Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Building Capacity to Apply Citizen Science Approaches in Policy and Practice for Public Health: Protocol for a Developmental Evaluation of Four Stakeholder-Led Projects Cover

Building Capacity to Apply Citizen Science Approaches in Policy and Practice for Public Health: Protocol for a Developmental Evaluation of Four Stakeholder-Led Projects

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. 1Arkesteijn, M, van Mierlo, B and Leeuwis, C. 2015. The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation. Evaluation, 21(1): 99115. DOI: 10.1177/1356389014564719
  2. 2Australian Prevention Partnership Centre. 2021. Harnessing the power of citizen science for prevention. Available at: https://preventioncentre.org.au/research-projects/harnessing-the-power-of-citizen-science-for-prevention/ (Last accessed 21 December 2021).
  3. 3Australian Public Service Commission. 2007. Changing behaviour: a public policy perspective. Canberra, ACT: Australian Public Service Commission.
  4. 4Barrie, H, Soebarto, V, Lange, J, McCorry-Breen, F and Walker, L. 2019. Using citizen science to explore neighbourhood influences on ageing well: pilot project. Healthcare, 7(4). DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7040126
  5. 5Bazeley, P. 2018. Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781526417190
  6. 6Braun, V and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2): 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  7. 7Cacari-Stone, L, Wallerstein, N, Garcia, AP and Minkler, M. 2014. The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: A conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9): 16151623. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961
  8. 8Creswell, J and Plano-Clark, V. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. California: Sage Publications.
  9. 9Department for Health and Ageing and Government of South Australia. 2017. SA Health Strategic Plan 2017 to 2020. Adelaide, SA: Government of South Australia.
  10. 10Dickinson, JL, Zuckerberg, B and Bonter, DN. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41(1): 149172. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
  11. 11Frieden, TR. 2014. Six components necessary for effective public health program implementation. American Journal of Public Health, 104(1): 1722. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301608
  12. 12Gamble, JAA and The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation. 2008. A developmental evaluation primer. Available at: http://mcconnellfoundation.ca/report/a-developmental-evaluation-primer/ (Last accessed 23 Feb 2022).
  13. 13Gudes, O, Yigitcanlar, T, Edwards, SJ and Pathak, V. 2015. Competitive smart cities through healthy decision-making. In Thomas, KD (ed.), Handbook of Research on Sustainable Development and Economics. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8433-1.ch003
  14. 14Guijt, I. 2014. Participatory Approaches. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
  15. 15Haklay, M, Dörler, D, Heigl, F, Manzoni, M, Hecker, S and Vohland, K. 2021. What Is Citizen Science? The Challenges of Definition. In Vohland, K, Land-Zandstra, A, Ceccaroni, L, Lemmens, R, Perelló, J, Ponti, M, Samson, R and Wagenknecht, K (eds.), The Science of Citizen Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
  16. 16Harper, LM and Dickson, R. 2019. Using developmental evaluation principles to build capacity for knowledge mobilisation in health and social care. Evaluation, 25(3): 330348. DOI: 10.1177/1356389019840058
  17. 17Hecker, S, Bonney, R, Haklay, M, Hölker, F, Hofer, H, Goebel, C, Gold, M, Makuch, Z, Ponti, M and Richter, A. 2018. Innovation in citizen science: Perspectives on science-policy advances. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.114
  18. 18Hecker, S, Wicke, N, Haklay, M and Bonn, A. 2019. How does policy conceptualise citizen science? A qualitative content analysis of international policy documents. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.230
  19. 19IBM Corp. 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  20. 20Kieslinger, B, Schäfer, T, Heigl, F, Dörler, D, Richter, A and Bonn, A. 2017. The challenge of evaluation: An open framework for evaluating citizen science activities. SocArXiv. September 20. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/enzc9
  21. 21Klaassen, P, Verwoerd, L, Kupper, F and Regeer, B. 2020. Reflexive monitoring in action as a methodology for learning and enacting Responsible Research and Innovation. In Yaghmaei, E and Van De Poel, I (eds.), Assessment of Responsible Innovation: Methods and Practices. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429298998-15
  22. 22Kullenberg, C and Kasperowski, D. 2016. What Is citizen science? A scientometric meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(1): e0147152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
  23. 23Marks, L, Laird, Y, Trevena, H, Smith, BJ and Rowbotham, S. 2022. A Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches in Chronic Disease Prevention. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.743348
  24. 24Mayne, J and Stern, E. 2013. Impact evaluation of natural resouce management research programs: a broader view. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  25. 25National Health and Medical Research Council. 2016. Statement on Consumer and Community involvement in Health and Medical Research. Council, NHaMR.
  26. 26Patton, MQ. 2010. Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.
  27. 27QSR International Pty Ltd. 2020. NVivo. QSR International Pty Ltd.
  28. 28Resnik, DB, Elliott, KC and Miller, AK. 2015. A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science. Environmental Science and Policy, 54: 475481. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.008
  29. 29Schade, S, Pelacho, M, van Noordwijk, T, Vohland, K, Hecker, S and Manzoni, M. 2021. Citizen Science and Policy. In Vohland, K, Land-Zandstra, A, Ceccaroni, L, Lemmens, R, Perelló, J, Ponti, M, Samson, R, and Wagenknecht, K (eds.), The Science of Citizen Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_18
  30. 30Silvertown, J, Cook, L, Cameron, R, Dodd, M, McConway, K, Worthington, J, Skelton, P, Anton, C, Bossdorf, O and Baur, B. 2011. Citizen science reveals unexpected continental-scale evolutionary change in a model organism. PloS one, 6(4): e18927. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018927
  31. 31Stanford Medicine. 2020. Our Voice: citizen science for health equity. Available at: http://med.stanford.edu/ourvoice.html (Last accessed 21 December 2021).
  32. 32Sullivan, BL, Aycrigg, JL, Barry, JH, Bonney, RE, Bruns, N, Cooper, CB, Damoulas, T, Dhondt, AA, Dietterich, T, Farnsworth, A, Fink, D, Fitzpatrick, JW, Fredericks, T, Gerbracht, J, Gomes, C, Hochachka, WM, Iliff, MJ, Lagoze, C, La Sorte, FA, Merrifield, M, Morris, W, Phillips, TB, Reynolds, M, Rodewald, AD, Rosenberg, KV, Trautmann, NM, Wiggins, A, Winkler, DW, Wong, W-K, Wood, CL, Yu, J and Kelling, S. 2014. The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation, 169: 3140. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003
  33. 33Tasmanian Government: Department of Health and Human Services. 2016. Healthy Tasmania Five Year Strategic Plan. Tasmanian Government: Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmania.
  34. 34Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Schmidt, NR, Froehlich, HE, Wagner, C, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J, Harsch, MA and Parrish, JK. 2015. Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181: 236244. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
  35. 35Todd, A and Nutbeam, D. 2018. Involving consumers in health research: what do consumers say? Public Health Research and Practice, 28(2): e2821813. DOI: 10.17061/phrp2821813
  36. 36VicHealth. 2019. Action Agenda for Health Promotion 2019–2023. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
  37. 37Wellbeing SA and Government of South Australia. 2020. Wellbeing SA Strategic Plan 2020–2025. Government of South Australia.
  38. 38World Health Organisation. 2017. Engagement and participation for health equity. Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
  39. 39World Health Organisation. 2019. A multilevel governance approach to preventing and managing noncommunicable diseases: the role of cities and urban settings. Denmark: Who Regional Office for Europe.
  40. 40Yin, RK. 2008. Case study research: design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.488 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 21, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 9, 2022
Published on: Jul 19, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Samantha Rowbotham, Yvonne Laird, Leah Marks, Pippy Walker, Katherine Pontifex, Amani Sobhan, Karen Wardle, Kim Jose, Kate Garvey, Sean O’Rourke, Ben Smith, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.