Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Biomedical Citizen Science at the National Institutes of Health Cover

Biomedical Citizen Science at the National Institutes of Health

By: Ellen Mintz and  Jennifer Couch  
Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. 1Babich, R, Craig, E, Muscat, A, Disney, J, Farrell, A, Silka, L and Jayasundara, N. 2021. Defining drinking water metal contaminant mixture risk by coupling zebrafish behavioral analysis with citizen science. Nature Scientific Reports, 11(1): 17303. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96244-4
  2. 2Bailey, C, Farrell, A, Purty, T, Taylor, A and Disney, J. 2021. Development of Privacy Features on Anecdata.org, a Free Citizen Science Platform for Collecting Datasets for Climate Change and Related Projects. Frontiers in Climate, 3. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.620100
  3. 3Bauer, A and Popovic, Z. 2017. Collaborative Problem Solving in an Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Game. Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery on Human-Computer Interactions, 1(22). DOI: 10.1145/3134657
  4. 4Cancer Moonshot Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP). 2016. Cancer Moonshot Blue Ribbon Panel Report. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
  5. 5Buman, MP, Winter, SJ, Sheats, JL, Hekler, EB, Otten, JJ, Grieco, LA and King, AC. 2013. The Stanford Healthy Neighborhood Discovery Tool: a computerized tool to assess active living environments. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 44: e41e47. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.028
  6. 6Chaffin, JD, Bratton, JF, Verhamme, EM, Bair, HB, Beecher, AA, Binding, CE, Birbeck, JA, Bridgeman, TB, Chang, X, Crossman, J, Currie, WJS, Davis, TW, Dick, GJ, Drouillard, KG, Errera, RM, Frenken, T, MacIsaac, HJ, McClure, A, McKay, RM, Reitz, LA, Domingo, JWS, Stanislawczyk, K, Stumpf, RP, Swan, ZD, Snyer, BK, Westrick, JA, Xue, P, Yancey, CE, Zastepa, A and Zhou, X. 2021. The Lake Erie HABs Grab: A binational collaboration to characterize the western basin cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms at an unprecedented high-resolution spatial scale. Harmful Algae, 108: 102080. DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2021.102080
  7. 7Collins, FS, Adams, AB, Aklin, C, Archer, TK, Bernard, MA, Boone, E, Burklow, J, Evans, MK, Jackson, S, Johnson, AC, Lorsch, J, Lowden, MR, Napoles, AM, Ordonez, AE, Rivers, R, Rucker, V, Schwetz, T, Segre, JA, Tabak, LA, Hooper, MW, Wolinetz, C and NIH UNITE. 2021. Affirming NIH’s commitment to addressing structural racism in the biomedical research enterprise. Cell, 184(12): 30753079. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.014
  8. 8Cooper, C and Lewenstein, B. 2016. Two Meanings of Citizen Science. The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science. 2016(2): 5162. Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.
  9. 9Cooper, CB, Hawn, CL, Larson, LL, Parrish, JK, Bowser, G, Cavalier, D, Dunn, RR, Haklay, M, Gupta, KK, Osborne Jelks, N, Johnson, VA, Katti, M, Leggett, A, Wilson, OR and Wilson, S. 2021. Inclusion in citizen science: the conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372(6549): 13861388. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6487
  10. 10Cooper, S, Khatib, F, Treuille, A, Barbero, J, Lee, J, Beenen, M, Leaver-Fay, A, Baker, D, Popovic, Z and Foldit players. 2010. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature, 466: 75660. DOI: 10.1038/nature09304
  11. 11Cooper, S, Sterling, ALR, Kleffner, R, Silversmith, WM and Siegel, JB. 2018. Repurposing Citizen Science Games as Software Tools for Professional Scientists. Foundations of Digital Games, 2018: 16. DOI: 10.1145/3235765.3235770
  12. 12Cold Spring Harbor DNA Learning Center (DNALC). 2022a. Barcode Long Island. Available: https://dnabarcoding101.org/programs/bli/ [Accessed 17 March 2022].
  13. 13Cold Spring Harbor DNA Learning Center (DNALC). 2022b. Barcoding US Ants. Available: https://dnabarcoding101.org/citizen/usants/index.html [Accessed 17 March 2022].
  14. 14Denny, J and Tabak, L. 2022. All of Us: Release of Nearly 100,000 Whole Genome Sequences Sets Stage for New Discoveries. NIH Director’s Blog [Online]. Available from: https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2022/03/29/nihs-all-of-us-research-programs-first-nearly-100000-complete-human-genome-sequences-set-stage-for-new-discoveries/ [Accessed 29 March 2022].
  15. 15Dong, Z, Jim, RC, Hatley, EL, Backus, AS, Shine, JP, Spengler, JD and Schaider, LA. 2015. A longitudinal study of mercury exposure associated with consumption of freshwater fish from a reservoir in rural south central USA. Environmental Research, 136: 15562. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.09.029
  16. 16Dong, Z, Lynch, RA and Schaider, LA. 2016. Key contributors to variations in fish mercury within and among freshwater reservoirs in Oklahoma, USA. Environmental Science: Process & Impacts, 18: 22236. DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00495K
  17. 17Du, L, Robles, AJ, King, JB, Powell, DR, Miller, AN, Mooberry, SL and Cichewicz, RH. 2014. Crowdsourcing natural products discovery to access uncharted dimensions of fungal metabolite diversity. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 53(3): 804809. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201306549
  18. 18Eieben, CB, Siegel, JB, Bale, JB, Cooper, S, Khatib, F, Shen, BW, Foldit players, Stoddard, BL, Popovic, Z and Baker, D. 2012. Increased Diels-Alderase activity through backbone remodeling guided by Foldit players. Nature Biotechnology, 30: 1902. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2109
  19. 19Eitzel, MV, Cappadonna, JL, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, RE, VirapongseI, A, West, SE, Kyba, C, Bowser, A, Cooper, CB, Sforzi, A, Metcalfe, AN, Harris, ES, Thiel, M, Haklay, M, Ponciano, L, Roche, J, Ceccaroni, L, Shilling, FM, Dorler, D, Heigl, F, Kiessling, T, Davis, BY and Jiang, Q. 2017. Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science:Theory and Practice, 2(1): 120. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
  20. 20Biden, JR, Executive Office of the President. 2021. Memorandum on Restoring Trust in Government Through Scientific Integrity and Evidence-Based Policymaking. The White House. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/27/memorandum-on-restoring-trust-in-government-through-scientific-integrity-and-evidence-based-policymaking/ (Last accessed 17 March 2022).
  21. 21Guerrini, CJ, Wexler, A, Zettler, PJ and McGuire, AL. 2019. Biomedical Citizen Science or Something Else? Reflections on Terms and Definitions. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8): 1719. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619880
  22. 22Haklay, M, Dorler, D, Heigl, F, Manzoni, M, Hecker, S and Vohland, K. 2021. What is Citizen Science? The Challenges of Definition. In: et al. The Science of Citizen Science. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
  23. 23Jacob, JA. 2016. Researchers Turn to Canine Clinical Trials to Advance Cancer Therapies. Journal of the American Medical Association Network, 315(15): 15501552. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0082
  24. 24Jim, RC, Hatley, EL, Backus, AS, Dong, Z, Schaider, LA, Shine, JP, Spengler, JD and Lynch, RA. 2014. Grand Lake watershed mercury study: Mercury exposure among fish consumers and bioaccumulation in commonly consumed fish. September 2014. Available at http://www.grandlakemercurystudy.org/images/GrandLakeWatershedMercuryStudy_FinalReport_Sept2014.pdf.
  25. 25Khatib, F, DiMaio, F, Foldit Contenders Group, Foldit Void Crushers Group, Cooper, S, Kazmierczyk, M, Gilski, M, Krzywda, S, Zabrankska, H, Pichova, I, Thompson, J, Popovic, Z, Jaskolski, M and Baker, D. 2011. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18: 11751177. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2119
  26. 26Kim, JS, Greene, MJ, Zlateski, A, Lee, K, Richardson, M, Turaga, SC, Purcaro, M, Balkam, M, Robinson, A, Behabadi, BF, Campos, M, Denk, W, Seung, HS and the EyeWirers. 2014. Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina. Nature, 509: 331336. DOI: 10.1038/nature13240
  27. 27King, AC, Campero, MI, Garcia, D, Blanco-Velazquez, I, Banchoff, A, Fierros, F, Escobar, M, Cortes, AL, Sheats, JL, Hua, J, Chazaro, A, Done, M, Espinosa, PR, Vuong, D and Ahn, DK. 2021a. Testing the effectiveness of community-engaged citizen science to promote physical activity, foster healthier neighborhood environments, and advance health equity in vulnerable communities: The Steps for Change randomized controlled trial design and methods. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 108: 106526. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106526
  28. 28King, AC, King, DK, Banchoff, A, Solomonov, S, Ben Natan, O, Hua, J, Gardiner, P, Rosas, LG, Espinosa, PR, Winter, SJ, Sheats, J, Salvo, D, Aguilar-Farias, N, StathiI, A, Akira Hino, A, Porter, MM, On Behalf of the Our Voice Global Citizen Science Research Network. 2020. Employing participatory citizen science methods to promote age-friendly environments worldwide. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5): 1541. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051541
  29. 29King, AC, Odunitan-Wayas, FA, Chaudhury, M, Rubio, MA, BaiocchiAIOCCHI, M, Kolbe-Alexander, T, Montes, F, Banchoff, A, Sarmiento, OL, Balter, K, Hinckson, E, Chastin, S, Lambert, EV, Gonzalez, SA, Guerra, AM, Gelius, P, Zha, C, Sarabu, C, Kakar, PA, Fernes, P, Rosas, LG, Winter, SJ, McClain, E, Gardiner, PA, On Behalf Of The Our Voice Global Citizen Science Research Network. 2021b. Community-based approaches to reducing health inequities and fostering environmental justice through global youth-engaged citizen science. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3): 892. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030892
  30. 30King, AC, Winter, SJ, Chrisinger, BW, Hua, J and Banchoff, AW. 2019. Maximizing the promise of citizen science to advance health and prevent disease. Preventative Medicine, 119: 4447. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.016
  31. 31Koepnick, B, Flatten, J, Husain, T, Ford, A, Silva, DA, Bick, MJ, Bauer, A, Liu, G, Ishida, Y, Boykov, A, Estep, RD, Kleinfelter, S, Norgard-Solano, T, Wei, L, Foldit players, Montelione, GT, DiMaio, F, Popovic, Z, Khatib, F, Cooper, S and Baker, D. 2019. De novo protein design by citizen scientists. Nature, 570: 390394. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1274-4
  32. 32Lauer, M. 2022. FY 2021 By The Numbers: Extramural Grant Investments in Research. 7 March 2022. Available at https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2022/03/07/fy-2021-by-the-numbers-extramural-grant-investments-in-research/. (Last accessed 1 June 2022)
  33. 33LeBlanc, AK and Mazcko, CN. 2020. Improving human cancer therapy through the evaluation of pet dogs. Nature Reviews Cancer, 20: 727742. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-020-0297-3
  34. 34Lee, J, Kladwang, W, Lee, M, Cantu, D, Azizyan, M, KimIM, H, Limpaecher, A, Yoon, S, Treuille, A, Das, R and EteRNA Participants. 2014. RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proceedings of the Nationall Academies of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(6): 21222127. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313039111
  35. 35Marizzi, C, Florio, A, Lee, M, Khalfan, M, Ghiban, C, Nash, B, Dorey, J, McKenzie, S, Mazza, C, Cellini, F, Baria, C, Bepat, R, Costentino, L, Dvorak, A, Gacevic, A, Guzman-Moumtzis, C, Heller, F, Holt, NA, Horenstein, J, Joralemon, V, Kaur, M, Kaur, T, Khan, A, Kuppan, J, Laverty, S, Lock, C, Pena, M, Petrychyn, I, Puthenkalam, I, Ram, D, Ramos, A, Scoca, N, Sin, R, Gonzalez, I, Thakur, A, Usmanov, H, Han, K, Wu, A, Zhu, T and Micklos, DA. 2018. DNA Barcoding Brooklyn (New York): A first assessment of biodiversity in Marine Park by citizen scientists. PLoS One, 13: e0199015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199015
  36. 36Miller, JA, Lee, V, Cooper, S and El-Nasr, MS. 2019a. Large-scale analysis of visualization options in a citizen science game. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 2019: 535542. DOI: 10.1145/3341215.3356274
  37. 37Miller, JA, Narayan, U, Hantsbarger, M, Cooper, S and El-Nasr, MS. 2019b. Expertise and engagement: Re-designing citizen Sscience games with players’ minds in mind. Foundation of Digital Games, 2019(6): 111. DOI: 10.1145/3337722.3337735
  38. 38Mintz, E and Couch, J. 2021. NIH Citizen Science Working Group [Online]. National Cancer Institute. Available at https://www.cancer.gov/research/resources/citizen-science/working-group [Accessed 1 March 2022].
  39. 39National Center for Biotechnology Information: National Library of Medicine (NBCI). 2020. Available at https://ncbi-codeathons.github.io [Accessed 31 March 2022].
  40. 40National Cancer Institute Cancer Currents Blog (NCI). 2019. Nature’s Bounty: Revitalizing the Discovery of New Cancer Drugs from Natural Products. Available at https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2019/cancer-drugs-natural-products-nci-program [Accessed 22 March 2019].
  41. 41National Cancer Institute (NCI). 2021a. DataViz+Cancer. Available at https://apply.hub.ki/cancerplusviz/ [Accessed 30 March 2022].
  42. 42National Cancer Institute (NCI). 2021b. Establish a Network for Direct Patient Engagement. Available at https://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/moonshot-cancer-initiative/implementation/patient-engagement [Accessed 20 March 2022].
  43. 43National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). 2012. Partnerships for Environmental Public Health Evaluation Metrics Manual. NIH Publication No. 12–7825, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Available at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/assets/docs/a_c/complete_peph_evaluation_metrics_manual_508.pdf. [Accessed 30 March 2022].
  44. 44National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Partnerships for Environmental Public Health (PEPH). 2020. Citizen Science Programs at the Centers for Oceans and Human Health. Available at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/translational/peph/webinars/ohh/index.cfm [Accessed 16 March 2022]
  45. 45National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Partnerships for Environmental Public Health (PEPH). 2022. About PEPH: Partnerships for Environmental Public Health. Available at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/translational/peph/about/index.cfm [Accessed 10 March 2022]
  46. 46National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2017. What We Do- Mission and Goals. Available at https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/mission-goals. [Accessed 29 August 2022].
  47. 47National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2021. Who We Are- Organization. Available at https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/organization. [Accessed 29 August 2022]
  48. 48National Library of Medicine Board of Regents (RNLM). 2017. A Platform for Biomedical Discovery and Data-Powered Health: National Library of Medicine Strategic Plan 2017–2027. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
  49. 49National Library of Medicine (NLM). 2020. Congressional Justification. Available at https://www.nlm.nih.gov/about/2020CJ_NLM.pdf. [Accessed 19 March 2022]
  50. 50Network of the National Library of Medicine, National Library of Medicine (NNLM). 2022. Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Available: https://nnlm.gov/guides/wikipedia-edit-a-thon [Accessed 15 March 2022]
  51. 51Office of Data Science Strategy, National Institutes of Health (ODSS). 2021. Codeathons at NIH. Available at https://datascience.nih.gov/codeathons-nih [Accessed 30 March 2022]
  52. 52Ostrander, EA, Dreger, DL and Evans, JM. 2019. Canine cancer genomics: Lessons for canine and human health. Annual Review of Animal Bioscencesi, 7: 449472. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014523
  53. 53Plassais, J, Kim, J, Davis, BW, Karyadi, DM, Hogan, AN, Harris, AC, Decker, B, Parker, HG and Ostrander, EA. 2019. Whole genome sequencing of canids reveals genomic regions under selection and variants influencing morphology. Nat Commun, 10: 1489. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09373-w
  54. 54Ponnada, A, Cooper, S, Thapa-Chhetry, B, Miller, JA, John, D and Intille, S. 2019. Designing Videogames to Crowdsource Accelerometer Data Annotation for Activity Recognition Research. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 2019:135147. DOI: 10.1145/3311350.3347153
  55. 55Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, Brusseau, ML, Artiola, J, Maier, RM and Gandolfi, AJ. 2015. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. International Journal of Public Health, 7(1): 13.
  56. 56Robinson, A. n.d. EyeWire: A Game to Crowdsource Brain Mapping. Citizen Science Tool Kit Case Study. Available at https://www.citizenscience.gov/assets/files/eyewire-brain-mapping.pdf. [Last accessed 31 May 2022]
  57. 57Robles, AJ, Du, L, Cichewicz, RH and Mooberry, SL. 2016. Maximiscin Induces DNA Damage, Activates DNA Damage Response Pathways, and Has Selective Cytotoxic Activity against a Subtype of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Natural Products, 79: 18221827. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00290
  58. 58Scistarter. n.d. NLM NNLM Citizen Science Month. Available at https://scistarter.org/NLM [Accessed 12 March 2022].
  59. 59Shah, N, Guo, Y, Wendelsdorf, KV, Lu, Y, Sparks, R and Tsang, JS. 2016. A crowdsourcing approach for reusing and meta-analyzing gene expression data. Nature Biotechnology, 34: 8036. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3603
  60. 60Scientific Integrity Fast-Track Action Committee (SIF-TAC). 2022. Protecting the Integrity of Government Science. United States of America Executive Office of the President Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/01-22-Protecting_the_Integrity_of_Government_Science.pdf [Last accessed 17 March 2022]
  61. 61Silent Spring Institute (SSI). 2022. Digital Exposure Report-Back Interface (DERBI). Available at https://silentspring.org/project/digital-exposure-report-back-interface-derbi [Accessed 15 March 2022].
  62. 62Stanifer, SR, Rayens, MK, Wiggins, A, Gross, D and Hahn, EJ. 2022. Home Radon Testing in Rural Appalachia. J Rural Health, 38: 251261. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12552
  63. 63Thornburg, CC, Britt, JR, Evans, JR, Akee, RK, Whitt, JA, Trinh, SK, Harris, MJ, Thompson, JR, Ewing, TL, Shipley, SM, Grothaus, PG, Newman, DJ, Schneider, JP, Grkovic, T and O’Keefe, BR. 2018. NCI Program for Natural Product Discovery: A Publicly-Accessible Library of Natural Product Fractions for High-Throughput Screening. ACS Chemical Biology, 13(9), 24842497. DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00389
  64. 64University of Oklahoma Natural Products Discovery Group (UONPDG). 2021. The University of Oklahoma Citzen Science Soil Collection Program. Available at https://whatsinyourbackyard.org/about/ [Last accessed 16 March 2022].
  65. 65Wiggins, A and Wilbanks, J. 2019. The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8): 314. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859
  66. 66Wilson, BAP, Thornberg, CC, Henrich, CJ, Grkovic, T and O’Keefe, BR. 2020. Creating and screening natural product libraries. Natural Product Repositories, 37: 893918. DOI: 10.1039/C9NP00068B
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.543 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 8, 2022
Published on: Dec 15, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Ellen Mintz, Jennifer Couch, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.