Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mapping the Landscape of Do-it-Yourself Medicine Cover

Mapping the Landscape of Do-it-Yourself Medicine

Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Volume 7 (2022): Issue 1
By: Anna Wexler  
Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. 1American Dental Association (ADA). 2018. ADA launches public awareness campaign discouraging DIY dentistry. 9 August 2018. Available at http://web.archive.org/web/20210516205325/https://www.ada.org/en/publications/ada-news/2018-archive/august/ada-launches-public-awareness-campaign-discouraging-diy-dentistry?nav=news. Accessed on September 1, 2022.
    Back to article
  2. 2Asarani, NAM, Reynolds, AN, Elbalshy, M, Burnside, M, Bock, M. de, Lewis, DM and Wheeler, BJ. 2020. Efficacy, safety, and user experience of DIY or open-source artificial pancreas systems: a systematic review. Acta Diabetologica, 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01623-4
    Back to article
  3. 3Baker, CN. 2022. Abortion how-to: The Ms. Q&A on menstrual extraction with Carol Downer. Ms. Magazine, July 14. Available at: https://msmagazine.com/2022/07/14/abortion-how-to-carol-downer-menstrual-extraction. Accessed on September 10, 2022.
    Back to article
  4. 4Bikson, M, Bestmann, S and Edwards, D. 2013. Transcranial devices are not playthings. Nature, 501(7466): 167–167. DOI: 10.1038/501167b
    Back to article
  5. 5Borry, P, Sénécal, K and Knoppers, BM. 2016. Do-it-yourself newborn screening. JAMA Pediatrics, 170(6): 523. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0166
    Back to article
  6. 6Branstetter, G. 2016. Sketchy pharmacies are selling hormones to transgender people. The Atlantic, 31 August. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/08/diy-hormone-replacement-therapy/498044. Accessed on September 1, 2022.
    Back to article
  7. 7Braune, K, Gajewska, KA, Thieffry, A, Lewis, DM, Froment, T, O’Donnell, S, Speight, J, Hendrieckx, C, Schipp, J, Skinner, T, Langstrup, H, Tappe, A, Raile, K and Cleal, B. 2021. Why #WeAreNotWaiting—motivations and self-reported outcomes among users of open-source automated insulin delivery systems: multinational survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6): e25409. DOI: 10.2196/25409
    Back to article
  8. 8Braune, K, O’Donnell, S, Cleal, B, Lewis, D, Tappe, A, Willaing, I, Hauck, B and Raile, K. 2019. Real-world use of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Online survey and analysis of self-reported clinical outcomes. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(7): e14087. DOI: 10.2196/14087
    Back to article
  9. 9Brewster, S, Fitzpatrick, G, Cox, A, Kostakos, V, O’Kane, AA, Aliomar, A, Zheng, R, Schulte, B and Trombetta, G. 2019. Social, cultural and systematic frustrations motivating the formation of a DIY hearing loss hacking community. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300531
    Back to article
  10. 10Burnside, M, Crocket, H, Mayo, M, Pickering, J, Tappe, A and de Bock, M. 2020. Do-it-yourself automated insulin delivery: A leading example of the democratization of medicine. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 14(5): 878–882. DOI: 10.1177/1932296819890623
    Back to article
  11. 11Burnside, MJ, Lewis, DM, Crocket, HR, Meier, RA, Williman, JA, Sanders, OJ, Jefferies, CA, Faherty, AM, Paul, RG, Lever, CS, Price, SKJ, Frewen, CM, Jones, SD, Gunn, TC, Lampey, C, Wheeler, BJ and de Bock, MI. 2022. Open-source automated insulin delivery in Type 1 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 387(10): 869–881. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203913
    Back to article
  12. 12Caplan, AL and Bateman-House, A. 2020. The danger of DIY vaccines. Science, 369(6507): 1035–1035. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe4440
    Back to article
  13. 13Carter, A and Stokes, S. 2021. Availability of ‘do-it-yourself’ orthodontics in the United Kingdom. Journal of Orthodontics, 49(1): 83–88. DOI: 10.1177/14653125211021607
    Back to article
  14. 14Chalker, R and Downer, C. 1996. The Woman’s Book of Choices: Abortion, Menstrual Extraction, RU-486. New York City: Seven Stories Press.
    Back to article
  15. 15Clements-Nolle, K, Marx, R, Guzman, R and Katz, M. 2001. HIV prevalence, risk behaviors, health care use, and mental health status of transgender persons: implications for public health intervention. American Journal of Public Health, 91(6): 915–921. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.91.6.915
    Back to article
  16. 16Condliffe, J. 2016. It costs $30 to make a DIY EpiPen, and here’s the proof. MIT Technology Review, 20 September. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/09/20/157437/it-costs-30-to-make-a-diy-epipen-and-heres-the-proof. Accessed on September 13, 2022.
    Back to article
  17. 17Cortez, MF. 2019. Patient hurt by do-it-yourself artificial pancreas prompts FDA warning. Bloomberg, 17 May. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-17/patient-hurt-by-do-it-yourself-pancreas-prompting-fda-warning. Accessed on September 13, 2022.
    Back to article
  18. 18Dawson, B. 2022. The underground abortion alternative being reconsidered after the Roe Leak. Mel Magazine, May 15. Available at: https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/menstruation-extraction-roe-v-wade-leak. Accessed on September 14, 2022.
    Back to article
  19. 19DeFilipp, Z, Bloom, PP, Soto, MT, Mansour, MK, Sater, MRA, Huntley, MH, Turbett, S, Chung, RT, Chen, Y-B and Hohmann, EL. 2019. Drug-resistant E. coli bacteremia transmitted by fecal microbiota transplant. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(21): 2043–2050. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910437
    Back to article
  20. 20de Haan, G, Santos, G-M, Arayasirikul, S and Raymond, HF. 2015. Non-prescribed hormone use and barriers to care for transgender women in San Francisco. LGBT Health, 2(4): 313–323. DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2014.0128
    Back to article
  21. 21Delfanti, A. 2013. Biohackers: The Politics of Open Science. London: Pluto Press.
    Back to article
  22. 22Eakin, E. 2014. The excrement experiment. 1 December 2014. Available at https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/12/01/excrement-experiment. Accessed on September 8, 2022.
    Back to article
  23. 23Eitzel, MV, Cappadonna, JL, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, RE, Virapongse, A, West, SE, Kyba, CCM, Bowser, A, Cooper, CB, Sforzi, A, Metcalfe, AN, Harris, ES, Thiel, M, Haklay, M, Ponciano, L, Roche, J, Ceccaroni, L, Shilling, FM, Dörler, D, Heigl, F, Kiessling, T, Davis, BY and Jiang, Q. 2016. Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
    Back to article
  24. 24Ekekezie, C, Perler, BK, Wexler, A, Duff, C, Lillis, CJ and Kelly, CR. 2020. Understanding the scope of do-it-yourself fecal microbiota transplant. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 115(4): 1. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000499
    Back to article
  25. 25Ernst, E. 2001. Rise in popularity of complementary and alternative medicine: reasons and consequences for vaccination. Vaccine, 20: S90–S93. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00290-0
    Back to article
  26. 26FDA. 2019. Important safety alert regarding use of fecal microbiota for transplantation and risk of serious adverse reactions due to transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms. 13 June 2019. Available at https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/important-safety-alert-regarding-use-fecal-microbiota-transplantation-and-risk-serious-adverse. Accessed on September 9, 2022.
    Back to article
  27. 27Ferretti, F. 2019. Mapping do-it-yourself science. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 15(1): 1. DOI: 10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1
    Back to article
  28. 28Folkers, K, Chapman, C and Redman, B. 2019. Federal right to try: Where is it going? Hastings Center Report, 49(2): 26–36. DOI: 10.1002/hast.990
    Back to article
  29. 29Fondén, E. 2020. Do it yourself hormone replacement therapy. Thesis; Lund University. Available at: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/9027210. Accessed on September 8, 2022.
    Back to article
  30. 30Gallegos, JE and Peccoud, J. 2018. In the face of high costs, DIYers hope to brew their own insulin. Discover, 13 September. Available at: https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/in-the-face-of-high-costs-diyers-hope-to-brew-their-own-insulin. Accessed on September 3, 2022.
    Back to article
  31. 31Gorvett, Z. 2016. DIY medicine at the edges of civilisation. BBC, 16 November. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161116-diy-medicine-at-the-edges-of-civilisation. Accessed on September 15, 2022.
    Back to article
  32. 32Greene, JA. 2016. Do-it-yourself medical devices — technology and empowerment in American health Ccre. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(4): 305–308. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1511363
    Back to article
  33. 33Grewe-Salfeld, M. 2021. Biohacking, Bodies and Do-It-Yourself: The Cultural Politics of Hacking Life Itself. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. DOI: 10.1515/9783839460047
    Back to article
  34. 34Guerrini, CJ, Sherkow, JS, Meyer, MN and Zettler, PJ. 2020. Self-experimentation, ethics, and regulation of vaccines. Science, 369(6511): 1570–1572. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe1963
    Back to article
  35. 35Guerrini, CJ, Wexler, A, Zettler, PJ and McGuire, AL. 2019. Biomedical citizen science or something else? Reflections on terms and definitions. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8): 17–19. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619880
    Back to article
  36. 36Haklay, M, Dörler, D, Heigl, F, Manzoni, M, Hecker, S and Vohland, K. 2021. What Is citizen science? The challenges of definition. In The Science of Citizen Science, Vohland, K, Land-Zandstra, A, Ceccaroni, L, Rob Lemmens, J, Ponti, PM, Samson, R and Wagenknecht, K (eds.), 13–33. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
    Back to article
  37. 37Hecker, S, Wicke, N, Haklay, M and Bonn, A. 2019. How does policy conceptualise citizen science? A qualitative content analysis of international policy documents. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 32. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.230
    Back to article
  38. 38Jennings, P and Hussain, S. 2020. Do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems: A Review of the emerging evidence and insights for healthcare professionals. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 14(5): 868–877. DOI: 10.1177/1932296819894296
    Back to article
  39. 39Jwa, A. 2015. Early adopters of the magical thinking cap: a study on do-it-yourself (DIY) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) user community. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(2): 292–335. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsv017
    Back to article
  40. 40Kempner, J and Bailey, J. 2019. Collective self-experimentation in patient-led research: How online health communities foster innovation. Social Science & Medicine, 238: 112366. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112366
    Back to article
  41. 41Khoruts, A, Hoffmann, DE and Palumbo, FB. 2019. The impact of regulatory Policies on the future of fecal microbiota transplantation. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(4): 482–504. DOI: 10.1177/1073110519897726
    Back to article
  42. 42King, LS. 1967. Do-it-yourself medicine. JAMA, 200(1): 23–29. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1967.03120140081012
    Back to article
  43. 43Koebler, J. 2022. Anarchist collective shares instructions to make DIY abortion pills. Vice, 3 May. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjby4b/anarchist-collective-shares-instructions-to-make-diy-abortion-pills. Accessed on September 5, 2022.
    Back to article
  44. 44Kremer, W. 2014. The brave new world of DIY faecal transplant. BBC, 27 May. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27503660. Accessed on August 17, 2022.
    Back to article
  45. 45Kullenberg, C and Kasperowski, D. 2016. What Is citizen science? – a scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1): e0147152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
    Back to article
  46. 46Landrain, T, Meyer, M, Perez, AM and Sussan, R. 2013. Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement. Systems and Synthetic Biology, 7(3): 115–126. DOI: 10.1007/s11693-013-9116-4
    Back to article
  47. 47Lesté-Lasserre, C. 2020. This $1 hearing aid could treat millions with hearing loss. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe9371
    Back to article
  48. 48Lewis, D. 2019. History and perspective on DIY closed looping. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 13(4): 790–793. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818808307
    Back to article
  49. 49Lewis, D, Leibrand, S and #OpenAPS Community. 2016. Real-world use of open source artificial pancreas systems. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 10(6): 1411–1411. DOI: 10.1177/1932296816665635
    Back to article
  50. 50Lewis, DM and Hussain, S. 2022. Practical guidance on open source and commercial automated insulin delivery systems: A guide for healthcare professionals supporting people with insulin-requiring diabetes. Diabetes Therapy, 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01299-9
    Back to article
  51. 51Litchman, ML, Lewis, D, Kelly, LA and Gee, PM. 2019. Twitter analysis of #OpenAPS DIY artificial pancreas technology use suggests improved A1C and quality of life. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 13(2): 164–170. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818795705
    Back to article
  52. 52Ma, Y, Liu, J, Rhodes, C, Nie, Y and Zhang, F. 2017. Ethical issues in fecal microbiota transplantation in practice. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(5): 34–45. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1299240
    Back to article
  53. 53Manero, A, Smith, P, Sparkman, J, Dombrowski, M, Courbin, D, Kester, A, Womack, I and Chi, A. 2019. Implementation of 3D printing technology in the field of prosthetics: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9): 1641. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091641
    Back to article
  54. 54Marty, R. 2019. Handbook for a Post-Roe America. New York City: Seven Stories Press.
    Back to article
  55. 55Maschião, LF, Bastos, FI, Wilson, E, McFarland, W, Turner, C, Pestana, T and Veras, MA. 2020. Nonprescribed sex hormone use among trans women: The complex interplay of public policies, social context, and discrimination. Transgender Health, 5(4): 205–215. DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2020.0012
    Back to article
  56. 56McClurg, L. 2018. Do DIY medical tests promise more than they can deliver? NPR, 28 May. Available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/05/28/614125270/do-diy-medical-tests-promise-more-than-they-can-deliver. Accessed on August 18, 2022.
    Back to article
  57. 57Mepham, N, Bouman, WP, Arcelus, J, Hayter, M and Wylie, KR. 2014. Self-prescribing of cross-sex hormones. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(12): 2995–3001. DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12691
    Back to article
  58. 58Metastasio, A, Negri, A, Martinotti, G and Corazza, O. 2018. Transitioning bodies: The case of self-prescribing sexual hormones in gender affirmation in individuals attending psychiatric services. Brain Sciences, 8(5): 88. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8050088
    Back to article
  59. 59Neuman, S. 2020. Man dies, woman hospitalized after taking form of chloroquine to prevent COVID-19. NPR, 24 March. Available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/24/820512107/man-dies-woman-hospitalized-after-taking-form-of-chloroquine-to-prevent-covid-19. Accessed on September 2, 2022.
    Back to article
  60. 60Omer, T. 2016. Empowered citizen ‘health hackers’ who are not waiting. BMC Medicine, 14(1): 118. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0670-y
    Back to article
  61. 61Palmer, W, Greeley, SAW, Letourneau-Freiberg, LR and Naylor, RN. 2020. Using a do-it-yourself artificial pancreas: Perspectives from patients and diabetes providers. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 14(5): 860–867. DOI: 10.1177/1932296820942258
    Back to article
  62. 62Parry-Hill. 2019. e-NABLE: DIY-AT Production in a multi-stakeholder system. Thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology. Available at https://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11145&context=theses. Accessed on September 3, 2022.
    Back to article
  63. 63Richterich, A. 2020. When open source design is vital: critical making of DIY healthcare equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Sociology Review, 29(2): 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/14461242.2020.1784772
    Back to article
  64. 64Roosth, S. 2017. Synthetic: How Life Got Made. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226440637.001.0001
    Back to article
  65. 65Rosenberg, CE. 2007. Our Present Complaint: American Medicine, Then and Now. John Hopkins University Press.
    Back to article
  66. 66Rotondi, NK, Bauer, GR, Scanlon, K, Kaay, M, Travers, R and Travers, A. 2013. Nonprescribed hormone use and self-performed surgeries: “Do-it-yourself” transitions in transgender communities in Ontario, Canada. American Journal of Public Health, 103(10): 1830–7. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301348
    Back to article
  67. 67Sanchez, NF, Sanchez, JP and Danoff, A. 2009. Health care utilization, barriers to care, and hormone usage among male-to-female transgender persons in New York City. American Journal of Public Health, 99(4): 713–719. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.132035
    Back to article
  68. 68Santora, T. 2020. Ignored by doctors, transgender people turn to DIY treatments. Undark, 29 June. Available at: https://undark.org/2020/06/29/transgender-diy-treatments. Accessed on September 8, 2022.
    Back to article
  69. 69Starr, P. 1982. The Social Transformation Of American Medicine: The Rise Of A Sovereign Profession And The Making Of A Vast Industry. Reprint edition. New York: Basic Books.
    Back to article
  70. 70Tomes, N. 2016. Remaking the American Patient: How Madison Avenue and Modern Medicine Turned Patients into Consumers. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. DOI: 10.5149/northcarolina/9781469622774.001.0001
    Back to article
  71. 71Trejo, M, Canfield, I, Robinson, JO and Guerrini, CJ. 2020. How biomedical citizen scientists define what they do: It’s all in the name. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 12(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1825139
    Back to article
  72. 72Westgarth, D. 2021. The alarming rise of DIY dentistry. BDJ In Practice, 34(12): 10–14. DOI: 10.1038/s41404-021-0974-2
    Back to article
  73. 73Wexler, A. 2015. A pragmatic analysis of the regulation of consumer transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) devices in the United States. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3): 669–696. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsv039
    Back to article
  74. 74Wexler, A. 2016. The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(4): 211. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102704
    Back to article
  75. 75Wexler, A. 2017a. Recurrent themes in the history of the home use of electrical stimulation: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the medical battery (1870–1920). Brain Stimulation, 10(2): 187–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.081
    Back to article
  76. 76Wexler, A. 2017b. The social context of “do-it-yourself” brain stimulation: Neurohackers, biohackers, and lifehackers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11: 224. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00224
    Back to article
  77. 77Wexler, A. 2018. Who uses direct-to-consumer brain stimulation products, and shy? A study of home users of tDCS Devices. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2(1): 114–134. DOI: 10.1007/s41465-017-0062-z
    Back to article
  78. 78Wexler, A and Hamilton, RH. 2017. Crowdsourced tDCS research: Feasible or fanciful? AJOB Neuroscience, 8(1): 50–53. DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2017.1288176
    Back to article
  79. 79Wicks, P, Vaughan, TE, Massagli, MP and Heywood, J. 2011. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nature Biotechnology, 29(5): 411–414. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1837
    Back to article
  80. 80Wiggins, A and Wilbanks, J. 2019. The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8): 3–14. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859
    Back to article
  81. 81Wurzman, R, Hamilton, RH, Pascual-Leone, A and Fox, MD. 2016. An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation. Annals of Neurology, 80(1): 1–4. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24689
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.553 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 14, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 18, 2022
Published on: Dec 15, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
do-it-yourself,
DIY medicine,
biomedical citizen science,
neurostimulation,
fecal microbiota transplant,
artificial pancreas

© 2022 Anna Wexler, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 7 (2022): Issue 1Next article