References
- 1Abroms, LC, Ahuja, M, Kodl, Y, Thaweethai, L, Sims, J, Winickoff, JP and Windsor, RA. 2012. Text2Quit: Results from a pilot test of a personalized, interactive mobile health smoking cessation program. Journal of Health Communication, 17: 44–53. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.649159
- 2Arienzo, MM, Collins, M and Jennings, KS. 2021. Enhancing engagement of citizen scientists to monitor precipitation phase. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9:
617594 . DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.617594 - 3Ault, T, Schwartz, MD, Zurita-Milla, R, Weltzin, JF and Betancourt, JL. 2015. Trends and natural variability of spring onset in the coterminous United States as evaluated by a new gridded dataset of spring indices. Journal of Climate, 28(21): 8363–8378. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00736.1
- 4Beaubien, EG and Hamann, A. 2011. Plant phenology networks of citizen scientists: recommendations from two decades of experience in Canada. International Journal of Biometeorology, 55: 833–841. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-011-0457-y
- 5Birkin, L and Goulson, D. 2015. Using citizen science to monitor pollination services. Ecological Entomology, 40: 3–11. DOI: 10.1111/een.12227
- 6Black, JM. 2009. River otter monitoring by citizen science volunteers in Northern California: social groups and litter size. Northwestern Naturalist, 90(2): 130–135. DOI: 10.1898/NWN08-22.1
- 7Brenskelle, L, Stucky, BJ, Deck, J, Walls, R and Guralnick, RP. 2019. Integrating herbarium specimen observations into global phenology data systems. Applications in Plant Sciences, 7(3): e01231. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1231
- 8Campaign Monitor. No date. “Ultimate Email Marketing Benchmarks for 2021: By Industry and Day.”
https://www.campaignmonitor.com/resources/guides/email-marketing-benchmarks/ Accessed Aug 4, 2021. - 9Cherubini, M, Villalobos-Zuniga, G, Boldi, M-O and Bonazzi, R. 2020. The unexpected downside of paying or sending messages to people to make them walk: Comparing tangible rewards and motivational messages to improve physical activity. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27(2): 1–44. DOI: 10.1145/3365665
- 10Cooper, CB, Dickinson, J, Phillips, T and Bonney, R. 2007. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12(2): 11–21. DOI: 10.5751/ES-02197-120211
- 11Crall, A, Kosmala, M, Cheng, R, Brier, J, Cavalier, D, Henderson, S and Richardson, A. 2017. Volunteer recruitment and retention in online citizen science projects using marketing strategies: lessons from Season Spotter. Journal of Science Communication, 16: 1–29. DOI: 10.22323/2.16010201
- 12Crimmins, MA and Crimmins, TM. 2008. Monitoring plant phenology using digital repeat photography. Environmental Management, 41: 949–958. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9086-6
- 13Crimmins, TM, Crimmins, MA, Gerst, KL, Rosemartin, AH and Weltzin, JF. 2017a. USA National Phenology Network’s volunteer-contributed observations yield predictive models of phenological transitions. PLoS ONE, 12(8): e0182919. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182919
- 14Crimmins, TM, Marsh, RL, Switzer, J, Crimmins, MA, Gerst, KL, Rosemartin, AH and Weltzin, JF. 2017b. USA National Phenology Network gridded products documentation. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1003. DOI: 10.3133/ofr20171003
- 15Crimmins, TM, Rosemartin, A, Lincicome, A and Weltzin, JF. 2010. USA National Phenology Network 2009 Observer Survey Report. USA-NPN Technical Series 2010–003.
https://www.usanpn.org/files/shared/files/2009_Observer_Survey_Report_final.pdf . - 16Crimmins, TM, Weltzin, JF, Rosemartin, AH, Surina, EM, Marsh, RL and Denny, EG. 2014. Targeted campaign increases activity among participants in Nature’s Notebook, a citizen science project. Natural Sciences Education, 43: 64–72. DOI: 10.4195/nse2013.06.0019
- 17Davis, LF, Ramirez-Andreotta, MD and Buxner, SR. 2020. Engaging diverse citizen scientists for environmental health: recommendations from participants and promotoras. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 1–27. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.253
- 18De Moor, T, Rijpma, A and Lopez, MP. 2019. Dynamics of engagement in citizen science: results from the “Yes, I do!” project. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 1–17. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.212
- 19Elmendorf, SC, Crimmins, TM, Gerst, KL and Weltzin, JF. 2019. Time to branch out? Application of hierarchical survival models in plant phenology. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 279:
107694 . DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107694 - 20Emery, N, Roth, K and Pivovaroff, AL. 2020. Flowering phenology indicates plant flammability in a dominant shrub species. Ecological Indicators, 109:
105745 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105745 - 21Eveleigh, A, Jennett, C, Blandford, A, Brohan, P and Cox, AL. 2014. Designing for dabblers and deterring dropouts in citizen science. CHI ‘14 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Toronto. Canada,
26 May–1 Jun 2014 , 2985–2994. DOI: 10.1145/2556288.2557262 - 22Frensley, T, Crall, A, Stern, M, Jordan, R, Gray, S, Prysby, M, Newman, G, Hmelo-Silver, C, Mellor, D and Huang, J. 2017. Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: a case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.84
- 23Freyne, J, Yin, J, Brindal, E, Hendrie, GA, Berkovsky, S and Noake, M. 2017. Push Notifications in Diet Apps: Influencing Engagement Times and Tasks. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33: 833–845. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2017.1289725
- 24Fuccillo, KK, Crimmins, TM, DeRivera, C and Elder, TS. 2015. Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring. International Journal of Biometeorology, 59: 917–926. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-014-0892-7
- 25Gerst, KL, Crimmins, TM, Posthumus, EE, Rosemartin, AH and Schwartz, MD. 2020. How well do the Spring Indices predict phenological activity across plant species? International Journal of Biometeorology, 64: 889–901. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-020-01879-z
- 26Goldsmith, GR, Crimmins, TM, Haas, D, Roush, M and Verbeke, M. 2019. Demographics, interests, and motivations of participants in a long-term citizen science project. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2019: ED33B–1013.
- 27Howard, AF. 2018. Asclepias syriaca (common milkweed) flowering date shift in response to climate change. Scientific Reports, 8:
17802 . DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36152-2 - 28Lopez, C. 2021. Motives for Citizen Science Program Participation and the Role of the Organization: Lessons from Water Quality Monitors in Texas. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1): 3. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.341
- 29Martin, VY and Greig, EI. 2019. Young adults’ motivation to feed wild birds and influences on their potential participation in citizen science: An exploratory study. Biological Conservation, 235: 295–307. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.009
- 30Mazer, SJ, Gerst, KL, Matthews, ER and Evenden, A. 2015. Species-specific phenological responses to winter temperature and precipitation in a water-limited ecosystem. Ecosphere, 6(6): 1–27. DOI: 10.1890/ES14-00433.1
- 31Nov, O, Arazy, O and Anderson, D. 2014. Scientists@Home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? PLoS ONE, 9(4). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090375
- 32Ohrel, R and Register, K. 2006.
Volunteer estuary monitoring: a methods manual . 2nd ed. Washington, DC: The Ocean Conservancy and the USEPA. - 33Pielot, M, Church, K and de Oliveira, R. 2014. An in-situ study of mobile phone notifications. In: Quigley, A, Diamond, S, Irani, P and Subramanian, S (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services;
2014 Sep 23–26 , 233–242. Tornoto, ON, Canada. New York, NY:ACM . DOI: 10.1145/2628363.2628364 - 34Prysby, M and Super, P. 2007.
Director’s guide to best practices: Programming—citizen science . Logan, UT: Association of Nature Center Administrators. - 35Rosemartin, AH, Crimmins, TM, Enquist, CAF, Gerst, KL, Kellermann, JL, Posthumus, EE, Weltzin, JF, Denny, EG, Guertin, P and Marsh, L. 2014. Organizing phenological data resources to inform natural resource conservation. Biological Conservation, 173: 90–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.003
- 36Schwartz, MD. 1997. Spring index models: an approach to connecting satellite and surface phenology. Phenology in seasonal climates I, 23–38.
- 37Schwartz, MD, Ahas, R and Aasa, A. 2006. Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Global Change Biology, 12: 343–351. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01097.x
- 38Shelton, JMG, Fisher, MC and Singer, AC. 2020. Campaign-based citizen science for environmental mycology: the science solstice and summer soil-stice projects to assess drug resistance in air- and soil-borne Aspergillus fumigatus. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1): 20. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.325
- 39Tang, J and Prestopnik, NR. 2019. Exploring the impact of game framing and task framing on user participation in citizen science projects. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(2): 260–280. DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2018-0214
- 40USA National Phenology Network. 2021.
Plant Phenology Data. Data type: Status and Intensity, 2018–2029 for the continental United States . USA-NPN, Tucson, Arizona, USA. Data set accessed Jan 19, 2021. DOI: 10.5066/F78S4N1V - 41Wallace, CSA, Walker, JJ, Skirvin, SM, Patrick-Birdwell, C, Weltzin, JF and Raichle, H. 2016. Mapping presence and predicting phenological status of invasive buffelgrass in southern Arizona using MODIS, climate and citizen science observation data. Remote Sensing, 8(7): 524. DOI: 10.3390/rs8070524
- 42West, S and Pateman, R. 2016. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2): 1–10. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.8
- 43Woolford, SJ, Barr, KLC, Derry, HA, Jepson, CM, Clark, SJ, Clark, VJ and Stretcher, KR. 2012. OMG do not say LOL: Obese adolescents’ perspectives on the consent of text message to enhance weight loss efforts. Obesity, 19(12): 2382–2387. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.266