- 27Nitsche, F. n.d. What is a theory of change? Available at
https://tools4dev.org/blog/what-is-a-theory-of-change/#:~:text=A%20Theory%20of%20Change%20(ToC,come%20about%20through%20your%20project [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. - 28Ottinger, G. 2010. Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2): 244–270. Available at
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27786204 [Last accessed 15th May 2023]. DOI: 10.1177/0162243909337121 - 29Pandya, RE. 2012. A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 314–317. DOI: 10.1890/120007
- 30Pateman, R, Tuhkanen, H and Cinderby, S. 2021. Citizen Science and the Sustainable Development Goals in Low and Middle Income Country Cities. Sustainability, 13(17):
9534 . DOI: 10.3390/su13179534 - 31Pateman, RM, Dyke, A and West, SE. 2021. The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1):
9 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.369 - 32Phillips, T, Bonney, R and Shirk, J. 2012.
What is our impact? Toward a Unified Framework for Evaluating Outcomes of Citizen Science Participation . In Bonney, R and Dickinson, JL (eds.), Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research, Cornell University Press. pp. 82–95. Available athttp://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v7pp.12 [last accessed 15th May 2023]. DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.003.0006 - 33Purcell, K, Garibay, C and Dickinson, JL. 2012.
A Gateway to Science for All: Celebrate Urban Birds . In: Citizen Science. Cornell University Press. pp. 191–200. DOI: 10.7591/9780801463952-020 - 34Rappold, AG, Hano, MC, Prince, S, Wei, L, Huang, SM, Baghdikian, C, Stearns, B, Gao, X, Hoshiko, S, Cascio, WE, Diaz-Sanchez, D and Hubbell, B. 2019. Smoke Sense Initiative Leverages Citizen Science to Address the Growing Wildfire-Related Public Health Problem. Geohealth, 3(12): 443–457. DOI: 10.1029/2019GH000199
- 35Sauermann, H, Vohland, K, Antoniou, V, Balázs, B, Göbel, C, Karatzas, K, Mooney, P, Perelló, J, Ponti, M and Samson, R. 2020. Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 49(5):
103978 . DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978 - 36Schaefer, T, Kieslinger, B, Brandt, M and van den Bogaert, V. 2021.
Evaluation in citizen science: the art of tracing a moving target . In: The science of citizen science. Springer. pp. 495–514. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_25 - 37Somerwill, L and Wehn, U. 2022. How to measure the impact of citizen science on environmental attitudes, behaviour and knowledge? A review of state-of-the-art approaches. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1): 1–29. DOI: 10.1186/s12302-022-00596-1
- 38Sorensen, AE, Jordan, RC, LaDeau, SL, Biehler, D, Wilson, S, Pitas, J-H and Leisnham, PT. 2019. Reflecting on efforts to design an inclusive citizen science project in West Baltimore. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 13. DOI: DOI: 10.5334/cstp.170
- 39Suter, S, Barrett, B and Welden, N. 2023. Do biodiversity monitoring citizen science surveys meet the core principles of open science practices? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(2): 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10887-y
- 40Tulloch, AI and Szabo, JK. 2012. A behavioural ecology approach to understand volunteer surveying for citizen science datasets. Emu-Austral Ornithology, 112(4): 313–325. DOI: 10.1071/MU12009
- 41van Noordwijk, TC, Bishop, I, Staunton-Lamb, S, Oldfield, A, Loiselle, S, Geoghegan, H and Ceccaroni, L. 2021.
Creating positive environmental impact through citizen science . In: The science of citizen science. Springer. pp. 373–395. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_19 - 42Vasiliades, MA, Hadjichambis, AC, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D, Adamou, A and Georgiou, Y. 2021. A Systematic Literature Review on the Participation Aspects of Environmental and Nature-Based Citizen Science Initiatives. Sustainability, 13(13):
7457 . DOI: 10.3390/su13137457 - 43von Gönner, J, Herrmann, TM, Bruckermann, T, Eichinger, M, Hecker, S, Klan, F, Lorke, J, Richter, A, Sturm, U and Voigt-Heucke, S. 2023. Citizen science’s transformative impact on science, citizen empowerment and socio-political processes. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 5(1): 11–33. DOI: 10.1007/s42532-022-00136-4
- 44Wagenknecht, K, Woods, T, Sanz, FG, Gold, M, Bowser, A, Rüfenacht, S, Ceccaroni, L and Piera, J. 2021. EU-Citizen.Science: A platform for mainstreaming citizen science and open science in Europe. Data Intelligence, 3(1): 136–149. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00085
- 45Waite, S, Husain, F, Scandone, B, Forsyth, E and Piggott, H. 2021. ‘It’s not for people like (them)’: structural and cultural barriers to children and young people engaging with nature outside schooling. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(1): 54–73. DOI: 10.1080/14729679.2021.1935286
- 46Walajahi, H. 2019. Engaging the “Citizen” in citizen science: Who’s actually included? The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8): 31–33. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619868
- 47Walker, DW, Smigaj, M and Tani, M. 2021. The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8(1):
e1488 . DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1488 - 48Walker, G, Mitchell, G, Fairburn, J and Smith, G. 2005. Industrial pollution and social deprivation: Evidence and complexity in evaluating and responding to environmental inequality. Local environment, 10(4): 361–377. DOI: 10.1080/13549830500160842
- 49Weber, N and Locke, B. 2022. Ethics of Open Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10402 [cs.CY]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.10402
- 50Wehn, U, Gharesifard, M, Ceccaroni, L, Joyce, H, Ajates, R, Woods, S, Bilbao, A, Parkinson, S, Gold, M and Wheatland, J. 2021. Impact assessment of citizen science: state of the art and guiding principles for a consolidated approach. Sustainability Science, 16(5): 1683–1699. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-00959-2
- 51West, SE, Pateman, RM and Dyke, A. 2021. Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1):
14 . DOI: 10.5334/cstp.370