Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Citizen Science and the Pandemic: A Case Study of the Christmas Bird Count Cover

Citizen Science and the Pandemic: A Case Study of the Christmas Bird Count

By: Cade Coldren  
Open Access
|Jul 2022

Figures & Tables

cstp-7-1-473-g1.png
Figure 1

Map of states and provinces used for detailed analyses of number of participants, effort, and number of species recorded.

Table 1

Number of states and provinces showing declines and increases in number of CBC counts in 2020 compared with that predicted based on trends of the previous 10 years. Results by state are in Supplemental Tables 1 and 2.

UNITED STATESCANADA
DeclinedTotal4210
Outside 95% CI317
<10%212
10–20%146
>20%72
IncreasedTotal73
Outside 95% CI41
<10%60
10–20%00
>20%13
As predicted10
cstp-7-1-473-g2.png
Figure 2

Spatial distribution of Christmas Bird Counts in California (a) and Saskatchewan (b) prior to the pandemic (2019) and during the pandemic (2020). Each circle represents one count.

Table 2

Differences in spatial distribution of CBC counts in 2019 and 2020 for California and Saskatchewan, two regions exhibiting the greatest reduction in counts owing to the pandemic. Mean distance between counts was produced by proximity analysis in ArcMap. Restriction in coverage is the difference in spatial limit in 2019 compared with 2020 in each of the cardinal directions.

CALIFORNIASASKATCHEWAN
Mean distance between counts:201932.697 km ± 1.247.799 km ± 4.5
     (km ± SE)202035.881 km ± 1.749.035 km ± 7.5
(P = 0.13)(P = 0.89)
Restriction in coverage:North054.887 km
South0128.963 km
East34.950 km105.431 km
West096.307 km
Table 3

Mean difference between actual values of numbers of participants and effort in Christmas Bird Count for 2020 and values predicted based on linear regression for the previous 10 years, for a subset of states and provinces. Negative numbers represent a decrease in 2020 relative to the expected values based on linear regression. With a Bonferroni Correction Factor applied, P-values < 0.001 are considered significant; other levels are shown for reference.

STATE OR PROVINCEPARTICIPANTS (NO. OF PEOPLE)TOTAL EFFORT (HOUR)EFFORT(HOUR/PERSON)SPECIES RECORDED
Alabama–0.8463.3230.1932.037
Alaska–1.296–7.6450.216–0.453
California–8.677***6.9120.716***1.544
Hawaii–3.457–0.4400.2951.642
Iowa–2.622*11.617**1.183***2.574**
Maine–0.38113.161***0.919**2.773*
Maryland–1.26421.775**0.858***6.432***
Oklahoma–1.98311.3351.020**7.472**
Wyoming–3.026*–3.7960.2690.188
Quebec–0.98610.882*0.4924.280***
Saskatchewan–0.6416.9670.165–0.225
w/o SKSA–3.157*–0.9900.156–0.343

[i] SKSA: Saskatoon count.

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.473 | Journal eISSN: 2057-4991
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 4, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 4, 2022
Published on: Jul 20, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Cade Coldren, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.