References
- 1Adams, WC. 2015. Conducting semi-structured interviews. Handbook of practical program evaluation, 4: 492–505. DOI: 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
- 2Alkin, MC and King, JA. 2016. The historical development of evaluation use. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(4): 568–579. DOI: 10.1177/1098214016665164
- 3Alkin, MC and King, JA. 2017. Definitions of evaluation use and misuse, evaluation influence, and factors affecting use. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(3): 434–450. DOI: 10.1177/1098214017717015
- 4Becker-Klein, R, Davis, C, Phillips, T, DelBianco, V, Grack Nelson, A and Christian Ronning, E. (in review). Using a shared embedded assessment tool to understand participant skills: Processes and lessons learned. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice.
- 5Becker-Klein, R, Peterman, K and Stylinski, C. 2016. Embedded assessment as an essential method for understanding public engagement in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.15
- 6Bequette, M, Cardiel, CL, Cohn, S, Kollmann, EK and Lawrenz, F. 2019. Evaluation capacity building for informal STEM education: Working for success across the field. New Directions for Evaluation, 161: 107–123. DOI: 10.1002/ev.20351
- 7Bowser, A, Cooper, C, De Sherbinin, A, Wiggins, A, Brenton, P, Chuang, T-R, Faustman, E, Haklay, M and Meloche, M. 2020. Still in need of norms: the state of the data in citizen science, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.303
- 8Brandon, PR and Fukunaga, LL. 2014. The state of the empirical research literature on stakeholder involvement in program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1): 26–44. DOI: 10.1177/1098214013503699
- 9Brown, ED and Williams, BK. 2019. The potential for citizen science to produce reliable and useful information in ecology. Conservation Biology, 33(3): 561–569. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13223
- 10Bundi, P, Frey, K and Widmer, T. 2021. Does evaluation quality enhance evaluation use? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 17(4): 661–687. DOI: 10.1332/174426421X16141794148067
- 11Burgess, HK, DeBey, LB, Froehlich, HE, Schmidt, N, Theobald, EJ, Ettinger, AK, HilleRisLambers, J, Tewksbury, J and Parrish, JK. 2017. The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208: 113–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014
- 12Cousins, JB. 2020. Collaborative approaches to evaluation: Principles in use (Vol. 3). Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781544344669
- 13Cousins, JB and Chouinard, JA. 2012. Participatory evaluation up close: An integration of research based knowledge. North Carolina: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
- 14D’Ostie-Racine, L, Dagenais, C and Ridde, V. 2016. A qualitative case study of evaluation use in the context of a collaborative program evaluation strategy in Burkina Faso. Health Res Policy Sys, 14(37). DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0109-0
- 15Daigneault, PM. 2014. Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map. Evaluation and program planning, 45: 171–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.003
- 16Froncek, B and Rohmann, A. 2019. “You get the great feeling that you’re being heard but in the end you realize that things will be done differently and in others’ favor”: An experimental investigation of negative effects of participation in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(1): 19–34. DOI: 10.1177/1098214018813447
- 17Grack Nelson, A, King, JA, Lawrenz, F, Reich, C, Bequette, M, Pattison, S, Kollmann, EK, et al. 2019. Using a complex adaptive systems perspective to illuminate the concept of evaluation capacity building in a network. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(2): 214–230. DOI: 10.1177/1098214018773877
- 18King, JA and Alkin, MC. 2019. The centrality of use: Theories of evaluation use and influence and thoughts on the first 50 years of use research. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(3): 431–458. DOI: 10.1177/1098214018796328
- 19King, JA and Stevahn, L. 2012.
Interactive evaluation practice: Mastering the interpersonal dynamics of program evaluation . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781452269979 - 20Miles, MB, Huberman, AM and Saldaña, J. 2018. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- 21National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/25183
- 22Patton, MQ. 1997. Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context. Evaluation Practice, 18(2): 147–163. DOI: 10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90019-2
- 23Patton, MQ. 2020. Evaluation use theory, practice, and future research: reflections on the Alkin and King AJE series. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(4): 581–602. DOI: 10.1177/1098214020919498
- 24Peterman, K, Becker-Klein, R, Stylinski, C and Grack Nelson, A. 2017.
Exploring embedded assessment to document scientific inquiry skills within citizen science . In: Herodotou, C, Sharples, M and Scanlon, E (eds.), Citizen Inquiry: Synthesising Science and Inquiry Learning, 63–82. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315458618 - 25Peterman, K, Del Bianco, V, Grover, A, Davis, C and Rosser, H. (in review). Hiding in Plain Sight: Secondary Analysis of Data Records as a Method for Learning about Citizen Science Projects and Volunteers’ Skills. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice.
- 26Peterman, K and Gathings, MJ. 2019. Using a community-created multisite evaluation to promote evaluation use across a sector. Evaluation and Program Planning, 74: 54–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.014
- 27Phillips, TB, Porticella, N, Constas, M and Bonney, R. 2018. Articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from citizen science: A conceptual model. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.126
- 28Schaefer, T, Kieslinger, B, Brandt, M and van den Bogaert, V. 2021.
Evaluation in citizen science: The art of tracing a moving target . In: Vohland, K, Land-Zandstra, A, Ceccaroni, L, et al. (eds.), The Science of Citizen Science, 495–514. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_25 - 29Shaw, J and Campbell, R. 2014. The “process” of process use: Methods for longitudinal assessment in a multisite evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(2): 250–260. DOI: 10.1177/1098214013506780
- 30Stevahn, L and King, JA. 2016. Facilitating interactive evaluation practice: engaging stakeholders constructively. Evaluation and Facilitation, 2016(149): 67–80. DOI: 10.1002/ev.20180
- 31Stylinski, CD, Peterman, K, Phillips, T, Linhart, J and Becker-Klein, R. 2020. Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: a snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(1): 77–92. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288
- 32West, S and Pateman, R. 2016. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2): 15. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8